Normal tissues: Highest in testis, moderate in brain, heart, and skeletal muscle; minimal in liver .
Cancer tissues: Upregulated in 60–82% of colon, lung, ovarian, breast, and uterine cancers . Overexpression correlates with:
Methionine adenosyltransferases (MATα1/MATα2): Binds nuclear MAT oligomers, reducing AdoMet production by 50% and altering DNA methylation .
R2TP/prefoldin-like complex: Facilitates assembly of protein complexes involved in chromatin remodeling and stress responses .
Promotes tumor growth by impairing methionine cycle flux and epigenetic regulation .
Silencing PDRG1 suppresses colon cancer cell proliferation and enhances radiation sensitivity .
Potential target for disrupting PDRG1-MAT interactions to restore AdoMet levels .
Biomarker for tumors with 20q11.2 amplification or methionine cycle dysregulation .
Parameter | Details |
---|---|
Expression system | Escherichia coli |
Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE) |
Formulation | 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 20% glycerol |
Applications | Protein interaction studies, antibody production, enzyme assays |
MGSSHHHHHH SSGLVPRGSH MLSPEAERVL RYLVEVEELA EEVLADKRQI VDLDTKRNQN REGLRALQKD LSLSEDVMVC FGNMFIKMPH PETKEMIEKD QDHLDKEIEK LRKQLKVKVN RLFEAQGKPE LKGFNLNPLN QDELKALKVI LKG.
PDRG1 (p53 and DNA damage-regulated gene 1) is a small oncogenic protein comprising 133 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of approximately 15.5 kDa in humans . The protein contains a β-prefoldin-like domain, with a helix-turn-helix motif (LNQDEL KALKVILKG) located at its C-terminus . This motif facilitates protein-protein interactions or potentially DNA binding. The protein's structure has been partially modeled using PHYRE2, which identified prefoldin as its closest homolog. The structural model encompasses residues K27-Q106, excluding approximately 25 residues from each terminal end .
For experimental approaches to study PDRG1 structure:
X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy for high-resolution structures
Circular dichroism spectroscopy for secondary structure analysis
Structural prediction software (such as AlphaFold) can provide additional insights when experimental data is unavailable
PDRG1 demonstrates a wide tissue distribution pattern in humans, with variable expression levels across different tissues:
Tissue | Relative Expression Level |
---|---|
Testis | Highest |
Brain | Moderate |
Heart | Moderate |
Lung | Moderate |
Spleen | Moderate |
Stomach | Moderate |
Skeletal muscle | Moderate |
Liver | Very low |
Expression has been confirmed through Northern blot analysis of human poly(A)+ RNA, identifying a 1.4 kb transcript in multiple tissues . For researchers investigating tissue-specific functions, quantitative RT-PCR is recommended for precise quantification of expression levels across tissues of interest.
PDRG1 displays nucleocytoplasmic localization, with studies using confocal microscopy of HA-PDRG1 and PDRG1-EGFP overexpression systems demonstrating its presence in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments . Quantitative analysis of fluorescence signals indicates higher concentration in the nuclear compartment, where PDRG1 colocalizes with nuclear speckles containing SC-35 . Motif searches have predicted nucleocytoplasmic localization (PSORT II) and identified a potential nuclear export signal (NES) involving serine 93, with the NetNES score increasing between residues E89-L95 .
Methodological approaches to study PDRG1 localization:
Immunofluorescence with specific antibodies in fixed cells
Live-cell imaging with fluorescent protein fusions
Cell fractionation followed by Western blotting
Proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX) to identify compartment-specific interactors
PDRG1 influences epigenetic regulation primarily through its interaction with methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) catalytic subunits MATα1 and MATα2 . Through these interactions, PDRG1 downregulates nuclear S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) synthesis, subsequently impacting epigenetic methylation processes . This mechanism is particularly significant given that increased PDRG1 expression correlates with global DNA hypomethylation in various tumor cells .
The interaction with MAT places PDRG1 at a crucial intersection between intermediary metabolism and epigenetic regulation. The protein's ability to modulate AdoMet levels provides a potential mechanism by which metabolic alterations can influence epigenetic patterns, a research area with significant implications for understanding cancer development.
Experimental approaches to investigate PDRG1's epigenetic functions:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify DNA binding sites
Bisulfite sequencing to assess DNA methylation changes following PDRG1 modulation
Mass spectrometry to quantify AdoMet levels in nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments
Histone modification profiling using antibody-based methods following PDRG1 knockdown or overexpression
PDRG1 serves as a component of the R2TP/prefoldin-like complex, with evidence from affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) studies identifying it as a subunit with abundance similar to consensus components . Within this complex, PDRG1 interacts with several proteins, particularly RUVBL1 and RUVBL2 (also known as TIP49a/b) . These interactions connect PDRG1 to chromatin remodeling complexes SWR-C and INO80 .
