The NIT1 Antibody (D-7) is a mouse-derived monoclonal IgG1 κ antibody designed to detect human NIT1. It is widely used in techniques such as western blotting (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), immunofluorescence (IF), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) . NIT1 is a 327-amino-acid protein involved in nitrile metabolism, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation, with roles in suppressing tumorigenesis and modulating immune responses .
NIT1 forms a complex with β-catenin and LEF-1/TCF-4, repressing β-catenin-mediated transcription. Knockdown of NIT1 elevates Wnt target gene expression (e.g., cyclin D1, MMP-14) .
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) confirmed NIT1’s presence on the promoters of Wnt target genes, such as cyclin D1 .
NIT1 is downregulated in CRC tissues, correlating with poor differentiation and serosal invasion. Overexpression inhibits CRC proliferation by inducing G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis .
Mechanism: NIT1 activates the TGFβ–Smad2/3 pathway by recruiting Smad2/3 to TGFβ receptors. SMAD3 further enhances NIT1 transcription, forming a positive feedback loop .
NIT1-deficient T cells exhibit hyperproliferation, elevated activation markers, and accelerated cell cycle progression. Loss of NIT1 reduces Fas- or Ca²⁺-induced apoptosis but does not affect DNA damage-induced apoptosis .
NIT1 (nitrilase-like protein 1) is a highly conserved metabolite repair enzyme found in most eukaryotes. Its primary function is the hydrolysis of deaminated glutathione (dGSH), a form of glutathione where the free amino group has been replaced by a carbonyl group . This repair mechanism is crucial because dGSH can be produced as an undesired byproduct through the side activity of numerous transaminases in cells.
Beyond this metabolic role, NIT1 functions as a tumor suppressor that enhances apoptotic responsiveness in cancer cells. This tumor suppressor activity appears to be additive to that of FHIT (Fragile Histidine Triad protein) . Loss of NIT1 expression promotes cell growth, increases resistance to DNA damage stress, and enhances susceptibility to NMBA-induced tumors. Additionally, NIT1 serves as a negative regulator of primary T-cells, suggesting immunomodulatory functions .
NIT1 antibodies are versatile tools in molecular and cellular research, with applications including:
Western Blot (WB): Detecting NIT1 protein in tissue or cell lysates, typically observed at molecular weights between 32-36 kDa .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Visualizing NIT1 expression patterns in formalin/PFA-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections .
Immunofluorescence/Immunocytochemistry (IF/ICC): Determining subcellular localization of NIT1 protein in cultured cells .
KD/KO Validation Studies: Confirming specificity of antibodies in NIT1 knockout or knockdown models .
The typical dilution ranges for these applications are:
The choice between polyclonal and monoclonal NIT1 antibodies depends on your experimental needs:
Polyclonal NIT1 Antibodies:
Recognize multiple epitopes on the NIT1 protein, often providing stronger signal detection
Particularly useful for applications requiring high sensitivity, such as detecting low-abundance NIT1 in certain tissue types
Commercial options include rabbit polyclonal antibodies (e.g., ab198203, 14380-1-AP) that react with human NIT1
Beneficial for initial screening experiments where signal amplification is desirable
Monoclonal NIT1 Antibodies:
Recognize a single epitope, providing higher specificity but potentially lower sensitivity
Ideal for experiments requiring consistent lot-to-lot reproducibility
Better suited for quantitative analyses and experiments requiring precise epitope targeting
Useful in distinguishing between closely related proteins or specific NIT1 isoforms
For most basic research applications examining expression patterns or protein interactions, polyclonal antibodies may offer sufficient specificity while maximizing detection sensitivity. For advanced applications requiring absolute specificity or quantitative precision, monoclonal antibodies may be preferable.
