PCBP2 belongs to the poly(C)-binding protein family characterized by triple KH (K-homologous) domains that mediate binding to nucleic acids, particularly poly(C) stretches. The protein is approximately 38-39 kDa and serves multiple functions in cellular processes:
RNA stability regulation, particularly for mRNAs containing C-rich elements in their 3' UTRs
Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression
Viral RNA replication for certain viruses
Modulation of innate immune responses
PCBP2 is primarily expressed in the nucleus but can shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm, allowing it to participate in both nuclear and cytoplasmic processes. The protein has been implicated in several physiological and pathological processes, making PCBP2 antibodies valuable tools for investigating these mechanisms .
PCBP2 antibodies are versatile reagents employed across multiple experimental techniques:
| Application | Typical Dilution Range | Common Uses |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:6000 | Protein expression analysis, molecular weight verification |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | Tissue distribution studies, protein localization |
| Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC) | 1:50-1:500 | Subcellular localization, co-localization studies |
| Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) | Varies by antibody | Protein-protein interaction studies |
| ELISA | Varies by format | Quantitative protein detection (limit ~0.1ng/ml for some formats) |
These applications have been validated with multiple PCBP2 antibodies across human, mouse, and rat samples, making them useful for comparative species studies .
When validating PCBP2 antibodies, several well-established controls should be considered:
Cell lines: HeLa, Jurkat, K-562, and 293T cells consistently show detectable PCBP2 expression
Tissues: Human testis, liver, colon, and cervical tissues show positive IHC staining
Molecular controls: Recombinant PCBP2 protein (particularly GST-tagged versions)
Negative controls: Non-transfected cell lysates in comparison with PCBP2-transfected lysates
Knockdown validation: siRNA or shRNA against PCBP2 to confirm antibody specificity
For RNA interference validation, researchers have successfully used the siRNA sequence "CCU CUA GAG GCC UAU ACC A" targeting PCBP2, which provides an excellent negative control for antibody specificity testing .
Several technical considerations should be addressed when using PCBP2 antibodies for tissue analysis:
Antigen retrieval: For FFPE tissues, TE buffer pH 9.0 is recommended for optimal epitope exposure, though citrate buffer pH 6.0 can also be used as an alternative
Antibody concentration: IHC applications typically require higher concentrations (1:50-1:200) compared to WB applications
Cross-reactivity: PCBP2 shares sequence homology with other PCBP family members, particularly PCBP1, requiring careful antibody selection to avoid cross-reactivity
Background staining: PCBP2 is widely expressed, which can sometimes result in higher background signals
Species differences: While sequence homology is high (mouse 100%, rat 97%), certain epitopes may show species-specific differences in detection efficiency
Proper storage and handling are critical for maintaining antibody performance:
Store concentrated antibody solutions at -20°C for long-term storage (typically stable for one year)
For frequent use, aliquot and store at 4°C for up to one month
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can degrade antibody quality
Most PCBP2 antibodies are supplied in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.2-7.3
Briefly centrifuge vials before opening to collect solution at the bottom
For dilution, use fresh buffers appropriate for the application (e.g., TBST with 5% BSA or milk for WB)
PCBP2 has been identified as a critical regulator of cGAS-STING antiviral signaling pathways. Research methodologies using PCBP2 antibodies have revealed:
Protein-protein interactions: Co-immunoprecipitation with PCBP2 antibodies followed by mass spectrometry identified PCBP2 as a cGAS-interacting protein
Domain mapping: Using PCBP2 antibodies with deletion mutants revealed that the KH3 domain of PCBP2 is critical for its interaction with cGAS
Signal pathway analysis: PCBP2 overexpression reduces cGAS-STING signaling while PCBP2 knockdown enhances innate immune responses to DNA stimulation
Methodological approach for investigating PCBP2-cGAS interactions:
Use PCBP2 antibodies to perform co-IP assays with cGAS
Compare phosphorylation levels of downstream molecules (TBK1, IRF3) in wild-type versus PCBP2-deficient cells
Measure transcriptional levels of antiviral genes (IFNB1, IFIT1) after viral challenge in cells with modified PCBP2 expression
Research has shown that PCBP2 negatively regulates cGAS enzymatic activity, attenuates cGAS aggregates, and affects cGAS-DNA phase separation, all of which can be monitored using appropriate PCBP2 antibodies in combination with functional assays .
