No references to "OFP15" or "OFP15 Antibody" appear in:
Antibody databases (e.g., Antibodies-online, AMSBIO, BioAtla)
Antibody characterization initiatives (e.g., NeuroMab, YCharOS)
The term "OFP15" does not align with standardized gene nomenclature (HUGO, NCBI) or known protein families.
Possible typographical error: The closest match is USP15 (Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 15), a well-characterized deubiquitinating enzyme with commercially available antibodies (e.g., AMSBIO A03057-1) .
Hypothetical protein: If "OFP15" refers to an uncharacterized open reading frame (ORF), no published validation studies exist.
"OFP" typically denotes Ovarian Follicular Protein or Olfactory Marker Protein, but no "OFP15" designation exists in these categories.
If pursuing research on this compound:
Verify nomenclature with genomic databases (NCBI, UniProt).
Consult antibody vendors for custom synthesis (e.g., BioAtla’s recombinant antibody platforms) .
Explore structural analogs: For example, USP15 antibodies (Table 1) may serve as functional substitutes if targeting ubiquitin-related pathways.
OFP15 Antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody that specifically targets the OFP15 protein (UniProt Number: Q9SJ45) from Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). The antibody is developed using a recombinant Arabidopsis thaliana OFP15 protein as the immunogen . As a research reagent, it's designed for the specific detection of OFP15 protein in experimental settings such as immunoassays and protein analysis techniques.
The antibody preparation typically contains three components:
200μg antigens (positive control)
1ml pre-immune serum (negative control)
OFP15 Antibody has been validated for the following applications:
| Application | Validated | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Yes | For quantitative detection of OFP15 |
| Western Blot (WB) | Yes | For detection of denatured OFP15 protein |
The antibody is particularly useful in plant biology research focusing on Arabidopsis thaliana, which serves as a model organism for understanding plant molecular biology and genetics .
When validating OFP15 Antibody for your research, follow these methodological steps:
Positive controls: Use the provided antigen (200μg) as a positive control to confirm antibody binding specificity .
Negative controls:
Utilize the included pre-immune serum as a negative control
Test with samples known to lack OFP15 expression
Include secondary antibody-only controls to detect non-specific binding
Specificity testing: Verify antibody specificity using knockout or knockdown systems if available. This is crucial as research has shown that many commercial antibodies may bind to proteins other than their intended targets, potentially leading to misleading results .
Western blot validation: Run a dilution series to determine optimal antibody concentration. Look for a single band at the expected molecular weight of OFP15 protein.
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test the antibody against related proteins to ensure it does not cross-react with other OFP family members or structurally similar proteins .
While specific values for OFP15 Antibody are not provided in the available data, understanding antibody specificity and sensitivity is critical for experimental design. For reference, high-quality antibodies typically demonstrate:
Specificity: The ability to distinguish the target antigen from other proteins. For research-grade antibodies, specificity above 99% is considered excellent, similar to diagnostic antibody tests which demonstrate specificity of 99.56-99.63% .
Sensitivity: The ability to detect low concentrations of the target protein. Quality research antibodies should detect their targets when present at physiologically relevant concentrations, comparable to diagnostic antibodies which have sensitivities of 95-100% when tested at appropriate timepoints .
Researchers should perform their own validation to establish these metrics for their specific experimental conditions. This is particularly important given recent findings of significant issues with antibody specificity in research applications .
For optimal Western blot results with OFP15 Antibody, consider these methodological adjustments:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate extraction buffers optimized for plant tissues
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Ensure complete denaturation of samples if required for epitope accessibility
Blocking optimization:
Test both BSA and non-fat dry milk as blocking agents
Consider 5% blocking solution in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20)
Block for 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C
Antibody dilution optimization:
Start with a dilution series (1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000)
Incubate primary antibody overnight at 4°C for optimal binding
Signal development:
Choose detection methods based on expected expression levels
Consider enhanced chemiluminescence for standard detection
Use fluorescent secondary antibodies for multiplexing or quantitative analysis
Controls:
Several factors can affect epitope accessibility and recognition by OFP15 Antibody:
Protein conformation: The three-dimensional structure of the target protein can mask epitopes. Consider using both native and denaturing conditions when optimizing protocols.
Fixation methods: Different fixation methods can preserve or destroy epitopes:
Paraformaldehyde may preserve structure but mask epitopes
Methanol fixation may expose some epitopes while destroying others
Heat-induced epitope retrieval may be necessary for some applications
Post-translational modifications: PTMs such as phosphorylation, glycosylation, or ubiquitination may alter epitope recognition. Consider the physiological state of your samples.
Sample preparation: Harsh detergents or extraction methods may denature the protein or damage epitopes.
pH and buffer conditions: Buffer composition can affect antibody-antigen interactions. Test different pH conditions and buffer compositions to optimize binding.
Plant OVATE Family Proteins (OFPs) share structural similarities that may lead to cross-reactivity. To address this:
Preabsorption controls: Preincubate the antibody with purified related proteins to absorb cross-reactive antibodies.
Knockout/knockdown validation: Test the antibody in tissues/cells with confirmed knockout or knockdown of OFP15.
Western blot analysis: Compare band patterns between wild-type and OFP15-deficient samples.
Bioinformatic analysis: Identify regions of sequence similarity between OFP15 and other OFP family members to predict potential cross-reactivity.
Competitive binding assays: Perform competition experiments with peptides representing unique and conserved regions of OFP15.
False results can arise from several sources:
False Positives:
Cross-reactivity with related proteins
Non-specific binding to high-abundance proteins
Insufficient blocking
Excessive antibody concentration
Secondary antibody cross-reactivity
False Negatives:
Epitope masking due to protein conformation
Protein degradation during sample preparation
Insufficient protein transfer in Western blots
Improper storage leading to antibody degradation
Interference from sample components
To quantitatively characterize OFP15 Antibody:
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Determine binding kinetics including:
Association rate constant (kon)
Dissociation rate constant (koff)
Equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA):
Perform titration curves to determine EC50 values
Compare binding to positive and negative controls
Immunoprecipitation efficiency:
Quantify the percentage of target protein pulled down
Analyze specific vs. non-specific binding
Western blot quantification:
Generate standard curves using purified recombinant protein
Use densitometry to quantify signals
Recent high-throughput approaches for characterizing antibody variants could also be applied to better understand OFP15 Antibody binding properties .
To ensure optimal stability and performance of OFP15 Antibody:
Storage temperature: Store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term stability .
Aliquoting: Divide into small, single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Additives: Consider adding stabilizers such as:
Glycerol (50%) for freeze protection
BSA (1 mg/ml) to prevent adsorption to tube walls
Preservatives like sodium azide (0.02%) to prevent microbial growth
Working dilutions: Store working dilutions at 4°C for up to one week; for longer periods, store at -20°C.
Stability monitoring: Periodically test antibody performance against a reference standard to monitor potential degradation.
For immunoprecipitation (IP) applications:
Sample preparation:
Use gentle lysis buffers to maintain protein-protein interactions
Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors
Perform pre-clearing with pre-immune serum to reduce non-specific binding
Antibody coupling:
Consider covalently coupling OFP15 Antibody to protein A/G beads
Use crosslinkers that minimize antibody leaching during elution
Optimization strategies:
Test different antibody-to-lysate ratios
Optimize binding conditions (temperature, duration, buffer composition)
Include appropriate controls (pre-immune serum, IgG control)
Validation:
Confirm specificity by Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated material
Verify enrichment of target protein compared to input sample
Downstream applications:
Mass spectrometry analysis of co-immunoprecipitated proteins
Functional assays of immunoprecipitated complexes
For chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) applications:
Crosslinking optimization:
Test different crosslinking times and concentrations
Consider dual crosslinking with both formaldehyde and protein-specific crosslinkers
Chromatin fragmentation:
Optimize sonication conditions for plant tissues
Aim for fragments between 200-500 bp for optimal resolution
Antibody specificity:
Verify OFP15 localization to chromatin or nuclear compartments
Include appropriate controls (IgG, pre-immune serum)
Washing stringency:
Optimize salt concentrations in wash buffers
Balance between reducing background and maintaining specific interactions
Data analysis:
Use appropriate normalization strategies
Compare enrichment to input and negative control regions
Note that these applications require additional validation beyond the standard ELISA and Western blot applications listed in the product specifications .
