OSR2 is a mammalian homolog of the Drosophila odd-skipped family of transcription factors with significant roles in embryonic development. The protein is approximately 312 amino acids long and contains five zinc finger domains that enable its function as a transcription factor . These domains are crucial for the protein's ability to bind to specific DNA sequences and regulate gene expression.
OSR2 exists in two isoforms produced through alternative splicing:
OSR2A: Contains all five zinc finger domains
OSR2B: Shorter by 36 amino acids and contains only three zinc finger motifs
Both isoforms localize to the nucleus and exhibit opposing transcriptional activities, highlighting the complexity of OSR2's regulatory functions. The protein's molecular weight is reported to be approximately 48,771 Da, though observed molecular weights in western blot applications may vary due to post-translational modifications .
OSR2 plays crucial roles in multiple developmental processes:
Bone morphogenesis and development
Chondrocyte differentiation
Embryonic digit, forelimb, and hindlimb morphogenesis
Embryonic skeletal joint development
Recent research has revealed an unexpected role for OSR2 in immune function. A 2024 study demonstrated that OSR2 functions as a biomechanical checkpoint that integrates mechanical signaling and facilitates terminal exhaustion of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells . This finding suggests potential implications for cancer immunotherapy, as targeting OSR2 could enhance T cell functionality in solid tumors.
OSR2 antibodies target various regions of the OSR2 protein:
This diversity in target regions allows researchers to select antibodies that are optimized for specific applications or experimental conditions.
OSR2 antibodies demonstrate varying reactivity across species, an important consideration when designing experiments:
This information is critical for researchers working with animal models, as it ensures the antibody will effectively recognize the target protein in their specific experimental system.
OSR2 antibodies are validated for multiple laboratory applications, making them versatile tools for protein detection and localization studies.
These applications enable researchers to detect and visualize OSR2 in various sample types and experimental contexts.
OSR2 antibodies are available in multiple formats to suit different experimental needs:
Unconjugated: The most common format, suitable for most applications
Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) conjugated: For enhanced sensitivity in Western blotting and ELISA
Fluorescent conjugates:
Biotin conjugated: For signal amplification and versatile detection systems
This variety of conjugates provides flexibility for researchers to optimize their detection methods based on their specific experimental requirements.
Most OSR2 antibodies are formulated in:
Some formulations may include additional stabilizers or BSA-free options for specific applications .
OSR2 antibodies have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of this protein's role in both developmental processes and disease states.
OSR2 antibodies have been used extensively to study the protein's role in:
Palatal development and craniofacial morphogenesis
Skeletal and joint development
Digit and limb formation
These studies have helped elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying developmental disorders associated with OSR2 dysfunction.
A groundbreaking 2024 study utilized OSR2 antibodies to investigate the protein's unexpected role in tumor immunology. The research revealed that OSR2 functions as a biomechanical checkpoint that:
Integrates biomechanical signaling in tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells
Is induced by the Piezo1/calcium/CREB axis in response to mechanical stress
Facilitates terminal exhaustion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells
This study demonstrated that depleting OSR2 alleviated T cell exhaustion, while forced OSR2 expression exacerbated exhaustion in solid tumor models. These findings suggest that targeting OSR2 could enhance cancer immunotherapy effectiveness .
Manufacturers employ various validation methods to ensure the specificity and performance of OSR2 antibodies.
OSR2 antibodies undergo rigorous validation through:
Protein array testing: Verifying specificity against target protein plus 383 other non-specific proteins
Western blot validation: Using cell lysates as positive controls
Immunohistochemistry validation: Testing on human tissues like small intestine
Predicted reactivity assessment: Based on sequence homology across species
These validation steps ensure that the antibodies specifically recognize OSR2 and perform reliably in their intended applications.
OSR2 antibodies are purified using various techniques to enhance specificity:
Affinity purification: Common method across most manufacturers
Peptide affinity chromatography: Using SulfoLink™ Coupling Resin
The purification method can influence the antibody's performance in specific applications, making this information valuable for researchers selecting antibodies for their experiments.
This diverse selection allows researchers to choose antibodies that best match their specific experimental requirements and budget constraints.
When selecting an OSR2 antibody, researchers should consider:
Target species compatibility
Validated applications matching experimental needs
Target region (epitope) and its accessibility in the experimental context
Clonality (polyclonal vs. monoclonal)
Conjugation options required for detection method
Recent validation data and quality control information
Cost and quantity needed for planned experiments
Making informed decisions based on these criteria can significantly impact experimental success and reliability of results.
