The At1g18020 Antibody (CSB-PA320520XA01DOA) is a monoclonal antibody specifically designed to target the protein encoded by the AT1G18020 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress), a model organism in plant biology. This antibody is part of a catalog of plant-specific antibodies developed for research purposes, such as protein localization, expression analysis, and functional studies .
The AT1G18020 gene encodes a putative 12-oxophytodienoate reductase-like protein 2A, which is implicated in plant stress responses and lipid metabolism. This enzyme is a member of the Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) family, known for catalyzing the reduction of reactive electrophilic compounds, such as jasmonate precursors, which play a critical role in plant defense and signaling pathways .
A study analyzing differential gene expression in Arabidopsis wild-type and rpt2 mutant plants revealed significant changes in AT1G18020 expression. The gene showed a log2 fold change of -1.91 (p-value: 0.0025) in wild-type plants under stress conditions, indicating its role in stress-responsive pathways .
| Gene ID | WT dS/nS | p-value | rpt2 dS/nS | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT1G18020 | -1.91 | 0.0025 | -1.29 | 0.5707 |
The AT1G18020 gene product is linked to:
Lipid Metabolism: Catalyzing the reduction of 12-oxophytodienoic acid (12-OPDA), a precursor of jasmonic acid .
Stress Tolerance: Modulating plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses, including wounding and pathogen attack .
Redox Regulation: Participating in detoxification pathways by reducing reactive electrophiles .
The At1g18020 Antibody enables precise detection of the protein in plant tissues, facilitating studies on:
Protein Localization: Identifying subcellular compartments (e.g., cytoplasm, nucleus) where the enzyme acts .
Pathway Interactions: Mapping its role in jasmonate biosynthesis and cross-talk with other signaling pathways .
Cancer Research: Exploring homologs in human diseases, as OYE-family enzymes are implicated in detoxification and tumor progression .
KEGG: ath:AT1G17990
UniGene: At.18923
At1g18020 Antibody (catalog number CSB-PA320520XA01DOA) is a polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes the protein encoded by the At1g18020 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress). This protein (UniProt accession P0DI09) plays important roles in plant cellular processes. The antibody is typically supplied in concentrations of 2ml/0.1ml or 10mg, depending on research requirements .
When designing experiments, researchers should note that this antibody has been validated for specific applications including immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and immunoprecipitation. For optimal results, always verify the application suitability in the manufacturer's documentation.
Proper validation is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility. Follow these methodological steps:
Titration: Always titrate the antibody under experimental conditions. At high concentrations, antibodies can bind to low-affinity targets after saturating intended epitopes, increasing background signal .
Positive and negative controls: Use Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type tissue as a positive control and either At1g18020 knockout lines or non-plant tissues as negative controls.
Specificity verification: Perform a western blot to confirm single-band detection at the expected molecular weight.
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related plant species if your research involves comparative studies.
These validation steps help establish confidence in antibody performance before proceeding with critical experiments.
For optimal performance and longevity of At1g18020 Antibody:
Store aliquots at -20°C for long-term preservation
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (limit to <5 cycles)
For working solutions, store at 4°C for up to two weeks
Add preservatives like sodium azide (0.02%) for solutions stored at 4°C
Maintain sterile conditions during handling
Following these storage protocols maximizes antibody shelf-life and ensures consistent experimental results over time.
Optimization requires systematic titration using the following methodology:
Prepare a dilution series (typically 1:500 to 1:5000) of At1g18020 Antibody
Run identical protein samples from Arabidopsis thaliana tissue
Perform immunoblotting under identical conditions for all dilutions
Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio across all concentrations
Select the dilution that provides the strongest specific signal with minimal background
This methodical approach identifies the optimal antibody concentration where target saturation occurs without off-target binding. Titration should be carried out under the exact conditions that will be used for experimental work, with antibody concentration as the only variable .
Selecting appropriate blocking reagents significantly impacts specificity:
| Blocking Agent | Advantages | Disadvantages | Recommended Starting Concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| BSA | Low background with plant samples | Potential cross-reactivity | 3-5% |
| Non-fat milk | Inexpensive, good general blocker | Plant proteins may cross-react | 5% |
| Casein | Effective for reducing non-specific binding | More expensive | 0.5-1% |
| Commercial blockers | Optimized formulations | Cost considerations | Per manufacturer |
Begin with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-T, then test alternatives if background issues persist. For especially sensitive applications, consider using combination blocking strategies that incorporate both protein (BSA) and detergent (Tween-20) components.
To minimize background in plant tissue immunohistochemistry:
Optimize fixation conditions (typically 4% paraformaldehyde)
Increase washing duration and frequency (minimum 3×15 minutes)
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in blocking solutions
Extend blocking duration to 2-3 hours at room temperature
Dilute primary antibody appropriately based on titration
Include 0.01% detergent in antibody incubation solutions
Pre-absorb antibody with non-specific proteins if cross-reactivity persists
Consider autofluorescence quenching steps for plant tissues
These methodical approaches address the specific challenges of plant tissue autofluorescence and protein complexity.
Multiple bands may result from several research-relevant factors:
Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation, glycosylation, or ubiquitination can alter migration patterns
Alternative splicing: At1g18020 may have splice variants
Protein degradation: Incomplete protease inhibition during sample preparation
Cross-reactivity: Antibody recognizing related epitopes in other proteins
Sample preparation issues: Incomplete denaturation or reduction
Methodological solutions include:
Verify sample integrity with fresh extraction and complete protease inhibitor cocktails
Test different detergents for extraction (RIPA, NP-40, Triton X-100)
Increase blocking stringency and washing steps
Use gradient gels to better resolve proteins of similar molecular weights
Consider immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify all detected proteins
When signal is weak or undetectable:
Verify protein expression: Confirm At1g18020 expression in your experimental conditions using RT-PCR
Check extraction efficiency: Different buffers may be required for membrane-associated proteins
Optimize antibody concentration: Insufficient antibody reduces detection sensitivity
Evaluate detection method sensitivity: Consider switching from colorimetric to chemiluminescent or fluorescent detection
Assess epitope accessibility: Denaturation conditions may affect epitope structure
Extend incubation time: Overnight primary antibody incubation at 4°C can improve signal
Use signal enhancement: Tyramide signal amplification or biotin-streptavidin systems can boost sensitivity
These methodical approaches address various technical factors that may contribute to signal issues.
For co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) to identify protein interaction partners:
Buffer optimization: Use gentle lysis buffers containing 0.5-1% NP-40 or Digitonin to preserve protein-protein interactions
Pre-clearing step: Incubate lysate with protein A/G beads before antibody addition to reduce non-specific binding
Antibody immobilization: Consider cross-linking At1g18020 Antibody to beads using BS3 or DMP
Control experiments: Include IgG controls and input sample lanes
Elution conditions: Use gentle elution with peptide competition where possible
Verification: Confirm interactions with reciprocal Co-IPs and proximity ligation assays
This advanced application can reveal important protein interaction networks involving the At1g18020 protein in plant cellular processes.
While not all antibodies are suitable for ChIP, methodological considerations for adapting At1g18020 Antibody include:
Crosslinking optimization: Test both formaldehyde (protein-DNA) and DSG (protein-protein) crosslinking
Sonication parameters: Optimize to generate 200-500bp DNA fragments
Antibody validation: Verify specificity in plant nuclear extracts before ChIP
Positive control regions: Include known binding regions if available
Negative control regions: Include genomic regions not expected to bind
Quantification method: Use both qPCR and sequencing for comprehensive analysis
For successful ChIP, validate antibody specificity for the native (non-denatured) conformation of At1g18020 protein, as western blot validation alone may not predict ChIP performance.
Recent advances in antibody engineering can enhance antibody performance through:
Epitope mapping: Identify the precise binding site using peptide arrays or hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry
CDR optimization: Apply deep learning methods like IgDesign to redesign complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)
Binding validation: Screen optimized antibodies using surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Affinity maturation: Generate variants with potentially improved binding characteristics
This advanced approach may be particularly valuable if current At1g18020 Antibody shows suboptimal performance in specific applications, allowing for custom antibody engineering to meet exact research requirements.
Flow cytometry with plant protoplasts requires specific methodological adjustments:
Protoplast preparation optimization: Use enzymatic digestion with carefully controlled concentrations and incubation times
Fixation protocol: Optimize to preserve epitopes while maintaining cell integrity
Permeabilization: Adjust conditions based on epitope location (surface vs. intracellular)
Antibody concentration: Titrate specifically for flow cytometry conditions
Controls: Include unstained, secondary-only, and isotype controls
Autofluorescence compensation: Implement proper compensation strategies for plant cell autofluorescence
Gating strategy: Develop specific strategies for plant protoplasts
These methodological considerations address the unique challenges of plant cell analysis by flow cytometry.
For quantitative analysis across experimental conditions:
Sample standardization: Normalize protein loading using total protein measurement methods like BCA
Internal controls: Include constitutively expressed proteins (tubulin, actin) on each blot
Standard curves: Generate a standard curve using recombinant protein if available
Technical replicates: Run at least three technical replicates per biological sample
Imaging methods: Use digital imaging with linear dynamic range
Normalization strategy: Apply appropriate normalization to account for loading variations
Statistical analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests for comparisons between conditions
This quantitative approach enables robust comparative studies of At1g18020 protein expression across experimental conditions.