RR13 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
RR13 antibody; Os08g0358800 antibody; LOC_Os08g26990 antibody; OsJ_27037 antibody; Two-component response regulator ORR13 antibody; OsRR13 antibody; OsRRA12 antibody
Target Names
RR13
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RR13 Antibody functions as a response regulator involved in the His-to-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction system. Phosphorylation of the Asp residue within the receiver domain activates the protein's ability to promote the transcription of target genes. Type-A response regulators, such as RR13, are believed to act as negative regulators of cytokinin signaling.
Database Links
Protein Families
ARR family, Type-A subfamily
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in flowers and panicles.

Q&A

What is the R13 antibody and what epitopes does it recognize?

R13 antibody refers to antibodies that recognize the 13-residue C-terminal epitope (peptide R13: EEEDDDMGFGLFD) of the Trypanosoma cruzi ribosomal P2β protein (TcP2β). The key antigenic motif within this peptide has been identified as ExDDxGF through alanine scanning mutation studies. This motif is critical for the cross-reactivity with the β1-adrenergic receptor in cardiac tissue, specifically mimicking the ESDE acidic amino acid sequence in the second extracellular loop of this receptor .

How are R13 antibodies detected in experimental settings?

R13 antibodies are typically detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with synthetic peptides representing the C-terminal region of T. cruzi ribosomal P proteins. Researchers commonly use peptide R13 (EEEDDDMGFGLFD) and related peptides such as H13 (human homolog) and C10 (the 10 C-terminal amino acids) to characterize the specificity of these antibodies. The ratio of reactivity against R13 versus H13 (R13/H13 ratio) is a crucial parameter, with values above 3 indicating a pathogenic response associated with Chagas' disease .

What is the significance of the R13/H13 ratio in antibody response measurement?

The R13/H13 ratio represents the relative reactivity of antibodies to the parasite-derived R13 peptide versus its human homolog (H13). This ratio serves as a critical indicator for distinguishing different antibody profiles:

R13/H13 RatioProfileClinical Significance
>3R13+/C10-Associated with pathogenic response and cardiac abnormalities
~1R13+/C10+Non-pathogenic autoimmune response without cardiac effects

A ratio above 3 is consistently measured in natural and experimental T. cruzi infections with pathogenic outcomes, making it a valuable diagnostic and prognostic marker .

How do R13 antibodies contribute to the pathogenesis of Chagas' heart disease?

R13 antibodies contribute to Chagas' heart disease pathogenesis through molecular mimicry. The ExDDxGF motif in the R13 peptide shares structural similarity with the AESDE sequence found in the second extracellular loop of the β1-adrenergic receptor. This cross-reactivity enables R13 antibodies to bind to and stimulate cardiac β1-adrenergic receptors, leading to functional abnormalities in cardiac tissue. The persistent stimulation results in supraventricular tachycardia and other cardiac manifestations observed in chronic Chagas' heart disease. Only antibodies with the R13+/C10- pattern that specifically recognize the third E residue in the R13 peptide exhibit this pathogenic cross-reactivity and functional effect on cardiomyocytes .

What is the relationship between R13 recombinants and antibody responses in chicken MHC studies?

In chicken MHC studies, the R13 recombinant (BF17-BG23) represents a unique genetic combination resulting from recombination within the MHC. Research shows that R13R13 homozygous chickens exhibit significantly lower primary and secondary antibody responses compared to R13B17 heterozygotes and B17B17 homozygotes when challenged with bovine red blood cells. This demonstrates that recombination affecting specific regions within the MHC can significantly impact antibody production capabilities. The lower antibody response in R13R13 homozygotes suggests that the recombination event altered regions critical for optimal antibody production .

GenotypePrimary Antibody ResponseSecondary Antibody Response
R13R13Significantly lowerSignificantly lower
R13B17HigherHigher
B17B17HigherIntermediate

How can researchers induce and detect anti-R13 antibodies in experimental models?

For inducing anti-R13 antibodies in experimental models:

  • Immunize animals (typically mice) with recombinant T. cruzi ribosomal P2β protein (TcP2β)

  • Follow a standard immunization protocol consisting of initial injection followed by periodic boosts

  • Collect blood samples after each boost to monitor antibody development

For detection:

  • Use ELISA with various peptides (R13, H13, C10) to characterize the antibody response

  • Calculate the R13/H13 ratio to determine the antibody profile (pathogenic vs. non-pathogenic)

  • Confirm functional activity using neonatal rat cardiomyocytes to measure changes in beating frequency

  • Perform electrocardiography on immunized animals to correlate antibody profiles with cardiac abnormalities

These methods allow for both quantitative measurement of antibody levels and qualitative assessment of their pathophysiological effects .

What techniques are employed to study R13 recombinant effects on antibody production in chicken MHC studies?

Researchers studying R13 recombinant effects in chicken MHC employ several specialized techniques:

  • Congenic line development: Creating lines that differ only at the MHC region through extensive backcrossing

  • Antigen challenge: Injecting antigens like bovine red blood cells (2.5% solution, 1mL intravenously) at specific time points (e.g., 4 and 11 weeks of age) to stimulate primary and secondary immune responses

  • Antibody titer measurement: Using microtiter methods to quantify total and mercaptoethanol-resistant (IgG) antibodies in serum samples collected 7 days post-injection

  • Statistical analysis: Applying least squares ANOVA with trial and B genotype as main effects, followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference test (P < 0.05) to separate significant means

  • Molecular characterization: Identifying specific recombination breakpoints through molecular techniques to correlate genetic differences with antibody response variations

How can epitope mapping techniques be applied to better understand the cross-reactivity of R13 antibodies?

Advanced epitope mapping techniques can provide crucial insights into R13 antibody cross-reactivity:

  • Alanine scanning mutagenesis: Systematically replace each amino acid in the R13 peptide with alanine to identify critical residues for antibody binding. This technique revealed that the ExDDxGF motif is essential for pathogenic antibodies, while non-pathogenic antibodies recognize only the DDxGF portion.

  • Peptide competition assays: Use synthetic peptides representing various portions of the R13 sequence and the β1-adrenergic receptor to quantify binding inhibition and cross-reactivity.

  • Structural biology approaches: Apply X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy to determine the three-dimensional structure of antibody-peptide complexes, revealing the precise molecular interactions.

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): Map the conformational dynamics of antibody-epitope interactions to understand how structural changes influence cross-reactivity.

  • Machine learning prediction models: Develop computational models to predict cross-reactivity based on antibody sequence data, potentially using active learning approaches as described in library-on-library settings for antibody-antigen interactions .

What are the methodological considerations for investigating the temporal dynamics of anti-R13 antibody responses in chronic T. cruzi infection?

Investigating temporal dynamics of anti-R13 antibody responses requires careful methodological planning:

  • Longitudinal sampling strategy:

    • Establish baseline measurements before infection

    • Collect samples at multiple time points during acute and chronic phases

    • Consider both short intervals (days) during acute phase and longer intervals (months) during chronic phase

  • Comprehensive antibody profiling:

    • Monitor changes in antibody isotypes (IgM, IgG, IgA)

    • Track shifts in epitope specificity (R13, H13, C10 reactivity)

    • Calculate R13/H13 ratios at each time point to detect profile changes

  • Correlation with disease progression:

    • Parallel monitoring of cardiac function (ECG, echocardiography)

    • Assessment of parasite load using qPCR

    • Evaluation of inflammatory markers

  • Antibody affinity maturation analysis:

    • Surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics

    • Avidity assays using chaotropic agents

    • B cell repertoire sequencing to track clonal evolution

  • Tissue-specific antibody analysis:

    • Sampling from different compartments (serum, tissue exudates)

    • Immunohistochemistry to detect tissue-bound antibodies

Research shows that anti-R13 antibody profiles remain stable once established, with no observed shift between R13+/C10- and R13+/C10+ patterns during immunization, suggesting independent evolution of these responses .

How can two-hybrid antibody micropattern assays be applied to study R13 antibody interactions with cellular receptors?

Two-hybrid antibody micropattern assays offer a powerful approach to studying R13 antibody interactions with cellular receptors:

  • Micropattern preparation: Use poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) stamps inked with antibody solutions and print them onto untreated glass coverslips to create defined antibody patterns.

  • Cell seeding: Seed human fibroblasts expressing GFP-tagged receptors of interest (e.g., β1-adrenergic receptor) onto the micropatterned coverslips.

  • Visualization: Observe receptor capture and distribution using confocal laser scanning microscopy, which allows for quantitative assessment of receptor-antibody interactions.

  • Competition experiments: Add soluble R13 peptides or receptor-derived peptides to compete with the receptor-antibody interaction, providing information about binding specificities and affinities.

  • Live-cell imaging: Monitor receptor dynamics and downstream signaling events in real-time following interaction with patterned antibodies.

This approach, similar to that described for MHC protein interactions , allows for spatial control of receptor-antibody interactions and enables detailed study of specificity, cross-reactivity, and functional consequences of R13 antibodies binding to cardiac receptors.

What are the advanced immunological techniques for distinguishing pathogenic from non-pathogenic anti-R13 antibodies?