The evolving understanding of OSR2's functions opens new potential applications for OSR2 antibodies.
The recent discovery of OSR2's role in CD8+ T cell exhaustion suggests potential therapeutic applications:
Development of antibody-based therapies targeting OSR2
Use of OSR2 antibodies to monitor treatment response in immunotherapy
Creation of diagnostic tools to assess T cell exhaustion status in cancer patients
OSR2 antibodies may prove valuable in several emerging research areas:
Biomechanical signaling in immune cells
Cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanisms
Developmental disorders associated with OSR2 mutations
Tissue engineering applications related to bone and joint development
As research continues to uncover new functions of OSR2, the applications of OSR2 antibodies will likely expand accordingly.
OSR2 (Odd-Skipped Related 2) is a transcription factor belonging to the Odd C2H2-type zinc-finger protein family. In humans, the canonical protein consists of 312 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of approximately 35.5 kDa and localizes to the nucleus . OSR2 plays a crucial role in cellular differentiation processes, making it a significant target for developmental biology and disease research . Up to three different isoforms have been reported for this protein, suggesting diverse functionality depending on cellular context . The gene is highly conserved, with orthologs identified in multiple species including mouse, rat, bovine, frog, zebrafish, chimpanzee, and chicken, indicating its evolutionary importance in vertebrate development .
Selection of an appropriate OSR2 antibody depends on multiple factors including:
Target region specificity: Determine whether you need an antibody targeting the N-terminal, internal region, or specific amino acid sequences (e.g., AA 101-276) . This choice depends on protein accessibility in your experimental conditions and whether you need to distinguish between isoforms.
Species reactivity: Verify the antibody's reactivity with your species of interest. Available antibodies show varying cross-reactivity profiles:
| Antibody Type | Species Reactivity | Cross-Reactivity Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| N-Terminal (ABIN2777344) | Human, Mouse, Rat, Cow, Dog, Guinea Pig, Horse, Rabbit | Human: 100%, Mouse: 93%, Rat: 93%, Cow: 93%, Dog: 93%, Guinea Pig: 93%, Horse: 93%, Rabbit: 93% |
| Internal Region (ABIN6258294) | Human, Mouse, Rat | Not specified |
| Middle Region (ARP90990_P050) | Mouse | Not specified |
Application compatibility: Different antibodies are optimized for specific techniques such as Western Blot (WB), ELISA, Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Immunocytochemistry (ICC), or Immunofluorescence (IF) . Choose one validated for your intended application.
Clonality consideration: Most available OSR2 antibodies are polyclonal (from rabbit) , which offers high sensitivity but potentially lower specificity than monoclonal alternatives.
OSR2 antibodies are employed in multiple research applications with varying degrees of technical complexity:
Western Blotting (WB): Most commonly used application for detecting OSR2 protein expression levels and molecular weight confirmation .
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Used for quantitative assessment of OSR2 levels in samples .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For visualizing OSR2 distribution in tissue sections, particularly useful in developmental studies and pathological examinations .
Immunocytochemistry (ICC): Allows subcellular localization studies of OSR2 in cultured cells .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Provides high-resolution imaging of OSR2 distribution, often used in co-localization studies with other proteins .
