NHD2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
NHD2 antibody; At1g49810 antibody; F10F5.6 antibody; Sodium/proton antiporter 2 antibody; AtNHD2 antibody; Na(+)/H(+) antiporter 2 antibody
Target Names
NHD2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The NHD2 antibody targets the Na(+)/H(+) antiporter, a transmembrane protein responsible for extruding sodium ions in exchange for external protons.
Database Links
Protein Families
NhaD Na(+)/H(+) (TC 2.A.62) antiporter family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the NHD2 Antibody and how does it differ from conventional antibodies?

NHD2 Antibody is a recombinant antibody related to specific proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Its design is comparable to other recombinant hybrid antibodies like NHDL, which combines variable light (VL) and heavy (VH) chains from unrelated specificities to create a stable antibody structure . While conventional antibodies typically have matched VL and VH domains evolved to recognize specific epitopes, hybrid designs like NHD2 can be engineered for specific research applications, particularly as controls in experimental settings. The antibody is available in different quantities (0.2mg and 10mg formats) for research applications .

What are the structural characteristics of hybrid antibodies like NHD2?

Hybrid antibodies feature recombined variable domains that determine their antigen-binding properties. Like NHDL, which was "generated by combining the variable light (VL) and heavy (VH) chains from two unrelated specificities," NHD2 likely has a similar design approach . This structure creates a stable IgG antibody that can be expressed and purified with predictable properties. The artificial VL/VH combination approach used in antibodies like NHD2 represents an important method for designing recombinant control antibodies with specific characteristics .

How can I validate the specificity of NHD2 Antibody in my experiments?

Validation of NHD2 Antibody specificity should follow established protocols for antibody validation:

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test the antibody against various antigens to confirm it binds only to intended targets.

  • Inhibition assays: Similar to methods described for other antibodies, perform inhibition studies where "the inhibition of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody binding to M2 protein was demonstrated graphically in proportion to the increased concentration of M2 protein in the test tubes containing the SARS-CoV-2 antibody" .

  • Western blot analysis: Verify that the antibody recognizes proteins of expected molecular weight in your experimental system.

  • Negative controls: Include appropriate controls lacking the target antigen to establish baseline reactivity.

  • ELISA validation: Perform dilution series to establish optimal working concentration and confirm binding specificity .

What are the optimal conditions for using NHD2 Antibody in immunoassays?

While specific conditions for NHD2 are not detailed in the available literature, antibody optimization should follow these methodological approaches:

  • Temperature optimization: Test antibody binding at different temperatures (4°C, room temperature, 37°C).

  • Incubation time: Evaluate different incubation periods to determine optimal binding without increased background.

  • Buffer conditions: Test various pH conditions and salt concentrations to optimize signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Blocking reagents: Compare different blocking agents (BSA, non-fat milk, commercial blockers) to minimize non-specific binding.

  • Antibody concentration: Create a dilution series to determine the minimum concentration yielding reliable results .

For immunoassays involving plant proteins like those from Arabidopsis thaliana, special considerations for plant-specific sample preparation may be necessary to reduce interference from plant compounds.

How should I design epitope mapping experiments using NHD2 Antibody?

Epitope mapping with NHD2 Antibody should follow methodologies similar to those used for other research antibodies:

  • BLAST sequence analysis: "Use the NIH/US National Library of Medicine's BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) sequence matching program to study the degrees of possible mimicry or amino acid (AA) sequence similarities" between your target protein and potential cross-reactive proteins.

  • HDX-MS approach: Consider hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry as used in studies of other antibodies: "Using HDX-MS, we successfully map the collective epitopes on fHbp of pAb populations" .

  • Inhibition study design: Design experiments where "After incubation, washing, and the addition of anti-human IgG labeled with enzyme and the completion of all ELISA steps, the ODs were recorded at 405 nm, and the inhibition of antibody binding to protein was demonstrated graphically in proportion to the increased concentration of protein in the test tubes containing the antibody" .

  • Peptide array analysis: Create overlapping peptide arrays spanning your protein of interest to precisely identify binding regions.

What controls should be included when using NHD2 Antibody in research applications?

Effective control strategies should include:

  • Negative controls: Include samples without the target antigen to establish baseline reactivity.

  • Isotype controls: Use an irrelevant antibody of the same isotype to identify non-specific binding.

  • Blocking peptide controls: When possible, pre-incubate the antibody with a specific blocking peptide to confirm binding specificity.

  • Knockout/knockdown controls: If available, include samples where the target gene is knocked out or down to confirm antibody specificity.

  • Cross-reactivity controls: Test the antibody against similar proteins to assess potential cross-reactivity issues. For antibodies like NHD2, this might include testing against multiple plant proteins .

How can I determine if NHD2 Antibody exhibits cross-reactivity with non-target proteins?

Cross-reactivity assessment should follow a systematic approach:

  • Western blot analysis: Test the antibody against tissue lysates from different species or tissues to identify unexpected bands.

  • ELISA plate testing: As described in research with other antibodies, "apply both human monoclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (spike protein, nucleoprotein) and rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (envelope protein, membrane protein) to different tissue antigens" to identify potential cross-reactivity.

  • Computational prediction: Use sequence alignment tools to predict potential cross-reactive epitopes: "We also did selective epitope mapping using BLAST and showed similarities and homology between spike, nucleoprotein, and many other SARS-CoV-2 proteins with the human tissue antigens" .

  • Inhibition studies: Perform competitive binding assays to quantify the degree of cross-reactivity. These can be graphically represented showing "the inhibition of antibody binding to protein was demonstrated graphically in proportion to the increased concentration of protein" .

What methods can be used to improve NHD2 Antibody specificity for challenging applications?

To enhance antibody specificity:

  • Affinity maturation: Consider techniques similar to those used in other studies, where "affinity maturation using OrthoRep enables production of single-digit nanomolar binders that maintain the intended epitope selectivity" .

  • Epitope-specific purification: Purify antibody using antigen-specific columns to remove cross-reactive antibodies.

  • Absorption protocols: Pre-absorb the antibody with related proteins to remove cross-reactive antibody populations.

  • Optimization of blocking conditions: Test different blocking reagents and concentrations to minimize non-specific binding.

  • Machine learning approaches: Consider computational methods like those described in the literature: "Machine learning can eliminate non-specific antibodies that bind to undesired targets" .

How can computational models be applied to predict and enhance NHD2 Antibody binding properties?

Modern computational approaches offer powerful tools for antibody research:

  • Machine learning predictions: "Our results suggest a new path for the discovery of therapeutic molecules by demonstrating that predictive and differentiable models of antibody binding can be learned from high-throughput experimental data without the need for target structural data" .

  • Ensemble modeling: Consider approaches like "Ens-Grad, by modeling antibody affinity with an ensemble of neural networks and efficiently optimizing it with gradient-based optimization" , which has successfully designed improved antibody sequences.

  • PALM-H3 and A2Binder frameworks: More advanced approaches include "PALM-H3 and A2Binder, and developed a comprehensive workflow for antibody generation and affinity optimization" .

  • De novo design: For completely novel antibody designs, consider methodologies like "combining computational protein design using a fine-tuned RFdiffusion network alongside yeast display screening enables the generation of antibody variable heavy chains (VHHs) and single chain variable fragments (scFvs) that bind user-specified epitopes with atomic-level precision" .

What strategies can be employed to investigate the conformational dynamics of antibody-antigen interactions involving NHD2?

Advanced structural analysis techniques can reveal important details about antibody-antigen interactions:

  • HDX-MS analysis: "Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify epitopes...recognized by polyclonal antibodies" provides insights into conformational dynamics of antibody-antigen complexes .

  • Cryo-EM characterization: Advanced structural studies can confirm "the proper Ig fold and binding pose of designed VHHs" and even verify "the accuracy of CDR loop conformations" .

  • Computational simulations: Molecular dynamics simulations can reveal binding mechanisms and conformational changes upon antibody-antigen interaction.

  • FRET-based assays: Design Förster resonance energy transfer experiments to monitor real-time binding dynamics between NHD2 and its target.

  • Single-molecule techniques: Consider methods to observe individual binding events, revealing heterogeneity in binding mechanisms.

How can NHD2 Antibody be integrated into multimodal imaging or detection systems?

Integrated detection systems can leverage antibodies for advanced applications:

  • Multiplex immunoassays: Design assays to simultaneously detect multiple targets alongside the NHD2 target.

  • Antibody conjugation strategies: Develop protocols for conjugating NHD2 to various detection modalities (fluorophores, quantum dots, gold nanoparticles).

  • Microfluidic platforms: Integrate the antibody into microfluidic systems for automated, high-throughput detection.

  • Combinatorial detection systems: Pair antibody-based detection with orthogonal methods (mass spectrometry, PCR) for enhanced sensitivity and specificity.

  • In vivo imaging applications: For applicable research areas, develop methods for in vivo tracking using appropriately modified antibodies.

What are the common challenges when using NHD2 Antibody in plant-based research, and how can they be overcome?

Working with plant systems presents unique challenges:

  • Plant compound interference: Plant secondary metabolites can interfere with antibody binding. Optimize extraction buffers with PVPP, DTT, or specific detergents to minimize interference.

  • Tissue-specific optimization: Different plant tissues require specific extraction protocols. Develop tissue-specific methods for leaf, root, and reproductive tissues.

  • Cross-reactivity with plant proteins: Validate specificity against multiple plant species and tissue types to ensure target-specific binding.

  • Plant protein abundance issues: For low-abundance proteins, develop enrichment protocols prior to antibody application.

  • Reproducibility across growth conditions: Standardize plant growth conditions to minimize variability in protein expression and antibody detection.

How should I analyze contradictory results obtained with NHD2 Antibody across different experimental platforms?

When faced with contradictory results:

  • Systematic validation: Test the antibody across multiple platforms with appropriate controls for each method.

  • Epitope accessibility analysis: Consider whether different sample preparation methods might alter epitope availability.

  • Lot-to-lot variation assessment: Verify if different antibody lots produce consistent results.

  • Cross-validation with alternative antibodies: When possible, compare results with antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein.

  • Protocol standardization: Develop detailed, standardized protocols to minimize technical variability.

Experimental PlatformPotential IssuesValidation Approach
Western BlotDenaturation may alter epitopesTest multiple denaturation conditions
ImmunohistochemistryFixation can mask epitopesCompare different fixation methods
ELISASurface binding may differ from solution phaseTest both direct and sandwich ELISA formats
Flow CytometryFixation and permeabilization may affect bindingOptimize fixation/permeabilization buffers
ImmunoprecipitationNative protein interactions may block epitopesTry different lysis conditions

How should NHD2 Antibody be properly cited and documented in scientific publications?

Proper documentation of antibodies is critical for research reproducibility:

  • Complete antibody information: "The Antibody Registry is a public, open database that enables citation of antibodies by providing a persistent record for any antibody-based reagent used in a publication" . Include catalog number, manufacturer, lot number, and RRID if available.

  • Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs): "The Antibody Registry is the authority for antibody Research Resource Identifiers, or RRIDs, which are requested or required by hundreds of journals seeking to improve the citation of these key resources" .

  • Validation evidence: Document the specific validation steps performed for your application: "Antibody RRIDs are required in several journals including Nature Protocols, Endocrinology and the Journal of Comparative Neurology" .

  • Experimental details: Provide complete details on concentration, incubation conditions, and detection methods.

  • Control experiments: Document all controls used to validate specificity and performance.

What are best practices for maintaining a comprehensive laboratory record of NHD2 Antibody experiments?

Effective record-keeping should include:

  • Antibody inventory system: Track lot numbers, purchase dates, and storage conditions.

  • Validation documentation: Maintain records of all specificity tests performed.

  • Protocol repository: Document detailed protocols, including buffer compositions and incubation conditions.

  • Result documentation: Record both positive and negative results, with representative images.

  • Electronic data management: Implement a searchable system for storing and retrieving experimental data.

Documentation ElementRequired InformationPurpose
Antibody IdentityCatalog #, lot #, source, RRIDReproducibility
Validation DataSpecificity tests, working dilution determinationQuality control
Experimental ConditionsBuffers, temperatures, incubation timesMethod reproducibility
ControlsPositive and negative controls usedResult interpretation
Raw DataOriginal blots/images, quantification filesData integrity

How might emerging antibody engineering approaches enhance the utility of antibodies like NHD2?

The future of antibody research offers exciting possibilities:

  • AI-driven design: New methods like "PALM-H3 and A2binder" offer "artificial intelligence framework for antibody generation and evaluation, which has the potential to significantly accelerate the development of antibody drugs" .

  • Atomic-level precision design: Recent advances show that "combining computational protein design using a fine-tuned RFdiffusion network alongside yeast display screening enables the generation of antibody variable heavy chains (VHHs) and single chain variable fragments (scFvs) that bind user-specified epitopes with atomic-level precision" .

  • Customized specificity profiles: Beyond simply binding targets, new approaches allow "designing protein sequences with highly specific binding profiles" .

  • High-capacity machine learning: Methods like those discussed by Liu et al. demonstrate that "machine learning can design complementarity determining regions of human Immunoglobulin G antibodies with target affinities that are superior to candidates derived from phage display panning experiments" .

  • Integration with emerging technologies: Future research will likely combine antibody engineering with technologies like spatial transcriptomics, CRISPR screening, and single-cell analysis.

What methodological advances may improve the reproducibility of research using antibodies like NHD2?

Improving reproducibility remains a critical challenge:

  • Standardized validation requirements: Journals increasingly require "antibody RRIDs have over 90% compliance while journals that ask with only passive instructions to authors have about 1% compliance" .

  • Structural validation: Methods to confirm "the proper Ig fold and binding pose" and verify "the accuracy of CDR loop conformations" provide stronger evidence of specificity .

  • Computational prediction: Machine learning approaches that "can eliminate non-specific antibodies that bind to undesired targets" will improve specificity .

  • Consistent reporting standards: Adoption of comprehensive reporting guidelines specifically for antibody-based research.

  • Open data sharing: Repositories for sharing raw antibody validation data to enable meta-analysis and improve community standards.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.