PCBP2 is a key RNA-binding protein with specificity for C-rich sequences. When investigating RNA-protein interactions:
RIP (RNA immunoprecipitation) assays:
Use PCBP2 antibodies optimized for IP applications
Include appropriate RNase inhibitors in all buffers
Validate with known PCBP2 RNA targets (e.g., α-globin mRNA)
Sequence captured RNAs to identify novel binding partners
RNA stability assays:
Compare mRNA half-life in PCBP2 knockdown versus control cells
Focus on transcripts containing C-rich elements in their 3' UTRs
Use actinomycin D to block transcription and monitor decay rates
Mapping binding sites:
Combine PCBP2 immunoprecipitation with RNA footprinting
Use deletion mutants of target RNAs to identify critical binding regions
Research has demonstrated that PCBP2 stabilizes sortilin transcripts by binding to C-rich elements (CREs) in the 3' UTR. This interaction is sensitive to Zn²⁺ levels, suggesting that PCBP2 may function as a zinc sensor in post-transcriptional regulation .
Rigorous validation of PCBP2 antibodies in genetic manipulation experiments is essential:
CRISPR-Cas9 knockout approaches:
Design guide RNAs targeting PCBP2 exons (e.g., "AAGATGGGCGGGAGTCTTCT" has been successful)
Validate knockout by WB with PCBP2 antibodies targeting different epitopes
Use immunofluorescence co-staining to confirm cell-specific deletion in mixed populations
siRNA/shRNA knockdown optimization:
Effective sequences include "CCU CUA GAG GCC UAU ACC A" for human PCBP2
Test knockdown efficiency at 48-72 hours post-transfection
Quantify reduction by densitometry of Western blots (expect 70-80% reduction)
Tissue-specific knockout models:
For pancreatic β cell-specific deletion, RIP-Cre mice crossed with floxed Pcbp2 resulted in ~80% depletion
Validate by co-immunofluorescence for PCBP2 and cell-type markers (e.g., insulin)
Recent research using PCBP2 antibodies has shown that β cell-specific knockout of PCBP2 affects insulin secretion in response to cAMP-mediated stimulation (IBMX), highlighting its role in pancreatic function .
PCBP2 contains three KH domains with distinct functions. To investigate domain-specific roles:
Domain mapping strategy:
Generate deletion constructs lacking specific KH domains (KH1, KH2, linker, or KH3)
Perform co-IP experiments with domain mutants and interaction partners
Use Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) assays to quantify binding affinities
Functional rescue experiments:
Deplete endogenous PCBP2 via RNAi or CRISPR
Reconstitute with domain deletion mutants
Assess functional recovery using appropriate readouts
Domain-specific antibody approaches:
Use epitope-specific antibodies targeting different regions of PCBP2
Compare immunoprecipitation profiles to identify domain-specific interaction partners
Research has identified that the KH3 domain is critical for PCBP2-cGAS interactions and subsequent regulation of antiviral signaling. Deletion of this domain results in loss of PCBP2's ability to regulate cGAS-STING activation, while other domain deletions maintain this functionality .
Investigating PCBP2 post-translational modifications requires specific methodological considerations:
Phosphorylation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate PCBP2 using validated antibodies
Perform Western blot with phospho-specific antibodies
Alternatively, use mass spectrometry to identify modification sites
Compare modification patterns before and after cellular stimulation
Subcellular distribution changes:
Use fractionation followed by Western blot with PCBP2 antibodies
Perform immunofluorescence to track relocalization after stimulation
Quantify nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios under different conditions
Modification-dependent interactions:
Compare PCBP2 interactome before and after specific cellular stimuli
Use phosphatase treatment to determine phosphorylation-dependent interactions
While less studied than some aspects of PCBP2 biology, post-translational modifications may be important for regulating PCBP2's RNA-binding activity and protein-protein interactions, particularly in response to cellular stress or immune stimulation .
When encountering non-specific bands with PCBP2 antibodies:
Optimization strategies:
Increase antibody dilution (test range from 1:1000-1:6000)
Use freshly prepared blocking solution (5% non-fat milk or BSA)
Extend blocking time to reduce background
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to washing buffers
Consider using PVDF membranes instead of nitrocellulose for certain applications
Controls to include:
PCBP2 knockdown or knockout lysates as negative controls
Recombinant PCBP2 protein as positive control
Multiple cell lines to confirm consistent banding pattern
Expected molecular weight variations:
Full-length human PCBP2: 38-39 kDa (calculated 38.6 kDa)
GST-tagged PCBP2: ~65 kDa (GST tag adds ~26 kDa)
Transfected PCBP2 lysates typically show bands at 38.7 kDa
Many researchers observe PCBP2 at a slightly higher apparent molecular weight (~43 kDa) than calculated, which is likely due to post-translational modifications or the protein's structural properties .
For robust co-IP experiments with PCBP2 antibodies:
Essential controls:
IgG control from same species as PCBP2 antibody
Input sample (5-10% of lysate used for IP)
Reciprocal IP (pull down with antibody against interacting partner)
Knockdown/knockout controls to establish specificity
Technical considerations:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads before IP
Optimize salt concentration in wash buffers
Test different lysis conditions (NP-40, RIPA, etc.)
Consider crosslinking for transient interactions
Validation approaches:
Confirm interactions by alternative methods (e.g., proximity ligation assay)
Use domain mutants to map interaction interfaces
Test interaction under different cellular conditions
Research using PCBP2 antibodies in co-IP experiments has successfully identified its interaction with cGAS, revealing a critical role in regulating antiviral signaling pathways. These studies employed mass spectrometry following co-IP to identify novel interaction partners, providing a model for similar approaches .
To optimize immunofluorescence staining with PCBP2 antibodies:
Fixation and permeabilization:
Compare paraformaldehyde (4%) versus methanol fixation
Test different permeabilization agents (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1% saponin)
Optimize incubation times for each step
Antibody concentration and incubation:
Start with 1:50-1:200 dilution range
Test both overnight 4°C and room temperature incubations
Consider using signal amplification for low abundance detection
Subcellular localization expectations:
Predominantly nuclear staining in most cell types
Some cytoplasmic staining depending on cell type and condition
Dynamic shuttling between compartments under certain stimuli
Validation approaches:
Include PCBP2 knockdown controls
Co-stain with markers for different subcellular compartments
Compare staining pattern with multiple PCBP2 antibodies
Immunofluorescence studies using PCBP2 antibodies have been successfully performed in HeLa cells at concentrations around 10 μg/ml, revealing primarily nuclear localization with some cytoplasmic distribution .
Comprehensive validation of PCBP2 antibodies should include:
Cross-species validation:
Test reactivity in human, mouse, and rat samples
Compare staining patterns across species
Be aware that some epitopes may show species-specific differences
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test against recombinant PCBP family members (PCBP1, PCBP3, PCBP4)
Use siRNA against specific family members to confirm specificity
Compare reactivity patterns with different antibodies against the same target
Application-specific validation:
Perform peptide competition assays
Use genetic knockdown/knockout models
Compare results from different detection methods
Epitope-specific considerations:
Antibodies raised against different epitopes may perform differently
N-terminal vs. C-terminal antibodies may detect different isoforms
Structural epitopes may be affected by protein conformation
Most commercial PCBP2 antibodies show reactivity to human, mouse, and rat samples, with sequence homology of 100% for mouse and 97% for rat compared to human PCBP2 .
PCBP2 antibodies have revealed important roles in several disease contexts:
Viral infections:
PCBP2 regulates antiviral signaling through the cGAS-STING pathway
Knockout of PCBP2 enhances type I interferon responses and reduces HSV-1 replication
PCBP2 antibodies help track protein expression during viral infection
Cancer biology:
PCBP2 regulates p73 expression and p73-dependent apoptosis
Antibody-based studies have identified aberrant PCBP2 expression in various cancers
PCBP2 stabilizes mRNAs encoding key cancer-related proteins
Metabolic disorders:
PCBP2 maintains pancreatic β cell function and insulin secretion
β cell-specific deletion of PCBP2 affects cAMP-mediated insulin secretion
PCBP2 antibodies enable tracking of expression in specific cell populations
Research using PCBP2 antibodies has shown that PCBP2 knockdown significantly enhances the mRNA expression of interferon-responsive genes following viral infection, suggesting potential therapeutic approaches targeting this pathway .
Novel methodologies incorporating PCBP2 antibodies include:
Proximity-dependent labeling:
BioID or APEX2 fusions with PCBP2 to identify spatial interactomes
Proximity ligation assays to visualize protein-protein interactions in situ
Combined with PCBP2 antibodies for validation
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Complementing fixed-cell antibody studies with tagged PCBP2 in live cells
Single-molecule tracking to monitor RNA-protein dynamics
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to measure kinetics
Single-cell techniques:
Combining PCBP2 antibodies with single-cell RNA-seq
CyTOF or spectral cytometry for multiparameter analysis
Spatial transcriptomics with PCBP2 protein localization
CRISPR screening:
Using PCBP2 antibodies to validate hits from CRISPR screens
Combining genetic perturbation with proteomic analysis
Identifying synthetic lethal interactions
Recent studies have used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate PCBP2 knockout cell lines and mice models, which are then validated using PCBP2 antibodies to confirm complete protein loss .
Integrative approaches combining PCBP2 antibodies with other techniques provide comprehensive insights:
Transcriptomics integration:
Combine PCBP2 RIP-seq with RNA-seq of PCBP2-depleted cells
Identify direct versus indirect effects on RNA regulation
Correlate PCBP2 binding with RNA stability changes
Structure-function analysis:
Pair antibody-based functional studies with structural biology
Use domain-specific antibodies to probe structural features
Combine with mutagenesis to map critical residues
Systematic interaction mapping:
Use PCBP2 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Compare interactomes under different cellular conditions
Validate key interactions with orthogonal methods
In vivo models:
Use tissue-specific PCBP2 knockout mice combined with antibody staining
Track phenotypic changes alongside molecular alterations
Apply PCBP2 antibodies for histological analysis of affected tissues
Research has demonstrated that combining PCBP2 immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry identified cGAS as an interaction partner, which was then validated using domain mapping and functional studies to reveal PCBP2's role in antiviral immunity .
Recent discoveries highlight PCBP2's role in biomolecular condensates:
Phase separation biology:
PCBP2 attenuates cGAS aggregates and cGAS-DNA phase separation
This impacts innate immune signaling efficiency
PCBP2 may play similar roles with other RNA-protein complexes
Methodological approaches:
Use PCBP2 antibodies to track protein localization to phase-separated compartments
Immunofluorescence to visualize co-localization with stress granules or P-bodies
Combine with live-cell imaging of tagged components
Functional consequences:
Phase separation may concentrate RNA-binding proteins with their targets
This can enhance or inhibit enzymatic activities
PCBP2 antibodies help correlate localization with function
Technical considerations:
Fixation methods can affect visualization of biomolecular condensates
Consider using low concentrations of paraformaldehyde
Combine antibody staining with fluorescent RNA probes
Research has shown that PCBP2 evidently attenuates cGAS aggregates and cGAS-DNA phase separation, suggesting a novel mechanism by which PCBP2 regulates innate immune responses .
Quantitative approaches using PCBP2 antibodies include:
Western blot quantification:
Use appropriate loading controls (GAPDH, β-actin)
Include calibration standards for absolute quantification
Analyze using densitometry software with linear dynamic range
Flow cytometry applications:
For intracellular PCBP2 detection in heterogeneous populations
Combine with surface markers for cell-type specific analysis
Use mean fluorescence intensity for relative quantification
ELISA-based quantification:
Sandwich ELISA with recombinant standards
Detection limit of approximately 0.1 ng/ml reported for some formats
Suitable for high-throughput screening applications
Image-based quantification:
Measure immunofluorescence intensity across subcellular compartments
Use automated image analysis for unbiased quantification
Compare nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios under different conditions
Researchers studying PCBP2 in pancreatic β cells have successfully used quantitative immunofluorescence to demonstrate ~80% depletion of PCBP2 in conditional knockout models, providing a template for similar quantitative approaches .