Immunoprecipitation (IP): Used for isolating OSR2 protein complexes to study protein-protein interactions .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for low-abundance OSR2 isoforms requires multiple technical considerations:
Sample preparation enhancement:
Detection sensitivity improvement:
Select antibodies targeting unique epitopes in specific isoforms, such as the N-terminal antibody (ABIN2777344) which recognizes the sequence "YSFLQAVNTF PATVDHLQGL YGLSAVQTMH MNHWTLGYPN VHEITRSTIT"
Employ enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates with extended signal duration
Consider signal amplification systems (tyramide or biotin-based)
Transfer optimization:
For the 35.5 kDa OSR2 protein, use PVDF membranes with 0.2 μm pore size
Implement wet transfer at lower voltage (30V) overnight at 4°C
Use transfer buffers containing 10-20% methanol for proteins of this size range
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Test alternative blocking agents (5% BSA often works better than milk for phosphorylated proteins)
Increase primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C) with optimized dilution
Consider validated antibodies like those affinity-purified via peptide chromatography or synthetic peptide immunogens
When performing immunohistochemistry with OSR2 antibodies across tissue types, researchers should address several critical factors:
Tissue-specific fixation optimization:
For embryonic tissues where OSR2 plays developmental roles: use 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours at 4°C
For adult tissues: test both paraformaldehyde and formalin fixation in parallel
Consider antigen retrieval requirements based on epitope accessibility in your tissue type
Antibody selection based on tissue specificity:
Background reduction strategies:
Implement tissue-specific blocking protocols (10% serum from the secondary antibody species)
Include avidin/biotin blocking steps when using biotinylated detection systems
Consider autofluorescence quenching methods for certain tissues (liver, brain)
Controls implementation:
Always include negative controls (primary antibody omission, isotype controls)
When possible, include tissues from OSR2 knockout models as gold-standard negative controls
Use tissues with known high OSR2 expression as positive controls
Signal development optimization:
For chromogenic detection: optimize development times based on tissue type
For fluorescent detection: consider signal amplification for tissues with low OSR2 expression
Consider multiplex staining to contextualize OSR2 expression with lineage markers
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly influence OSR2 antibody recognition and binding efficiency through several mechanisms:
Impact on epitope accessibility:
Phosphorylation events may alter protein conformation, potentially masking or exposing antibody binding sites
C2H2 zinc-finger domains (present in OSR2) are known to undergo SUMOylation which can interfere with antibody binding
Consider using phosphatase treatment in parallel samples to assess phosphorylation impact
Modification-specific detection strategies:
For studies focused on OSR2 PTMs, consider using:
Antibodies targeting specific modification sites (if available)
Combination of general OSR2 antibodies with PTM-specific antibodies in co-IP experiments
Pretreatment of samples with modification-removing enzymes to compare detection levels
Antibody selection considerations:
Antibodies targeting different regions might have varying sensitivity to PTMs
The internal region antibody (ABIN6258294) targets a larger region (likely spanning multiple potential modification sites)
The N-terminal antibody (ABIN2777344) targets a more defined sequence which might have fewer modification sites
Experimental design adaptation:
Include appropriate controls for PTM studies (phosphatase-treated, deglycosylated samples)
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm results
Implement mass spectrometry validation of PTM status when possible
Maintaining OSR2 antibody activity requires careful attention to storage conditions:
Temperature considerations:
Long-term storage: -20°C to -80°C in non-frost-free freezers
Working aliquots: 4°C for up to 2 weeks
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (create 10-20 μL single-use aliquots)
Buffer composition impact:
Most commercial OSR2 antibodies are supplied in buffered aqueous glycerol solutions
Glycerol percentage (typically 30-50%) prevents freezing at -20°C
Presence of preservatives like sodium azide (0.02-0.05%) inhibits microbial growth
Some antibodies undergo buffer exchange during affinity purification processes
Physical handling precautions:
Store upright to prevent cap contamination
Centrifuge briefly before opening to collect solution at bottom
Use sterile techniques when handling to prevent contamination
Consider oxygen-free environments for highly sensitive antibodies
Stability monitoring protocols:
Implement regular activity testing on control samples
Document lot-to-lot variation with standardized positive controls
Consider adding carrier proteins (BSA 1-5 mg/mL) to dilute antibody solutions
When introducing a new OSR2 antibody into your research, comprehensive validation is essential:
Determining optimal antibody concentration requires systematic titration across applications:
Western blot titration approach:
Immunohistochemistry optimization:
For paraffin sections: Begin with higher concentrations (1:50-1:200)
For frozen sections: Start with more dilute solutions (1:200-1:500)
Include antigen retrieval method optimization in parallel
Assess non-specific binding in negative control tissues
ELISA concentration determination:
Perform checkerboard titration (antibody vs. standard protein)
Calculate signal-to-noise ratio at each concentration
Determine lower limit of detection and quantification
Select concentration that provides linear response in your working range
Immunofluorescence considerations:
