PARD6B contains three conserved domains:
PDZ domain: Mediates protein-protein interactions, essential for complex assembly .
OPR domain: Facilitates binding to atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) isoforms .
Semi-CRIB domain: Enables interaction with small GTPases like CDC42 and RAC1 .
Functionally, PARD6B regulates epithelial tight junction formation, cell polarity, and mitotic spindle orientation by forming a complex with aPKC and PAR3 .
PARD6B interacts with multiple signaling molecules, as summarized below:
These interactions position PARD6B as a central node in pathways governing epithelial structure and cancer progression .
PARD6B exhibits broad tissue expression, with notable abundance in:
Kidneys: Strong mRNA and protein signals in adult and fetal tissues .
Epithelial cells: Localized to tight junctions in polarized tissues .
The Human Protein Atlas confirms protein detection in 20+ cancer types, including breast and colorectal carcinomas .
Breast Cancer: PARD6B is frequently amplified and overexpressed, driving Akt pathway activation and cell proliferation .
Synthetic Lethality: Inactivation of PARD6G (a paralog) synergizes with MYC dysregulation, suggesting therapeutic vulnerabilities .
Epithelial Restriction: PARD6B enforces cell cycle arrest in organized epithelia, counteracting oncogenic signals like MYC .
Paracellular Sealing: Loss disrupts tight junctions, promoting metastasis .
In mouse embryos, Pard6b knockdown causes:
Blastocyst Cavitation Failure: Due to disrupted tight junctions (TJP1/ZO-1 mislocalization) .
CDX2 Suppression: Reduced expression of this trophectoderm-lineage transcription factor, impairing placental development .
Apical-Basal Polarity Loss: Absent PRKCZ localization disrupts epithelial integrity .
Antibodies: Proteintech’s 13996-1-AP (validated in WB, IHC, IF; reacts with human, mouse, rat) .
PrEST Antigen: Recombinant PARD6B fragments (6.6 mg/ml) for antibody validation .
Animal Models: Pard6b-knockout mice show embryonic lethality, underscoring its developmental necessity .
PARD6B expression is modulated by:
Chemical Exposure: Upregulated by bisphenol A, chlorpyrifos, and dibutyl phthalate .
Pathogens: Targeted by oncogenic viruses (e.g., HPV) via GSK3B and TSC2 inactivation .
PARD6B is a member of the PAR6 family that encodes a cytoplasmic protein with several distinct domains: a PSD95/Discs-large/ZO1 (PDZ) domain, an OPR domain, and a semi-Cdc42/Rac interactive binding (CRIB) domain . These structural components enable PARD6B to function primarily in asymmetrical cell division and cell polarization processes as part of multi-protein complexes . The protein's domains facilitate specific protein-protein interactions that are essential for its role in establishing and maintaining cellular polarity.
Methodologically, researchers investigating PARD6B structure should consider:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for structural determination
Domain mutation studies to understand structure-function relationships
Fluorescence microscopy with tagged constructs to visualize subcellular localization during polarization events
PARD6B has been shown to interact with several key proteins including CDC42, Protein kinase Mζ, RAC1, and RHOQ . These interactions form the basis of PARD6B's role in polarity signaling networks. The protein typically functions as part of larger multiprotein complexes that regulate cell polarity and asymmetric division.
For studying these interactions, researchers should employ:
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX)
FRET or BiFC for visualizing interactions in living cells
Yeast two-hybrid screening for identifying novel interaction partners
Recent research has identified KLK10/LIPH/PARD6B/SLC52A3 as potential prognostic markers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) based on a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA)-mediated mechanism . This finding suggests PARD6B may play a significant role in pancreatic cancer progression and could serve as a biomarker for prognosis assessment.
Methodologically, researchers investigating PARD6B in pancreatic cancer should:
Perform multivariate survival analyses correlating PARD6B expression with patient outcomes
Investigate the ceRNA network involving PARD6B using RNA immunoprecipitation
Validate findings using both in vitro cell models and patient-derived xenografts
Consider how PARD6B expression correlates with established markers of pancreatic cancer progression
PARD6B, along with PKCζ and Pard3, shows reduced expression in lung adenocarcinoma tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues . This downregulation appears to contribute to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and increased invasion capabilities of lung cancer cells . The mechanism likely involves disruption of normal epithelial cell polarity, which is a critical step in cancer progression and metastasis.
For lung cancer researchers, effective methodological approaches include:
Analysis of PARD6B expression across lung cancer subtypes and stages
3D organoid cultures to model polarization defects
Correlation of PARD6B levels with EMT markers
In vivo metastasis models to validate in vitro findings
PARD6B has been analyzed across at least 14 different cancer types, suggesting its broad relevance to cancer biology . The expression and genetic alterations of PARD6B vary across cancer types, potentially reflecting tissue-specific roles of this polarity regulator. In some contexts, PARD6B may be targeted by loss-of-function mutations, suggesting a potential tumor suppressor role .
Researchers examining PARD6B across cancer types should:
Utilize cancer genomics databases (TCGA, ICGC) for comprehensive analysis
Perform comparative studies across multiple cancer types under identical conditions
Consider both genetic alterations and expression changes
Investigate tissue-specific interaction partners that might explain context-dependent functions
For investigating PARD6B function, researchers should consider several complementary models:
Polarized epithelial cell lines (MDCK, Caco-2, MCF10A) that form distinct apical-basal domains
3D organoid cultures that recapitulate tissue architecture and polarity
Patient-derived cancer cell lines with varying PARD6B expression levels
Genetically modified animal models (conditional knockouts, knock-ins)
The choice of model should reflect the specific aspect of PARD6B biology being investigated. For polarity studies, 3D culture systems provide more physiologically relevant conditions than 2D cultures, while patient-derived models are crucial for validating cancer-related findings.
When modulating PARD6B in experimental systems, researchers should consider:
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for complete knockout or endogenous tagging
Inducible shRNA/siRNA systems for temporal control of knockdown
Overexpression of wild-type or mutant PARD6B constructs
Domain-specific mutations to disrupt specific interactions
Optogenetic or chemical-genetic systems for acute, reversible control
Each approach has distinct advantages depending on research questions. For studying essential functions, inducible systems may be preferable to constitutive knockouts. When examining structure-function relationships, complementation with mutant constructs following endogenous PARD6B depletion offers robust insights.
To study PARD6B's role in EMT, researchers should employ:
EMT induction models using TGF-β, hypoxia, or other established triggers
Time-course experiments tracking PARD6B localization and expression during EMT
Co-analysis with established EMT markers (E-cadherin, vimentin, SNAIL1)
Migration and invasion assays following PARD6B modulation
Analysis of PARD6B's interaction partners before and during EMT
The involvement of PARD6B in regulating EMT is particularly relevant to cancer research, as downregulation of the PKCζ/Pard3/Pard6b polarity complex has been linked to lung adenocarcinoma cell EMT and invasion . Understanding how PARD6B interfaces with established EMT pathways can provide insights into metastasis mechanisms.
The relationship between PARD6B-mediated polarity defects and early carcinogenesis remains an active area of investigation. Disruption of cell polarity is often considered an early event in epithelial cancers, preceding full transformation and invasion. PARD6B, as a key polarity regulator, may contribute to this process through:
Disruption of tight junctions and adherens junctions
Altered asymmetric cell division leading to aberrant tissue architecture
Mislocalization of polarity complexes that normally suppress proliferation
Changes in cell-matrix interactions affecting tissue integrity
Researchers investigating this question should consider:
3D organoid models that allow visualization of early architectural changes
Correlation of PARD6B alterations with pre-malignant lesions in patient samples
Temporal manipulation of PARD6B during stepwise transformation models
Multi-omics approaches to identify early consequences of PARD6B disruption
The identification of PARD6B as part of a prognostic marker set (KLK10/LIPH/PARD6B/SLC52A3) in pancreatic cancer based on a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanism raises interesting questions about post-transcriptional regulation. ceRNAs typically function as microRNA "sponges," affecting the availability of microRNAs to regulate their target mRNAs.
To investigate this relationship, researchers should:
Identify specific microRNAs targeting PARD6B mRNA
Characterize the complete ceRNA network involving PARD6B
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation to validate predicted interactions
Assess how perturbation of ceRNA network members affects PARD6B expression
Determine if the ceRNA mechanism is cancer-type specific or broadly applicable
While PARD6B has specific roles in cancer, its family members (including PARD6A and PARD6G) also show disease associations. For example, PARD6A promotes EMT in ovarian cancer through SNAIL1 signaling , while PARD6G has been targeted by loss-of-function mutations in multiple cancers .
Researchers investigating functional differences between PAR6 family members should:
Compare expression patterns across tissues and cancer types
Perform paralog-specific knockdown/knockout followed by rescue experiments
Identify unique interaction partners of each family member
Investigate potential compensatory mechanisms between family members
Consider evolutionary conservation and divergence of PAR6 proteins
When analyzing PARD6B in clinical cancer datasets, researchers should consider:
Survival analysis methods (Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards)
Multivariate regression adjusting for clinical covariates
Expression correlation networks to identify functional relationships
Careful stratification of patients by cancer subtype, stage, and molecular features
Meta-analytical approaches when combining datasets
Analysis Type | Appropriate Statistical Methods | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Prognostic value | Cox regression, log-rank test | Adjust for known prognostic factors |
Expression comparison | ANOVA, t-test with multiple testing correction | Account for normal tissue heterogeneity |
Co-expression | Pearson/Spearman correlation, WGCNA | Validate in independent cohorts |
Mutation analysis | Fisher's exact test, enrichment analysis | Consider functional impact of mutations |
Contradictory findings about PARD6B likely reflect its context-dependent functions. To reconcile such discrepancies, researchers should:
Carefully document experimental conditions, cell types, and methodologies
Consider PARD6B's role as part of multiprotein complexes that may differ between systems
Account for potential paralog compensation by other PAR6 family members
Assess baseline polarization status of different model systems
Evaluate cancer stage-specific effects (early vs. late stage)
Perform direct comparative studies under standardized conditions
Consider post-translational modifications that might alter PARD6B function
This approach acknowledges that PARD6B may have different or even opposing functions depending on cellular context, similar to many other cancer-associated proteins.
PARD6B contains several important domains:
PARD6B is a cytoplasmic protein that is involved in various cellular processes:
PARD6B has been implicated in various diseases, particularly in cancer. Dysregulation of PARD6B can lead to abnormal cell division and migration, contributing to cancer progression and metastasis. For example, studies have shown that PARD6B is involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, which is a key step in cancer metastasis .
Recombinant PARD6B is produced using recombinant DNA technology, which involves inserting the gene encoding PARD6B into a suitable expression system, such as bacteria or yeast, to produce the protein in large quantities. This recombinant protein is used in various research applications to study its function and role in disease .
Recombinant PARD6B is used in a variety of research applications, including: