P4H11 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Target Protein: P4H11 in Arabidopsis thaliana

P4H11 refers to a prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H) isoform involved in post-translational modification of proteins, particularly in collagen synthesis and cell wall formation. While specific functional studies for P4H11 are not detailed in the provided sources, prolyl 4-hydroxylases generally:

  • Catalyze hydroxylation of proline residues in nascent collagen chains, critical for triple-helix stability .

  • Influence plant cell wall structure and stress responses .

Applications in Research

The antibody is validated for:

  • Western Blotting: Detects endogenous P4H11 protein in Arabidopsis lysates.

  • Immunohistochemistry: Localizes P4H11 expression in plant tissue sections.

  • ELISA: Quantifies protein levels in experimental setups .

Species Reactivity and Limitations

  • Confirmed Reactivity: Arabidopsis thaliana only .

  • No Cross-Reactivity: No data supports reactivity with human, mouse, or rat proteins.

Research Context and Gaps

While the P4H11 Antibody is commercially available, peer-reviewed studies directly utilizing this reagent are absent in the provided sources. Prolyl 4-hydroxylases in plants are broadly implicated in:

  • Cell wall biosynthesis during growth and pathogen defense.

  • Hypoxic stress adaptation via regulation of extracellular matrix proteins .

Further studies should validate its utility in mutant plant lines or under stress conditions.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (Made-to-order)
Synonyms
P4H11 antibody; At4g35820 antibody; F4B14.90Probable prolyl 4-hydroxylase 11 antibody; AtP4H11 antibody; EC 1.14.11.2 antibody
Target Names
P4H11
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets prolyl 4-hydroxylase 11 (P4H11), an enzyme that catalyzes the post-translational hydroxylation of proline residues within -Xaa-Pro-Gly- sequences in proline-rich peptides. This modification is crucial for the formation of 4-hydroxyproline, a key component of numerous plant cell wall glycoproteins, including extensins, hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins, lectins, and arabinogalactan proteins.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT4G35820

STRING: 3702.AT4G35820.1

UniGene: At.54621

Protein Families
P4HA family
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass type II membrane protein.

Q&A

What is P4H11 antibody and what target does it recognize?

P4H11 is a human monoclonal antibody that targets FLT3 (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3), a receptor tyrosine kinase frequently overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. It was selected for affinity maturation and development of therapeutic bispecific antibodies . As an anti-FLT3 lead clone, P4H11 demonstrates binding to specific domains of the FLT3 extracellular region and serves as a foundation for developing targeted immunotherapeutics against AML.

How does P4H11 compare to other anti-FLT3 antibodies in research applications?

P4H11 represents one of several human antibodies isolated against human FLT3 using phage display technology. When comparing domain-specific antibodies, those targeting domain 4 (like the evolved versions of P4H11) demonstrated higher in vitro cytotoxicity despite not necessarily having the highest affinity . This suggests that epitope specificity may be more important than raw binding strength for certain therapeutic applications. The antibody has been used as a starting point for affinity maturation through yeast display techniques, allowing for the development of higher-affinity variants with enhanced therapeutic potential.

What techniques are recommended for affinity maturation of P4H11?

Yeast display technology has been successfully employed for the affinity maturation of P4H11. This approach involves:

  • Library construction by shuffling variable heavy and light chain domains

  • Selection of higher-affinity variants through multiple rounds of screening

  • Characterization of lead candidates using binding affinity assays

The process has been shown to significantly enhance binding properties while maintaining target specificity . When implementing this approach, researchers should establish clear selection criteria focused on both affinity improvements and retention of desired functional properties, as the highest affinity antibody may not always translate to optimal therapeutic efficacy.

What functional assays are most appropriate for validating P4H11-derived bispecific antibodies?

Based on established protocols for similar antibodies, a multi-tiered functional assessment approach is recommended:

Assay TypePurposeKey Parameters
Binding AssaysDetermine affinity constantsKD values (pM-nM range)
Cell-based CytotoxicityMeasure target cell killingEC50, maximum lysis percentage
T-cell ActivationAssess effector functionCytokine production, CD69 expression
E:T Ratio StudiesDetermine potency at various effector:target ratiosActivity at ratios from 1:1 to 1:20
In vivo EfficacyConfirm therapeutic potentialTumor burden reduction in animal models

Comprehensive validation requires examining cytotoxicity against FLT3-expressing AML cell lines (such as EOL-1 and MV4-11) at varying effector-to-target (E:T) ratios . Notably, substantial target cell lysis can be detected at E:T ratios as low as 1:20, which simulates physiologically relevant conditions where effector cells may be limited.

How can P4H11 be optimized for bispecific antibody development?

The optimization of P4H11 for bispecific antibody development involves several critical steps:

  • Epitope mapping to determine the most optimal binding region on FLT3

  • Structural modifications to enhance stability and reduce immunogenicity

  • Selection of appropriate anti-CD3 antibody partners (such as 2B4)

  • Engineering of the bispecific format to optimize T-cell engagement

Research indicates that despite affinity considerations, targeting specific domains (particularly domain 4 of FLT3) results in superior bispecific antibody performance . The resulting bispecific constructs should be rigorously tested for binding to both targets (FLT3 and CD3) with dissociation constants in the picomolar to nanomolar range for optimal efficacy.

What strategies can prevent antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in P4H11-derived therapeutics?

To mitigate potential ADE effects in P4H11-derived therapeutics, researchers have successfully implemented Fc-engineering approaches:

  • N297A mutation in the IgG1-Fc region significantly reduces binding to Fc receptors

  • This modification effectively prevents Fc-mediated antibody uptake in cell lines such as Raji

  • Functional testing confirms that the mutation minimally impacts therapeutic efficacy

Alternative modifications like LALA (L234A/L235A) have also been employed in therapeutic antibodies, though consensus regarding the optimal approach continues to evolve . These modifications should be introduced during the construction of the expression vectors for the bispecific antibody to ensure consistent production of the engineered protein.

How do domain-specific targeting properties of anti-FLT3 antibodies impact bispecific efficacy?

Domain-specific targeting has profound implications for bispecific antibody efficacy:

  • Domain 4-targeting antibodies (such as evolved P4H11 derivatives and 4G8) demonstrated superior in vitro cytotoxicity

  • Domain 5-targeting antibodies (like mAb_E) showed the second highest activity

  • In subcutaneous AML xenograft models, domain 4-targeting bispecifics exhibited greater efficacy at lower doses (0.01 mg/kg)

This suggests that domain 4 of FLT3 represents an optimal region for IgG-based bispecific targeting, potentially due to factors such as epitope accessibility, structural constraints, or downstream signaling effects. Researchers should prioritize domain mapping when developing novel anti-FLT3 therapeutic antibodies.

What quality control measures should be implemented for P4H11 antibody production?

A comprehensive quality control framework for P4H11 production should include:

  • Molecular analysis:

    • SDS-PAGE for purity assessment

    • Mass spectrometry for sequence verification

    • ELISA for binding activity confirmation

  • Functional validation:

    • Binding affinity measurements to recombinant and cell-surface FLT3

    • Cytotoxicity assays with relevant cell lines

    • Stability testing under various storage conditions

Each production batch should undergo consistent testing to ensure reproducibility of research results. Documentation of all quality control parameters is essential for maintaining product integrity across different experimental timepoints.

How can researchers address variability in E:T ratios when testing P4H11-derived bispecific antibodies?

When addressing variability in E:T ratios during testing:

  • Standardize T-cell isolation and activation protocols

  • Test multiple E:T ratios (1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20) to establish a complete efficacy profile

  • Account for donor variability by using T cells from multiple healthy donors

  • Normalize results against appropriate controls for each experimental condition

Research indicates that while maximal killing is observed at higher E:T ratios (1:1), substantial target cell lysis can still be detected at ratios as low as 1:20 (5% T cells) . This broader efficacy range is important for predicting therapeutic potential in clinical settings where optimal E:T ratios may not be achievable.

What approaches can increase specificity of antibodies like P4H11 in complex targeting scenarios?

Enhancing antibody specificity requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Biophysics-informed modeling to identify distinct binding modes associated with specific ligands

  • High-throughput sequencing coupled with computational analysis to predict optimal binding profiles

  • Structure-guided mutations to enhance target discrimination

  • Selection strategies that explicitly test for cross-reactivity against similar epitopes

These approaches have successfully generated antibodies with customized specificity profiles, either with specific high affinity for particular target ligands or with controlled cross-specificity for multiple target ligands. For P4H11 derivatives, such techniques can optimize targeting of FLT3 while minimizing off-target effects.

How might long-term B cell responses influence the development of next-generation P4H11-like antibodies?

Recent research indicates that extended B cell maturation processes significantly enhance antibody effectiveness:

  • Germinal centers function as "engines of antibody evolution"

  • B cells require extended time periods (months rather than weeks) to maximize mutation and affinity maturation

  • "Slow delivery, escalating dose" vaccination strategies yield superior antibody responses

This understanding could inform development of improved immunization strategies for generating high-quality monoclonal antibodies like P4H11. Future development might benefit from protocols that allow for extended B cell evolution under controlled selection pressure.

What role could P4H11-derived antibodies play in combination immunotherapy approaches?

P4H11-derived bispecific antibodies show promise as components of combination immunotherapy approaches through:

  • Engaging T cells against AML cells with picomolar potency

  • Demonstrating efficacy against AML cell lines with varying levels of FLT3 expression

  • Showing potential for synergy with other therapeutic modalities

Future research should explore combinations with checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine therapies, or small molecule FLT3 inhibitors to potentially enhance therapeutic efficacy while reducing the emergence of resistance mechanisms.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.