| Application | Starting Dilution Range | Optimization Criteria | Typical Incubation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:500-1:2000 | Signal:background, specific band at 35.5 kDa | 1-2 hours RT or overnight 4°C |
| IHC | 1:50-1:500 | Nuclear localization, minimal background | 1-2 hours RT or overnight 4°C |
| ELISA | 1:1000-1:5000 | Linear standard curve, acceptable CV% | 1-2 hours RT |
| IF/ICC | 1:100-1:500 | Nuclear signal, specificity | Overnight 4°C |
Non-specific binding in OSR2 immunofluorescence can be systematically addressed:
Blocking optimization strategies:
Extend blocking time (1-2 hours at room temperature)
Test alternative blocking agents (5% BSA, 10% serum, commercial blockers)
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for better antibody penetration
Include protein blockers specific to your secondary antibody species
Antibody incubation refinement:
Technical optimization approaches:
Pre-adsorb antibody with tissue powder from negative control samples
Implement more stringent washing conditions (higher salt, mild detergents)
Consider using highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies
Reduce secondary antibody concentration if background remains high
Controls and validation:
Always include secondary-only controls to assess non-specific binding
Implement peptide competition controls with the immunizing peptide
Compare staining pattern with multiple OSR2 antibodies targeting different epitopes
Correlate with other detection methods (WB, IHC) to confirm specificity
Inconsistent OSR2 antibody performance in Western blots can stem from multiple factors:
Sample preparation variables:
Incomplete protein denaturation (OSR2 is a nuclear protein with potential protein-DNA interactions)
Inadequate lysis (nuclear proteins require specialized extraction)
Protein degradation (ensure fresh protease inhibitors)
Variable sample loading (verify with housekeeping controls)
Technical execution issues:
Inconsistent transfer efficiency (verify with reversible staining)
Variable blocking efficiency (standardize blocking time/temperature)
Antibody degradation (aliquot and store properly)
Inconsistent ECL reagent performance (prepare fresh)
Antibody-specific factors:
Resolution strategies:
Implement standardized protocols with detailed documentation
Include positive control samples with known OSR2 expression
Consider including recombinant OSR2 protein as reference standard
When switching antibody lots, run side-by-side comparison with previous lot
When faced with conflicting results from different OSR2 antibodies, follow this interpretation framework:
Antibody characteristic assessment:
Compare targeting epitopes (N-terminal vs. internal region antibodies may detect different isoforms)
Review validation data from manufacturers for each antibody
Consider clonality differences (all reported OSR2 antibodies are polyclonal but may target different epitopes)
Assess purification methods (peptide affinity chromatography vs. affinity purified )
Experimental condition analysis:
Evaluate whether conditions favor one epitope's accessibility over others
Consider whether sample preparation might differentially affect epitope integrity
Assess whether detection methods have varied sensitivity thresholds
Biological interpretation strategies:
Resolution approaches:
Implement orthogonal validation methods (mass spectrometry, RNA expression)
Utilize genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) to confirm specificity
Consider the collective weight of evidence rather than relying on a single antibody
Transparently report conflicting results in publications with potential interpretations
OSR2 antibodies offer valuable tools for developmental biology studies:
Spatiotemporal expression profiling:
Lineage tracing applications:
Combine OSR2 immunostaining with lineage-specific markers
Track cell fate decisions in OSR2-expressing populations
Implement dual/triple immunofluorescence with other transcription factors
Correlate with functional outcomes in developmental processes
Mechanistic developmental studies:
Use OSR2 antibodies in ChIP assays to identify target genes
Implement Co-IP to identify protein interaction partners during development
Study regulation of OSR2 by upstream developmental signals
Investigate post-translational modifications during developmental transitions
Cross-species developmental comparisons:
Emerging methodologies for studying OSR2 protein interactions include:
Advanced proximity labeling approaches:
Live-cell interaction monitoring:
High-throughput interaction screening:
Structural studies of interactions:
Cryo-EM of OSR2-containing complexes purified via immunoprecipitation
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map interaction interfaces
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify spatial proximity
Correlation with antibody epitope mapping data to understand functional domains
OSR2 antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating pathological conditions:
Cancer research applications:
Evaluate OSR2 expression changes in tumor tissues via IHC
Correlate expression with clinical outcomes and tumor characteristics
Study mechanisms of dysregulation using cell line models
Investigate potential as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker
Developmental disorder studies:
Tissue regeneration and wound healing research:
Monitor OSR2 expression during tissue repair processes
Investigate role in cell differentiation during regeneration
Study potential regulatory functions in stem cell populations
Correlate with functional recovery outcomes
Mechanistic studies in disease models:
Implement ChIP-seq using OSR2 antibodies to identify altered gene targeting
Study protein-protein interaction changes in disease states via Co-IP
Investigate post-translational modification alterations in pathological conditions
Correlate with functional consequences and potential therapeutic implications