NPAS2 Antibody targets the NPAS2 protein, encoded by the NPAS2 gene (Chromosome 2q11.2). NPAS2 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)-PAS transcription factor family and functions as a core circadian rhythm regulator. It dimerizes with BMAL1 to activate clock-controlled genes, maintaining 24-hour biological cycles in mammals .
NPAS2 antibodies are widely used in:
Circadian rhythm studies: Detecting NPAS2 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and peripheral tissues .
Cancer research: Investigating NPAS2's role in chemotherapy resistance in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). High NPAS2 expression correlates with poor prognosis and enhanced DNA repair via H2AX mRNA stabilization .
Gene regulation analysis: Studying transcriptional control by RORα and REV-ERBα, which modulate NPAS2 expression .
Data from The Human Protein Atlas :
| Tissue | Expression Level | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Brain (Cerebral Cortex) | High | IHC, RNA-seq |
| Lung | Moderate | IHC |
| Liver | Low | RNA-seq |
| Testis | High | IHC (Leydig cells) |
Mechanism: NPAS2 binds to H2AX mRNA, enhancing its stability and promoting DNA damage repair via homology-directed repair (HDR).
Impact: LUAD cells with NPAS2 knockdown showed:
40–60% reduction in colony formation under cisplatin treatment.
2.5-fold increase in apoptosis (via cleaved caspase-3 detection).
In vivo correlation: NPAS2-high tumors exhibited 30% faster regrowth post-chemotherapy.
NPAS2 is a core circadian molecule that functions as a transcription factor. It plays critical roles in multiple biological processes beyond circadian rhythm regulation. NPAS2 contributes significantly to liver fibrogenesis through direct transcriptional activation of hairy and enhancer of split 1 (Hes1), a critical transcriptor of Notch signaling . In lung adenocarcinoma, NPAS2 binds to and enhances the stability of H2AX mRNA, decreasing tumor cell sensitivity to chemotherapy by augmenting DNA damage repair . NPAS2 also appears to regulate GABAergic neurotransmission in the ventral striatum by binding to genes encoding GABAA receptor subunits . The protein generally forms heterodimers with BMAL1, another core circadian rhythm transcription factor, to regulate the expression of numerous target genes .
NPAS2 demonstrates variable expression across human tissues. According to the Human Protein Atlas, there is medium consistency between antibody staining and RNA expression data for NPAS2 . In liver fibrosis studies, NPAS2 has been found to be exclusively expressed in activated hepatic stellate cells (aHSCs), with its expression pattern coinciding with that of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a well-established marker of aHSCs in human fibrotic livers . In gastric cancer tissues, immunohistochemical analysis has shown that NPAS2 is mainly expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, with positive cells appearing as yellow and brown granular staining under microscopic examination . NPAS2 mRNA has been detected in various cell lines including MCF-7 (breast cancer) and HCT-15 (colorectal cancer) cells .
Proper validation of NPAS2 antibodies is essential for reliable research outcomes. Researchers should:
Confirm antibody specificity using positive and negative control tissues or cells with known NPAS2 expression levels.
Validate the antibody using multiple detection methods such as Western blot, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence to ensure consistent results.
Perform siRNA knockdown experiments to confirm antibody specificity, as demonstrated in studies where NPAS2 knockdown was quantitatively determined by qRT-PCR prior to each assay, and only populations with greater than 70% reduction were used in subsequent analyses .
Cross-validate with mRNA expression data when possible, as seen in liver fibrosis studies where NPAS2 mRNA increase correlated with the induction of α-SMA mRNA (r = 0.458, p = 0.007) .
Include appropriate controls in each experiment, such as incubation with non-immune IgG as done in ChIP experiments .
ChIP is a powerful technique for studying NPAS2's function as a transcription factor. Based on published research methodologies:
Select a high-quality ChIP-grade NPAS2 antibody, such as the NPAS2 antibody (H20X, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) used in successful ChIP experiments .
