NRF2 Antibodies are immunological tools designed to detect and study the NFE2L2 protein, which regulates antioxidant response elements (AREs) in genes involved in detoxification and redox homeostasis . These antibodies enable researchers to investigate NRF2's role in cellular defense mechanisms against oxidative damage, cancer progression, and inflammatory diseases .
Detects endogenous NRF2 (~68–110 kDa) in untreated and treated cell lines (HepG2, MDA-MB-231, RAW264.7) .
Validated against transfected 293T cells expressing 3xFlag-tagged NRF2 .
Competitor comparisons show superior specificity in HepG2 lysates .
Localizes NRF2 in cytoplasm and nuclei of human breast carcinoma samples .
Requires citrate buffer (pH 6.0) antigen retrieval for optimal staining .
Active Motif's antibody validates binding to ARE regions in target genes (e.g., GCLC) .
Used with magnetic bead-based ChIP-IT® kits for high-sensitivity assays .
Demonstrates nuclear localization in HeLa, Neuro2A, and treated cells .
Compatible with co-staining using cytoskeletal markers (e.g., phalloidin) .
NRF2 antibodies have been utilized in peer-reviewed studies:
NRF2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) is a transcription factor involved in cellular stress response. In SDS-PAGE, human NRF2 typically migrates above 100 kDa, with the exact position depending on the percentage of the gel used. In 8% Tris-glycine gels, monoclonal anti-NRF2 antibodies typically detect NRF2 as three bands migrating between 100 and 130 kDa . This migration pattern is significantly higher than the theoretical molecular weight calculated from the amino acid sequence, which is a common property of many transcription factors due to post-translational modifications and intrinsically disordered regions.
Antibody validation is particularly crucial for NRF2 research because recent mass spectrometry studies have identified that several commercial anti-NRF2 antibodies bind to calmegin, an ER-residing chaperone that co-migrates with NRF2 in SDS-PAGE . This cross-reactivity can lead to misinterpretation of experimental results, particularly when analyzing NRF2 levels in different cellular compartments. Proper validation through knockdown experiments, stimulation with NRF2 activators (such as tert-BHQ), and translation inhibition tests can help distinguish true NRF2 signals from calmegin.
NRF2 antibodies are primarily used in western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence studies to investigate:
Nuclear translocation of NRF2 upon stress conditions
Protein-protein interactions involving NRF2
Changes in NRF2 stability and degradation
Subcellular localization of NRF2
Effects of drug treatments on NRF2 pathway activation
For western blot analysis, antibodies such as anti-NRF2 [EP1808Y] (Abcam), anti-NRF2 (D1Z9C) XP (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-NRF2 (E5F1A) (Cell Signaling Technology) have been used, though with varying degrees of specificity .
Distinguishing between NRF2 and calmegin in western blots requires strategic experimental approaches:
Translation inhibition: Treatment with translation inhibitors like emetine (20 μM for 2 hours) will decrease NRF2 levels but not affect calmegin levels .
NRF2 activation: Treatment with NRF2 activators such as tert-BHQ (50 μM for 4-5 hours) increases NRF2 levels while calmegin remains unchanged .
Subcellular fractionation: NRF2 is predominantly nuclear upon activation, while calmegin is primarily found in the cytoplasmic/ER fraction . Proper fractionation can help differentiate between these proteins.
Knockdown experiments: siRNA-mediated knockdown of NRF2 will reduce NRF2 bands but not affect calmegin bands .
Mass spectrometry verification: For definitive identification, immunoprecipitated proteins can be analyzed by mass spectrometry as demonstrated in recent studies .
Based on validation studies with NRF2 knockdown and tert-BHQ treatment, the Cell Signaling E5F1A antibody demonstrates high specificity for nuclear NRF2 in immunofluorescence applications . This antibody shows weak nuclear signals under basal conditions but strong nuclear accumulation upon tert-BHQ treatment, which is abrogated by NRF2 knockdown .
Interestingly, some antibodies that cross-react with calmegin in western blots can still be useful for detecting nuclear NRF2 in immunofluorescence. For instance, the Abcam EP1808Y antibody shows specific nuclear NRF2 accumulation upon tert-BHQ treatment that is eliminated by NRF2 knockdown, suggesting it can be used for detecting nuclear NRF2 despite its cross-reactivity with calmegin in western blots .
Optimal sample preparation for NRF2 detection includes:
Protein extraction: Use of IP buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% TritonX-100) followed by sonication and centrifugation has proven effective for NRF2 immunoprecipitation studies .
Gel selection: 8% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gels provide optimal separation for NRF2, which migrates between 100-130 kDa .
For immunofluorescence: Fixation with ice-cold 4% para-formaldehyde for 10 minutes, followed by permeabilization with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 minutes has been successful. Blocking with 5% FBS or 10% goat serum improves specificity .
Signal amplification: For weak signals, tyramide-based signal enhancement may be necessary, especially with the Cell Signaling E5F1A antibody .
Essential controls for NRF2 antibody experiments include:
Positive controls:
Treatment with known NRF2 activators (tert-BHQ, 50 μM for 4-5 hours)
Overexpression of NRF2 in appropriate cell lines
Negative controls:
siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown of NRF2
Translation inhibition (emetine, 20 μM for 2 hours) to reduce NRF2 levels
Ideally, NRF2 knockout cell lines when available
Specificity controls:
Analysis of calmegin expression
Subcellular fractionation to confirm proper localization
Secondary antibody-only controls for immunofluorescence
Technical controls:
A comprehensive validation strategy for NRF2 antibodies should include:
Knockdown/knockout verification: Confirm signal reduction with NRF2 siRNA or in NRF2 knockout cells.
Pharmacological manipulation:
Increased signal with NRF2 activators (tert-BHQ)
Decreased signal with translation inhibitors (emetine)
Mass spectrometry confirmation: Immunoprecipitate protein bands of interest and identify by LC-MS/MS to confirm NRF2 presence and detect potential cross-reactive proteins .
Comparative antibody analysis: Test multiple antibodies with different epitopes to confirm consistent detection patterns.
Cell fractionation: Verify expected subcellular distribution of the detected protein.
For successful NRF2 immunoprecipitation:
Cell preparation: Use 10 × 10^6 cells per condition for adequate protein yield .
Lysis conditions: IP buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% TritonX-100) with sonication and centrifugation .
Antibody selection: The Abcam EP1808Y antibody (2 μg per sample) has been successfully used for NRF2 immunoprecipitation .
Incubation conditions: Overnight incubation at 4°C provides optimal binding.
Bead selection: 50 μl of protein G magnetic beads are suitable for pulldown .
Washing and elution: Multiple washes with IP buffer and PBS, followed by elution in 2× Laemmli buffer at 50°C for 10 minutes .
Gel separation: Use 8% SDS-PAGE for optimal separation of the 100-130 kDa range containing NRF2 .
Multiple bands in NRF2 western blots can result from:
Cross-reactivity: Many anti-NRF2 antibodies cross-react with calmegin, which co-migrates with NRF2 in SDS-PAGE. This is particularly problematic as calmegin often gives stronger western blot signals than NRF2 .
Post-translational modifications: NRF2 undergoes various post-translational modifications including phosphorylation and ubiquitination that can affect migration.
Degradation products: NRF2 has a short half-life and may appear as degradation fragments.
Alternative splicing: Different NRF2 isoforms may be detected.
To distinguish between these possibilities:
Compare signal patterns after NRF2 knockdown
Use tert-BHQ treatment to stabilize NRF2
Perform translation inhibition with emetine to differentiate NRF2 (decreases) from calmegin (stable)
To improve specificity in NRF2 immunofluorescence:
Antibody selection: The Cell Signaling E5F1A antibody shows high specificity for nuclear NRF2 .
Signal amplification: For weak signals, use tyramide-based signal amplification (Tyramide SuperBoost kit) with 7-minute incubation with tyramide reagent .
Validation controls: Include NRF2 knockdown samples and tert-BHQ-treated samples as negative and positive controls, respectively .
Blocking optimization: Use 5% FBS or 10% goat serum for optimal blocking .
Confocal microscopy: Use confocal microscopy with z-stack analysis to accurately determine subcellular localization.
Nuclear counterstaining: Use DAPI (300 nM) to clearly define nuclear boundaries .
When western blot and immunofluorescence results seem contradictory:
Consider cross-reactivity: Antibodies may detect different proteins in different applications. For example, some antibodies that cross-react with calmegin in western blots may still specifically detect nuclear NRF2 in immunofluorescence .
Evaluate subcellular localization: In immunofluorescence, focus on nuclear localization for NRF2, as calmegin is primarily cytoplasmic/ER-associated .
Verify with fractionation: Perform cell fractionation followed by western blot to confirm the localization patterns observed in immunofluorescence.
Use multiple antibodies: Compare results with multiple antibodies having different epitopes.
Functional validation: Use NRF2 activators (tert-BHQ) and knockdown approaches to confirm the functional identity of the detected protein .
Mass spectrometry provides powerful verification for antibody-based detection of NRF2:
Protein identification: LC-MS/MS can definitively identify proteins immunoprecipitated by anti-NRF2 antibodies, distinguishing between NRF2 and cross-reactive proteins like calmegin .
Protocol overview:
Quantitative analysis: Extract chromatograms of representative peptides using tools like Skyline to confirm reliable detection and quantification .
Coverage assessment: Analyze peptide coverage across protein sequences to distinguish between similar proteins .
The following validated mass spectrometry protocol has been used successfully for NRF2 detection:
Sample preparation: Immunoprecipitate NRF2 from control cells, emetine-treated cells (20 μM, 2h), and tert-BHQ-treated cells (50 μM, 4h) .
Gel separation: Separate immunoprecipitates on 8% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE and stain with Flamingo .
Sample processing:
Digestion and extraction:
LC-MS/MS analysis: Analyze using appropriate LC-MS/MS protocols to identify NRF2 and potential cross-reactive proteins .