The NIN antibody targets the Ninein protein (NIN), a centrosomal protein critical for microtubule anchoring, spindle organization, and cell cycle regulation . This antibody is widely utilized in research to investigate cytoskeletal dynamics, mitotic mechanisms, and diseases linked to centrosomal dysfunction, such as cancer and neurodevelopmental disorders.
NIN antibodies enable critical insights into:
Centrosomal Function: Localization of Ninein to the centrosome during interphase and its redistribution during mitosis .
Disease Mechanisms: Dysregulated NIN expression correlates with tumor progression (e.g., glioblastoma) .
Developmental Biology: Role in neuronal migration and cortical development, as shown in rodent models .
Atlas Antibodies’ HPA005939 identified aberrant NIN expression in gastrointestinal cancers via IHC .
Abcam’s ab231181 revealed NIN’s interaction with γ-tubulin in microtubule nucleation .
Format: Liquid (0.1 mg/ml)
Immunogen: Recombinant fragment corresponding to HUMAN NIN (UniProt: Q8N4C6)
Format: Lyophilized (reconstitute in PBS)
Immunogen: Synthetic peptide within Human NIN (C-terminus)
What is Ninein (NIN) protein and why is it important in cellular research?
Ninein (NIN) is a critical scaffolding protein that plays a significant role in centrosome cohesion and microtubule anchoring by interacting with other centrosome proteins . As a centrosomal component, Ninein is essential for proper cell division and organization of microtubule networks. Research involving NIN antibodies provides valuable insights into cellular architecture, division mechanisms, and various related pathologies. The protein's predicted molecular weight is approximately 243 kDa, making it a relatively large cellular target that requires specific detection methods .
What are the primary applications for NIN antibodies in research?
NIN antibodies are commonly used in several key research applications:
Western blotting (WB) for protein expression analysis
Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues (IHC-P) for localization studies
Immunofluorescence (IF) for subcellular localization and co-localization studies
Immunoprecipitation (IP) for protein-protein interaction studies
According to documented applications, NIN antibodies have demonstrated compatibility with human and rat samples, particularly in tissues such as stomach, cerebrum, heart, and cell lines like K562 . Each application requires specific optimization protocols to ensure reliable and reproducible results.
What sample types work best with NIN antibodies?
NIN antibodies have been validated with:
Sample Type | Compatibility | Optimization Notes |
---|---|---|
Cell lysates (e.g., K562) | High | Requires proper lysis buffers with protease inhibitors |
Tissue lysates (e.g., rat testis) | High | Homogenization at low temperatures recommended |
FFPE tissue sections | High | Proper antigen retrieval essential |
Recombinant proteins | High | Useful as positive controls |
Frozen tissue sections | Moderate | May require protocol optimization |
When working with tissue samples, proper tissue fixation and antigen retrieval procedures are crucial for optimal NIN detection .
How should I prepare samples for optimal NIN antibody detection?
For optimal detection:
Cellular samples: Lyse cells using appropriate buffers containing detergents, salts, and protease/phosphatase inhibitors to prevent protein degradation. Sample preparation should be performed at low temperatures to preserve protein integrity .
Tissue samples: For paraffin-embedded tissues, perform proper fixation (typically formalin) followed by effective antigen retrieval procedures. The documented staining for NIN has been achieved using 20 μg/ml antibody concentration with DAB staining in immunohistochemical analysis .
Protein quantification: Accurate protein measurement using BCA assay or similar methods is essential before loading samples for Western blotting or other comparative analyses .
How can I validate the specificity of a NIN antibody?
A multi-modal validation approach is recommended:
Positive controls: Test the antibody on samples known to express NIN (e.g., recombinant NIN protein, K562 cell lysate, or rat testis lysate) .
Molecular weight verification: Confirm detection at the expected molecular weight (approximately 243 kDa for NIN) .
Knockout/knockdown validation: Compare antibody staining between wild-type samples and those where NIN expression has been reduced or eliminated.
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to block specific binding sites.
Multiple antibody comparison: Use antibodies targeting different epitopes of NIN and compare staining patterns.
Thorough validation ensures experimental results reflect true NIN distribution rather than non-specific binding or artifacts.
What controls are essential when using NIN antibodies in immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence studies?
Essential controls include:
Primary antibody omission: To assess non-specific binding of secondary antibody
Isotype control: Use an irrelevant antibody of the same isotype and concentration
Positive tissue control: A sample known to express NIN (documented examples include rat stomach, cerebrum, and heart tissues)
Negative tissue control: Tissue known to lack NIN expression
Absorption control: Primary antibody pre-incubated with excess antigen
Secondary antibody only: To establish background staining levels
Documentation of proper controls significantly enhances the credibility of research findings and helps distinguish between specific and non-specific signals.
How do I troubleshoot weak or absent NIN antibody signal in Western blotting?
When encountering weak or absent signals:
Antibody concentration: Increase concentration (documented working concentration is approximately 2 μg/ml for Western blotting)
Protein loading: Increase total protein amount, especially for potentially low-abundance targets
Transfer efficiency: Optimize transfer conditions for high molecular weight proteins (NIN is ~243 kDa)
Blocking conditions: Test alternative blocking agents (BSA vs. milk) and durations
Detection method: Switch to more sensitive detection systems (chemiluminescence vs. colorimetric)
Sample preparation: Ensure proper lysis with protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Membrane type: PVDF membranes may provide better protein retention than nitrocellulose for some applications, though both have advantages and limitations
What are the key considerations for designing co-localization experiments with NIN antibodies?
For effective co-localization studies:
Antibody compatibility: Ensure primary antibodies are from different host species to avoid cross-reactivity
Secondary antibody selection: Use cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies to prevent species cross-reactivity
Fluorophore selection: Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Controls: Include single-stain controls to assess bleed-through
Fixation method: Optimize to preserve both antigens of interest
Antigen retrieval: May need to compromise between optimal conditions for both targets
Quantification: Use appropriate co-localization coefficients (Pearson's, Manders') and software for analysis
When studying centrosomal proteins like NIN, co-staining with other centrosomal markers provides important context for understanding spatial relationships and protein interactions.
How do I distinguish between specific and non-specific binding when using NIN antibodies?
To differentiate specific from non-specific binding:
Pre-adsorption: Use secondary antibodies pre-adsorbed against potential cross-reactive species to minimize non-specific binding
Blocking optimization: Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers) and concentrations
Washing stringency: Increase wash duration and/or detergent concentration
Antibody titration: Perform dilution series to identify optimal concentration balancing signal and background
Comparison with other NIN antibodies: Different antibodies targeting the same protein should show similar patterns
Biological validation: Compare staining patterns with known biology of NIN (centrosomal localization)
For immunohistochemistry applications, a concentration of 20 μg/ml has been documented as effective for NIN detection with minimal background .
What approaches can be used to detect different isoforms or post-translational modifications of NIN?
For isoform and post-translational modification detection:
Epitope-specific antibodies: Select antibodies targeting regions unique to specific isoforms
Modification-specific antibodies: Use antibodies recognizing specific post-translational modifications
2D gel electrophoresis: Separate proteins by both molecular weight and isoelectric point before Western blotting
Immunoprecipitation-coupled mass spectrometry: Enrich NIN using antibodies then analyze by mass spectrometry
Phosphatase treatment: Compare antibody reactivity before and after phosphatase treatment to identify phosphorylation-dependent epitopes
Sequential probing: Strip and reprobe membranes with different NIN antibodies targeting different regions/modifications
How can computational approaches enhance NIN antibody-based research?
Computational methods are increasingly valuable for antibody research:
Epitope prediction: Bioinformatic tools can identify likely epitopes based on protein structure and sequence properties
Cross-reactivity prediction: Computational models can predict potential cross-reactivity with similar proteins
Binding mode identification: Biophysics-informed models can distinguish different binding modes for closely related epitopes
Antibody design: Deep learning models can generate antibody sequences with desired properties like specificity and developability
Image analysis: Automated quantification of immunostaining using machine learning algorithms
Recent advances in deep learning have demonstrated the possibility of computationally generating novel antibody sequences with customized specificity profiles, which could be applied to generating improved NIN-targeting antibodies .
What methodological considerations are important when quantifying NIN expression levels across different experimental conditions?
For reliable quantification across conditions:
Standardized protocols: Maintain identical sample preparation, antibody concentrations, and development times
Loading controls: Use appropriate housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH) consistently across all samples
Linear detection range: Ensure signal falls within the linear range of detection method
Normalization strategy: Determine appropriate normalization (total protein vs. housekeeping proteins)
Technical replicates: Perform multiple technical replicates to assess variability
Biological replicates: Include sufficient biological replicates to account for natural variation
Quantification software: Use appropriate software with background subtraction capabilities
Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on experimental design and data distribution
What are the differences between monoclonal and polyclonal NIN antibodies in research applications?
Feature | Monoclonal NIN Antibodies | Polyclonal NIN Antibodies |
---|---|---|
Specificity | High for single epitope | Recognizes multiple epitopes |
Batch consistency | High reproducibility | Batch-to-batch variation |
Sensitivity | Lower (single epitope) | Higher (multiple epitopes) |
Applications | Excellent for specific domain detection | Better for protein detection under varying conditions |
Epitope masking resistance | Vulnerable to single epitope loss | Resistant (multiple epitopes) |
Background | Generally lower | Potentially higher |
Cost/production | Higher | Lower |
The documented rabbit polyclonal Ninein antibody (ab231181) has been validated for Western blotting and immunohistochemistry applications . When selecting between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, consider the specific research question and required detection sensitivity.
How should I optimize NIN antibody dilution for different experimental techniques?
Optimization strategy by technique:
Western Blotting:
Immunohistochemistry:
Immunofluorescence:
Start at higher concentration than IHC (often 2-5× higher)
Adjust based on signal intensity and background
Consider longer primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C)
Immunoprecipitation:
Usually requires higher antibody concentration
Titrate antibody-to-lysate ratio
Optimize binding conditions (time, temperature, buffer)
Document all optimization parameters systematically to ensure reproducibility across experiments.
What strategies can improve detection of low-abundance NIN in various sample types?
To enhance detection of low-abundance NIN:
Signal amplification: Employ tyramide signal amplification or polymeric detection systems
Sample enrichment: Use subcellular fractionation to isolate centrosome-containing fractions
Increased antibody concentration: Higher primary antibody concentration may be necessary
Extended incubation: Longer primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C)
Sensitive detection methods: Use highly sensitive chemiluminescent substrates for Western blotting
Reduced background: Optimize blocking and washing to improve signal-to-noise ratio
Protein loading: Increase total protein loaded (for Western blotting)
Precipitation techniques: Use immunoprecipitation to concentrate target protein before detection