Include appropriate controls in parallel: anti-acetyl-Histone H3 as a positive control and non-immune rabbit IgG as a negative control .
For ChIP-Seq applications, follow established protocols but modify fixation time and sonication conditions based on the specific cell type being studied.
For PCR verification of ChIP results, design primers targeting putative NPAS2 binding sites, such as E-box elements. For example, research has identified an E-box (nucleotide −1875 to nucleotide −1869) in the Hes1 promoter as a critical binding site for NPAS2 .
Validate ChIP results using site-directed mutagenesis analyses of identified binding sites to confirm their functional significance .
This approach has successfully identified several genes encoding subunits of the GABAA receptor as direct binding targets of NPAS2 and confirmed NPAS2's direct binding to the E-box region of the Hes1 promoter .
For optimal immunohistochemical detection of NPAS2 in cancer tissues:
Tissue preparation: Use formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (typically 30 μm cryostat sections for immediate fixation or 150-300 μm sections for tissue punches) .
Antigen retrieval: Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0).
Primary antibody: Incubate with validated NPAS2 antibody at optimized dilution (determined through titration experiments).
Detection system: Utilize a highly sensitive detection system compatible with your primary antibody.
Scoring method: Apply a semi-quantitative integration method for evaluation. Select five high-power visual fields (400×) for each sample under the microscope .
Interpretation: NPAS2 positive staining appears as yellow and brown granular structures in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Two professional pathologists should independently score the sections without knowledge of clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes .
Using this approach, researchers have successfully demonstrated significant differences in NPAS2 expression, such as the 65.35% positive rate in gastric cancer tissues compared to 30.69% in adjacent tissues .
To investigate NPAS2's role in DNA damage response:
Establish experimental cell models:
DNA damage induction:
DNA damage response assessment:
DNA repair capacity evaluation:
mRNA stability analysis:
Using these approaches, researchers have demonstrated that NPAS2 depletion significantly impairs γH2AX accumulation and homology-directed repair, while NPAS2 can enhance H2AX mRNA stability by direct binding .
NPAS2 plays a critical role in liver fibrosis through direct transcriptional activation of Hes1. To investigate this mechanism:
Animal models: Use both carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄) and bile duct ligation (BDL)-induced fibrosis models with wild-type and NPAS2 knockout mice .
Fibrosis assessment techniques:
Cellular mechanistic studies:
Molecular mechanism investigation:
These approaches revealed that NPAS2 knockout significantly decreased hydroxyproline content, α-SMA, and Col1α1 expression in fibrotic liver tissues compared to wild-type mice, and NPAS2 directly binds to the E-box region of the Hes1 promoter to activate its transcription .
The literature presents contradictory findings regarding NPAS2's role in cancer:
To address these contradictions, researchers should:
Conduct tissue-specific studies:
Compare NPAS2 expression and function across different cancer types using the same methodologies
Use tissue microarrays to evaluate NPAS2 expression across multiple cancer types simultaneously
Investigate context-dependent functions:
Examine NPAS2's interaction partners in different cellular contexts
Study post-translational modifications that might alter NPAS2 function
Consider temporal aspects:
Evaluate NPAS2's role at different stages of cancer progression
Account for circadian timing in experimental design
Perform comprehensive pathway analysis:
Use in vivo models:
Develop tissue-specific NPAS2 knockout or overexpression models
Evaluate tumor growth, metastasis, and response to therapy in these models
To investigate the relationship between NPAS2, circadian rhythms, and disease:
Temporal expression analysis:
Clock gene network analysis:
Functional circadian studies:
Use luciferase reporter assays to monitor circadian oscillations
Evaluate phase, amplitude, and period changes after NPAS2 manipulation
Perform genome-wide circadian transcriptome analysis
Disease-specific approaches:
Translational approaches:
Evaluate circadian timing of therapeutic interventions
Investigate chronotherapeutic strategies targeting NPAS2 pathways
Explore potential of NPAS2 as a biomarker for disease progression or therapeutic response
To investigate NPAS2's protein-protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use NPAS2 antibodies to pull down protein complexes
Probe for interaction partners such as BMAL1 using Western blot
Perform reciprocal Co-IP using BMAL1 antibodies to confirm interactions
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Visualize protein-protein interactions in situ
Quantify interactions in different cellular compartments
Compare interaction patterns across different time points
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC):
Generate fusion constructs of NPAS2 and potential partners with split fluorescent protein fragments
Observe reconstituted fluorescence upon protein interaction
Track interactions in living cells over time
ChIP-reChIP:
Perform sequential ChIP with NPAS2 and BMAL1 antibodies
Identify genomic regions co-occupied by both factors
Compare with single ChIP results to determine unique versus shared binding sites
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Use tandem affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry
Identify novel interaction partners
Characterize post-translational modifications that affect interactions
These approaches can help elucidate how NPAS2 forms heterodimers with BMAL1 to transcriptionally regulate numerous target genes and identify novel interaction partners that may modify NPAS2 function in different cellular contexts.