Advanced immunological techniques to distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic anti-R13 antibodies include:

  • Functional cellular assays:

    • Cardiomyocyte beating frequency analysis

    • Calcium flux measurements in receptor-expressing cells

    • cAMP accumulation assays to detect receptor activation

  • Biophysical characterization:

    • Surface plasmon resonance for binding kinetics determination

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry for thermodynamic binding parameters

    • Bio-layer interferometry for real-time binding analysis

  • Structural approaches:

    • Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy of antibody-receptor complexes

    • X-ray crystallography of Fab fragments bound to peptide epitopes

    • Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for epitope mapping

  • Antibody engineering techniques:

    • Creation of chimeric antibodies swapping variable regions between pathogenic and non-pathogenic antibodies

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in complementarity-determining regions

    • Affinity maturation to enhance or reduce pathogenic potential

  • In vivo assessment:

    • Transfer of purified antibody fractions to animal models

    • Real-time ECG monitoring following antibody administration

    • Tissue-specific antibody deposition analysis

These advanced techniques can provide comprehensive characterization beyond the basic R13/H13 ratio measurement and epitope mapping approaches .

How might active learning approaches improve R13 antibody-epitope interaction predictions?

Active learning approaches could significantly enhance R13 antibody-epitope interaction predictions through:

  • Iterative optimization: Beginning with a small labeled dataset of known R13 antibody-epitope interactions and progressively expanding it by selecting the most informative additional experiments to perform.

  • Library-on-library screening: Testing many R13 antibody variants against many epitope variants simultaneously to identify specific interacting pairs, reducing the number of required experiments by up to 35% compared to random sampling approaches.

  • Out-of-distribution prediction improvement: Addressing the challenge of predicting interactions involving antibodies or epitopes not represented in training data, which is particularly relevant for predicting cross-reactivity with novel targets like the β1-adrenergic receptor.

  • Algorithm selection: Implementing specialized algorithms that have demonstrated superior performance in antibody-antigen binding prediction, potentially reducing the number of required experimental variants and accelerating the learning process by dozens of steps.

  • Simulation frameworks: Utilizing simulation systems like the Absolut! framework to evaluate potential active learning strategies before costly experimental implementation .

What is the potential significance of IgA isotype R13 antibodies in disease progression and diagnosis?

The potential significance of IgA isotype R13 antibodies in disease progression and diagnosis is substantial but currently underexplored:

  • Mucosal immunity connection: IgA antibodies predominantly function at mucosal surfaces, suggesting that IgA R13 antibodies might indicate mucosal involvement in the initial immune response against T. cruzi or in autoimmune processes.

  • Isotype-specific pathogenicity: Different antibody isotypes can engage different effector mechanisms. IgA R13 antibodies might have distinct pathogenic effects compared to IgG R13 antibodies, potentially through interaction with FcαRI receptors on immune cells.

  • Prognostic value: Based on studies of IgA ACPA in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where IgA1 (but not IgA2) ACPA is associated with progression from at-risk status to clinical disease, IgA R13 antibodies might have similar prognostic value in predicting progression from asymptomatic T. cruzi infection to symptomatic Chagas' disease.

  • Dynamic changes during disease transition: IgA1 ACPA levels decline at RA onset and during early disease phases, suggesting that monitoring IgA R13 antibody levels over time might reveal similar patterns that could serve as biomarkers for disease transition.

  • Barrier leakiness indication: The decrease in serum IgA antibodies before disease onset might indicate starting barrier leakiness prior to clinical manifestation, potentially offering a new window for preventive intervention .

How can knockout/knockdown cell lines be utilized to validate R13 antibody specificity and function?

Knockout/knockdown cell lines provide powerful tools for validating R13 antibody specificity and function:

  • Target validation: Using CRISPR-Cas9 to generate β1-adrenergic receptor knockout cell lines allows researchers to confirm that the functional effects of R13 antibodies are specifically mediated through this receptor.

  • Specificity testing: Western blot analysis of parental and knockout cell lines (similar to the Rab13 antibody validation described in search result ) can definitively demonstrate antibody specificity. If a band is present in parental cells but absent in knockout cells, this confirms target specificity.

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Creating knockout cell lines for both the primary target and potential cross-reactive targets enables systematic evaluation of antibody cross-reactivity, which is critical for understanding the molecular mimicry between T. cruzi ribosomal P proteins and cardiac receptors.

  • Immunocytochemistry validation: Labeling wild-type and knockout cells with different fluorescent dyes, co-culturing them, and performing immunocytochemistry with R13 antibodies allows for direct comparison of staining patterns within the same field of view, as demonstrated with other antibodies .

  • Functional reconstitution experiments: Re-introducing wild-type or mutated versions of the target protein in knockout cells provides an opportunity to identify specific domains or residues required for R13 antibody binding and functional effects.

Validation MethodTechnical ApproachExpected Results for Specific Antibody
Western blotCompare parent vs. knockout cell linesBand present in parent, absent in knockout
ImmunofluorescenceCo-culture labeled WT and KO cellsStaining in WT cells only
Functional assayCompare signaling responsesEffect in WT, no effect in KO cells
ReconstitutionRe-express protein in KO cellsRestoration of antibody binding/function

What computational approaches can predict cross-reactivity between R13 antibodies and human proteins?

Advanced computational approaches for predicting cross-reactivity between R13 antibodies and human proteins include:

  • Epitope similarity searching: Utilizing algorithms that identify sequence and structural similarities between the R13 epitope (EEEDDDMGFGLFD) and the human proteome, with particular focus on regions exposed in membrane proteins like G-protein coupled receptors.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Conducting long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of R13 antibody binding to both the parasite epitope and potential human cross-reactive targets to compare binding energetics and conformational dynamics.

  • Machine learning models:

    • Training deep neural networks on existing antibody-epitope binding data

    • Incorporating structural information through graph neural networks

    • Employing active learning approaches to iteratively improve predictions based on experimental feedback

  • Network analysis of protein interactions: Mapping the interaction network of proteins containing motifs similar to the ExDDxGF sequence to identify potential off-target interactions beyond the known β1-adrenergic receptor cross-reactivity.

  • Quantum mechanical calculations: Performing detailed quantum mechanical calculations of the binding interface to predict electronic interactions that contribute to antibody specificity and cross-reactivity.

These computational approaches can prioritize potential cross-reactive targets for experimental validation, accelerating the identification of mechanisms underlying the pathogenic effects of R13 antibodies and potentially revealing novel therapeutic targets.

How might therapeutic strategies targeting R13 antibodies be developed for Chagas' disease treatment?

Development of therapeutic strategies targeting R13 antibodies could follow several promising approaches:

  • Peptide-based immunoadsorption: Designing synthetic peptides based on the R13 sequence or its cross-reactive β1-adrenergic receptor epitope for use in extracorporeal immunoadsorption to selectively remove pathogenic antibodies from circulation.

  • Competitive peptide antagonists: Developing high-affinity peptide mimetics that can compete with cardiac receptors for R13 antibody binding, thereby preventing receptor stimulation without affecting normal receptor function.

  • B-cell targeted therapies: Creating biologics that specifically target and deplete B-cell populations producing pathogenic R13 antibodies, potentially using the ExDDxGF motif coupled to cytotoxic agents.

  • Epitope-specific immunomodulation: Administering modified R13 peptides that induce a shift from the pathogenic (R13+/C10-) antibody profile to the non-pathogenic (R13+/C10+) profile through altered antigen presentation and T-cell help.

  • Receptor-protective antibodies: Developing therapeutic antibodies that bind to the β1-adrenergic receptor in a manner that prevents interaction with pathogenic R13 antibodies while preserving normal receptor function.

These approaches would require extensive preclinical validation in animal models before advancing to clinical trials, but they represent rational strategies based on the current understanding of R13 antibody pathogenesis .

What are the implications of R13 antibody research for understanding other autoimmune conditions involving molecular mimicry?

R13 antibody research provides valuable insights for understanding other autoimmune conditions involving molecular mimicry:

  • Epitope characterization methodology: The approach used to identify the ExDDxGF motif in R13 antibodies through alanine scanning mutagenesis demonstrates a powerful technique applicable to characterizing pathogenic epitopes in other autoimmune conditions.

  • Cross-reactivity mechanisms: The elucidation of structural similarities between parasite and human epitopes provides a mechanistic framework for understanding molecular mimicry in conditions like rheumatic fever (Streptococcus and cardiac myosin) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (Campylobacter and gangliosides).

  • Antibody profile discrimination: The distinction between pathogenic (R13+/C10-) and non-pathogenic (R13+/C10+) antibody profiles, despite both recognizing portions of the same epitope, highlights the importance of fine epitope specificity in determining pathogenicity—a concept relevant to many autoimmune diseases.

  • Disease progression biomarkers: The observation that R13/H13 ratios remain stable throughout disease progression suggests that initial B cell repertoire selection events might determine long-term autoimmunity outcomes, a finding potentially applicable to conditions like rheumatoid arthritis where shifts in antibody isotypes (like IgA1 ACPA) correlate with disease progression .

  • Therapeutic targeting strategies: Approaches developed to modulate R13 antibody responses could inform similar strategies for other autoimmune conditions where molecular mimicry plays a pathogenic role.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.