The NPEPL1 Antibody (Polclonal Antibody, PA5-30821) is a research-grade immunoglobulin designed to detect the aminopeptidase-like 1 (NPEPL1) protein in biological samples. It is primarily used in molecular biology and cancer research to study NPEPL1 expression levels, which are linked to disease progression and therapeutic responses. This antibody is produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific and has been validated for use in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blotting .
NPEPL1 is a metalloprotease involved in peptide degradation and cellular signaling pathways . Its upregulation has been observed in aggressive cancers, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), where it correlates with advanced tumor stages and poor prognosis . The protein interacts with pathways such as cAMP signaling and voltage-gated calcium channels, influencing tumor growth and immune evasion .
The antibody enables researchers to:
Quantify NPEPL1 expression in tumor tissues to assess cancer progression .
Investigate therapeutic responses, such as sensitivity to drugs like cisplatin and axitinib .
Analyze immune microenvironment changes, including regulatory T-cell infiltration linked to NPEPL1 overexpression .
Studies using the NPEPL1 Antibody have revealed:
Prognostic value: High NPEPL1 expression predicts shorter survival in ccRCC patients, with AUC values (1/3/5-year) of 0.659–0.709 .
Therapeutic implications: Patients with elevated NPEPL1 levels show enhanced sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., axitinib) and platinum-based chemotherapeutics .
This antibody is likely to catalyze the removal of unsubstituted N-terminal amino acids from various peptides.
NPEPL1 (Aminopeptidase-Like 1) is a 523 amino acid protein belonging to the peptidase M17 family. It plays a crucial role in processing and degrading intracellular proteins by catalyzing the removal of unsubstituted N-terminal amino acids from various peptides. This function maintains cellular homeostasis and regulates protein turnover, which is essential for various physiological processes, including hormone regulation and metabolic pathways . The protein features several zinc-binding sites important for enzymatic activity and exists in three isoforms due to alternative splicing events, allowing for functional diversity in different cellular contexts .
NPEPL1 antibodies have been validated for multiple applications with varying degrees of efficacy:
| Application | Success Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | High | Most commonly validated application across antibodies |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Good | Particularly effective in cell lines like MCF-7 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Moderate-High | Works well with proper antigen retrieval |
| ELISA | Good | Validated for many commercially available antibodies |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | Limited | Fewer antibodies validated for this application |
For optimal results, researchers should select antibodies specifically validated for their intended application. For instance, Proteintech's 17211-1-AP antibody is validated for WB, IHC, IF/ICC, and ELISA with human, mouse, and rat samples .
Optimal dilutions vary by antibody and application:
| Antibody | Application | Recommended Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| 17211-1-AP (Proteintech) | Western Blot | 1:500-1:1000 |
| 17211-1-AP (Proteintech) | IHC | 1:50-1:500 |
| 17211-1-AP (Proteintech) | IF/ICC | 1:200-1:800 |
| SH-A14081 (Novatein) | Western Blot | 1:100-1000 |
| SH-A14081 (Novatein) | ELISA | 1:500-3000 |
It is strongly recommended to titrate each antibody in your specific experimental system to determine optimal conditions, as sample type and preparation methods can significantly impact antibody performance .
NPEPL1 is ubiquitously expressed across multiple tissue types. Immunohistochemistry studies have successfully detected NPEPL1 in human kidney tissue, suggesting expression in renal tissues . At the cellular level, NPEPL1 has been detected in various cell lines, including HeLa and MCF-7 cells using Western blotting and immunofluorescence techniques . The expression pattern can vary between normal and pathological states, with upregulation observed in certain cancer tissues, particularly clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) .
Studies using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases have revealed significant correlations between NPEPL1 expression and cancer outcomes:
Beyond ccRCC, NPEPL1 has been implicated in prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers, suggesting a broader role in oncogenic processes .
Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses have identified several mechanisms potentially mediated by NPEPL1:
Cellular components: Enrichment in voltage-gated calcium channel complex and immunoglobulin complex .
Molecular functions: Channel activity and passive transmembrane transporter activity .
Signaling pathways: Involvement in cAMP signaling pathway, oxytocin signaling pathway, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and pancreatic secretion pathways .
Biological processes: Detection of external stimulus and detection of abiotic stimulus .
Differential gene expression analysis comparing high and low NPEPL1 expression identified 5,679 differentially expressed genes (5,635 upregulated, 44 downregulated), suggesting NPEPL1 may function within complex gene regulatory networks .
NPEPL1 expression appears to modulate both immune cell infiltration and therapeutic responses:
Immune microenvironment effects:
"CIBERSORT" analysis revealed that elevated NPEPL1 expression correlates with enrichment of regulatory T cells and follicular helper T cells in the tumor microenvironment .
This suggests NPEPL1 may influence immunosuppressive mechanisms within tumors, potentially affecting immunotherapy responses.
Drug sensitivity correlations:
Patients with high NPEPL1 expression demonstrated increased sensitivity to specific therapeutics:
These findings suggest NPEPL1 expression might serve as a biomarker for treatment selection, potentially guiding personalized therapeutic approaches in oncology.
Ensuring antibody specificity presents several methodological challenges:
Cross-reactivity concerns: NPEPL1 belongs to the aminopeptidase family with structural similarities to other family members, increasing the risk of cross-reactivity. Researchers should validate specificity through knockout/knockdown controls.
Isoform detection: NPEPL1 exists in multiple isoforms due to alternative splicing. Confirming which isoforms are detected by a specific antibody requires careful epitope mapping and validation .
Species conservation: NPEPL1 shows high sequence conservation across species (up to 100% identity in many regions by BLAST analysis) . While this facilitates cross-species application, it may complicate distinguishing between orthologues in mixed-species experiments.
Polyreactivity considerations: Recent research on antibody polyreactivity highlights that some antibodies demonstrate broader binding profiles than expected. Evaluating NPEPL1 antibodies for polyreactivity should be considered, especially in complex experimental systems .
For Western Blotting:
Optimal lysis buffers: RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors is generally effective
Recommended protein loading: 20-40 μg total protein per lane
Reduction conditions: Standard DTT or β-mercaptoethanol treatment
Expected molecular weight: ~52 kDa observed (calculated MW: 56 kDa)
For Immunohistochemistry:
Fixation: 10% neutral buffered formalin (24-48 hours)
Antigen retrieval: TE buffer pH 9.0 (primary recommendation) or citrate buffer pH 6.0 (alternative)
Blocking: 3% BSA or 5-10% normal serum matching secondary antibody host
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C for primary antibody
For Immunofluorescence:
Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde (15-20 minutes at room temperature)
Permeabilization: 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 (10 minutes)
Blocking: 5% normal serum with 0.3% Triton X-100
Mounting: Anti-fade mounting medium with DAPI for nuclear counterstain
A comprehensive validation approach should include multiple strategies:
Genetic validation:
siRNA/shRNA knockdown of NPEPL1 followed by Western blot
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines as negative controls
Overexpression systems as positive controls
Biochemical validation:
Pre-adsorption with immunizing peptide/protein
Multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins
Cross-platform validation:
Correlation of protein detection with mRNA expression
Comparison across multiple detection methods (WB, IHC, IF)
Testing in multiple cell lines with known NPEPL1 expression levels
Controls to include:
When selecting a NPEPL1 antibody, researchers should evaluate:
Epitope characteristics:
Location: Different antibodies target distinct regions (e.g., AA 405-454, AA 371-470, N-terminal, C-terminal)
Conservation: Epitopes with 100% identity across species enable cross-species application
Domain specificity: Consider whether specific functional domains need to be targeted
Technical specifications:
Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies offer broader epitope recognition; monoclonal antibodies provide higher specificity
Host species: Choose based on compatibility with experimental system and secondary antibodies
Purification method: Immunoaffinity purified antibodies generally offer higher specificity
Validation extent:
Application-specific validation: Ensure the antibody is validated for your specific application
Publication record: Previously published studies using the antibody provide confidence in performance
Lot-to-lot consistency: Evaluate manufacturer quality control data
Experimental compatibility:
Buffer formulation: Consider compatibility with your experimental system
Storage conditions: Evaluate stability requirements and aliquoting recommendations
Sample type compatibility: Ensure validation in your specific sample type (human, mouse, etc.)
Implementing NPEPL1 antibodies in multiplexed systems requires careful optimization:
For multiplexed immunofluorescence:
Antibody panel design:
Select NPEPL1 antibodies from different host species than other target antibodies
Consider using directly conjugated primary antibodies when possible
Test for cross-reactivity between antibodies in the panel
Sequential staining approach:
When using same-species antibodies, consider tyramide signal amplification
Employ complete antibody stripping between rounds
Validate signal specificity after each round
Spectral considerations:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Include appropriate controls for spectral unmixing
Validate staining patterns with single-color controls
For mass cytometry applications:
Conjugate NPEPL1 antibodies with rare earth metals
Validate signal preservation post-conjugation
Include isotype controls labeled with the same metal
For multiplexed immunohistochemistry:
Optimize chromogen selection for visual discrimination
Consider automated staining platforms for consistency
Validate each antibody independently before multiplexing
Quantitative assessment of NPEPL1 expression should follow these methodological principles:
For immunohistochemistry quantification:
Scoring systems:
H-score: Combines intensity (0-3) and percentage of positive cells
Allred score: Sum of proportion score (0-5) and intensity score (0-3)
Automated image analysis: Software-based quantification of staining intensity and distribution
Standardization approaches:
Include reference control slides in each batch
Use digital scanning for consistent analysis
Employ multiple independent scorers for validation
Cutoff determination:
Establish thresholds for "high" vs. "low" expression based on:
Statistical methods (e.g., receiver operating characteristic curves)
Correlation with clinical outcomes
Comparison with normal tissue expression
For Western blot quantification:
Use proper loading controls (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin)
Employ densitometry with linear dynamic range validation
Present data as relative expression normalized to controls
This analytical approach has been successfully applied to identify the prognostic value of NPEPL1 expression in ccRCC, where increased expression correlates with poorer outcomes across multiple clinical parameters .