The polyclonal nature of OFP15 Antibody has important implications:
Advantages to consider:
Recognition of multiple epitopes, increasing detection sensitivity
More robust to minor changes in protein conformation
Greater tolerance to sample preparation variations
Often works across multiple applications (WB, ELISA, IP)
Limitations to address:
Batch-to-batch variation requires validation between lots
Greater potential for cross-reactivity with related proteins
Higher background in some applications
Less predictable epitope specificity
Methodological recommendations:
Compare critical experiments across antibody lots
Include comprehensive controls for cross-reactivity
Consider epitope mapping to identify the regions recognized
For quantitative applications, establish standard curves with each new lot
When selecting detection methods, consider these comparisons:
| Detection Method | Advantages | Limitations | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFP15 Antibody (IHC/IF) | Visualizes protein localization in situ | Potential cross-reactivity; fixation artifacts | Studying subcellular localization |
| OFP15 Antibody (WB) | Confirms protein size; semi-quantitative | Detects denatured protein only | Confirming protein expression |
| OFP15 Antibody (ELISA) | Quantitative; high-throughput | Limited spatial information | Quantifying expression levels |
| mRNA detection (qPCR) | High sensitivity; specific | Not reflective of protein levels | Transcriptional studies |
| Fluorescent fusion proteins | Real-time monitoring; live cells | Potential functional interference | Dynamic studies |
| Mass spectrometry | Unbiased detection; identifies PTMs | Low throughput; expensive | Comprehensive proteomics |
This comparison highlights the importance of choosing the appropriate method based on your specific research question and experimental requirements.
Lot-to-lot validation is critical for polyclonal antibodies. Follow these best practices:
Record keeping:
Document lot numbers
Retain reference samples from previous lots
Side-by-side comparison:
Test new and old lots in parallel
Use identical samples and protocols
Standard curve analysis:
Generate dilution series with purified antigen
Compare EC50 or limit of detection values
Specificity assessment:
Test against positive and negative control samples
Check for unexpected bands or staining patterns
Performance metrics:
Compare signal-to-noise ratios
Evaluate background levels
Assess specificity in relevant experimental contexts
This approach aligns with recent efforts to systematically evaluate antibodies used in research, addressing the concerning finding that many antibodies may not specifically bind their intended targets .
Emerging technologies offer opportunities for enhanced antibody characterization:
Structural analysis:
Epitope mapping using hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry
X-ray crystallography of antibody-antigen complexes
Cryo-electron microscopy for structural determination
High-throughput binding analysis:
Computational prediction:
Next-generation sequencing:
Repertoire analysis of polyclonal antibody populations
Identification of dominant epitope-specific clones
These approaches could provide deeper insights into OFP15 Antibody binding properties and guide optimization of experimental protocols.
Potential future applications include:
Single-cell proteomics:
Characterizing OFP15 expression in rare cell populations
Spatial transcriptomics combined with antibody detection
CRISPR screening validation:
Confirming protein-level changes in gene-edited plants
Assessing phenotypic consequences of OFP15 modifications
Synthetic biology applications:
Engineering plant signaling pathways involving OFP proteins
Developing biosensors for monitoring plant stress responses
Directed evolution approaches:
Translational applications:
Agricultural biotechnology applications
Plant stress response monitoring in field conditions
These emerging applications highlight the continuing importance of well-characterized, specific antibodies in advancing biological research.