Patatin-14 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Biological Context of Patatin-like Phospholipase A2 (Pat1)

Patatin-like phospholipases are enzymes that hydrolyze phospholipids, playing roles in membrane remodeling and immune evasion. In R. parkeri, Pat1 facilitates:

  • Membrane escape: Critical for bacterial exit from host vacuoles into the cytosol .

  • Immune evasion: Prevents detection by host galectins and autophagy receptors like p62 .

  • Cell-cell spread: Enables actin-based motility for intercellular dissemination .

A transposon mutant (pat1::Tn) showed reduced virulence in mice, with delayed weight loss and improved survival rates compared to wild-type strains .

Hypothetical Mechanism of a Pat1-Targeting Antibody

While no antibody named "Patatin-14" is documented, antibodies targeting bacterial phospholipases could theoretically:

  • Neutralize enzymatic activity: Block phospholipase-mediated membrane lysis.

  • Promote opsonization: Enhance phagocytic clearance via Fc receptor binding .

  • Disrupt oligomerization: Inhibit functional multimerization, as seen in IgM structure .

Table 1: Key Findings from R. parkeri Pat1 Studies

ParameterWild-Type Pat1pat1::Tn Mutant
Vacuole escapeRapid (1–2 hpi)Delayed (>4 hpi)
LAMP-1 colocalizationLowIncreased
Mouse survival0% by day 10>80% by day 40
Galectin-3 targetingAvoidedIncreased

Antibody Engineering Considerations

Lessons from functional antibody development for other enzymes (e.g., PAD4 ) suggest:

  • Allosteric modulation: Antibodies binding outside catalytic pockets can alter enzyme conformation or oligomeric state .

  • Dose-response relationships: Protection correlates with antibody concentration adjusted for target affinity . For example, COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies require ~0.4–0.5 mg/L for 50% efficacy .

Research Gaps and Opportunities

  • Structural characterization: No cryo-EM or crystallographic data exist for Pat1-antibody complexes.

  • In vivo neutralization assays: Efficacy of anti-Pat1 antibodies remains untested.

  • Cross-reactivity risks: Patatin-like domains are conserved across pathogens, necessitating specificity validation.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
Patatin-14 antibody; EC 3.1.1.- antibody
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Patatin-14 Antibody is likely involved in the response of tubers to pathogens due to its probable lipolytic acyl hydrolase (LAH) activity.
Database Links

UniGene: Stu.20733

Protein Families
Patatin family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole.
Tissue Specificity
Tuber.

Q&A

What is Patatin-14 and its relationship to the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein family?

Patatin-14 belongs to the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein family, which includes proteins characterized by a conserved serine-aspartate catalytic dyad . PEDFR (pigment epithelium-derived factor receptor), also known as PNPLA2, is a prominent member of this family functioning as a 54 kDa transmembrane protein . These proteins typically have lipase activity and are involved in lipid metabolism and cellular signaling pathways . The family is characterized by the presence of a patatin domain, originally identified in plants, which confers phospholipase activity essential for their biological functions .

How does PNPLA2/PEDFR expression vary across different tissue types?

PNPLA2/PEDFR shows distinctive tissue-specific expression patterns that correlate with its diverse functions. It is highly expressed in adipose tissue, where it catalyzes the formation of diacylglycerol from triglycerides, serving as a key regulator of lipid homeostasis . Additionally, significant expression has been documented in the retina (where it functions as a receptor for PEDF), testis, cardiac muscle, and skeletal muscle . This tissue distribution pattern suggests multiple physiological roles beyond lipid metabolism, potentially including tissue-specific signaling pathways and specialized cellular functions that vary depending on the microenvironment and metabolic requirements of different tissues .

What are the key structural characteristics of antibodies targeting patatin-like proteins?

Antibodies targeting patatin-like proteins, such as the Human PEDFR/PNPLA2 Alexa Fluor® 405-conjugated Antibody, are typically designed to recognize specific epitopes within the functional domains of these proteins . The most effective antibodies target conserved regions that are accessible in the native protein conformation while maintaining specificity for the target protein versus other family members . For instance, antibodies against PEDFR/PNPLA2 often target regions within the Val162-Thr332 sequence (derived from accession #Q96AD5), which contains signature motifs critical for recognition . These antibodies may be conjugated with fluorescent markers like Alexa Fluor® 405 to facilitate detection in imaging and flow cytometry applications while preserving immunoreactivity and specificity .

What are the main applications of Patatin-14 antibodies in research?

Patatin-14 antibodies serve multiple crucial research applications spanning cellular and molecular biology. They are extensively used in immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize protein localization and trafficking within cells, particularly when conjugated with fluorophores like Alexa Fluor® 405 . Flow cytometry applications enable quantitative assessment of protein expression levels across cell populations . Additionally, these antibodies are valuable tools for Western blotting to determine protein expression and molecular weight verification, immunoprecipitation to study protein-protein interactions, and ELISA for quantitative protein detection . In functional studies, they can be employed to neutralize protein activity, allowing researchers to elucidate the physiological roles of patatin-like proteins in various cellular processes .

How can HIP14's PAT activity be accurately measured and distinguished from other palmitoyltransferases?

Accurate measurement of HIP14's protein palmitoyltransferase (PAT) activity requires specialized assays that distinguish it from other PATs. The most effective approach utilizes an in vitro palmitoylation assay with substrate specificity determination . In this method, membrane fractions containing HIP14 are isolated and incubated with peptide substrates that mimic specific palmitoylation motifs, such as FarnCNRas(NBD) which resembles the C-terminal RAS farnesylated-palmitoylation motif, or MyrGCK(NBD) which mimics the N-terminal myristoylated-palmitoylation motif . HIP14 shows significantly higher activity toward FarnCNRas(NBD) compared to MyrGCK(NBD), demonstrating its substrate preference . To confirm specificity, comparative analysis with mutant forms (such as the DHHS mutant) can be performed, as mutations in the DHHC-CRD domain abolish enzymatic activity . Additionally, RNAi knockdown experiments targeting HIP14 can validate the specificity of observed PAT activity by demonstrating selective reduction in palmitoylation of preferred substrates .

What is the relationship between HIP14 overexpression and cell transformation in experimental models?

HIP14 overexpression exhibits profound transformative effects on cellular phenotypes through its PAT activity. In NIH 3t3 fibroblasts, stable overexpression of HIP14 induces dramatic morphological and behavioral changes characteristic of oncogenic transformation . These cells rapidly form foci on tissue culture plates, continue proliferating beyond saturation density (indicating escape from contact inhibition), and demonstrate a 150-fold increase in colony formation in soft agar with significantly larger colonies compared to wild-type cells . Critically, this transformative capacity is directly dependent on HIP14's enzymatic activity, as cells expressing a catalytically inactive DHHS mutant (with a mutation in the DHHC-CRD domain) maintain normal growth patterns indistinguishable from wild-type cells . This dependency on enzymatic function suggests that HIP14's oncogenic potential operates through selective protein palmitoylation, likely targeting signaling proteins involved in growth regulation, particularly those containing farnesylated-palmitoylation motifs similar to RAS proteins .

How does DHHC domain mutation affect the functional activity of patatin-like proteins in experimental systems?

Mutation of the DHHC domain critically impairs the functional activity of patatin-like proteins, particularly their PAT enzymatic function. Studies examining the DHHC-CRD domain in HIP14 demonstrate that mutation of the key DHHC motif to DHHS completely abolishes PAT activity toward farnesylated substrate peptides (FarnCNRas(NBD)) . This mutation prevents the formation of the essential acyl-enzyme intermediate that normally occurs during the palmitoylation reaction . The functional impairment is not attributable to reduced protein expression, as Western blot analyses of both whole-cell extracts and membrane fractions have shown that the DHHS-mutant protein is actually expressed at higher levels than wild-type HIP14 . Beyond enzymatic activity, this mutation also eliminates the transformative cellular effects associated with HIP14 overexpression, including focus formation, escape from contact inhibition, and anchorage-independent growth . These findings demonstrate that the DHHC domain is absolutely essential for both the biochemical catalytic function and downstream biological effects of patatin-like proteins with PAT activity .

What are the implications of HIP14's substrate specificity for targeting RAS-related oncogenic pathways?

HIP14's preferential activity toward the farnesylated-palmitoylation motif found in H- and N-RAS proteins has significant implications for targeting RAS-related oncogenic pathways . This substrate specificity positions HIP14 as a potential upstream regulator of RAS signaling by controlling RAS localization through palmitoylation . Studies have demonstrated increased HIP14 expression in N-, K-, and H(EJ)-RAS-transformed NIH 3t3 cells, with EJ-RAS cells showing the highest levels, suggesting a potential feed-forward amplification mechanism in RAS-driven oncogenesis . The specific reduction in palmitoylation of FarnCNRas(NBD) peptides following HIP14 knockdown (86% reduction) without affecting MyrGCK(NBD) palmitoylation confirms HIP14's selective influence on RAS-like substrates . This specificity makes HIP14 a promising therapeutic target for interrupting RAS-dependent oncogenic signaling, particularly in malignancies driven by palmitoylation-dependent RAS isoforms (H- and N-RAS) . Inhibitors designed to block HIP14's PAT activity could potentially disrupt proper membrane localization of oncogenic RAS proteins, thereby attenuating downstream signaling cascades that drive cellular proliferation and survival .

What are the optimal conditions for using Patatin-14 antibodies in immunofluorescence studies?

For optimal immunofluorescence studies using Patatin-14 antibodies, several critical parameters must be carefully controlled. Begin with fixation optimization: 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes at room temperature) typically preserves epitope accessibility while maintaining cellular morphology . For membrane proteins like PEDFR/PNPLA2, include a permeabilization step using 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for 5-10 minutes to enable antibody access while preserving membrane structure . Antibody concentration requires titration, typically starting at 1:100-1:500 dilution in blocking buffer containing 1-5% serum and 0.1% BSA . For fluorophore-conjugated antibodies like Alexa Fluor® 405-conjugated anti-PEDFR/PNPLA2, protect from light during all steps to prevent photobleaching . Include appropriate blocking steps (30-60 minutes with 5-10% serum from the same species as the secondary antibody) to minimize non-specific binding . For co-localization studies, carefully select compatible fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap and include single-label controls to confirm specificity . Finally, validate staining patterns with appropriate positive and negative controls, including known expressing tissues/cells and knockout/knockdown samples if available .

How can researchers effectively validate the specificity of their Patatin-14 antibodies?

Thorough validation of Patatin-14 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach. First, implement Western blot analysis to confirm recognition of a single band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 54 kDa for PEDFR/PNPLA2) . Compare the results across multiple cell/tissue types with known differential expression levels . Perform parallel experiments with genetic knockdown/knockout models using siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9 systems to verify signal reduction/elimination that corresponds with target protein depletion . Employ competitive binding assays using purified recombinant target protein to demonstrate signal attenuation . For DHHC domain-containing proteins like HIP14, compare wild-type and catalytic mutant (e.g., DHHS) constructs to assess functional specificity alongside recognition specificity . Conduct pre-absorption tests where antibodies are pre-incubated with immunizing peptides before application to samples, which should eliminate specific signals . Finally, compare results across multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of the same protein to confirm consistent localization and expression patterns, and include isotype controls to rule out non-specific binding .

What experimental design considerations are crucial when studying the relationship between HIP14 expression and PAT activity?

When investigating the relationship between HIP14 expression and PAT activity, researchers must implement a comprehensive experimental design that accounts for multiple variables. First, establish quantitative measurement systems for both HIP14 expression (via RT-PCR for mRNA and Western blotting for protein) and PAT activity (using in vitro palmitoylation assays with specific substrates like FarnCNRas(NBD)) . Include genetic manipulation approaches with both gain-of-function (overexpression of wild-type HIP14) and loss-of-function (siRNA knockdown) components to establish causality between expression and activity . Critically, incorporate enzyme-dead controls (DHHS mutant) that maintain normal expression but lack catalytic activity to distinguish between expression-dependent and activity-dependent effects . Account for subcellular localization by performing fractionation studies, as PAT activity requires proper membrane targeting of HIP14 . Consider cellular context by comparing results across multiple cell types with different basal expression levels, particularly comparing normal cells with transformed variants (e.g., RAS-transformed cells) . Finally, include time-course analyses to capture potential adaptation mechanisms that may compensate for altered HIP14 levels, and measure potential effects on downstream targets to connect biochemical activity to biological outcomes .

How can researchers resolve inconsistent results between different detection methods for patatin-like proteins?

Resolving inconsistencies between detection methods for patatin-like proteins requires systematic troubleshooting across multiple parameters. First, evaluate epitope accessibility differences between methods—proteins like PEDFR/PNPLA2 may present different epitopes depending on conformational states in native (flow cytometry, immunoprecipitation) versus denatured (Western blot) conditions . For membrane-associated proteins like HIP14, verify proper subcellular fractionation protocols are being used, as incomplete membrane isolation can significantly impact detection in activity assays . Compare antibody clone specificities; different antibodies may recognize distinct epitopes with varying accessibility or may cross-react with related family members . For discrepancies between mRNA and protein levels, investigate post-transcriptional regulation by examining protein stability (cycloheximide chase), ubiquitination status, or microRNA regulation . In functional assays measuring PAT activity, confirm substrate specificity by comparing results with multiple substrate peptides (e.g., FarnCNRas(NBD) versus MyrGCK(NBD)) . Finally, create standard curves with recombinant proteins for quantitative methods, and implement spike-in controls to assess recovery efficiency and matrix effects across different sample types . Comprehensive documentation of all protocol variations between methods will facilitate identification of critical variables affecting detection consistency.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing HIP14 expression data in relation to oncogenic potential?

The statistical analysis of HIP14 expression data in relation to oncogenic potential requires sophisticated approaches that account for biological variability and experimental design complexity. For comparing expression levels between normal and transformed cells, paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (for non-parametric data) are appropriate when analyzing matched samples . When examining correlations between HIP14 expression and quantitative metrics of transformation (colony numbers, growth rates), Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients should be calculated with scatter plots to visualize relationships . For complex experimental designs incorporating multiple variables (different RAS isoforms, various time points, multiple cell lines), two-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests enables detection of interaction effects between factors . Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests is essential when correlating HIP14 expression with outcomes in animal models . To determine critical expression thresholds associated with transformation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis should be employed to identify optimal cutoff values with maximum sensitivity and specificity . For all analyses, appropriate multiple testing corrections (e.g., Bonferroni, Benjamini-Hochberg) must be applied to control false discovery rates, particularly when examining multiple endpoints or conducting genome-wide expression correlations .

How should researchers address potential cross-reactivity issues when studying closely related patatin-like family members?

Addressing cross-reactivity issues when studying closely related patatin-like family members requires a multi-layered approach to ensure specificity. Begin with in silico analysis of sequence homology among family members to identify unique regions suitable for targeting; for instance, while the DHHC domain is highly conserved, the surrounding regions often have greater sequence divergence . Perform comprehensive epitope mapping to confirm antibody recognition sites, and validate antibody specificity using recombinant proteins of multiple family members in parallel Western blots or ELISAs . Implement genetic approaches by creating knockout/knockdown models for individual family members to confirm signal specificity; the dramatic reduction in specific PAT activity seen in HIP14 siRNA experiments demonstrates this approach's effectiveness . For activity assays, design substrate peptides that exploit known preferences of individual family members, such as HIP14's preference for farnesylated over myristoylated substrates . Use competition assays with titrated amounts of purified proteins to determine relative binding affinities and potential cross-reactive thresholds . When possible, employ orthogonal detection methods that target different molecular characteristics (e.g., combining antibody-based detection with activity-based protein profiling using substrate analogs) . Finally, include comprehensive controls in each experiment, including samples with overexpression of related family members to establish detection thresholds for cross-reactivity .

What are the emerging applications of autoantibodies against patatin-like proteins as biomarkers?

Recent research has revealed promising applications for autoantibodies against patatin-like and related proteins as biomarkers for early disease detection, particularly in oncology. For instance, autoantibodies against 14-3-3 zeta protein have shown potential as predictive biomarkers for hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with liver cirrhosis, a premalignant liver condition . Studies have demonstrated that these autoantibodies can appear in patient serum up to 9 months before clinical HCC diagnosis, with titers gradually increasing as nodule size expands . The prevalence of autoantibodies against 14-3-3 zeta protein was found to be significantly higher in liver cirrhosis patients (16.1%) compared to those with chronic hepatitis (0%) and normal controls (1.7%) . This pattern suggests autoantibodies may represent early immune responses to altered protein expression or post-translational modifications occurring during malignant transformation . Similar approaches could be applied to patatin-like proteins, particularly those with altered expression or activity in disease states . Future research should focus on developing standardized assay platforms (ELISA, protein arrays) for detecting these autoantibodies in diverse patient populations, correlating autoantibody titers with disease progression, and establishing predictive algorithms that combine multiple autoantibody signatures for improved diagnostic accuracy .

How might targeting HIP14 PAT activity serve as a novel approach for cancer therapeutics?

Targeting HIP14 PAT activity represents a promising novel approach for cancer therapeutics based on its critical role in cellular transformation and connections to established oncogenic pathways. The direct correlation between HIP14's enzymatic activity and cellular transformation, as demonstrated by the inability of catalytically inactive DHHS mutants to transform cells, provides strong mechanistic rationale for therapeutic intervention . HIP14's selective palmitoylation of substrates containing the farnesyl-dependent palmitoylation motif found in oncogenic H- and N-RAS proteins positions it as a potential upstream regulator of RAS signaling pathways that drive numerous malignancies . Unlike direct RAS inhibition, which has proven challenging, targeting HIP14 could disrupt proper membrane localization of RAS proteins, thereby attenuating downstream signaling . Small molecule inhibitors of HIP14 could be developed by targeting the DHHC-CRD domain essential for catalytic activity or substrate binding interfaces . Proof-of-concept studies using RNAi approaches have already demonstrated that HIP14 knockdown significantly reduces specific PAT activity toward RAS-like substrates by up to 86% . Future drug development should focus on high-throughput screening assays using the in vitro palmitoylation assay with FarnCNRas(NBD) substrate to identify compounds that selectively inhibit HIP14 activity . Additionally, combination therapies coupling HIP14 inhibitors with downstream RAS pathway inhibitors could provide synergistic effects by simultaneously targeting multiple nodes in oncogenic signaling networks .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.