Patatin-04/09 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
antibody; Patatin-04/09 antibody; EC 3.1.1.- antibody
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Patatin-04/09 Antibody targets a probable lipolytic acyl hydrolase (LAH). This enzyme is believed to play a role in the defense response of tubers against pathogens.
Database Links

UniGene: Stu.20733

Protein Families
Patatin family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole.
Tissue Specificity
Tuber.

Q&A

What is Patatin-04/09 and what does an antibody against it recognize?

Patatin-04/09 belongs to the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein (PNPLA) family, which includes several members with phospholipase activity. Originally identified in potato tubers as storage proteins, patatin-like domains are now recognized across multiple species. In humans, proteins like PNPLA6 (also known as Neuropathy Target Esterase or NTE) contain patatin-like domains and function in lipid metabolism.

An antibody against Patatin-04/09 typically recognizes specific epitopes within the patatin domain, which is characterized by a catalytic dyad (Ser-Asp) responsible for hydrolytic activities. These antibodies are critical for research investigating phospholipid metabolism, membrane dynamics, and related pathologies .

What is the difference between patatin-like phospholipase domain proteins in plants versus mammals?

Plant Patatin Proteins:

  • Function primarily as storage proteins in tubers

  • Organized in multicopy gene families (e.g., potato patatin genes are clustered in the genome)

  • Show differential expression during developmental stages, particularly during tuber formation

  • Typically have molecular weights of 40-45 kDa

Mammalian Patatin-Like Proteins (PNPLAs):

  • Function as regulatory enzymes in lipid metabolism

  • Include nine family members (PNPLA1-9) with diverse functions

  • PNPLA3 and PNPLA6 are among the best characterized

  • Associated with various pathological conditions (e.g., PNPLA3 variants with fatty liver disease)

Both share the conserved patatin domain with a catalytic dyad, but have evolved different physiological roles suited to their respective organisms.

What are the typical applications of Patatin-04/09 antibodies in research?

ApplicationPurposeTypical Working Dilution
Western Blot (WB)Detection of denatured protein1:500-1:2000
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)Localization in tissue sections1:100-1:300
ImmunofluorescenceSubcellular localization1:100-1:500
ImmunoprecipitationProtein-protein interaction studies2-5 μg per 1 mg of lysate

Key applications include:

  • Investigating lipid metabolism pathways

  • Studying membrane biogenesis and remodeling

  • Researching pathological conditions like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

  • Examining neurodegenerative conditions linked to patatin-domain containing proteins

How should researchers validate the specificity of a Patatin-04/09 antibody?

A comprehensive validation approach should include:

  • Positive and negative controls:

    • Use tissues/cells known to express high levels (e.g., liver for PNPLA3, nervous tissue for PNPLA6)

    • Include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls

  • Multiple detection methods:

    • Confirm results using at least two techniques (e.g., WB and IHC)

    • Verify the detected molecular weight matches predictions (e.g., PNPLA6 calculated MW: 149,995 Da, observed: ~39 kDa for specific fragments)

  • Peptide competition assay:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to confirm signal elimination

    • Use structurally similar but non-target peptides as controls

  • Orthogonal validation:

    • Compare results with alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test antibody against related PNPLA family members

    • Verify species specificity if working with cross-species samples

What methodological considerations are important when using Patatin-04/09 antibodies for studying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)?

When investigating NAFLD using Patatin-04/09 antibodies, researchers should consider:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Fresh liver samples must be processed quickly to preserve phosphorylation states

    • Consider using phosphatase inhibitors during extraction to maintain post-translational modifications that may affect antibody recognition

  • Genetic background analysis:

    • Screen for PNPLA3 I148M variant (rs738409) which strongly influences NAFLD progression

    • Consider genetic background when interpreting antibody staining patterns

  • Experimental controls:

    • Include both normal and steatotic liver samples

    • Use appropriate animal models (e.g., high-fat diet, genetic models)

  • Co-localization studies:

    • Combine with lipid droplet markers (e.g., PLIN proteins) and ER markers

    • Assess subcellular distribution changes during disease progression

  • Functional correlation:

    • Correlate protein levels with enzymatic activity measurements

    • Consider assessing lipid profiles alongside protein expression

  • Technical considerations:

    • Lipid-rich tissues may require modified fixation and embedding protocols

    • Optimize antigen retrieval methods for fatty tissues

How can researchers effectively use Patatin-04/09 antibodies in studying membrane dynamics and phospholipid metabolism?

For effective investigation of membrane dynamics:

  • Subcellular fractionation approach:

    • Separate membrane fractions (plasma membrane, ER, Golgi, etc.)

    • Confirm fraction purity with organelle-specific markers

    • Analyze patatin protein distribution across fractions

  • Live-cell imaging techniques:

    • Combine antibodies with fluorescent phospholipid analogs

    • For dynamic studies, consider using cell-permeable antibody fragments or fluorescent protein fusions

  • Lipid-protein interaction studies:

    • Use co-immunoprecipitation with patatin-04/09 antibodies to identify interacting lipids

    • Consider lipidomic analysis of immunoprecipitated complexes

  • Analyzing phospholipid substrates:

    • Integrate antibody detection with mass spectrometry to identify affected lipid species

    • Focus on phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, and sphingomyelin modifications

  • Trafficking studies:

    • Explore relationships with Rab GTPases, particularly Rab2A, which regulates lipid metabolism

    • Use pulse-chase approaches with antibody detection to track protein movement

What are important considerations when generating recombinant single-chain antibodies (scFv) against Patatin-04/09 proteins?

When developing scFv antibodies against Patatin-04/09:

  • Antigen design considerations:

    • Target unique epitopes within the patatin domain

    • Avoid highly conserved regions if specificity for a particular family member is desired

    • Consider using peptides from the Internal region (e.g., AA range 1031-1080 for PNPLA6)

  • Library construction approaches:

    • Use immunized animals (rabbits show good results for patatin proteins)

    • Consider spleen and blood as complementary sources for antibody repertoires

    • Employ phage display technology for selection

  • Selection strategy optimization:

    • Implement multiple rounds of panning (typically 3-4)

    • Include negative selection steps against related patatin family members

    • Verify binding by phage ELISA and sequence selected clones

  • Expression and purification considerations:

    • Express in prokaryotic systems at low temperatures (e.g., using pCold I vector)

    • Consider fusion partners that enhance solubility

    • Validate functionality of purified scFv by comparing with parent IgG

  • Stability enhancement approaches:

    • Consider adding stabilizing fusion peptides like ATS (acidic tail of synuclein)

    • Test thermal stability and serum half-life of modified constructs

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding or weak signals when using Patatin-04/09 antibodies?

When encountering issues with Patatin-04/09 antibodies:

For non-specific binding:

  • Increase blocking stringency (try 5% BSA or 5% milk in PBS-T)

  • Optimize antibody concentration (perform titration experiments)

  • Include competing peptides to block specific binding sites

  • Increase washing duration and frequency

  • Consider alternative detergents in wash buffers

For weak signals:

  • Optimize antigen retrieval methods (test heat-mediated vs. enzymatic methods)

  • Increase antibody concentration or incubation time

  • Use signal amplification systems (HRP-polymer or biotin-streptavidin)

  • Ensure samples contain adequate target protein (verify with positive controls)

  • Check sample preparation (inadequate fixation or over-fixation can mask epitopes)

For both issues:

  • Test multiple antibody lots or sources

  • Verify antibody storage conditions (avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles)

  • Consider species cross-reactivity if working with non-human samples

  • Test alternative detection methods (fluorescent vs. chromogenic)

What approaches can be used to study the role of patatin-like phospholipase domain proteins in lipid remodeling during disease states?

To investigate PNPLA proteins in disease-related lipid remodeling:

  • Combined antibody-lipidomic approaches:

    • Use antibodies to quantify protein expression/localization

    • Correlate with comprehensive lipidomic analysis of affected tissues

    • Focus on disease-relevant lipid species (e.g., triglycerides, phospholipids)

  • Gene editing strategies:

    • Generate knockout/knockin models targeting specific patatin domains

    • Use CRISPR/Cas9 to introduce disease-associated mutations

    • Apply antibodies to verify protein expression changes

  • Substrate specificity analysis:

    • Combine immunoprecipitation with enzyme activity assays

    • Test activity against multiple lipid substrates

    • Correlate substrate preferences with disease progression

  • Regulatory pathway mapping:

    • Investigate AMPK-TBC1D1-Rab2A signaling axis effects on patatin proteins

    • Study PPARγ interactions with patatin-domain proteins

    • Monitor phosphorylation state changes during disease progression

  • Therapeutic intervention assessment:

    • Use antibodies to monitor protein changes after treatment

    • Evaluate compounds like silybin that reprogram lipid metabolism

    • Track subcellular redistribution of patatin proteins following intervention

How can researchers integrate antibody-based detection with genetic analysis of patatin-domain variants in population studies?

For integrating antibody and genetic approaches:

  • Variant-specific detection strategies:

    • Develop antibodies that specifically recognize disease-associated variants

    • Use epitope mapping to ensure antibodies can distinguish protein variants

    • Consider developing antibodies against common disease-associated variants (e.g., PNPLA3 I148M)

  • Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) integration:

    • Correlate genotype data with antibody-based protein quantification

    • Investigate how genetic variants affect protein expression levels

    • Use tissue microarrays for higher throughput analysis

  • Functional correlation approaches:

    • Assess enzymatic activity in samples grouped by genotype

    • Correlate protein localization patterns with specific genetic variants

    • Study protein-protein interactions influenced by genetic variants

  • Clinical application considerations:

    • Develop standardized protocols for antibody-based diagnostics

    • Establish reference ranges for protein expression based on genetic background

    • Consider how genetic variants might affect therapeutic antibody binding

  • Longitudinal analysis methods:

    • Use antibodies to track protein changes over disease course

    • Correlate with genetic risk profiles for disease progression

    • Monitor treatment response in relation to genetic background

What are the optimal sample preparation methods for detecting Patatin-04/09 proteins in different tissue types?

Sample preparation requirements vary by tissue type:

Liver tissue:

  • Flash freeze in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection

  • Section at 5-8 μm thickness for IHC

  • For WB, homogenize in RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors

  • Add lipase inhibitors to prevent degradation of lipid-protein complexes

Brain tissue:

  • Perfusion fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for IHC

  • Post-fix for no more than 24 hours to prevent epitope masking

  • For frozen sections, use OCT embedding and cut at 10-15 μm

  • For WB, use specialized neuronal extraction buffers with mild detergents

Cell culture:

  • For adherent cells, consider in-situ fixation to preserve spatial organization

  • For suspension cells, gentle fixation in solution followed by cytospin

  • For biochemical analysis, use detergent-free lysis methods initially

General considerations:

  • Always include phosphatase inhibitors as patatin phosphorylation status affects function

  • Consider using sucrose gradient fractionation to study membrane associations

  • For lipid-rich samples, optimize detergent concentration to maintain protein-lipid interactions

How can researchers effectively use Patatin-04/09 antibodies in multiplexed imaging applications?

For multiplexed imaging with Patatin-04/09 antibodies:

  • Antibody panel design:

    • Select antibodies raised in different host species to avoid cross-reactivity

    • Consider using directly conjugated primary antibodies to eliminate secondary antibody cross-reactivity

    • Validate each antibody independently before combining

  • Sequential staining approaches:

    • Implement tyramide signal amplification (TSA) with antibody stripping between rounds

    • Use heat-mediated antibody removal (95°C in citrate buffer) for complete stripping

    • Validate complete removal of previous antibodies before applying subsequent ones

  • Spectral unmixing strategies:

    • Use spectrally distinct fluorophores (minimum 30nm separation between emission peaks)

    • Include single-stained controls for spectral unmixing algorithms

    • Consider confocal or spectral imaging systems for better separation

  • Co-localization analysis:

    • Stain for organelle markers alongside Patatin-04/09

    • Focus on relevant compartments (lipid droplets, ER, Golgi)

    • Use Manders' or Pearson's coefficients to quantify co-localization

  • Quantitative considerations:

    • Include calibration standards for each fluorophore

    • Use automated image analysis algorithms to reduce bias

    • Implement machine learning approaches for pattern recognition in complex samples

What approaches should be used to optimize immunoprecipitation of patatin-like phospholipase domain proteins?

Optimizing immunoprecipitation of patatin domain proteins requires:

  • Lysis buffer optimization:

    • Test multiple detergent types and concentrations (CHAPS often preserves lipid-protein interactions better than stronger detergents)

    • Include appropriate protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails

    • Consider adding glycerol (5-10%) to stabilize enzymatic activity

  • Antibody coupling strategies:

    • Direct coupling to beads (using crosslinkers) can reduce background from antibody heavy chains

    • For transient interactions, consider chemical crosslinking prior to lysis

    • Test both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies as they may capture different protein populations

  • Co-factor considerations:

    • Include calcium in buffers as many patatin domains are calcium-dependent

    • Test the effect of ATP addition on complex formation

    • Consider lipid addition to stabilize certain protein conformations

  • Washing stringency balance:

    • Implement a gradient washing approach (decreasing detergent concentrations)

    • For interactome studies, use milder conditions to preserve weak interactions

    • For specificity, increase washing stringency but validate target retention

  • Elution strategies:

    • Compare competitive elution (with immunizing peptide) vs. denaturing conditions

    • For subsequent activity assays, use native elution conditions

    • For mass spectrometry, consider on-bead digestion to minimize sample loss

How can researchers distinguish between different members of the patatin-like phospholipase family using antibody-based approaches?

To distinguish between PNPLA family members:

  • Epitope selection strategy:

    • Target non-conserved regions outside the catalytic domain

    • Focus on unique C-terminal or N-terminal regions

    • Use sequence alignment analysis to identify family member-specific regions

  • Validation approaches:

    • Test antibodies against recombinant proteins of multiple family members

    • Use cells with known expression patterns of different family members

    • Employ knockout/knockdown models as negative controls

  • Isoform-specific detection methods:

    • Develop isoform-specific antibodies targeting splice variant regions

    • Use 2D gel electrophoresis to separate isoforms before antibody detection

    • Combine with RT-PCR to correlate protein with transcript variants

  • Advanced techniques:

    • Implement proximity ligation assays to detect specific interactions

    • Use super-resolution microscopy to discern subtle differences in localization

    • Consider mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics as a complementary approach

  • Post-translational modification analysis:

    • Develop modification-specific antibodies (phospho, glyco, ubiquitinated)

    • Use these to distinguish differently modified forms of the same protein

    • Correlate modifications with functional outcomes

What considerations are important when developing immunoassays for detecting patatin-domain proteins in biological fluids?

For developing immunoassays targeting patatin proteins in fluids:

  • Sample preprocessing requirements:

    • Determine optimal anticoagulants for blood collection (EDTA vs. heparin)

    • Establish standardized centrifugation protocols to remove interfering components

    • Consider pre-clearing steps to reduce non-specific binding

  • Assay format selection:

    • Sandwich ELISA offers better specificity than direct coating methods

    • Consider magnetic bead-based assays for improved sensitivity

    • Develop multiplex assays to detect multiple family members simultaneously

  • Sensitivity enhancement approaches:

    • Implement signal amplification (e.g., poly-HRP systems)

    • Consider chemiluminescent or electrochemiluminescent detection

    • Use sample concentration methods for low-abundance targets

  • Calibration and quantification:

    • Develop recombinant protein standards that match native forms

    • Include spike-recovery experiments to assess matrix effects

    • Establish appropriate dilution protocols for different sample types

  • Validation requirements:

    • Test assay performance across diverse patient populations

    • Assess influence of common pathological conditions

    • Determine reference ranges in healthy populations

  • Technical considerations:

    • Evaluate cross-reactivity with related family members

    • Assess potential interference from autoantibodies

    • Determine stability of analytes during sample storage and processing

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.