For optimal Western blot detection of NIT1 protein:
Lysis Buffer Composition:
Standard RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS)
Supplement with protease inhibitors (complete cocktail) to prevent degradation
Add phosphatase inhibitors if investigating potential post-translational modifications
Sample Processing:
Harvest cells at 70-80% confluence or tissue samples (flash-frozen)
Homogenize in ice-cold lysis buffer (1 mL per 10⁷ cells or 100 mg tissue)
Incubate on ice for 30 minutes with occasional vortexing
Centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Collect supernatant and quantify protein concentration
Gel Electrophoresis Parameters:
Load 20-40 μg of protein per lane as demonstrated in published protocols
Use 8% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation near the 32-36 kDa range
Include positive control samples (HepG2, HeLa, or HEK-293T cell lysates)
Transfer and Detection:
Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for NIT1)
Block with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with primary NIT1 antibody (1:500-1:3000 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL detection system
Optimizing IHC for NIT1 across different tissues requires careful attention to several parameters:
Antigen Retrieval Methods:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using TE buffer pH 9.0 is recommended as the primary method
Alternative approach: citrate buffer pH 6.0 if TE buffer yields high background
Pressure cooker retrieval (125°C, 3 minutes) often provides superior results compared to microwave methods
Tissue-Specific Considerations:
Pancreatic tissue: Validated protocols show successful staining using 1:200-1:800 antibody dilution
High-expression tissues (liver, kidney): Use higher dilutions (1:500-1:800)
Low-expression tissues: Lower dilutions (1:100-1:200) may be necessary
Signal Development and Visualization:
Use polymer-HRP detection systems for enhanced sensitivity
Optimize DAB development time (typically 5-10 minutes)
Consider signal amplification systems for tissues with low NIT1 expression
Counterstain with hematoxylin for nuclear contrast (30 seconds to 1 minute)
Controls:
Positive tissue control: Human pancreatic cancer tissue shows reliable NIT1 expression
Negative controls: Primary antibody omission and isotype controls
Validation with RNA expression data from public databases for tissue-specific expression patterns
When encountering inconsistent results with NIT1 antibodies, consider these troubleshooting strategies:
For Western Blotting Issues:
Multiple bands: May indicate protein degradation (add fresh protease inhibitors), post-translational modifications, or non-specific binding (increase blocking or antibody dilution)
Weak signal: Increase protein loading (40-60 μg), reduce antibody dilution, or extend exposure time
No signal: Verify protein transfer efficiency, antibody activity, and positive control samples
High background: Increase washing steps, use higher antibody dilutions, or switch to alternative blocking agents
For IHC/IF Challenges:
Weak staining: Optimize antigen retrieval, reduce antibody dilution, or extend incubation time
Non-specific staining: Increase blocking time/concentration, optimize antibody dilution, or try alternative secondary antibodies
Variable results across experiments: Standardize fixation times, processing protocols, and maintain consistent antibody lots
Antibody Validation Approaches:
Confirm antibody specificity using NIT1 knockout or knockdown models
Compare results across multiple NIT1 antibodies targeting different epitopes
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Perform peptide competition assays to confirm binding specificity
NIT1 has established tumor suppressor properties, making its study valuable in cancer research. Advanced applications of NIT1 antibodies in cancer studies include:
Tissue Microarray (TMA) Analysis:
Use NIT1 antibodies with IHC on TMAs containing multiple cancer types and matched normal tissues
Quantify expression differences using digital image analysis software
Correlate expression levels with clinical parameters, staging, and patient outcomes
Cell Line Panels and Functional Studies:
Screen cancer cell line panels using Western blot to identify NIT1 expression patterns across different cancer types
Combine with proliferation, migration, and invasion assays following NIT1 manipulation
Use immunofluorescence to track NIT1 subcellular localization changes in response to treatments
Mechanistic Studies:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation with NIT1 antibodies to identify binding partners in normal vs. cancer cells
Use chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to investigate potential transcriptional regulatory roles
Examine post-translational modifications of NIT1 in different cancer contexts
Clinical Correlations:
Develop tissue microarray analysis workflows that correlate NIT1 expression with:
Patient survival data
Response to specific therapies
Metastatic potential
Tumor molecular subtypes
Recent research has revealed that NIT1 functions as a deaminated glutathione amidase, representing an important metabolite repair mechanism . To investigate this function:
Metabolic Flux Analysis:
Use NIT1 antibodies to confirm expression or knockout in cell models before conducting metabolomic studies
Combine with mass spectrometry to measure deaminated glutathione accumulation in NIT1-deficient models
Track cellular antioxidant status in relation to NIT1 expression levels
Enzyme Activity Assays:
Immunoprecipitate NIT1 using specific antibodies for in vitro activity assays
Measure conversion of deaminated glutathione to its products
Assess the impact of potential inhibitors or enhancers on enzyme activity
Subcellular Localization Studies:
Use confocal microscopy with NIT1 antibodies and organelle markers to determine precise subcellular localization
Track potential translocation under oxidative stress conditions
Correlate localization with metabolic function through fractionation studies
The available data indicates that NIT1 knockout models accumulate deaminated glutathione, confirming its metabolite repair function . This represents a crucial cellular mechanism to prevent the accumulation of potentially harmful modified metabolites.
Conflicting results between different NIT1 antibodies can arise from several factors:
Epitope Differences and Accessibility:
Different antibodies target distinct epitopes that may be differentially exposed in various experimental conditions
Some epitopes may be masked by protein-protein interactions or conformational changes
Others may be modified by post-translational modifications in specific cellular contexts
Validation Approach for Resolving Conflicts:
Multi-antibody comparison: Test multiple antibodies targeting different NIT1 epitopes in parallel
Cross-validation with orthogonal methods: Correlate antibody results with mRNA expression (RT-qPCR) or tagged overexpression systems
Specificity controls: Use NIT1 knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Peptide competition: Perform blocking experiments with immunizing peptides
Systematic Evaluation Table for Conflicting Antibody Results:
| Experimental Scenario | Possible Explanation | Validation Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody A shows signal, Antibody B doesn't | Epitope B may be masked or modified | Denaturing vs. native conditions comparison |
| Different subcellular localization patterns | Epitope accessibility in specific compartments | Co-localization with GFP-tagged NIT1 |
| Discrepant molecular weights | Post-translational modifications, alternative splicing | Mass spectrometry validation |
| Inconsistent expression patterns across tissues | Tissue-specific isoforms or modifications | RNA-seq correlation, isoform-specific primers |
NIT1 has been identified as a negative regulator of primary T-cells , suggesting immunomodulatory functions that merit investigation:
Co-immunoprecipitation Studies:
Use NIT1 antibodies to pull down protein complexes from T-cell lysates
Identify binding partners through mass spectrometry
Validate interactions using reverse co-IP and proximity ligation assays
T-cell Functional Assays:
Use flow cytometry with NIT1 antibodies to correlate expression levels with T-cell activation markers
Compare NIT1 expression in different T-cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+, Tregs)
Examine expression changes during T-cell activation, differentiation, and exhaustion
Analysis of Signaling Pathways:
Combine NIT1 immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies against key T-cell signaling molecules
Track NIT1 expression changes following cytokine stimulation or TCR engagement
Investigate the impact of NIT1 knockdown on T-cell signaling cascades
In vivo Immunological Studies:
Utilize NIT1 antibodies for flow cytometry and IHC analysis of immune cell infiltrates in tumor models
Compare NIT1 expression in tumor-infiltrating vs. peripheral T-cells
Correlate NIT1 levels with markers of T-cell functionality and exhaustion
While standard applications for NIT1 antibodies include WB, IHC, and IF/ICC, adapting them for flow cytometry requires specific optimizations:
Cell Preparation and Fixation:
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (10 minutes at room temperature)
Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100 or commercial permeabilization buffers
For intracellular staining, saponin-based buffers (0.1-0.5%) may provide better epitope accessibility
Antibody Staining Protocol:
Block with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes
Incubate with primary NIT1 antibody (starting at 1:50-1:100 dilution)
Wash 3× with PBS containing 0.5% BSA
Incubate with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody
Include proper compensation controls if performing multi-color analysis
Validation and Controls:
Include NIT1 knockout/knockdown controls
Use isotype control antibodies at the same concentration
Compare expression patterns with known NIT1-expressing cell lines (HepG2, HeLa, HEK-293T)
Consider direct conjugation of validated NIT1 antibodies for multi-color panels
Optimization Considerations:
Titrate antibody concentrations to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Test different fixation and permeabilization protocols if initial results are suboptimal
For cell sorting applications, limit fixation time to preserve viability
Various experimental conditions can significantly impact NIT1 detection, requiring specific protocol adaptations:
Stress Conditions and Expression Changes:
Oxidative stress may alter NIT1 expression and localization due to its role in glutathione metabolism
Nutrient deprivation can affect metabolic enzyme expression patterns
DNA damaging agents may induce changes in NIT1 levels due to its tumor suppressor function
Protocol Modifications Table:
| Experimental Condition | Expected Impact | Recommended Protocol Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Oxidative stress treatments | Potential upregulation and relocalization | Shorter fixation times, gentler permeabilization |
| Apoptosis induction | Possible protein cleavage | Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes |
| Growth factor stimulation | Expression level changes | Include time-course analysis |
| Hypoxic conditions | Altered metabolism affecting NIT1 function | Compare normoxic vs. hypoxic detection methods |
| In vivo tissue analysis | Complex microenvironment effects | Optimize tissue collection and fixation times |
Sample Processing Considerations:
For tissues with high protease activity, increase protease inhibitor concentration
In metabolic studies, rapid sample processing is critical to preserve native modifications
When studying NIT1 in relation to redox status, consider non-reducing gel conditions
For subcellular fractionation studies, verify fraction purity with compartment-specific markers
Advanced Analytical Approaches:
Combine NIT1 antibody detection with functional metabolic assays
Use quantitative image analysis for precise localization studies
Consider proximity ligation assays for detecting NIT1-protein interactions in situ
Multiplex immunofluorescence can provide valuable insights into NIT1's interactions with other metabolic enzymes and its subcellular distribution:
Multiplex Panel Design:
NIT1 + glutathione metabolism enzymes (GST, GR, GPx)
NIT1 + mitochondrial markers to assess metabolic compartmentalization
NIT1 + oxidative stress markers to correlate with cellular damage
Technical Considerations:
Use tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for detecting low-abundance NIT1
Employ sequential staining protocols to avoid antibody cross-reactivity
Include proper spectral unmixing controls
Optimize antibody stripping protocols between rounds if using sequential staining
Analysis Approaches:
Utilize advanced image analysis software for colocalization quantification
Perform single-cell analysis of expression correlations
Develop tissue segmentation algorithms to distinguish cell types in complex tissues
Multiplex imaging can reveal whether NIT1 colocalizes with deaminated glutathione production sites or with downstream metabolic pathways, providing functional insights beyond simple expression analysis.
Comprehensive validation of new NIT1 antibodies requires a multi-faceted approach:
Essential Validation Steps:
Genetic Models: Test antibody in NIT1 knockout/knockdown systems
Overexpression Systems: Examine detection in cells overexpressing tagged NIT1
Peptide Competition: Confirm specificity by pre-absorbing antibody with immunizing peptide
Cross-species Reactivity: Test on samples from multiple species if claiming multi-species reactivity
Multi-application Testing: Evaluate performance across WB, IHC, IF/ICC, and IP applications
Advanced Validation Approaches:
Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins
Epitope mapping to precisely define the binding site
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics and affinity
Comparison with established commercial antibodies
Validation Data Presentation Format:
| Validation Method | Expected Result | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Western blot in NIT1-KO cell line | No band at 32-36 kDa | Complete absence of target band |
| Overexpression system | Increased band intensity | >3-fold signal increase |
| Peptide competition | Signal reduction | >80% reduction in signal intensity |
| Mass spectrometry | NIT1 peptide identification | >2 unique peptides with high confidence |
| Cross-application correlation | Consistent expression patterns | Concordant results across ≥3 applications |
NIT1's dual role in metabolite repair and tumor suppression positions it at the intersection of metabolism and cancer biology:
Translational Research Applications:
Use tissue microarrays with NIT1 antibodies to analyze expression across cancer progression stages
Correlate NIT1 expression with metabolic biomarkers in patient samples
Develop prognostic scoring systems incorporating NIT1 status
Mechanistic Investigation Approaches:
Map NIT1 interaction networks in normal vs. cancer cells using antibody-based proteomics
Analyze post-translational modifications of NIT1 in response to metabolic stress
Investigate feedback mechanisms between metabolite levels and NIT1 expression
Examine NIT1's role in DNA damage response pathways
Therapeutic Implications:
Screen for compounds that modulate NIT1 expression or activity
Investigate synthetic lethality approaches in NIT1-deficient cancers
Develop combination strategies targeting metabolic vulnerabilities in NIT1-altered tumors
Biomarker Development Pipeline:
Standardize quantitative IHC protocols for NIT1 detection in clinical samples
Correlate expression patterns with treatment responses
Integrate with other metabolic and proliferative markers for comprehensive profiling
This integrated approach can help elucidate how metabolic repair defects contribute to cancer development and identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in tumors with altered NIT1 function.