OST3A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

3A1 Monoclonal Antibody

3A1 is a murine-derived monoclonal antibody that recognizes immature and mature T-cell antigens. It has diagnostic utility in identifying T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cases that lack conventional markers .

Key Features

  • Target: Antigen expressed on T-ALL blasts.

  • Structure: Composed of two heavy and two light chains (typical IgG structure) .

  • Diagnostic Applications:

    • Identifies T-ALL cells when conventional markers like CALLA (common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen) are absent .

    • Works synergistically with anti-CALLA reagents for leukemia subtyping .

Supporting Data

Parameter3A1 Antibody Profile
ReactivityT-cells (immature and mature)
Associated MarkersTdT, Acid Phosphatase (AcP)
Negative MarkersOKT3, OKT4, OKT8, Leu-7
Clinical Use CaseResolving unclassified ALL

OKT3 Monoclonal Antibody

OKT3 targets the CD3 complex on human T-cells and is used to treat acute renal allograft rejection .

Key Features

  • Target: CD3ε chain on T-cell receptors .

  • Mechanism:

    • Inhibits cytotoxic T-cell activity (steric hindrance at 10⁻⁸ M) .

    • Acts as a mitogen at low concentrations (10⁻¹² M) .

  • Clinical Applications:

    • Reverses 94% of acute kidney transplant rejections vs. 75% with steroids .

    • Improves 1-year graft survival to 62% (vs. 45% for steroids) .

Functional Comparison: OKT3 vs. Steroids

ParameterOKT3 TreatmentHigh-Dose Steroids
Rejection Reversal94%75%
1-Year Graft Survival62%45%
Side EffectsCytokine release syndromeHyperglycemia, infections

Nomenclature Considerations

The term "OST3A" may stem from:

  1. Typographical errors: Confusion between "OST3A" and established antibodies like 3A1 or OKT3.

  2. Alternative naming conventions: For example, "OKT3" refers to Ortho Kung T-cell 3, while "3A1" follows a distinct numbering system.

  3. Hypothetical antibodies: No peer-reviewed studies or databases (e.g., OAS ) explicitly reference "OST3A."

Research Limitations

  • No direct evidence for "OST3A" exists in PubMed, OAS, or antibody databases .

  • Structural ambiguity: If OST3A exists, its Fab/Fc regions and isotype remain uncharacterized .

Recommendations for Further Investigation

  1. Validate the term "OST3A" through primary sources (e.g., manufacturer datasheets).

  2. Explore cross-reactivity studies between 3A1, OKT3, and putative OST3A targets.

  3. Screen the OAS database for sequences labeled "OST3A" .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
OST3A antibody; At1g11560 antibody; T23J18.22 antibody; Probable dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide--protein glycosyltransferase subunit 3A antibody
Target Names
OST3A
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
OST3A Antibody targets a subunit of the oligosaccharyl transferase (OST) complex. This complex plays a crucial role in protein N-glycosylation, catalyzing the initial transfer of a specific glycan (Glc(3)Man(9)GlcNAc(2) in eukaryotes) from the lipid carrier dolichol-pyrophosphate to an asparagine residue within an Asn-X-Ser/Thr consensus motif in nascent polypeptide chains. This process, known as N-glycosylation, occurs cotranslationally. The OST complex associates with the Sec61 complex, the channel-forming translocon complex responsible for mediating protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). All subunits of the OST complex are essential for maximal enzyme activity.
Database Links
Protein Families
OST3/OST6 family
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is 3-OST3A and why is it important in cancer research?

3-OST3A (Heparan Sulfate-glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase 3A) is an enzyme that catalyzes the 3-O-sulfation of heparan sulfate (HS) chains. This protein has emerged as a significant player in cancer biology due to its context-dependent functionality, acting as either a tumor suppressor or an oncogene depending on the cellular environment. Research has demonstrated that 3-OST3A exhibits tumor-suppressive properties in luminal A breast cancer cells (like MCF-7), while demonstrating oncogenic properties in HER2+ breast cancer cells (like SKBR3) . This dual nature makes 3-OST3A an important target for cancer research, as understanding its expression patterns and functions could provide insights into cancer progression mechanisms.

The significance of 3-OST3A extends to its involvement in critical signaling pathways. It affects FGF-7-HS interactions and regulates FGF-7 signaling, which plays crucial roles in both mammary gland development and breast cancer progression . Clinical data shows that 3-OST3A expression levels vary significantly across different breast cancer subtypes and correlate with patient outcomes in HER2+ breast cancers, suggesting its potential as both a biomarker and therapeutic target .

How do expression patterns of 3-OST3A differ across breast cancer subtypes?

3-OST3A exhibits distinct expression patterns across breast cancer subtypes, with important functional and clinical implications:

In Luminal A breast cancer (e.g., MCF-7 cells), 3-OST3A typically shows lower expression compared to other subtypes. Functionally, it acts as a tumor suppressor in this context. When experimentally overexpressed, it reduces cell growth rate, promotes apoptosis through enhanced expression of pro-apoptotic protein Bax, decreased anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, and activation of caspase-mediated apoptosis . Studies in xenografted mice confirm that 3-OST3A expression retards tumor progression in this breast cancer subtype .

In Triple Negative breast cancer (e.g., MDA-MB-231 cells), 3-OST3A overexpression completely inhibits cell proliferation, suggesting strong anti-tumor effects . This reinforces its potential tumor-suppressive role in this aggressive breast cancer subtype.

In HER2+ breast cancer (e.g., SKBR3 cells), 3-OST3A shows significantly higher expression and functions as an oncogene. It enhances proliferation when overexpressed and reduces cell growth when knocked down . This represents a complete functional reversal compared to its role in Luminal A cells.

Clinical data corroborates these laboratory findings, with significantly lower 3-OST3A expression in Luminal A tumors compared to other breast cancer subtypes, suggesting that reduced expression contributes to carcinogenesis in this context . Conversely, higher 3-OST3A expression in HER2+ patients is associated with reduced survival and faster cancer progression .

What are the basic applications of 3-OST3A antibodies in experimental cancer research?

3-OST3A antibodies serve several fundamental applications in cancer research:

Protein expression detection and quantification represents the most common application. Researchers can use 3-OST3A antibodies for Western blotting to quantify protein levels across different cell lines and tissue samples . This allows comparison of expression between normal and malignant tissues, or across different cancer subtypes.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence enable visualization of 3-OST3A expression patterns in tissue sections and cultured cells. These techniques permit assessment of subcellular localization, which provides insights into protein function. They also allow evaluation of expression heterogeneity within tumors, which may have important clinical implications.

Validation of genetic manipulations is another critical application. When conducting overexpression studies using vectors like pcDNA3.1(+)-3-OST3A-hemagglutinin (HA) or knockdown experiments using siRNAs targeting 3-OST3A, antibodies confirm successful protein level alteration . This validation step is essential for attributing observed phenotypic changes to 3-OST3A modulation.

Flow cytometry with 3-OST3A antibodies enables quantitative assessment of protein expression at the single-cell level. This is particularly useful for analyzing heterogeneous cell populations and can be combined with other markers to identify specific cell subpopulations with distinct 3-OST3A expression patterns.

In clinical correlation studies, 3-OST3A antibodies analyze patient samples to correlate expression levels with clinical outcomes. Research has demonstrated that 3-OST3A expression is associated with cancer progression and survival in HER2+ breast cancer patients , highlighting its potential as a prognostic biomarker.

What protocols should be followed for immunodetection of 3-OST3A in cell lines?

When designing protocols for 3-OST3A detection in cell lines, researchers should consider several methodological approaches:

For Western blotting, prepare total cell lysates using appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent protein degradation. Separate proteins by SDS-PAGE using 10-12% gels, which provide optimal resolution for 3-OST3A. Transfer proteins to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes and block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA. Incubate with validated anti-3-OST3A primary antibody at optimized dilution, followed by appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence and normalize expression to housekeeping proteins such as β-actin or GAPDH .

For immunofluorescence microscopy, culture cells in appropriate chambers (e.g., Lab-Tek chambers as mentioned in the research) . Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100. Block non-specific binding with appropriate serum, then incubate with anti-3-OST3A primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Detect using fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies and counterstain nuclei with DAPI. Analyze using confocal microscopy for detailed subcellular localization.

When planning flow cytometry analysis, prepare single-cell suspensions and fix/permeabilize cells for intracellular 3-OST3A detection. Stain with anti-3-OST3A antibody followed by fluorescent secondary antibody, then analyze using flow cytometry to quantify expression levels across cell populations . Include appropriate isotype controls to assess non-specific binding.

When comparing expression across different breast cancer subtypes, include representative cell lines from each molecular subtype as described in the research: Luminal A (MCF-7, T-47D), HER2+ (SKBR3, BT-474), Triple Negative (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-468), and normal breast epithelial cells (MCF-10A) as controls .

For all applications, validate antibody specificity using positive controls (cells overexpressing 3-OST3A-HA) and negative controls (cells transfected with empty vector or treated with 3-OST3A siRNA) . This validation step is critical for ensuring reliable and reproducible results.

How can researchers optimize immunohistochemical detection of 3-OST3A in tissue samples?

Optimizing immunohistochemical detection of 3-OST3A in tissue samples requires careful attention to several methodological aspects:

For tissue preparation, both formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and frozen sections can be used, but fixation protocols should be standardized to ensure consistent results. For FFPE tissues, fixation time should be optimized to prevent overfixation, which can mask epitopes. Tissue sections should be cut at 3-5 μm thickness for optimal antibody penetration.

Antigen retrieval represents a critical step for 3-OST3A detection in FFPE tissues. Heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) should be tested to determine optimal conditions. The research indicates that epigenetic modifications affect 3-OST3A expression , suggesting that chromatin structure may influence epitope accessibility, making antigen retrieval particularly important.

For antibody selection and optimization, titrate primary anti-3-OST3A antibodies to determine the optimal concentration that provides maximum specific staining with minimal background. Incubation time and temperature should also be optimized, with overnight incubation at 4°C often yielding better results than shorter incubations at room temperature.

When selecting detection systems, consider chromogenic (DAB) detection for routine analysis and quantification, or fluorescent detection for co-localization studies with other markers. For low-expression samples, signal amplification methods such as tyramide signal amplification may improve sensitivity.

For quantification of expression, implement digital image analysis using validated software to ensure objective and reproducible scoring. Develop a standardized scoring system (e.g., H-score, Allred score) based on staining intensity and percentage of positive cells. The research used ROC curves to determine optimal cut-offs for expression levels in clinical samples .

When working with breast cancer tissues specifically, classify samples according to molecular subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, Triple Negative) following established guidelines, such as the St Gallen breast cancer consensus as mentioned in the research . This classification is essential for proper interpretation of 3-OST3A expression patterns.

What controls are essential when validating 3-OST3A antibody specificity?

Ensuring antibody specificity is critical for reliable research outcomes. When working with 3-OST3A antibodies, researchers should implement comprehensive control measures:

Positive and negative cellular controls provide the foundation for antibody validation. Use cell lines with verified 3-OST3A expression as positive controls. The research identifies several breast cancer cell lines with varying 3-OST3A expression levels that can serve this purpose . For definitive positive controls, include cells transfected with 3-OST3A-expressing constructs, such as the pcDNA3.1(+)-3-OST3A-HA mentioned in the research . For negative controls, use cell lines with minimal endogenous 3-OST3A expression or cells treated with 3-OST3A siRNA to knock down expression .

Genetic validation approaches offer stringent specificity testing. Compare antibody signals in wild-type cells versus cells with 3-OST3A knockdown using siRNA as described in the research methodology . Perform rescue experiments by re-expressing 3-OST3A in knockdown cells to restore the antibody signal. For comprehensive validation, consider generating CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited cells with complete 3-OST3A knockout as definitive negative controls.

Epitope-tagged constructs provide another validation strategy. Express 3-OST3A with epitope tags (e.g., HA-tag as used in the research) and detect the tagged protein with both anti-3-OST3A and anti-tag antibodies. Confirmation of signal co-localization verifies antibody specificity for the target protein.

Technical controls should include isotype controls (using non-specific antibodies of the same isotype as the 3-OST3A antibody) to assess non-specific binding. Include secondary-only controls to evaluate background signal. Always perform antibody titration to determine the optimal concentration that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background.

For Western blot validation, confirm the antibody detects a band of the expected molecular weight for 3-OST3A. Verify band disappearance or significant reduction following siRNA treatment. In overexpression studies, confirm increased band intensity correlating with increased 3-OST3A expression .

How can 3-OST3A antibodies be used to investigate FGF-7 signaling pathways?

3-OST3A antibodies can be instrumental in investigating the complex relationship between 3-OST3A and FGF-7 signaling, which is particularly relevant in breast cancer biology. The research demonstrates that 3-O-sulfation of heparan sulfate is important for HS-FGF-7-FGFR2IIIb complex formation, and 3-OST3A expression can impair FGF-7 binding in MCF-7 cells . Here's a methodological approach:

For cell-surface binding analysis, researchers can perform FGF-7 binding assays as described in the methodology section. Serum-starve cells and incubate with recombinant human FGF-7 (0.5 ng/mL) for 30 minutes. Immunostain cells for both FGF-7 and 3-OST3A expression using specific antibodies. Analyze binding patterns by confocal laser scanning microscopy or flow cytometry . Compare binding patterns between cells with normal, overexpressed, or knocked-down 3-OST3A levels to assess how 3-OST3A modifies FGF-7 interactions with cell-surface heparan sulfate.

For signaling pathway analysis, after FGF-7 stimulation, perform time-course experiments and use antibodies against downstream signaling molecules alongside 3-OST3A detection. Focus on ERK/phospho-ERK (proliferative signaling), AKT/phospho-AKT (survival signaling), and p38/phospho-p38 (stress signaling) as the research indicates these pathways are affected by 3-OST3A expression . Western blotting or multiplex immunofluorescence can be used to simultaneously detect these markers in relation to 3-OST3A levels.

Co-localization studies can reveal spatial relationships between 3-OST3A and components of the FGF-7 signaling pathway. Use dual immunofluorescence with antibodies against 3-OST3A and FGF-7/FGFR2IIIb. Analyze these relationships using confocal microscopy with appropriate co-localization analysis software. Quantify co-localization using established metrics like Pearson's correlation coefficient or Manders' overlap coefficient.

For functional correlation studies, design experiments to correlate 3-OST3A expression with cellular responses to FGF-7 stimulation. Measure cell proliferation using assays like MTT or BrdU incorporation. Assess apoptotic response using markers like cleaved caspase-9 and PARP cleavage, which the research shows are affected by 3-OST3A expression . Evaluate migration and invasion capabilities using appropriate in vitro assays to comprehensively understand how 3-OST3A affects FGF-7-mediated cellular behaviors.

How can 3-OST3A antibodies help elucidate treatment response mechanisms in HER2+ breast cancer?

3-OST3A antibodies can provide valuable insights into treatment response mechanisms in HER2+ breast cancer, particularly regarding trastuzumab sensitivity. The research demonstrates that 3-OST3A expression enhances trastuzumab's antiproliferative effect in SKBR3 cells, while its knockdown abrogates this effect . This finding has significant clinical implications and can be further investigated using the following approaches:

For clinical correlation studies, use 3-OST3A antibodies to assess expression levels in patient-derived HER2+ breast cancer samples. Stratify samples based on 3-OST3A expression levels using standardized scoring systems. Correlate expression with documented clinical response to trastuzumab treatment. This approach could help identify whether 3-OST3A expression levels could serve as a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab response.

Mechanistic investigations should focus on how 3-OST3A affects HER2 signaling. Perform co-immunoprecipitation experiments with 3-OST3A antibodies to identify potential interactions with components of the HER2 signaling pathway. Use proximity ligation assays to visualize and quantify protein-protein interactions in situ. These techniques can reveal whether 3-OST3A directly or indirectly modulates HER2 receptor function or downstream signaling.

For treatment response monitoring, design experiments to track 3-OST3A expression changes during trastuzumab treatment. Use 3-OST3A antibodies for immunoblotting or immunofluorescence to assess expression before treatment and at various time points after treatment initiation. Compare expression patterns between trastuzumab-sensitive and resistant cell lines to identify potential differences that might contribute to treatment response.

Combination therapy assessment should investigate how 3-OST3A expression affects response to trastuzumab in combination with other therapeutic agents. The research noted that approximately 40% of HER2+ breast cancer patients show resistance to trastuzumab . Determine whether 3-OST3A expression correlates with response to combination therapies such as trastuzumab plus pertuzumab or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. This could inform more personalized treatment strategies for HER2+ breast cancer patients.

What techniques can be employed to study the epigenetic regulation of 3-OST3A expression?

The research indicates that 3-OST3A expression is epigenetically regulated, with a canonical CpG island in its proximal promoter region and first exon . Several techniques can be employed to investigate this regulation:

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays represent a powerful approach for studying epigenetic regulation. The research utilized the Low Cell# ChIP kit (Diagenode) with antibodies against various histone modifications and transcription factors . Cross-link proteins to DNA using formaldehyde, lyse cells, and sonicate chromatin to appropriate fragment sizes (typically 200-500 bp). Immunoprecipitate with antibodies against histone modifications of interest, focusing on repressive marks (H3K9me3, H3K27me3) and active marks (H3K4me3, H3K9ac). Purify the DNA and analyze by qPCR using primers targeting the 3-OST3A promoter region as described in the research methodology .

Bisulfite sequencing provides detailed information about DNA methylation patterns. The research used this technique to analyze the methylation status of two regions in the 3-OST3A gene . Treat genomic DNA with sodium bisulfite to convert unmethylated cytosines to uracil while leaving methylated cytosines unchanged. Amplify the region of interest using nested PCR with primers designed for bisulfite-converted DNA (examples provided in the research methodology) . Subclone PCR products into an appropriate vector and sequence multiple clones to assess methylation patterns at individual CpG sites.

Drug treatment studies can reveal the contribution of different epigenetic mechanisms to 3-OST3A silencing. The research used treatment with both DNA methylation inhibitors (Aza) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (TSA) . Treat cells with these agents individually and in combination, then assess changes in 3-OST3A expression by RT-qPCR and protein analysis. The research indicated that both deacetylation and methylation inhibitors were required to reactivate 3-OST3A expression in some cell lines, suggesting complex epigenetic regulation .

Sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP) can identify co-occurrence of different epigenetic marks or transcription factors. First immunoprecipitate with one antibody, then perform a second immunoprecipitation on the enriched chromatin using another antibody. This technique is particularly useful for identifying complexes involved in 3-OST3A regulation, such as the distinct repressive complexes in different cell lines mentioned in the research .

How should researchers address context-dependent functional differences of 3-OST3A across cancer types?

The dual nature of 3-OST3A as both tumor suppressor and oncogene depending on cellular context presents analytical challenges. Researchers should implement systematic approaches to address and interpret these context-dependent differences:

Establish a standardized experimental framework that acknowledges context-dependency as a fundamental property of 3-OST3A rather than an experimental inconsistency. Always specify the exact cellular context when reporting findings, including cell type, molecular classification, baseline 3-OST3A expression, and relevant signaling pathway status. For breast cancer studies, clearly classify samples by molecular subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, Triple Negative) following established guidelines such as the St Gallen consensus mentioned in the research .

Implement parallel experimental designs across multiple cell lines representing different contexts. The research demonstrated this approach by studying 3-OST3A in MCF-7 (Luminal A), MDA-MB-231 (Triple Negative), and SKBR3 (HER2+) cells . Apply identical experimental manipulations (overexpression, knockdown) across these cell lines and measure the same functional outcomes (proliferation, apoptosis, signaling). This parallel approach directly highlights context-dependent differences.

Focus on mechanistic investigations rather than general phenotypic outcomes. For instance, in MCF-7 cells, 3-OST3A impairs FGF-7-HS interactions and inhibits ERK/AKT signaling, leading to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis . In SKBR3 cells, investigate whether 3-OST3A interacts with HER2-related pathways to promote proliferation. By identifying context-specific molecular mechanisms, researchers can explain seemingly contradictory functional outcomes.

Create comprehensive comparison tables documenting context-dependent findings:

Cancer Type/Subtype3-OST3A ExpressionFunctional RoleAffected PathwaysPhenotypic EffectsReference
Luminal A (MCF-7)LowTumor SuppressorFGF-7 signaling, ERK/AKT inhibitionReduced proliferation, enhanced apoptosis, retarded tumor growth
Triple Negative (MDA-MB-231)VariableTumor SuppressorCell proliferationComplete inhibition of proliferation
HER2+ (SKBR3)HighOncogeneCell proliferation, trastuzumab responseEnhanced proliferation, affects drug response

Validate findings in clinical samples to ensure laboratory observations translate to patient contexts. The research demonstrated this approach by analyzing 3-OST3A expression in patient samples classified by breast cancer subtype . Correlate expression with clinical outcomes using appropriate statistical methods, such as univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier log-rank analyses as described in the research .

What technical challenges might researchers encounter when detecting 3-OST3A in clinical samples?

Detecting 3-OST3A in clinical samples presents several technical challenges that researchers should anticipate and address:

Antibody specificity represents a primary concern. Commercial antibodies may vary in specificity and sensitivity, potentially leading to inconsistent results across studies. To address this, thoroughly validate antibodies using positive controls (cells overexpressing 3-OST3A-HA) and negative controls (cells transfected with empty vector or treated with 3-OST3A siRNA) as described in the research methodology . Test multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of 3-OST3A to confirm consistent detection patterns.

Variable expression levels across different breast cancer subtypes can affect detection sensitivity. The research demonstrated that 3-OST3A expression is significantly lower in Luminal A tumors compared to other subtypes . For low-expression samples, optimize detection protocols by using signal amplification methods (e.g., tyramide signal amplification for IHC) or highly sensitive detection systems for mRNA quantification, such as digital droplet PCR.

Sample preservation effects can significantly impact detection. Formalin fixation may mask epitopes and affect antibody binding, particularly for proteins subject to epigenetic regulation like 3-OST3A . Optimize antigen retrieval methods specifically for 3-OST3A detection in FFPE samples. Compare results between FFPE and frozen sections when possible to assess potential fixation artifacts. Document fixation conditions and times in all experimental reports.

Tumor heterogeneity presents challenges for representative sampling. 3-OST3A expression may vary within the same tumor, potentially leading to misleading results if sampling is limited. Analyze multiple areas within each tumor to account for heterogeneity. Use tissue microarrays with multiple cores per case when screening large sample sets. Consider employing single-cell approaches for highly heterogeneous samples to capture the full spectrum of expression.

Technical variability in staining procedures can introduce batch-to-batch inconsistencies. Implement automated staining platforms when possible to minimize technical variation. Include standard control samples in each batch to monitor staining consistency. Use digital image analysis for objective quantification of staining intensity and distribution, reducing observer bias in interpretation.

How should researchers correlate 3-OST3A expression with clinical outcomes in breast cancer?

Correlating 3-OST3A expression with clinical outcomes requires rigorous methodological approaches to ensure reliable and clinically meaningful results:

Implement precise subtype classification as the foundation for analysis. The research demonstrates that 3-OST3A expression and function vary significantly across breast cancer subtypes . Classify all samples according to established molecular subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, Triple Negative) following guidelines such as the St Gallen breast cancer consensus mentioned in the research . This classification is essential for meaningful interpretation of expression data.

Establish standardized scoring systems for expression quantification. The research utilized ROC curve analysis to determine optimal cut-offs for expression levels in clinical samples . Develop and validate scoring methods specific for 3-OST3A, whether using manual assessment (H-score, Allred score) or digital image analysis. Document the distribution of expression values within each subtype and determine appropriate thresholds for categorizing expression as high or low.

Apply appropriate statistical methods for outcome correlation. The research employed univariate analysis (Fisher exact t-test) to associate 3-OST3A expression with cancer progression and death in HER2+ breast tumors . This was further confirmed using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analyses . For comprehensive analysis, perform both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent prognostic value of 3-OST3A expression while controlling for established prognostic factors.

Create subtype-specific reference tables for clinical interpretation:

Breast Cancer Subtype3-OST3A Expression PatternClinical CorrelationStatistical SignificanceClinical Implication
Luminal ASignificantly lower than other subtypesNot specifically reportedP<0.042Potential loss of tumor suppressor function
HER2+Significantly higher than other subtypesAssociated with cancer progression and deathP≤0.004 (progression), P≤0.046 (death)Potential adverse prognostic marker
Triple NegativeVariableNot specifically reportedNot reportedRequires further investigation

Investigate treatment response correlations, particularly for HER2+ breast cancers. The research showed that 3-OST3A expression enhanced trastuzumab's antiproliferative effect in HER2+ cells . Stratify patient cohorts by both 3-OST3A expression and treatment regimen to identify potential predictive value for therapy response. This approach may help identify the approximately 40% of HER2+ patients who might benefit from extended adjuvant therapy, as referenced in the research .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.