PDH2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
PDH2 antibody; MAB1 antibody; At5g50850 antibody; K16E14.1 antibody; Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta-1 antibody; mitochondrial antibody; PDHE1-B antibody; EC 1.2.4.1 antibody; Protein MACCI-BOU antibody
Target Names
PDH2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex plays a crucial role in cellular metabolism, catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and carbon dioxide. This multi-enzyme complex comprises three enzymatic components: pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1), dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase (E2), and lipoamide dehydrogenase (E3), each present in multiple copies.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G50850

STRING: 3702.AT5G50850.1

UniGene: At.24270

Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion matrix.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in roots, immature rosettes, and mature rosettes.

Q&A

FAQs for PDH2 Antibody Research

Advanced Research Questions

Q3: How can structural modeling tools like AlphaFold2 resolve discrepancies in PDH2 antibody-antigen interaction data?

  • Methodology:

    • Predicted Complex Analysis: Generate AlphaFold2 models of PDH2-antibody interfaces to identify key binding residues (e.g., CDR regions) .

    • Mutational Validation: Introduce point mutations in predicted interaction sites (e.g., VH CDR2) and test binding affinity via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) .

    • Case Study: A humanized PDH2 antibody showed a 7x improvement in KD after AlphaFold2-guided framework optimization .

Q4: What strategies are effective for reconciling contradictory PDH2 localization data across immunofluorescence (IF) and subcellular fractionation studies?

  • Integrated Approach:

    • Multi-Method Validation: Combine IF with cellular fractionation followed by Western blot (e.g., nuclear vs. mitochondrial fractions) .

    • Proteomic Overlay: Use proximity ligation assays (PLA) to confirm PDH2 interactions in situ .

    • Example: Jurkat cell studies showed 80% mitochondrial localization via IF but only 60% in fractionation assays, resolved by accounting for antibody cross-reactivity with mitochondrial matrix proteins .

Methodological Deep Dives

Q5: How can researchers leverage proteomic enrichment data to identify off-target PDH2 antibody interactions?

  • Workflow:

    • Enrichment: Treat cells with biotinylated PDH2 antibody, perform streptavidin pull-down, and analyze via LC-MS/MS .

    • Bioinformatics: Compare enriched proteins against CRAPome (Contaminant Repository for Affinity Purification) to filter nonspecific binders .

    • Validation: Use competitive displacement assays with excess PDH2 peptide to confirm specificity (e.g., 90% reduction in off-target signals) .

Q6: What computational tools are optimal for designing PDH2 antibodies with enhanced binding kinetics?

  • Generative AI Models:

    • De Novo Design: Train models on HER2/trastuzumab structural data to generate PDH2-specific HCDR sequences with low-nM affinity .

    • Affinity Maturation: Combine RosettaAntibody with molecular dynamics simulations to optimize electrostatic complementarity .

    • Outcome: AI-designed antibodies achieved EC50 values of 5–10 nM in cell-based assays, comparable to trastuzumab benchmarks .

Data Interpretation Frameworks

Q7: How should researchers interpret PDH2 antibody cross-reactivity in multi-tissue panels?

  • Decision Tree:

    • Step 1: Screen antibody against tissue microarrays (TMAs) to identify cross-reactive tissues .

    • Step 2: Perform peptide blocking assays using PDH2-derived peptides .

    • Step 3: Validate ambiguous signals with RNA-seq or CRISPR-KO models .

Q8: What statistical thresholds are recommended for defining "enrichment" in PDH2 interactome studies?

  • Criteria:

    • Fold Change: ≥2x over IgG controls (p < 0.01, Benjamini-Hochberg correction) .

    • Reproducibility: Require detection in ≥2 biological replicates .

    • Example: A 2025 study defined 1,034 enriched proteins using Jurkat and K562 proteomic overlap (FDR < 1%) .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.