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with NPAS2 antibodies:
Specificity issues:
Validate antibodies using NPAS2 knockout tissues/cells as negative controls
Perform pre-absorption tests with recombinant NPAS2 protein
Compare results from multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of NPAS2
Cross-reactivity with CLOCK protein:
Due to structural similarities between NPAS2 and CLOCK, carefully select antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Confirm specificity by comparing staining patterns in tissues with known differential expression
Use siRNA knockdown of NPAS2 versus CLOCK to confirm antibody specificity
Variable detection sensitivity:
Optimize fixation and antigen retrieval protocols for each application
Test multiple antibody dilutions and incubation conditions
For low expression tissues, consider signal amplification methods
Temporal expression variations:
Account for circadian expression patterns by collecting samples at consistent timepoints
When comparing samples, ensure they were collected at the same circadian time
Use time-course experiments to capture the full range of expression
Subcellular localization detection:
For accurate quantification of NPAS2 expression:
Immunohistochemistry quantification:
Western blot quantification:
Use appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
Apply densitometric analysis with normalization
Include standard curves with recombinant NPAS2 for absolute quantification
Consider the potential impact of post-translational modifications on antibody binding
qRT-PCR for mRNA quantification:
Digital pathology approaches:
Use automated imaging systems for objective quantification
Apply machine learning algorithms to classify positive cells
Develop tissue-specific thresholds based on control samples
Single-cell analysis:
Apply single-cell RNA-seq to characterize cell-specific expression patterns
Use imaging mass cytometry for simultaneous detection of multiple markers
Correlate NPAS2 expression with cell-type specific markers
Emerging technologies offer significant potential for advancing NPAS2 research:
CRISPR-tagged endogenous NPAS2:
Generate knock-in cell lines expressing tagged NPAS2 at endogenous levels
Avoid artifacts associated with antibody specificity issues
Enable live-cell imaging of NPAS2 dynamics
Single-molecule imaging techniques:
Apply super-resolution microscopy to visualize NPAS2 distribution at the nanoscale
Use single-molecule tracking to monitor NPAS2 movement and interactions
Implement optogenetic approaches to control NPAS2 activity with spatiotemporal precision
Spatial transcriptomics and proteomics:
Map NPAS2 expression and activity across tissue microenvironments
Correlate with disease progression in complex tissues
Identify cell type-specific roles in heterogeneous samples
AI-enhanced image analysis:
Develop deep learning models for automated quantification of NPAS2 immunostaining
Implement multi-parameter analysis to correlate NPAS2 with other markers
Create predictive models linking NPAS2 patterns to disease outcomes
Multiplexed antibody methods:
Apply cyclic immunofluorescence or mass cytometry for simultaneous detection of NPAS2 with dozens of other proteins
Create comprehensive protein interaction networks
Identify context-specific signaling patterns
These technologies could significantly enhance our understanding of NPAS2's role in both normal physiology and disease states, potentially revealing new therapeutic targets and biomarkers.