PARD6A (Partitioning Defective 6 Homolog Alpha) is a scaffolding protein critical for cellular polarity and tight junction formation. The HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody is a specialized immunological tool used to detect PARD6A expression via enzymatic amplification in assays like Western blot (WB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). This conjugation enables sensitive detection of the target protein by linking horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to the antibody, which catalyzes colorimetric or chemiluminescent reactions .
The HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody binds to epitopes on the PARD6A protein, which contains a PDZ domain and a CRIB-like motif. These domains mediate interactions with small GTPases (e.g., Cdc42, Rac) and atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), forming a ternary complex essential for:
Cellular Polarity: Establishing asymmetry in epithelial cells and neurons .
Tight Junction Formation: Maintaining epithelial barrier integrity .
Cancer Research: Studying epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metastatic carcinomas .
Role in Asymmetric Cell Division: PARD6A is critical for polarizing mother cells during asymmetric division in C. elegans and mammals, influencing developmental and cancer outcomes .
Viral Resistance: Depletion of PARD6B (a homolog) disrupts apical endosomes, reducing susceptibility to luminal viral infections. PARD6A antibodies may aid in studying similar mechanisms .
Neurological and Epithelial Disorders: PARD6A dysregulation is implicated in axon specification and epithelial barrier dysfunction, making it a target for therapeutic research .
Cross-reactivity: Polyclonal antibodies (e.g., Avantor’s rabbit anti-PARD6A) may require optimization to minimize non-specific binding .
Epitope Specificity: Monoclonal antibodies (e.g., Santa Cruz’s G-9 or C-3 clones) offer higher precision but may vary in epitope recognition .
The table below highlights key differences in product offerings:
PARD6A (also known as PAR-6A, PAR6alpha, or PAR6C) is a scaffold protein that functions as a critical component of the PAR complex, which establishes and maintains cell polarity. It assembles with atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and the small Rho-GTPase Cdc42 to define cell polarity and regulate membrane trafficking . PARD6A is primarily localized to cell junctions, cell membranes, cell projections, cytoplasmic ruffles, and tight junctions .
At the molecular level, PARD6A contains PDZ domains that enable protein-protein interactions with other polarity regulators like Par3. Research has shown that one Par3 protein can potentially bind to two Par6 proteins, which may serve as the foundation for polarity-generating protein scaffolds in cells . This architecture allows for the precise spatial organization required for establishing cellular asymmetry.
Dysregulation of PARD6A has been implicated in various pathological conditions, including cancer progression and neurological disorders, making it an important target for research investigations .
The HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody directly conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for enhanced detection sensitivity. This conjugation eliminates the need for secondary antibodies in experimental workflows. The antibody is typically:
Generated in rabbits immunized with recombinant human PARD6A protein (amino acids 248-344)
Purified using Protein G affinity chromatography with >95% purity
Stored in a buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative
Maintained at -20°C or -80°C to preserve activity, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Reactive primarily with human PARD6A, though cross-reactivity with other species may occur depending on sequence conservation
The HRP conjugation provides direct enzymatic activity for colorimetric or chemiluminescent detection in applications such as ELISA and Western blotting.
In mammals, there are three closely related isoforms of PAR6: PARD6A, PARD6B, and PARD6D. While they share structural similarities, they exhibit distinct functional specializations:
Research using gene knockouts or depletion experiments has demonstrated that these isoforms are not entirely redundant. For instance, in studies of apical endosome function, depletion of PARD6B affected transcytosis and apical recycling, but these functions could not be rescued by overexpression of either PARD6A or PARD6D . This indicates that despite structural similarities, each isoform likely mediates distinct aspects of cellular polarity regulation.
Optimizing Western blot protocols for PARD6A detection requires attention to several critical parameters:
Sample Preparation:
Include protease inhibitors in lysis buffers to prevent degradation of PARD6A
Use phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylated forms of PARD6A or associated proteins
For membrane-associated PARD6A, ensure lysis buffers contain appropriate detergents
Protocol Optimization:
Dilution Range: Begin with a 1:500 to 1:2000 dilution as recommended for PARD6A antibodies
Blocking Solution: 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST; test both if experiencing background issues
Incubation Conditions: Primary antibody incubation at 4°C overnight often yields better results than shorter incubations at room temperature
Washing Steps: Implement stringent washing with TBST (at least 3-5 washes, 5-10 minutes each)
Detection System: Select ECL substrate sensitivity based on expected protein abundance
Important Considerations:
The calculated molecular weight of PARD6A is 37 kDa, but it typically appears at ~47 kDa on SDS-PAGE due to post-translational modifications
Multiple bands may indicate different isoforms, degradation products, or post-translationally modified variants
Always include positive controls like extracts from SW620, HT-29, Jurkat, U-251MG, or Raji cell lines
When analyzing PARD6A in specialized contexts (e.g., polarity complexes), consider co-immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting
Immunoprecipitation (IP) is a valuable technique for studying PARD6A interactions with other components of polarity complexes such as Cdc42, aPKC, and Par3. Optimizing IP conditions requires consideration of several factors:
Buffer Composition:
Use mild lysis buffers (e.g., 1% NP-40 or Triton X-100) to preserve protein-protein interactions
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Consider phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylation-dependent interactions
Adjust salt concentration (150-300 mM NaCl) depending on interaction strength
Protocol Recommendations:
Pre-clear lysates with protein G beads to reduce non-specific binding
For co-IP of PARD6A with Cdc42, consider using GST-JFC1D1 as a pull-down method for active Rab8, which has been shown to work in similar polarity complex studies
When studying PARD6A interaction with GRAF1 and Cdc42, the APEX-tagged proximity labeling approach has proven effective for identifying neighboring proteins in the complex
For weak or transient interactions, consider using crosslinking reagents before lysis
Data Interpretation:
Always include appropriate negative controls (non-specific IgG, lysates from cells with PARD6A knockdown)
Validate interactions using reverse co-IP (immunoprecipitate the binding partner and blot for PARD6A)
Consider proximity ligation assays as a complementary approach to confirm interactions in intact cells
Research has demonstrated that PARD6A interactions can be detected through multiple approaches, including the APEX-tagged proximity labeling system, which successfully identified interactions between GRAF1, Cdc42, Rab8, EHD1, and MICAL-L1 in polarized cells .
Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with antibodies, including those against PARD6A. Here are comprehensive troubleshooting strategies:
Sources of Non-Specific Binding:
Insufficient blocking
Suboptimal antibody dilution
Cross-reactivity with similar epitopes
Sample overloading
Inadequate washing
Systematic Troubleshooting Approach:
Advanced Validation Techniques:
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide before application
Multiple antibody validation: Test different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of PARD6A
Immunodepletion: Sequential probing of the same lysate with the same antibody should show signal reduction
When interpreting results, remember that PARD6A is observed at approximately 47 kDa despite a calculated molecular weight of 37 kDa , which could be due to post-translational modifications or the presence of protein complexes.
Investigating PARD6A's role in cell polarity requires sophisticated experimental approaches. The HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody can be employed in several advanced experimental designs:
Polarized Epithelial Model Systems:
Grow epithelial cells (MDCK, Caco-2) on Transwell filters to establish apical-basolateral polarity
Use immunofluorescence with PARD6A antibody to track its localization during polarization
Correlate PARD6A distribution with tight junction markers (ZO-1, occludin) and other polarity proteins (Par3, aPKC)
Asymmetric Cell Division Models:
Track PARD6A localization during mitosis in stem cell populations
Correlate PARD6A distribution with asymmetric fate determinants
Analyze how perturbation of PARD6A affects daughter cell fate specification
Polarity Complex Formation Analysis:
Research has shown that Par3 protein can bind to two Par6 proteins, potentially forming the basis for polarity-generating protein scaffolds . This can be investigated through:
Co-immunoprecipitation of PARD6A with Par3 followed by Western blotting
Proximity ligation assays to visualize PARD6A-Par3 interactions in situ
FRET or BRET analyses to measure direct protein-protein interactions in live cells
Membrane Dynamics Studies:
PARD6A has been linked to membrane trafficking processes. Studies have shown that depletion of GRAF1, which interacts with components of the polarity complex, affects Rab8 activity and alters the localization of phosphorylated Par6 from uniform membrane distribution to asymmetric redistribution . Researchers can investigate:
The co-localization of PARD6A with membrane trafficking markers
The effect of PARD6A depletion on endocytic recycling
How PARD6A phosphorylation status affects its membrane recruitment
Distinguishing the functions of PARD6A, PARD6B, and PARD6D requires careful experimental design:
Isoform-Specific Depletion and Rescue:
Research has demonstrated that depletion of PARD6B affects apical endosome function, and this phenotype cannot be rescued by overexpression of PARD6A or PARD6D . Similar approaches can be used to identify other isoform-specific functions:
Use isoform-specific siRNA/shRNA to deplete individual PAR6 proteins
Perform rescue experiments with expression constructs for each isoform
Measure functional readouts relevant to polarity (barrier function, protein trafficking, etc.)
Domain Swap Experiments:
Create chimeric proteins by swapping domains between PARD6A, PARD6B, and PARD6D
Express these in cells depleted of endogenous PAR6 proteins
Identify which domains confer isoform-specific functions
Proteomic Analysis of Isoform-Specific Interactomes:
Perform immunoprecipitation of each PAR6 isoform individually
Analyze binding partners by mass spectrometry
Compare interactomes to identify unique and shared interaction partners
Tissue-Specific Expression Analysis:
Use isoform-specific antibodies to map expression patterns across tissues
Correlate expression with tissue-specific polarity phenomena
Investigate how tissue environments might regulate isoform expression
Experimental Data Example:
In studies of polarized epithelial cells, depletion of PARD6B resulted in defects in transcytosis and apical recycling. When researchers attempted to rescue these defects by overexpressing myc-tagged PARD6A or PARD6D, they found that neither isoform could restore normal function, while reintroduction of myc-tagged PARD6B successfully rescued the phenotype . This demonstrates that despite structural similarities, PARD6B has unique functional properties in apical endosome regulation that cannot be compensated by other isoforms.
PARD6A dysregulation has been implicated in various pathological conditions, including cancer and neurological disorders . HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody can be instrumental in investigating disease mechanisms:
Cancer Research Applications:
Tumor Tissue Array Analysis:
Compare PARD6A expression levels and localization between normal and tumor tissues
Correlate expression patterns with clinical parameters and patient outcomes
Identify potential biomarker value
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Studies:
Track PARD6A redistribution during EMT induction
Correlate changes with loss of cell polarity and increased invasiveness
Investigate PARD6A interaction with EMT-related signaling pathways
3D Tumor Organoid Models:
Analyze PARD6A localization in 3D cultures that better recapitulate tumor architecture
Study how PARD6A affects organoid formation and polarity establishment
Test how targeting PARD6A impacts tumor organoid growth and invasion
Neurological Disorder Models:
Investigate PARD6A distribution in neuronal cultures from disease models
Correlate PARD6A localization with neuronal polarity defects
Examine how disease-associated mutations affect PARD6A function
Experimental Approach Considerations:
Use multiple detection methods (Western blot, immunofluorescence, IHC) for comprehensive assessment
Include appropriate positive controls (such as SW620, HT-29, or Jurkat cell lines)
Validate findings with genetic manipulation (knockdown/overexpression)
Consider combined staining with other markers to assess contextual changes in polarity complex formation
For instance, in cancer studies, researchers could investigate how PARD6A interacts with the PAR complex and whether alterations in this interaction contribute to loss of cell polarity and increased invasiveness. The HRP-conjugated antibody would be particularly useful for sensitive detection in tissue samples where protein expression might be variable.
Optimizing fixation and immunostaining protocols is crucial for accurate detection of PARD6A, which is found in multiple cellular compartments including cell junctions, membrane, projections, cytoplasm, and tight junctions :
Fixation Method Comparison:
| Fixation Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4% Paraformaldehyde (15-20 min) | Preserves structure, compatible with most antibodies | May mask some epitopes | General PARD6A detection, membrane localization |
| Methanol (-20°C, 10 min) | Better for some nuclear/cytoskeletal antigens | Can distort membranes | Detecting PARD6A in tight junctions |
| Acetone (-20°C, 5 min) | Good for some membrane proteins | Significant lipid extraction | Quick fixation of cytoskeletal PARD6A |
| PFA + Triton X-100 | Combines fixation with permeabilization | May increase background | Comprehensive detection across compartments |
Cell Type-Specific Considerations:
Different cell types may require tailored approaches:
Epithelial Cells (MDCK, Caco-2):
Grow on Transwell filters for proper polarization
Fix from both apical and basolateral compartments
Consider z-stack confocal imaging to properly resolve apical vs. basolateral staining
Neuronal Cells:
Gentler fixation protocols to preserve delicate processes
Longer permeabilization time for dense cytoskeletal networks
Consider co-staining with axonal/dendritic markers to assess polarized distribution
Cancer Cell Lines:
Step-by-Step Optimized Protocol:
Wash cells in PBS (2-3 times)
Fix with 4% PFA for 15-20 minutes at room temperature
Wash thoroughly with PBS (3 times, 5 minutes each)
Permeabilize with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5-10 minutes
Block with 5% normal serum (matching secondary antibody host) in PBS for 1 hour
Incubate with PARD6A antibody (1:100-1:500 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Wash with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (3 times, 5 minutes each)
For HRP-conjugated antibodies: Develop using appropriate substrate
For unconjugated antibodies: Incubate with secondary antibody (1:500) for 1 hour at room temperature
Counterstain nuclei with DAPI if desired
Mount and analyze
Troubleshooting High Background:
Increase antibody dilution (1:500 - 1:1000)
Extend blocking time to 2 hours
Add 0.1% BSA to antibody dilution buffer
Perform additional washing steps
Quantitative analysis of PARD6A in complex tissues requires sophisticated approaches to address heterogeneity and spatial organization:
Sample Preparation Considerations:
Use consistent fixation protocols across all samples
Consider antigen retrieval optimization for tissue sections (citrate buffer pH 6.0 or EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
Include positive control tissues with known PARD6A expression
Process experimental and control samples in parallel to minimize batch effects
Quantification Methodologies:
Digital Image Analysis Workflow:
Acquire high-resolution images using standardized microscope settings
Apply flat-field correction to normalize illumination
Define regions of interest (cellular compartments, tissue areas)
Segment images to identify positive staining
Extract quantitative parameters:
Mean fluorescence/staining intensity
Percentage of positive cells
Subcellular distribution patterns
Co-localization coefficients with other markers
Advanced Analysis Approaches:
Spatial Statistics: Analyze the clustering or dispersion of PARD6A staining relative to tissue landmarks
Multi-parameter Analysis: Correlate PARD6A with other polarity markers (aPKC, Par3) and functional outcomes
Machine Learning Classification: Train algorithms to recognize patterns of PARD6A distribution associated with specific phenotypes
Research has demonstrated that PARD6A localization can be dynamic and context-dependent. For example, in polarized cells, phosphorylated Par6 is normally detected along the entire membrane, but GRAF1 depletion causes asymmetric redistribution . These subtle changes in distribution pattern require careful quantitative analysis rather than simple positive/negative assessment.
Rigorous controls are essential for ensuring the reliability and interpretability of experiments using PARD6A antibody:
Antibody Validation Controls:
Positive Controls:
Negative Controls:
Primary antibody omission
Non-specific IgG from the same species (rabbit for most PARD6A antibodies)
Cells with PARD6A knockdown via siRNA/shRNA
If available, tissues/cells from PARD6A knockout models
Specificity Controls:
Experimental Design Controls:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Loading Control | Ensure equal protein loading in Western blots | Probe for housekeeping proteins (GAPDH, β-actin) |
| Transfection Control | Verify knockdown/overexpression efficiency | Include vector-only and untransfected controls |
| Treatment Time Course | Determine optimal detection window | Analyze multiple time points after stimulus/treatment |
| Reagent Controls | Ensure reagent functionality | Include manufacturer-recommended positive controls |
Critical Controls for Specific Applications:
Co-immunoprecipitation:
Input lysate control
IgG pull-down control
Reverse co-IP (immunoprecipitate binding partner, detect PARD6A)
Immunofluorescence:
Single-color controls for multi-channel imaging
Background autofluorescence control
Co-staining with markers of known cellular compartments
Functional Studies:
Rescue experiments with wild-type PARD6A after knockdown
Comparison with other PAR6 isoforms (PARD6B, PARD6D)
Parallel analysis of known PARD6A downstream targets
Data Interpretation Considerations:
PARD6A dysregulation has been implicated in cancer development and progression . Using HRP-conjugated PARD6A antibody, researchers can investigate several key aspects of cancer biology:
Mechanisms of Cancer Cell Polarity Loss:
Compare PARD6A localization between normal and transformed epithelial cells
Investigate how oncogenic signaling alters PARD6A distribution and function
Determine whether PARD6A mislocalization correlates with loss of tissue architecture
PARD6A in Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion:
Research has shown that proper polarity protein function is essential for controlled cell migration. Dysregulation of polarity complexes can contribute to enhanced invasiveness. Researchers can:
Track PARD6A distribution during cancer cell migration using live-cell imaging
Correlate PARD6A localization patterns with invasive capacity
Determine how manipulation of PARD6A levels affects migration/invasion in 3D matrices
Therapeutic Targeting Opportunities:
Use PARD6A antibody to assess target engagement in drug development
Investigate how restoring PARD6A function affects cancer cell phenotypes
Explore PARD6A as a biomarker for treatment response
Experimental Model Recommendations:
| Model System | Applications | Analytical Approaches |
|---|---|---|
| Cancer Cell Lines | Molecular mechanism studies | Western blot, IF, Co-IP |
| Patient-Derived Xenografts | Translational relevance | IHC, tissue microarrays |
| 3D Organoids | Physiological architecture | Confocal imaging, invasion assays |
| Genetic Cancer Models | In vivo tumor development | IF, IHC, Western blot |
Research Questions to Explore:
Does PARD6A expression correlate with clinical outcomes in specific cancer types?
How does PARD6A interact with known oncogenes or tumor suppressors?
Can targeting PARD6A or its interactions restore normal cell polarity and reduce malignant behaviors?
Emerging techniques offer new opportunities for studying PARD6A dynamics with unprecedented resolution:
Advanced Live Imaging Approaches:
Fluorescent Protein Tagging:
Generate PARD6A-GFP/RFP fusion constructs
Observe real-time recruitment to polarity complexes
Track movement between cellular compartments
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching):
Measure PARD6A mobility in different cellular domains
Determine if disease states alter protein dynamics
Identify factors affecting PARD6A retention at cell junctions
Single-Molecule Tracking:
Visualize individual PARD6A molecules
Characterize diffusion rates and confinement zones
Identify transient interactions with other polarity proteins
Proximity-Based Detection Methods:
APEX Proximity Labeling:
Research has shown that APEX-tagged GRAF1 successfully identified nearby proteins including Rab8, Cdc42, EHD1, and MICAL-L1 in polarized cells . Similar approaches could be applied specifically to PARD6A:
Generate PARD6A-APEX fusion proteins
Identify proteins in close proximity through biotinylation
Map the PARD6A "neighborhood" in different cellular contexts
BioID Approach:
Express PARD6A-BioID fusion in cells
Identify biotinylated proximity partners
Compare interactome changes during polarization
Split-GFP Complementation:
Create PARD6A and potential partner split-GFP fusions
Visualize interactions through reconstituted fluorescence
Monitor interaction dynamics in real-time
Optogenetic Control:
Develop light-controlled PARD6A recruitment systems
Study consequences of acute PARD6A mislocalization
Determine minimum requirements for polarity complex function
Technical Considerations:
Ensure that tags don't interfere with PARD6A function
Validate fusion protein localization against endogenous PARD6A
Consider photobleaching, phototoxicity, and expression levels
Include appropriate controls (non-interacting proteins, mutant versions)
PARD6A functions within a complex network of signaling pathways. Investigating these interactions requires sophisticated experimental approaches:
PARD6A Interactions with Rho GTPase Signaling:
Research has demonstrated connections between PARD6A and Cdc42, a small Rho-GTPase that defines cell polarity and regulates membrane trafficking .
GTPase Activity Assays:
Pull-down active GTPases using GST-tagged binding domains
Determine how PARD6A manipulation affects GTPase activation
Connect GTPase activity to downstream polarity phenotypes
Effector Pathway Analysis:
Monitor phosphorylation of downstream targets (PAK, LIMK)
Assess cytoskeletal organization following PARD6A manipulation
Determine how GTPase inhibitors affect PARD6A localization
PARD6A and aPKC Signaling:
PARD6A forms a complex with aPKC that regulates numerous cellular processes :
Phosphorylation Studies:
Analyze aPKC substrate phosphorylation following PARD6A modulation
Investigate PARD6A phosphorylation status using phospho-specific antibodies
Determine how phosphatase inhibitors affect PARD6A function
Polarity Complex Assembly Analysis:
Experimental Approaches to Study Cross-Talk:
| Technique | Application | Key Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Phospho-proteomics | Identify phosphorylation changes | Global effects of PARD6A on cellular signaling |
| Protein-protein interaction screens | Map PARD6A interactome | Discover novel pathway connections |
| CRISPR interference/activation | Manipulate pathway components | Genetic dissection of signaling hierarchy |
| Small molecule inhibitors | Target specific pathways | Acute versus chronic signaling effects |