The prefoldin-like complex participates in various cellular processes, including:
Protein folding and stability
Assembly of protein complexes
Transcriptional regulation
RNA polymerase II function
For researchers investigating PDRG1's role in these complexes, recommended methodological approaches include:
Co-immunoprecipitation to validate and characterize protein-protein interactions
Size exclusion chromatography to analyze complex formation and stability
Functional assays measuring transcriptional activity with reporter genes
CRISPR-based genetic screens to identify synthetic lethal interactions with PDRG1
Several post-translational modifications (PTMs) of PDRG1 have been predicted or identified in high-throughput studies, suggesting complex regulation of this protein's function:
Modification | Residues | Detection Method | Potential Function |
---|---|---|---|
Phosphorylation | S3, S52, S54 (human) | Mass spectrometry | Regulation of protein interactions |
Phosphorylation | S120 (mouse) | Mass spectrometry | Potentially species-specific regulation |
Ubiquitination | K27, K108, K125 (human) | Mass spectrometry | Protein turnover or signaling |
These modifications may modulate PDRG1's activity, localization, and interaction capabilities . For researchers investigating PDRG1 regulation, targeted mass spectrometry approaches can identify condition-specific modifications, while site-directed mutagenesis of modification sites can elucidate their functional significance.
PDRG1 demonstrates notable expression changes in various cancers, with many tumor types showing increased expression compared to corresponding normal tissues . Interestingly, a pan-cancer analysis revealed that while PDRG1 is highly expressed in most tumors, it shows low expression in some tumor tissues, suggesting context-dependent roles .
The human PDRG1 gene is located on chromosome 20 at position 20q11.2, a region frequently showing DNA gains in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and dysplastic nodules . This chromosomal location is also associated with alterations in cirrhotic processes, which correlates with impaired methionine cycle function, particularly reduced AdoMet production .
Methodological considerations for cancer researchers:
Use multiple cancer cell lines to account for tissue-specific effects
Combine immunohistochemistry and transcript analysis for comprehensive expression profiling
Consider analyzing matched tumor-normal pairs to identify patient-specific alterations
Utilize publicly available cancer genomics databases (TCGA, ICGC) for large-scale expression analyses
PDRG1 has been identified as a potential pan-cancer biomarker with significant implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis . Its utility as a prognostic marker has been preliminarily validated in hepatocellular carcinoma . The prognostic value likely stems from PDRG1's involvement in multiple cancer-related processes, including DNA damage response and epigenetic regulation.
For researchers investigating PDRG1 as a prognostic marker:
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified by PDRG1 expression levels
Multivariate Cox regression models to adjust for clinicopathological variables
Meta-analysis of expression data across multiple cancer types
Correlation of PDRG1 expression with treatment response metrics
As suggested by its name (p53 and DNA damage-regulated gene 1), PDRG1 was discovered in studies identifying components of the cellular response to DNA damage and is regulated by p53 . This relationship connects PDRG1 to a central tumor suppressor pathway with critical functions in cell cycle control, apoptosis, and genomic stability.
The specific mechanisms by which p53 regulates PDRG1 and how PDRG1 functions within the broader p53 signaling network remain areas requiring further investigation. For researchers exploring this relationship:
ChIP assays to determine if p53 directly binds the PDRG1 promoter
Reporter assays with wild-type and mutant PDRG1 promoters to map p53 responsive elements
Expression analysis following p53 activation or inhibition
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify potential physical interactions
When investigating PDRG1 function, researchers can employ several approaches to modulate its expression:
Approach | Advantages | Limitations | Optimal Applications |
---|---|---|---|
siRNA/shRNA | Rapid knockdown, cost-effective | Incomplete silencing, potential off-target effects | Initial screening, transient studies |
CRISPR-Cas9 | Complete knockout, stable modification | Time-consuming, potential compensatory mechanisms | Long-term studies, isogenic cell line generation |
Overexpression systems | Allows structure-function studies with mutants | Non-physiological levels, potential aggregation | Protein interaction studies, rescue experiments |
Inducible expression systems | Temporal control of expression | System leakiness, additional selection markers | Developmental studies, toxic gene expression |
For most effective results, validation of expression changes should employ both RNA (qRT-PCR) and protein (Western blot) analyses, and phenotypic effects should be confirmed with at least two independent modulation methods.
Given PDRG1's involvement in multiple protein complexes, characterizing its interactome is crucial for understanding its functions. Recommended methodological approaches include:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS): Allows unbiased identification of protein complexes
Proximity-based labeling (BioID, APEX): Captures transient and weak interactions
Provides spatial context for interactions
Can identify interactions in specific cellular compartments
Co-immunoprecipitation: Validates specific interactions identified in high-throughput studies
Use both overexpressed and endogenous proteins when possible
Include RNase treatment to distinguish RNA-dependent interactions
Fluorescence-based interaction assays (FRET, BiFC): Provides spatial and temporal information
Useful for monitoring dynamics of interactions
Applicable in living cells
Studies in Arabidopsis thaliana have shown that PDRG1 impairment leads to embryonic lethality , suggesting potential developmental importance in other organisms as well. This essential nature creates challenges for studying PDRG1 in animal models:
Embryonic lethality: Complete knockout may prevent analysis of adult phenotypes
Solution: Conditional knockout systems (Cre-lox, inducible systems)
Alternative: Hypomorphic alleles retaining partial function
Functional redundancy: Related proteins might compensate for PDRG1 loss
Solution: Double/triple knockout approaches
Alternative: Dominant-negative constructs
Context-dependent functions: Effects may vary across tissues and developmental stages
Solution: Tissue-specific and temporally controlled expression systems
Approach: Comprehensive phenotyping across multiple systems
Translation between model systems: Findings in one model may not directly translate to humans
Solution: Validate key findings across multiple model organisms
Approach: Complementation studies with human PDRG1 in model organism backgrounds
Given PDRG1's association with cancer and its role in processes including epigenetic regulation, it represents a potential therapeutic target. Future research directions could include:
Development of PDRG1 inhibitors:
Design small molecules targeting the prefoldin-like domain
Disrupt specific protein-protein interactions, particularly with MAT enzymes
Create peptide-based inhibitors mimicking interaction interfaces
Combination approaches:
Pair PDRG1 targeting with epigenetic therapies
Explore synthetic lethality with DNA damage response inhibitors
Investigate enhancing p53 pathway drugs through PDRG1 modulation
Biomarker development:
Validate PDRG1 as a predictive marker for treatment response
Develop assays for detecting PDRG1 alterations in liquid biopsies
Create multiplex panels combining PDRG1 with related biomarkers
Methodological considerations should include patient-derived xenograft models, high-throughput drug screening, and computational approaches to predict effective combination strategies.
Despite progress in understanding PDRG1's involvement in cancer, many aspects of its normal physiological functions remain unclear:
Developmental roles: Given the embryonic lethality observed in plants , what are PDRG1's functions during mammalian development?
Approach: Temporally controlled knockout studies during development
Method: Single-cell transcriptomics following PDRG1 modulation
Tissue-specific functions: Why does PDRG1 show highest expression in testis, and what specialized functions might it serve there?
Approach: Comparative interactome studies across tissues
Method: Tissue-specific conditional knockouts
Stress response coordination: How does PDRG1 integrate signals from DNA damage, metabolic state, and other cellular stressors?
Approach: Phosphoproteomics following various stressors
Method: Live-cell sensors monitoring PDRG1 activity or localization
Evolutionary conservation: What aspects of PDRG1 function are conserved across species, and which represent species-specific adaptations?
Approach: Comparative genomics and functional complementation studies
Method: CRISPR-based replacement of endogenous PDRG1 with orthologs
The p53 protein, often referred to as the “guardian of the genome,” plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular integrity by regulating the cell cycle and preventing genomic mutations. It is a tumor suppressor protein that responds to various cellular stresses to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, DNA repair, or changes in metabolism. The DNA-Damage Regulated 1 (PDRG1) protein, also known as p53 and DNA-Damage Regulated 1, is a protein coding gene that is regulated by p53 and is involved in the cellular response to DNA damage.
The p53 protein is encoded by the TP53 gene located on chromosome 17p13.1. It is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of a wide array of genes involved in cell cycle control, apoptosis, DNA repair, and other critical cellular processes. Upon DNA damage, p53 is stabilized and activated through post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and acetylation. Activated p53 can induce the expression of genes that halt the cell cycle, allowing time for DNA repair or triggering apoptosis if the damage is irreparable .
PDRG1, also known as p53 and DNA-Damage Regulated 1, is a protein coding gene that is regulated by p53. It is located on chromosome 20 and is involved in protein folding and the cellular response to DNA damage. PDRG1 is predicted to enable unfolded protein binding activity and is part of the prefoldin complex, which assists in the proper folding of newly synthesized proteins .
The interaction between p53 and PDRG1 is crucial for the cellular response to DNA damage. Upon DNA damage, p53 is activated and can induce the expression of PDRG1. PDRG1, in turn, plays a role in chaperone-mediated protein folding, ensuring that proteins are correctly folded and functional. This interaction helps maintain cellular homeostasis and prevents the propagation of damaged DNA .
Mutations in the TP53 gene are among the most common alterations in human cancers, highlighting the importance of p53 in tumor suppression. The loss of p53 function can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and tumor development. Understanding the role of p53 and its regulated proteins, such as PDRG1, is essential for developing targeted cancer therapies. Research into the p53-PDRG1 pathway may provide insights into novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment .