PI4KG5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
PI4KG5 antibody; PI4KGAMMA5 antibody; At1g26270 antibody; F28B23.7 antibody; Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase gamma 5 antibody; AtPI4Kgamma5 antibody; PI-4Kgamma5 antibody; PI4K gamma 5 antibody; EC 2.7.1.67 antibody
Target Names
PI4KG5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Phosphatidylinositol (PI) phosphorylation to PI4P initiates the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). PIP2 serves as a precursor to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3), a crucial second messenger.

Gene References Into Functions
  • PI4Kγ5 plays a critical role in the normal function of ANAC078. Specifically, PI4Kγ5 is necessary for the proteolytic activation of ANAC078 via cleavage. [PI4Kγ5] PMID: 27529511
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G26270

STRING: 3702.AT1G26270.1

UniGene: At.20251

Protein Families
PI3/PI4-kinase family, Type II PI4K subfamily

Q&A

What is PI4KG5 antibody and what is its relation to PI4KA?

PI4KG5 antibody is a research tool designed to target phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type IIIα (PI4KA) or related proteins in the phosphoinositide pathway. PI4KA is recognized as a critical enzyme involved in maintaining plasma membrane phosphoinositide pools, particularly phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P₂) . As a research tool, PI4KG5 antibody enables the study of PI4K enzyme localization, expression levels, and functional interactions in various experimental contexts. The enzyme targeted by this antibody plays essential roles in cellular membrane trafficking and has been identified as a host factor required for hepatitis C virus replication .

How should PI4KG5 antibody be validated before experimental use?

Validation of PI4KG5 antibody should include multiple complementary approaches:

  • Western blot analysis: Confirm specificity by verifying band size corresponds to the target protein molecular weight

  • Knockout/knockdown controls: Test antibody against samples with genetic deletion or reduced expression of the target

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with competing peptide to confirm binding specificity

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related kinases like other PI4K family members

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Verify pulled-down proteins match expected targets

This multi-pronged validation ensures experimental results accurately reflect PI4K biology rather than off-target effects, which is particularly important given the structural similarities between phosphoinositide kinase family members .

What are optimal storage conditions for maintaining PI4KG5 antibody activity?

For maximum stability and performance of PI4KG5 antibody:

  • Store concentrated antibody stocks at -80°C in small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Working dilutions can be maintained at 4°C for 1-2 weeks with appropriate preservatives

  • Include carrier proteins (0.1-1% BSA) to prevent adherence to storage containers

  • Monitor for signs of degradation through regular validation experiments

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can cause aggregation and loss of binding capacity

Proper storage is critical as antibody degradation can lead to misleading experimental results and poor reproducibility across experiments.

What mechanisms explain heterogeneity in antibody responses against PI4K-related targets?

Heterogeneity in antibody responses against PI4K-related targets can be understood through mathematical modeling frameworks that consider antibody production and clearance dynamics. Research on antibody kinetics reveals:

This heterogeneity framework helps explain why different subjects may show variable antibody persistence against PI4K targets, with implications for experimental design and data interpretation in longitudinal studies .

How can PI4KG5 antibody be adapted for brain tissue applications?

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents a significant challenge for antibody-based applications in neurological research. Recent innovations for enhancing BBB penetration applicable to PI4KG5 antibody include:

  • Polymer conjugation: The site-directed addition of biodegradable polymers such as poly 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (PMPC) at hinge regions can facilitate brain delivery while maintaining antibody functionality

  • Optimized polymer chain length: Testing different chain lengths (50, 100, or 200 monomers) to determine optimal brain penetration versus retained binding affinity

  • Strategic modification locations: Targeting hinge and near-hinge regions for modification preserves antigen-binding regions

This approach could transform PI4KG5 antibody into a valuable tool for studying PI4K biology in neurological contexts, potentially opening new research avenues for understanding phosphoinositide signaling in brain disorders .

What are the key considerations when designing PI4KG5 antibody-based imaging experiments?

When designing imaging experiments using PI4KG5 antibody:

  • Fixation protocol optimization:

    • Paraformaldehyde (4%) works well for most applications

    • Methanol fixation may better preserve phosphoinositide epitopes

    • Test multiple conditions to determine optimal epitope accessibility

  • Signal amplification strategies:

    • Direct fluorophore conjugation for simple localization

    • Secondary antibody detection for increased sensitivity

    • Tyramide signal amplification for low-abundance targets

  • Controls and validation:

    Control TypeImplementationPurpose
    Negative controlSecondary antibody onlyDetect non-specific binding
    Specificity controlPre-absorption with antigenConfirm signal is target-specific
    Knockout/knockdownsiRNA or genetic modelsValidate absence of signal
    ColocalizationKnown PI4K markersConfirm expected distribution
  • Quantification approaches:

    • Measure intensity relative to housekeeping proteins

    • Assess subcellular distribution changes following stimulation

    • Analyze colocalization with plasma membrane and ER markers

These methodological considerations ensure that imaging data accurately reflects PI4K biology, particularly important given its dynamic localization between cellular compartments.

How does PI4KG5 antibody compare to bispecific antibody approaches in research applications?

FeaturePI4KG5 AntibodyBispecific AntibodiesImplications
Target recognitionSingle epitopeDual epitopesBispecifics offer higher specificity
MechanismDirect bindingImmune cell recruitmentBispecifics can bridge immune cells to targets
Production complexityStandardHigher complexityPI4KG5 is simpler to produce
ApplicationsResearch, diagnosticsResearch, therapeuticsDifferent downstream utilities
CustomizabilityLimitedHighly adaptableBispecifics offer more design options

What are effective strategies for enhancing the specificity of PI4KG5 antibody in complex samples?

Enhancing specificity of PI4KG5 antibody in complex biological samples can be achieved through several approaches:

  • Epitope-targeted selection:

    • Apply phage display experiments with systematic variations in CDR3 regions

    • Select antibodies against multiple ligand combinations to identify those with highest specificity

    • Utilize computational models to predict and design antibody variants with customized specificity profiles

  • Cross-adsorption techniques:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with related PI4K family proteins

    • Remove cross-reactive antibodies through affinity chromatography

    • Enrich for highly specific clones through negative selection

  • Optimized assay conditions:

    • Titrate antibody concentration to minimize background

    • Adjust buffer components (salt, detergents, blocking agents)

    • Implement stringent washing protocols

  • Biophysics-informed modeling:

    • Use computational approaches to identify unique binding modes

    • Design antibodies with high specificity for particular targets while excluding closely related proteins

These strategies significantly improve signal-to-noise ratios and reduce false positives when working with PI4KG5 antibody in complex experimental systems .

How can PI4KG5 antibody be utilized to study phosphoinositide dynamics during cell signaling?

PI4KG5 antibody can be employed in multiple experimental approaches to investigate phosphoinositide dynamics:

  • Immunofluorescence time-course studies:

    • Track PI4K localization changes following receptor stimulation

    • Quantify translocation between cellular compartments

    • Correlate with PtdIns(4,5)P₂ depletion and recovery phases

  • Proximity ligation assays:

    • Identify protein-protein interactions during signaling

    • Detect complexes formed with phospholipase C during activation

    • Quantify associations with membrane recruitment factors

  • ChIP-based approaches for regulatory studies:

    • Investigate transcriptional regulation of PI4K during different cellular states

    • Identify transcription factors controlling expression

  • Live-cell imaging with recombinant systems:

    • Combine with fluorescent phosphoinositide sensors

    • Track dynamic changes in real-time during receptor activation

These applications are particularly relevant given PI4KA's critical role in maintaining plasma membrane phosphoinositide pools during strong receptor stimulation and phospholipase C activation .

What considerations should be made when designing experiments to study PI4K inhibition effects using PI4KG5 antibody?

When studying PI4K inhibition effects with PI4KG5 antibody, researchers should consider:

  • Toxicity and viability concerns:

    • Complete PI4KA inhibition can lead to severe cellular consequences including death

    • Pharmacological blockade in animal models has been associated with sudden death correlating with PtdIns(4,5)P₂ depletion

    • Genetic inactivation leads to severe intestinal necrosis in animal models

  • Experimental design approaches:

    • Implement dose-response studies with partial inhibition

    • Use time-course experiments to capture temporal dynamics

    • Include washout periods to assess recovery

  • Complementary methods validation:

    • Compare antibody-based detection with functional assays

    • Correlate protein levels with enzymatic activity measurements

    • Combine with phosphoinositide quantification techniques

  • Controls for specificity:

    • Include genetic knockdown/knockout controls

    • Utilize multiple inhibitors with different mechanisms

    • Account for potential scaffolding functions outside enzymatic activity

These considerations acknowledge important distinctions between genetic and pharmacological approaches when studying PI4K biology, particularly relevant when evaluating it as a potential therapeutic target .

What are common pitfalls in PI4KG5 antibody-based assays and how can they be mitigated?

Common PitfallUnderlying CauseMitigation Strategy
False negativesEpitope masking by protein interactionsTry multiple antibodies targeting different regions
Inconsistent resultsAntibody lot variabilityValidate each new lot, maintain reference standards
Non-specific bindingCross-reactivity with related kinasesPerform pre-absorption with related proteins
Poor signal in fixed tissuesEpitope destruction during fixationTest multiple fixation protocols and antigen retrieval methods
Background in immunofluorescenceSecondary antibody cross-reactivityUse species-matched negative controls, optimize blocking
Weak signal in western blotsLow abundance of target proteinImplement immunoprecipitation before blotting
Contradictory results across techniquesContext-dependent epitope accessibilityUse multiple detection methods and cross-validate findings

Addressing these common technical challenges improves reliability and reproducibility of PI4KG5 antibody-based experiments, particularly important when studying proteins with complex regulation and multiple interaction partners.

How might emerging antibody engineering technologies enhance PI4KG5 antibody research applications?

Emerging technologies hold significant promise for advancing PI4KG5 antibody applications in research:

  • Deep learning for antibody design:

    • AI models like those used in AF2Complex can predict optimal antibody structures for specific epitopes

    • Computational approaches enable customized specificity profiles without extensive experimental screening

  • Enhanced delivery systems:

    • Conjugation with brain-penetrant polymers like PMPC at hinge regions improves BBB penetration

    • Biocompatible polymer modifications maintain antibody functionality while expanding tissue accessibility

  • Bispecific antibody technology:

    • Dual targeting capabilities enable simultaneous recognition of PI4K and interacting partners1

    • T-cell engaging formats could be developed for therapeutic applications1

  • Single-cell antibody profiling:

    • High-throughput sequencing combined with computational analysis allows identification of specific binding modes

    • More precise epitope mapping capabilities through systematic variant analysis

These technological advances will likely transform both basic research applications and potential therapeutic development related to PI4K biology1 .

What are the limitations of current PI4KG5 antibody research and how might they be addressed?

Current limitations in PI4KG5 antibody research include:

These considerations highlight both the risks and opportunities in PI4K research, particularly important when evaluating it as a potential therapeutic target .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.