OCT4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
OCT4 antibody; 4-Oct antibody; At3g20660 antibody; F3H11.5 antibody; Organic cation/carnitine transporter 4 antibody; AtOCT4 antibody
Target Names
OCT4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets the high-affinity carnitine transporter, which plays a crucial role in the active cellular uptake of carnitine. It also transports organic cations.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G20660

STRING: 3702.AT3G20660.1

UniGene: At.50209

Protein Families
Major facilitator (TC 2.A.1) superfamily, Organic cation transporter (TC 2.A.1.19) family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Mostly expressed in siliques, and, to a lower extent, in stems, leaves, flowers and siliques. Present in pollen. In the stems of secondary inflorescences present in the phloem cells and xylem parenchyma cells.

Q&A

What is OCT4 and why is it important as a research target?

OCT4 (Octamer-binding transcription factor 4) is a protein encoded by the human gene POU5F1 (POU class 5 homeobox 1). It functions as a critical transcription factor with a molecular weight of approximately 38,571 daltons and belongs to the POU transcription factor family, Class-5 subfamily . OCT4 is widely recognized as a pluripotent stem cell marker, with its expression being highly regulated during embryonic development. The protein is abundantly expressed in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and becomes downregulated during differentiation processes. Experimental knockdown of OCT4 in embryonic stem cells reliably triggers differentiation, confirming its essential role in maintaining pluripotency . Because of these characteristics, OCT4 antibodies are invaluable tools for identifying and characterizing pluripotent stem cell populations in various research applications.

How can I reliably distinguish between OCT4 isoforms in my experiments?

Distinguishing between OCT4 isoforms requires careful methodological considerations at both RNA and protein detection levels:

For RNA detection:

  • Design primers specifically targeting unique regions of each isoform, particularly exon 1 for OCT4A which is absent in OCT4B and OCT4B1

  • Include appropriate controls in each experiment: positive controls (human embryonic stem cells or embryonic carcinoma cell lines) and negative controls (human adult fibroblast cells)

  • Consider restriction digestion approaches: OCT4A contains unique ApaI and Tsp45I restriction sites in exon 1 not present in pseudogenes or other splice variants

  • Implement DNase treatment of RNA samples to eliminate genomic DNA contamination

For protein detection:

  • Select antibodies recognizing epitopes in the N-terminal region to distinguish OCT4A from other isoforms

  • Use multiple antibodies targeting different regions to confirm specificity

  • Employ Western blot analysis to verify the molecular weight of detected proteins, as OCT4A and OCT4B isoforms have different molecular weights

What validation steps should I include when using OCT4 antibodies?

Comprehensive validation of OCT4 antibodies should include:

  • Verification of specificity using known positive controls (embryonic stem cells) and negative controls (fully differentiated cells)

  • Testing for cross-reactivity with related proteins or unrelated proteins of similar size

  • Confirmation of results using multiple detection methods (e.g., immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry)

  • Validation of antibody performance in the specific application and experimental conditions

  • Knockdown or knockout controls to confirm antibody specificity by demonstrating reduced or absent signal in OCT4-depleted samples

  • Assessment of antibody reactivity across species if planning cross-species experiments

Remember that antibodies detecting OCT4 protein isoforms may recognize the identical C-terminal region but differ in their ability to detect the distinct N-terminal regions . This distinction is crucial for accurate identification of specific isoforms.

How should I design experiments to minimize false positives when detecting OCT4?

False positive OCT4 detection is a significant concern that can arise from multiple sources, including pseudogene amplification, non-specific antibody binding, and failure to distinguish between isoforms. To minimize these issues:

For RT-PCR and qPCR:

  • Design primers spanning exon-exon junctions specific to the target isoform

  • Include no-RT controls to detect genomic DNA contamination

  • Use restriction enzyme digestion methods to distinguish OCT4A from pseudogenes

  • Sequence amplification products to confirm identity

  • Include positive and negative tissue/cell controls in each experiment

For protein detection:

  • Use antibodies validated for the specific application and target isoform

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls

  • Verify results using complementary techniques (e.g., Western blot and immunofluorescence)

  • Optimize antibody dilutions and detection methods for each experimental system

  • Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm results

What are the best applications for different types of OCT4 antibodies?

OCT4 antibodies vary in their optimal applications based on their properties and the epitopes they recognize:

ApplicationRecommended Antibody TypeKey Considerations
Western BlotAntibodies validated for denatured proteinsVerify molecular weight matches expected isoform
ImmunocytochemistryAntibodies detecting native epitopesConfirm nuclear localization pattern for OCT4A
Flow CytometryDirectly conjugated antibodiesOptimize fixation and permeabilization protocols
ChIP AssaysHigh-affinity antibodies to native epitopesValidate specificity in IP applications first
ImmunohistochemistryAntibodies validated for fixed tissuesUse appropriate antigen retrieval methods

Based on user reviews, some OCT4 antibodies work particularly well for specific applications. For example, one review noted that GeneTex's antibody performed excellently for detecting OCT4 expression in iPSCs by immunocytochemistry analysis . Another review mentioned that Novus Biologicals' antibody was perfect for detecting Oct4 expression by Western blot .

How do I address inconsistent results when using OCT4 antibodies?

Inconsistent results with OCT4 antibodies can stem from several sources:

  • Antibody quality: Different lots may have varying performance; validate each new lot

  • Sample preparation: Inconsistent fixation or protein extraction methods can affect epitope accessibility

  • Pseudogene interference: In PCR-based detection, pseudogene amplification can create false positives

  • Isoform specificity: Different antibodies may recognize different isoforms

  • Technical variables: Changes in incubation times, temperatures, or buffer compositions can impact results

Troubleshooting approaches:

  • Thoroughly validate each new antibody lot with appropriate positive and negative controls

  • Standardize all experimental protocols and conditions

  • Use multiple detection methods to confirm results

  • Consider the specific OCT4 isoform being targeted and ensure antibody specificity

  • Sequence amplicons from PCR-based methods to verify identity

How can I interpret conflicting OCT4 expression data in somatic tissues?

Conflicting reports of OCT4 expression in somatic tissues represent a significant challenge in the field. These discrepancies may arise from:

  • Detection of different OCT4 isoforms: While OCT4A is primarily associated with pluripotent cells, OCT4B or OCT4B1 may be expressed in some somatic cells

  • Pseudogene amplification: OCT4 pseudogenes can be amplified by PCR if primers are not specific enough

  • Non-specific antibody binding: Some antibodies may cross-react with unrelated proteins

  • Technical variations: Differences in detection sensitivity between methods

To properly interpret such data:

  • Verify which isoform is being detected using isoform-specific approaches

  • Employ multiple independent detection methods

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls

  • Consider the biological relevance of the detected expression through functional assays

The literature indicates significant controversy regarding OCT4 expression in somatic tissues, with some reports suggesting expression in somatic stem cells, tumor cells, and differentiated cells, while others argue these are false positives .

How do I design experiments to investigate functions of specific OCT4 isoforms?

Investigating isoform-specific functions requires sophisticated experimental approaches:

  • Isoform-specific knockdown: Design siRNAs targeting unique regions of each isoform

  • Overexpression studies: Express individual isoforms in appropriate cell systems

  • Domain-specific mutagenesis: Modify specific functional domains to assess their contribution

  • Subcellular localization analysis: Determine whether different isoforms localize to different cellular compartments

  • Interaction partner identification: Use co-immunoprecipitation with isoform-specific antibodies to identify unique binding partners

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation: Identify genomic binding sites specific to each isoform

When designing these experiments, it's essential to verify isoform specificity at each step using the validation methods discussed previously, as cross-reactivity or inadvertent detection of other isoforms can lead to misinterpretation of results.

What emerging technologies are enhancing OCT4 detection and functional analysis?

Several cutting-edge technologies are advancing our ability to study OCT4:

  • Single-cell gene expression analysis: Allows assessment of OCT4 isoform expression at the individual cell level

  • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: Enables precise modification of OCT4 gene loci to study isoform-specific functions

  • Proximity labeling techniques: Identify proteins interacting with specific OCT4 isoforms in their native cellular context

  • Advanced imaging approaches: Super-resolution microscopy provides detailed visualization of OCT4 subcellular localization

  • Proteomics: Mass spectrometry-based approaches can definitively identify OCT4 isoforms and post-translational modifications

  • Structural biology: Cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography provide insights into structural differences between isoforms

These technologies require careful experimental design and often benefit from the use of multiple complementary approaches to ensure reliable results.

How can I ensure reproducibility in OCT4 antibody-based experiments?

Ensuring reproducibility in OCT4 research requires:

  • Detailed documentation of antibody information: catalog number, lot number, host species, clonality, and epitope information

  • Comprehensive reporting of experimental conditions: sample preparation methods, antibody dilutions, incubation times, and detection systems

  • Inclusion of appropriate controls in each experiment

  • Validation across multiple biological replicates

  • Verification using complementary techniques

  • Transparent reporting of all results, including negative findings

The scientific community has emphasized the importance of discriminating OCT4 isoforms to avoid confusions in stem cell research, yet this issue is still not well recognized in many studies . Researchers should be particularly cautious when interpreting OCT4 expression in contexts outside embryonic stem cells.

What reference standards should I use when working with OCT4 antibodies?

Appropriate reference standards for OCT4 antibody experiments include:

  • Positive controls: Human embryonic stem cells or embryonic carcinoma cell lines are ideal positive controls for OCT4A expression

  • Negative controls: Human adult fibroblast cells are recommended as negative controls

  • Expression vectors: Cells transfected with expression vectors for specific OCT4 isoforms

  • Knockout/knockdown samples: Cells with targeted depletion of OCT4 serve as specificity controls

When selecting commercial antibodies, consider those with extensive validation data across multiple applications. The market currently offers at least 623 OCT4 antibodies across 28 suppliers, with varying applications, species reactivity, and conjugate options .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.