FAQs for OIG-1 Antibody Research
Below are structured research-focused questions addressing key methodological and conceptual challenges in studying the C. elegans OIG-1 protein, synthesized from peer-reviewed studies.
Methodology:
Use transgenic strains expressing fluorescent reporters (e.g., Poig-1::GFP or mCherry::OIG-1 fusions) under GABA-specific promoters like unc-25 .
Validate via live antibody labeling (e.g., anti-OIG-1 antibodies) combined with immunofluorescence in oig-1(ok1687) mutants to confirm specificity .
Critical controls: Include coelomocyte staining to confirm secretion (full-length OIG-1) vs. intracellular retention (OIG-1-SP, lacking signal peptide) .
Approach:
Compare ACR-12::GFP puncta dynamics in wild-type vs. oig-1 null mutants using time-lapse imaging (8–18 hours post-hatching) .
Rescue experiments: Express OIG-1 variants (secreted vs. non-secreted) in GABA neurons (unc-25 promoter) or cholinergic neurons (unc-17 promoter) to test cell autonomy .
Key metric: Quantify dorsal-to-ventral ACR-12::GFP redistribution rates (Figure 1F in ).
Resolution:
Contradiction: While OIG-1 is secreted (evidenced by coelomocyte uptake), its synaptic stabilization does not require secretion .
Experimental strategies:
Hypothesis testing:
Screen transcriptional regulators of oig-1 using GFP reporters with truncated promoters (e.g., Poig-1Δ300) .
CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of candidate transcription factor binding sites in the oig-1 promoter.
Evidence: oig-1 expression ceases in DD neurons by L2, correlating with dorsal synapse formation .
Multiplexed approach:
Use triple-transgenic strains (e.g., oig-1 mutants + nlp-12 mutants) to assess redundant pathways.
Map spatial overlap of OIG-1::mCherry with Wnt receptor LIN-17::GFP using super-resolution microscopy.
Table: Known synaptic organizers in C. elegans DD remodeling:
Antibody validation:
Quantitative analysis: