NOMO1 is a 134 kDa protein encoded by the NOMO1 gene (UniProt ID: Q15155) and plays roles in developmental signaling pathways, including Nodal modulation . The biotin-conjugated NOMO1 antibody is a polyclonal rabbit IgG antibody covalently linked to biotin, allowing its use in streptavidin-based detection workflows.
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Conjugate | Biotin |
| Target Reactivity | Human, Mouse |
| Applications | WB, IHC, IF/ICC, IP, ELISA |
| Immunogen | NOMO1 fusion protein (Ag11895) |
| Molecular Weight | Observed: 135 kDa; Calculated: 134 kDa |
Biotin conjugation typically involves covalent attachment of biotin molecules to lysine residues or carbohydrate groups on the antibody. This process enhances compatibility with streptavidin-enzyme conjugates (e.g., HRP, alkaline phosphatase) or fluorescent streptavidin probes . While specific protocols for NOMO1 biotinylation are not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, analogous workflows for biotinylated antibodies (e.g., anti-GST in ) suggest:
Conjugation Method: NHS ester chemistry for amine-group biotinylation.
Purification: Affinity chromatography to remove free biotin.
Quality Control: Validation via ELISA or western blot to confirm biotin incorporation and binding efficiency .
Biotinylated NOMO1 antibodies are suited for multiplex assays requiring signal amplification.
WB: Detected in human brain tissue, A431 (epidermoid carcinoma), and COLO 320 (colorectal adenocarcinoma) cells .
IHC: Strong staining in human colon cancer, pancreas, and normal colon tissues .
Confirmed reactivity with human and mouse samples . No cross-reactivity with unrelated proteins (e.g., GST or BSA) under standard conditions .
Cancer Studies: NOMO1 expression profiling in AML (acute myeloid leukemia) cell lines like Nomo1, where structural surfaceomics identified integrin β2 as a therapeutic target .
Signal Amplification: Biotin-streptavidin systems enhance detection of low-abundance NOMO1 in neuronal or epithelial tissues .
Co-IP Assays: Isolate NOMO1-containing protein complexes using streptavidin magnetic beads .
Storage: Stable at -20°C in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol .
Batch Variation: Assess biotin incorporation via HABA assay or competitive ELISA to ensure consistency .
Interference: Endogenous biotin in tissues (e.g., liver) may require blocking with avidin/biotin solutions .
NOMO1 (Nodal Modulator 1, also known as pM5 protein) is a protein that may function as an antagonist of Nodal signaling pathways . Nodal signaling is crucial in embryonic development, particularly in establishing left-right asymmetry and mesoderm formation. Understanding NOMO1's functional characteristics provides context for research applications targeting this protein. In experimental systems, NOMO1 has been shown to modulate the activity of the Nodal pathway by potentially interfering with receptor binding or downstream signaling cascades.
NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated is a polyclonal antibody derived from rabbit hosts that specifically targets human NOMO1 protein. It has been developed using recombinant Human Nodal modulator 1 protein (specifically amino acids 918-1044) as the immunogen . The antibody is of IgG isotype and has been purified using Protein G purification methods with >95% purity . The biotin conjugation provides significant advantages for detection systems utilizing avidin-biotin chemistry. This antibody is formulated in a preservative buffer containing 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, and 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4 .
NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated has been tested and validated for ELISA applications . The biotin conjugation makes this antibody particularly suitable for detection systems that utilize streptavidin or avidin. These detection methods include:
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with streptavidin-HRP
Immunohistochemistry using streptavidin-conjugated fluorophores or enzymes
Flow cytometry with streptavidin-fluorophore detection systems
The biotin-streptavidin interaction offers a powerful detection method due to the high binding affinity (Kd ≈ 10^-15 M) between biotin and streptavidin, providing sensitive and specific signal amplification in various experimental settings .
When using NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated for ELISA, sample preparation should be tailored to preserve the target protein's native conformation while maximizing accessibility to the antibody:
For cell lysates: Use non-denaturing lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors to preserve protein integrity. Typical buffers include RIPA or NP-40 based formulations with protease inhibitor cocktails.
For tissue samples: Homogenize tissues in appropriate buffers followed by clarification through centrifugation to remove cellular debris.
Sample dilution: Prepare serial dilutions of samples to ensure measurements fall within the assay's linear range.
Blocking: Use 1-5% BSA or non-fat dry milk in appropriate buffer to reduce non-specific binding.
Controls: Include both positive controls (recombinant NOMO1) and negative controls (samples known to lack NOMO1) to validate experimental results.
The use of biotin-conjugated antibodies requires careful consideration of endogenous biotin in samples, which can potentially interfere with specific detection. Pre-treatment with avidin to block endogenous biotin may be necessary for certain sample types.
To maintain optimal activity of NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term storage .
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can cause protein denaturation and loss of antibody activity .
When working with the antibody:
Thaw aliquots on ice
Return unused portions to freezer promptly
Consider preparing working aliquots during initial thaw to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Exposure to light: Minimize exposure to light as some biotin conjugates can be light-sensitive.
Buffer conditions: The antibody is stable in its provided buffer containing 50% glycerol, which helps prevent freezing damage .
Proper handling ensures optimal performance and extends the useful life of the antibody preparation.
When implementing NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated in a new experimental system, several validation steps should be performed:
Specificity testing:
Include positive control samples known to express NOMO1
Include negative control samples (cells/tissues not expressing NOMO1)
Consider peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Optimization of antibody concentration:
Perform titration experiments to determine optimal working dilution
Test multiple concentrations to identify the dilution providing best signal-to-noise ratio
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test closely related proteins to ensure specificity
Review literature for potential cross-reactive proteins
Reproducibility testing:
Perform replicate experiments to ensure consistent results
Document lot-to-lot variation if using antibodies from different lots
Application-specific validation:
For ELISA: Establish standard curves using recombinant NOMO1
Determine assay sensitivity, dynamic range, and limits of detection
These validation steps are essential to ensure reliable and interpretable results before proceeding with experimental investigations using this antibody.
High background signals are common challenges when working with biotin-conjugated antibodies. Here are methodological approaches to address this issue:
Endogenous biotin blocking:
Pre-treat samples with free avidin/streptavidin to mask endogenous biotin
Use commercial biotin blocking kits specifically designed for this purpose
Optimize blocking conditions:
Increase blocking agent concentration (5-10% BSA/milk)
Consider alternative blocking agents (e.g., normal serum from the same species as secondary reagent)
Extend blocking time (2-4 hours or overnight at 4°C)
Washing optimization:
Increase number of washes between steps
Use detergent-containing wash buffers (0.05-0.1% Tween-20)
Extend washing times
Dilution factors:
Further dilute the biotin-conjugated NOMO1 antibody
Optimize streptavidin-conjugated detection reagent concentration
Control for non-specific binding:
Include isotype controls at equivalent concentrations
Perform absorption controls with recombinant NOMO1 protein
These methodological adjustments can significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio in experiments using biotin-conjugated antibodies .
False-negative results can occur for several reasons when using NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated:
| Potential Cause | Methodological Solution |
|---|---|
| Insufficient antigen exposure | Optimize sample preparation: test alternative fixation methods, increase permeabilization, or try antigen retrieval techniques |
| Antibody degradation | Verify antibody activity using positive controls; consider fresh antibody aliquots |
| Interfering substances in sample | Purify samples further or dilute to reduce interferents |
| Suboptimal reaction conditions | Adjust buffer composition, pH, temperature, and incubation times |
| Target protein denaturation | Use gentler extraction methods that preserve native protein conformations |
| Steric hindrance | Test different epitope-targeting antibodies or modify detection method |
| Insufficient detection reagent | Increase concentration or incubation time of streptavidin conjugate |
| Biotin-streptavidin interference | Use biotin-free detection systems as alternative approach |
When troubleshooting, it's recommended to systematically test each variable while maintaining appropriate controls to identify the specific cause of false-negative results.
Accurate quantification of NOMO1 expression using biotin-conjugated antibodies requires methodological precision:
Standard curve generation:
Use purified recombinant NOMO1 protein at known concentrations
Generate a standard curve covering the expected concentration range
Ensure linear relationship between signal and concentration
Normalization strategies:
Normalize to total protein concentration
Use housekeeping proteins as internal controls
Consider spike-in controls for recovery assessment
Signal quantification methods:
For ELISA: Use spectrophotometric measurement with appropriate wavelength
For Western blot: Apply densitometry with proper background subtraction
For flow cytometry: Calculate mean fluorescence intensity or percentage of positive cells
Data analysis considerations:
Apply statistical methods appropriate for the experimental design
Consider technical and biological replicates in analysis
Use appropriate curve-fitting models for standard curves
Validation against alternative methods:
Compare results with other quantification techniques (e.g., qPCR for mRNA)
Verify findings using antibodies targeting different epitopes
This systematic approach ensures reliable quantification of NOMO1 expression levels in experimental samples.
Proximity labeling using biotin-conjugated antibodies like NOMO1 Antibody offers powerful insights into protein-protein interactions:
Experimental design strategies:
Primary approach: Use NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated as a probe to identify proximal proteins
APEX-based proximity labeling: Combine with peroxidase-mediated biotinylation to identify proteins in close proximity to NOMO1
BioID method: Create fusion constructs combining NOMO1 with biotin ligase for in vivo proximity labeling
Implementation methodology:
For APEX-based methods: Express APEX-NOMO1 fusion in cells, treat with biotin-phenol and H₂O₂, then use anti-biotin antibodies for enrichment of biotinylated peptides
The anti-biotin antibody enrichment enables identification of specific biotinylation sites, with up to 30-fold more sites identified compared to streptavidin-based methods
Analysis approaches:
Mass spectrometry identification of labeled proteins
Quantitative comparison between experimental and control conditions
Network analysis of identified interaction partners
These methods can reveal previously unknown interaction partners of NOMO1 and provide insights into its functional roles in cellular processes and signaling pathways.
To investigate NOMO1's role in Nodal signaling using biotin-conjugated antibodies:
Protein complex immunoprecipitation:
Use NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated to pull down NOMO1 and associated proteins
Analyze co-precipitated proteins for known Nodal pathway components
Employ streptavidin-coated beads for efficient capture of biotin-antibody-protein complexes
Signal pathway perturbation analysis:
Monitor changes in NOMO1 localization following Nodal pathway activation
Combine with phospho-specific antibodies against downstream effectors (e.g., Smad2/3)
Correlate NOMO1 expression levels with pathway activity markers
Receptor interaction studies:
Investigate direct interactions between NOMO1 and Nodal receptors
Employ crosslinking approaches followed by biotin-antibody pulldown
Use proximity ligation assays to visualize interactions in situ
Temporal dynamics investigation:
Track NOMO1 expression and localization during developmental processes
Correlate with Nodal signaling activity markers
Analyze feedback regulation mechanisms
These methodological approaches can elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which NOMO1 antagonizes Nodal signaling and its broader roles in developmental and pathological contexts.
Optimizing mass spectrometry for NOMO1 interaction partner analysis requires specific methodological considerations:
Sample preparation optimization:
Perform stringent controls including IgG control pulldowns
Use on-bead digestion to minimize sample loss
Consider crosslinking approaches to capture transient interactions
Enrichment strategy enhancement:
Employ anti-biotin antibody enrichment of biotinylated peptides rather than streptavidin-based protein enrichment
This approach can yield >30-fold more biotinylation sites compared to streptavidin-based methods
Use approximately 50 μg of anti-biotin antibody for 1 mg peptide input for optimal results
MS acquisition parameters:
Implement data-dependent acquisition (DDA) for discovery
Consider parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted validation
Use appropriate collision energies for peptide fragmentation
Data analysis methodology:
Apply stringent statistical filtering to distinguish true interactors from background
Use label-free quantification or isotope labeling for comparative analyses
Implement specialized interaction scoring algorithms (e.g., SAINT, CompPASS)
Validation experiments:
Confirm key interactions using orthogonal methods
Perform reciprocal pulldowns with identified partners
Use functional assays to assess biological relevance
These optimized approaches maximize the identification of genuine NOMO1 interaction partners while minimizing false positives in mass spectrometry analyses.
When comparing NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated with other detection methods for Nodal signaling studies:
| Detection Method | Advantages | Limitations | Complementarity with NOMO1 Antibody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unconjugated antibodies | Flexible detection options; can be used with various secondary antibodies | Requires additional detection step; potential for cross-reactivity | Can be used for validation and comparative studies |
| Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies | Direct visualization; suitable for multiplexing | Potential photobleaching; limited signal amplification | Useful for co-localization studies with NOMO1 |
| RNA-based detection (ISH/qPCR) | Measures transcript levels; spatial information (ISH) | Does not detect protein; post-transcriptional regulation missed | Complements protein detection to assess transcription-translation correlation |
| Genetic reporters (GFP fusion) | Live-cell imaging; temporal dynamics | May affect protein function; overexpression artifacts | Provides dynamic information complementing antibody-based static analysis |
| Proximity ligation assays | Detects protein-protein interactions in situ | Technical complexity; optimization required | Can validate interactions identified using biotin-conjugated antibody pulldowns |
Selection between polyclonal NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated (such as CSB-PA015931LD01HU ) and monoclonal alternatives requires careful consideration of experimental goals:
Epitope recognition:
Polyclonal antibodies: Recognize multiple epitopes on NOMO1, potentially providing more robust detection across different experimental conditions
Monoclonal antibodies: Target single epitopes, offering higher specificity but potentially more sensitivity to epitope masking or denaturation
Application-specific factors:
For ELISA: Polyclonal antibodies may provide better antigen capture through multiple epitope binding
For highly specific applications: Monoclonal antibodies offer consistent epitope targeting
For denatured proteins: Epitope-specific considerations determine optimal choice
Reproducibility considerations:
Polyclonal antibodies: Batch-to-batch variation may occur
Monoclonal antibodies: Higher consistency between lots
Detection sensitivity:
Polyclonal antibodies: Often provide signal amplification through multiple epitope binding
Monoclonal antibodies: May require additional signal amplification strategies
Research context:
Novel research areas: Polyclonal antibodies provide broader epitope coverage
Established research with known critical epitopes: Monoclonal antibodies offer precision
The polyclonal NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated offers advantages for detection across varied experimental conditions, while monoclonal alternatives would provide higher specificity for targeted applications.
Integration of NOMO1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated into multiplex detection systems requires strategic methodological planning:
Spectral separation strategies:
Pair biotin-conjugated NOMO1 antibody with streptavidin conjugates having distinct spectral properties
Select complementary fluorophores for other markers with minimal spectral overlap
Consider sequential detection protocols for overlapping signals
Multiplex platform optimization:
For flow cytometry: Use streptavidin conjugated to fluorophores distinct from other markers
For immunohistochemistry: Employ chromogenic or fluorescent detection systems compatible with other detection methods
For multiplex ELISA: Utilize discrete capture locations (e.g., different wells or array spots)
Addressing detection challenges:
Cross-reactivity: Test antibodies individually before combining
Signal interference: Employ appropriate blocking between detection steps
Signal balancing: Adjust antibody concentrations to equalize detection sensitivity
Validation requirements:
Single-marker controls to establish baseline signals
Comparison with sequential single-marker detection
Absorption controls to confirm specificity in multiplex context
Data analysis considerations:
Compensation matrices for spectral overlap in flow cytometry
Colocalization analysis for microscopy
Statistical approaches for correlation analysis
These methodological strategies enable effective integration of NOMO1 detection into comprehensive multiplex biomarker systems while maintaining specificity and sensitivity.