LTA2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Lymphotoxin-alpha Antibodies

Lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA) antibodies represent a class of immunological research tools designed for the detection and characterization of LTA, also known as tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNF-beta). LTA functions as a cytokine with significant roles in immune regulation and inflammatory responses. The antibodies targeting this protein are valuable for investigating cytokine-mediated immune pathways in various experimental contexts .

LTA antibodies are available in multiple formats, targeting different epitopes and amino acid regions of the Lymphotoxin-alpha protein. These antibodies have been developed using various host organisms and exhibit different specificities and applications, making them versatile tools for immunological research .

Biological Functions

LTA is primarily produced by lymphocytes and demonstrates cytotoxic properties against a wide range of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Its involvement in immune system regulation makes it a target of interest for immunological and oncological research. Understanding the molecular interactions of LTA provides valuable insights into its role in inflammatory responses and potential therapeutic applications .

Epitope Targeting and Antibody Formats

Based on the available data, LTA antibodies target various amino acid sequences within the LTA protein, including:

  • AA 53-172 region (ABIN2904372)

  • Pro36 - Leu205 range (OACD07862)

  • Multiple other epitope targets including AA 49-202, AA 36-205, AA 46-72, AA 39-281, and others

This diversity in epitope targeting allows researchers to select antibodies specific to their regions of interest within the LTA protein.

Host Organisms and Antibody Types

LTA antibodies are primarily produced in rabbit hosts, resulting in polyclonal antibodies, though some monoclonal variants from mouse hosts are also available. The polyclonal nature of many LTA antibodies provides broad epitope recognition, while monoclonal variants offer higher specificity for particular epitopes .

Applications and Usage Guidelines

LTA antibodies demonstrate versatility across multiple experimental techniques, making them valuable tools for immunological research.

Experimental Applications

The research data indicates that LTA antibodies are validated for multiple applications including:

  • Western Blotting (WB): For protein detection in cell and tissue lysates

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For protein localization in tissue sections

  • Immunohistochemistry-Paraffin (IHC-P): For fixed paraffin-embedded samples

  • Immunocytochemistry (ICC): For cellular localization studies

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): For visualization of protein distribution

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP): For protein isolation and purification

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative protein detection

  • Flow Cytometry (FACS): For cell population analysis

Recommended Dilutions and Working Concentrations

ApplicationRecommended Dilution
Western Blotting1:50-1:400
Immunocytochemistry1:50-1:500
Immunohistochemistry (frozen)1:50-1:500
Immunohistochemistry (paraffin)1:10-1:100
ELISA1:100-1:5,000

Optimal working dilutions should be determined empirically by each researcher based on their specific experimental conditions and samples .

Research Findings on Toll-like Receptor Involvement

While the search results don't contain extensive data on research findings using LTA antibodies specifically, they do provide valuable information about LTA in the context of Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation, which is relevant to understanding the biological functions that these antibodies help investigate.

TLR2 and TLR4 Dependency

Research has demonstrated that lipoteichoic acid (a different type of LTA than lymphotoxin-alpha, but one that shares the acronym) stimulates macrophages in a process that requires both TLR2 and TLR4. This stimulation is enhanced by hemoglobin (Hb), resulting in a temporal response pattern with distinct phases of cytokine secretion .

Temporal Phases of Macrophage Response

The macrophage response to LTA-Hb mixtures can be divided into two phases:

  • Early phase (up to 6 hours): TLR4-independent and primarily mediated by TLR2

  • Late phase (after 6 hours): Requires both TLR2 and TLR4 for optimal cytokine secretion

This biphasic response suggests a complex interplay between TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathways in mediating macrophage responses to LTA stimulation .

Implications for Immunological Research

These findings highlight the importance of understanding receptor-ligand interactions in innate immune responses. LTA antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating these interactions and characterizing the molecular mechanisms underlying cytokine secretion in response to various stimuli .

Current Limitations and Challenges

While LTA antibodies offer valuable insights into cytokine-mediated immune responses, several challenges remain in their application:

  • Optimization of working conditions for specific experimental setups

  • Validation across different species and sample types

  • Integration of findings from different experimental approaches

Future Research Opportunities

Future research utilizing LTA antibodies may focus on:

  • Elucidating the specific signaling pathways activated by LTA in different cell types

  • Investigating the therapeutic potential of targeting LTA-mediated processes

  • Developing improved antibodies with enhanced specificity and sensitivity for detecting LTA in complex biological samples

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
LTA2 antibody; At3g25860 antibody; MPE11.1 antibody; Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component 4 of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex antibody; chloroplastic antibody; EC 2.3.1.12 antibody; Dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase component 4 of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex antibody; Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex component E2 4 antibody; PDC-E2 4 antibody; PDCE2 4 antibody; plE2 antibody
Target Names
LTA2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex catalyzes the overall conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and CO2. It comprises multiple copies of three enzymatic components: pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1), dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase (E2), and lipoamide dehydrogenase (E3).
Gene References Into Functions
  1. The A. thaliana plastidial E2 subunit incorporates a single lipoyl-prosthetic group covalently attached to Lys96. PMID: 21798751
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G25860

STRING: 3702.AT3G25860.1

UniGene: At.23227

Protein Families
2-oxoacid dehydrogenase family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast stroma.

Q&A

What is the molecular target of LTA2 antibodies in autoimmune research?

LTA2 antibodies are designed to target lymphotoxin-α (LT-α) expressed by pathogenic T cells. These antibodies specifically recognize and bind to LT-α1β2 complexes present on the surface of activated T cells. Unlike conventional neutralizing antibodies, LTA2 antibodies work by stably binding to surface-expressed LT-α1β2, marking these cells for clearance through a process known as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This novel mechanism allows for selective targeting of specific pathogenic T cell populations while leaving beneficial immune components largely intact .

How do LTA2 antibodies achieve selective T cell targeting?

LTA2 antibodies achieve selective targeting through differential expression patterns of LT-α1β2 on T cell subsets. Research has confirmed that TH1 and TH17 cells express significantly higher levels of LT-α1β2 on their surface compared to other T cell populations, and importantly, they maintain this expression during their production of inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-17. In contrast, TH2 cells express lower levels of LT-α1β2 and rapidly downregulate this expression after activation. This expression pattern enables LTA2 antibodies to preferentially target the TH1 and TH17 cells implicated in autoimmune pathology while sparing regulatory T cells and TH2 cells .

What distinguishes LTA2 antibodies from other immunotherapeutic approaches?

The distinguishing feature of LTA2 antibodies lies in their unique mechanism of action. Unlike conventional approaches that broadly suppress immune function or block cytokines:

  • They tag specific cell populations (TH1 and TH17) for elimination rather than simply neutralizing cytokines

  • They preserve the interaction between LT-α1β2 and its receptor (LTβR), maintaining lymphoid tissue architecture and function

  • They selectively deplete pathogenic T cells while sparing regulatory T cells and other beneficial immune components

  • They avoid the collateral damage to lymphoid structures seen with LTβR fusion proteins

These properties potentially allow for more targeted intervention in autoimmune diseases with fewer systemic immunosuppressive effects compared to existing therapies .

What are the optimal methods for evaluating LTA2 antibody specificity in experimental models?

When evaluating LTA2 antibody specificity, researchers should implement a multi-faceted approach:

  • Flow cytometry analysis comparing binding to different T cell subsets (TH1, TH2, TH17, Tregs) under both resting and activated conditions

  • ELISA and biolayer interferometry to quantify binding affinity and specificity for LT-α1β2 versus other configurations

  • Confocal imaging to visualize antibody localization in target tissues

  • Functional assays measuring cytotoxicity against target versus non-target cell populations

  • Ex vivo testing using primary cells from both disease models and controls

The gold standard approach involves parallel testing in multiple disease models, such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), comparing efficacy to established therapies such as anti-TNF-α. Critical controls must include testing against cells lacking LT-α expression and using antibody variants with mutations that prevent phagocytosis to confirm mechanism specificity .

How should researchers design experiments to distinguish antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity from cytokine neutralization effects?

To properly distinguish between antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and direct cytokine neutralization effects, researchers should:

  • Generate modified antibody variants with intact binding but impaired Fc-mediated functions

  • Compare wild-type antibodies with Fc-mutated variants that retain antigen binding but lack ability to induce phagocytosis

  • Perform depletion studies measuring T cell populations before and after treatment

  • Conduct in vitro phagocytosis assays with labeled target cells and appropriate macrophage populations

  • Implement adoptive transfer experiments using labeled pathogenic T cells to track their clearance

Research has demonstrated that mutations in LTA2 antibodies that prevent phagocytosis render the antibody therapeutically ineffective despite maintaining binding to soluble LT-α3, confirming that cell depletion rather than cytokine neutralization is the primary mechanism of action .

What protocols are recommended for developing TCR-like antibodies targeting intracellular antigens?

Developing TCR-like antibodies requires specialized techniques to identify antibodies recognizing peptide-MHC complexes. A recommended protocol includes:

  • Screening large human scFv phage libraries (>10^11 diversity) against purified peptide-MHC complexes

  • Multi-stage selection with increasing stringency to identify high-affinity binders

  • Validation of specificity using cells with matched or mismatched HLA types

  • Characterization of binding kinetics using techniques like biolayer interferometry

  • Functional validation through cytotoxicity assays and in vivo tumor models

This approach has been successfully applied to develop antibodies against cancer-testis antigens like NY-ESO-1 presented by HLA-A*02:01, resulting in antibodies that can be further engineered into chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for T cell therapy. The method expands the repertoire of targetable antigens beyond surface proteins to include intracellular proteins presented as peptide-MHC complexes .

How can LTA2 antibodies be engineered for enhanced efficacy in autoimmune disease models?

Advanced engineering of LTA2 antibodies can significantly enhance their therapeutic efficacy through several strategies:

  • Fc engineering to optimize ADCC activity while minimizing complement activation

  • Affinity maturation to increase binding specificity for pathogenic T cell subsets

  • Glycoengineering to enhance interaction with Fcγ receptors on phagocytes

  • Development of bispecific formats targeting both LT-α and a second disease-relevant marker

  • Incorporation of payload-delivery capabilities for targeted drug delivery

Recent research indicates that optimizing the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mechanism is crucial, as studies with phagocytosis-deficient antibody variants showed dramatically reduced therapeutic efficacy despite maintained target binding. Additionally, engineering approaches that preserve the LT-α1β2/LTβR interaction have demonstrated superior outcomes by maintaining lymphoid tissue architecture compared to approaches that disrupt this interaction .

What are the current challenges in translating LTA2 antibody therapy from animal models to human clinical applications?

Translating LTA2 antibody therapy to human applications faces several significant challenges:

  • Species-specific differences in LT-α expression patterns between mouse models and humans

  • Potential immunogenicity of humanized or fully human antibodies in clinical settings

  • Complexity in predicting optimal dosing schedules for sustained T cell subset depletion

  • Need for biomarkers to identify patients most likely to respond to therapy

  • Potential for unexpected effects on tertiary lymphoid structures in human tissues

Researchers must address these challenges through thorough preclinical validation using humanized mouse models and ex vivo human tissue studies. Additionally, comprehensive safety profiling is essential to determine potential risks of compromised immunity against specific pathogens. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate whether persistent depletion of TH1 and TH17 cells might lead to unexpected consequences for host defense or tissue homeostasis .

How can single-cell sequencing technologies enhance the development of next-generation LTA2 antibodies?

Single-cell sequencing technologies offer transformative opportunities for LTA2 antibody development through:

  • Precise characterization of LT-α expression heterogeneity across T cell subpopulations

  • Identification of co-expressed markers that could enable more selective targeting

  • Analysis of transcriptional changes in response to antibody treatment

  • Dissection of resistance mechanisms in non-responding cell populations

  • Discovery of novel subtypes of pathogenic T cells for targeted intervention

Implementing integrated single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing can reveal the relationships between T cell clonality, LT-α expression, and disease pathogenesis. This approach has been successfully applied in studying tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer, where researchers identified highly clonal immunoglobulin production relevant to disease outcomes. Similar approaches could revolutionize autoimmune disease therapy by enabling precision targeting of disease-driving T cell populations .

How does LTA2 antibody therapy compare with other T cell-directed therapies in efficacy and safety profiles?

Comparative analysis between LTA2 antibody therapy and existing T cell-directed approaches reveals several key distinctions:

Therapeutic ApproachTarget SpecificityMechanismSafety ConsiderationsEfficacy in Autoimmunity
LTA2 antibodiesTH1/TH17 cells expressing LT-α1β2Selective ADCC of pathogenic T cellsPreserves lymphoid architecture; Spares regulatory T cellsPartial disease amelioration comparable to anti-TNF-α
Anti-CD25 antibodiesAll activated T cells expressing IL-2RDepletion or functional blockingMay deplete T regulatory cellsEffective but with risk of compromising immune regulation
General T cell depletionAll T cellsBroad elimination of T lymphocytesSignificant immunosuppressionHigh efficacy with substantial infection risk
LTβR fusion proteinLT-α1β2 signaling pathwayBlocks LTβR interactionDisrupts lymphoid architectureMixed clinical results

How might LTA2 antibody approaches be integrated with B cell-focused immunotherapies?

Integration of LTA2 antibody therapy with B cell-focused approaches offers promising synergistic potential through complementary mechanisms:

  • Targeting the T-B cell interaction axis at multiple points

  • Combining depletion of pathogenic T cells with modulation of autoantibody production

  • Leveraging tertiary lymphoid structures as therapeutic targets

  • Enhancing efficacy while potentially reducing dosing requirements for each individual agent

  • Addressing multiple pathogenic mechanisms simultaneously

Recent research on tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) demonstrates that B cells within these structures produce highly clonal IgA and IgG antibodies that exert immune pressure against malignant progression. Similar mechanisms may operate in autoimmune diseases, suggesting that carefully modulating rather than completely eliminating B cell responses while depleting pathogenic T cells could optimize therapeutic outcomes. This integrated approach would require careful timing of interventions to maintain beneficial immune surveillance while eliminating disease-driving processes .

What insights from cancer immunotherapy with TCR-like antibodies can be applied to autoimmune disease treatment?

Cancer immunotherapy research with TCR-like antibodies offers valuable translatable insights for autoimmune disease treatment:

  • TCR-like antibodies developed against cancer-testis antigens demonstrate the feasibility of targeting intracellular antigens presented on MHC molecules

  • The successful engineering of these antibodies into CAR-T cell therapies suggests similar approaches might target autoantigen-specific T cells

  • Phage display technology used to develop high-affinity TCR-like antibodies can be repurposed to target autoimmune disease-specific epitopes

  • In vivo models confirm the potential for selective elimination of specific cell populations without broad immunosuppression

  • Combination approaches from oncology may inform similar strategies in autoimmunity

The development process for these antibodies typically involves screening human scFv phage libraries against specific peptide-MHC complexes, followed by extensive validation of specificity and function. This approach has shown promise in cancer models targeting NY-ESO-1 peptides presented by HLA-A*02:01 and could be adapted to target autoreactive T cells recognizing self-peptides in autoimmune conditions .

What role might tertiary lymphoid structures play in LTA2 antibody efficacy for autoimmune diseases?

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) represent a critical frontier in understanding and potentially enhancing LTA2 antibody efficacy:

  • TLS serve as local sites of B and T cell cooperation in diseased tissues

  • They contain highly clonal antibody-producing cells relevant to disease progression

  • LT-α signaling is implicated in TLS formation and maintenance

  • TLS activity correlates with improved outcomes in some cancer contexts

  • The specific microenvironment within TLS may influence therapeutic antibody penetration and activity

Recent research demonstrates that TLS produce highly clonal IgA and IgG antibodies that exert immune pressure against disease progression. Understanding how LTA2 antibodies interact with and potentially modulate TLS could reveal new therapeutic strategies. Some evidence suggests that preserving LT-α1β2 interaction with its receptor while depleting specific T cell populations may maintain beneficial TLS functions while eliminating pathogenic components. This emerging understanding could lead to more nuanced approaches that harness rather than eliminate these structures .

How might advanced antibody engineering techniques enhance LTA2 antibody specificity and efficacy?

Advanced antibody engineering offers multiple avenues to enhance LTA2 antibody performance:

  • Structure-guided design using crystallographic data of LT-α complexes to optimize binding interfaces

  • Development of switchable antibody formats with activity dependent on disease-specific triggers

  • Multispecific antibody formats simultaneously targeting LT-α and additional disease markers

  • Site-specific conjugation technologies for precise payload delivery

  • Fc engineering to fine-tune effector functions for optimal T cell depletion without compromising lymphoid tissue integrity

Variable chain engineering, as demonstrated in antibody development against tau epitopes, provides insights into optimizing binding kinetics and specificity. For example, the variable heavy (VH) and light (VL) chain sequences can be systematically modified to enhance both affinity and specificity. This approach, combined with biolayer interferometry to measure binding kinetics, enables rational design of next-generation antibodies with improved therapeutic properties .

What methodological advances are needed to better evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of LTA2 antibody therapies?

Comprehensive evaluation of long-term LTA2 antibody effects requires methodological innovations in several areas:

  • Development of humanized mouse models that better recapitulate human immune system complexity

  • Implementation of longitudinal single-cell profiling to track changes in immune cell populations

  • Advanced imaging techniques to visualize antibody distribution and effects in tissues

  • Standardized protocols for assessing lymphoid tissue architecture and function

  • Systems biology approaches to predict potential off-target effects and long-term consequences

Current methods like light transmission aggregometry (LTA) used in platelet function studies demonstrate the importance of standardized assay conditions when evaluating biological responses. Similarly, standardized protocols are needed for assessing LTA2 antibody effects across different disease models. Integration of multiple readouts—including immune cell depletion, cytokine production, tissue architecture, and functional outcomes—will provide a more complete understanding of therapeutic effects and potential risks .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.