NTPCR is significantly upregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tissues compared to para-cancerous tissues (p < 0.01) .
SKOV3 and OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cell lines show elevated NTPCR levels versus normal ovarian epithelial cells (IOSE80) .
RNA sequencing identified STAT1 and OAS2 as hub genes in NTPCR-regulated pathways .
Integrative metabolomic analysis linked NTPCR to bile acid biosynthesis and glucuronate metabolism .
NTPCR antibodies require rigorous validation to ensure specificity and minimize off-target effects. Key steps include:
Tissue Cross-Reactivity (TCR) Studies: Testing at multiple concentrations to distinguish high-affinity binding from non-specific interactions .
Controls: Use of isotype-matched antibodies and blocking peptides to confirm signal specificity .
NTPCR’s tumor-suppressive role in ovarian cancer suggests therapeutic potential. Overexpression inhibits oncogenic processes, making it a candidate for:
Biomarker development for early cancer detection.
Gene therapy targeting NTPCR-deficient tumors.
NTPCR Antibody exhibits nucleotide phosphatase activity towards ATP, GTP, CTP, TTP, and UTP. It hydrolyzes nucleoside diphosphates with lower efficiency.
# NTPCR Antibody Research FAQs
Comprehensive guidance for academic researchers, organized by complexity and methodological focus
Discrepancies arise from epitope-specific binding or post-translational modifications. A systematic approach:
Epitope mapping: Compare immunogen sequences (e.g., Boster’s AA 141–190 vs. Bio-Techne’s C-terminal region ).
Experimental design:
Data integration:
For large-scale studies (e.g., tumor biomarker screening):
Multi-modal validation:
Computational tools:
While NTPCR is overexpressed in tumors, its cytotoxicity is not linked to enzymatic activity but may involve alternative mechanisms (e.g., stress response modulation) . Experimental approaches:
Functional studies:
Knockdown: Use siRNA/shRNA to assess phenotypic changes.
Enzyme inhibition: Compare outcomes with catalytically inactive mutants.
Proteomic analysis: Identify interacting partners using immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry.
Common causes and solutions:
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Endogenous biotin/avidin | Use BSA-free blocking buffers . |
| Tissue fixation artifacts | Optimize antigen retrieval (e.g., citrate buffer). |
| Cross-reactivity | Pre-incubate with blocking peptide . |
Experimental workflow:
Negative control: NTPCR KO cells.
Positive control: WT or overexpressing cells.
Detection: WB/IHC with antibody and secondary.
Data analysis:
Signal-to-noise ratio: Calculate SNR = (KO signal - background) / (WT signal - background).
Acceptable SNR: <0.1 for true negativity.
For therapeutic monitoring or biomarker studies:
Calibration standards: Use recombinant NTPCR protein (e.g., NP_115700.1 ).
Mass spectrometry integration:
Co-localization studies:
IHC: Stain NTPCR alongside markers of immune infiltration (e.g., CD8, PD-L1).
IF: Use secondary antibodies with distinct fluorophores.
Functional assays:
T cell co-culture: Assess NTPCR’s impact on T cell activation/proliferation.
CRISPR screening: Identify downstream targets of NTPCR.
5. Emerging Applications 5.1 Can NTPCR antibodies be adapted for novel detection platforms? Yes, with modifications:
Biosensors: Conjugate antibodies to nanobodies or aptamers for real-time detection.
Flow cytometry: Use fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies .
Challenges:
Stability: Ensure antibody conformational integrity post-labeling.
Sensitivity: Optimize antigen density for signal detection.
6. Data Analysis and Interpretation 6.1 How should I handle conflicting NTPCR expression data across antibody suppliers?
Meta-analysis:
Normalize data: Express as fold-change relative to controls.
Statistical testing: Use ANOVA to compare across studies.
Epigenetic factors: Consider sample fixation, processing times, and tissue heterogeneity.
7. Ethical and Safety Considerations 7.1 What safety protocols are required for NTPCR antibody handling?