The PER60 Antibody is a recombinant monoclonal antibody derived from hybridoma technology, where antibody-secreting B cells are fused with immortal cancer cells to produce large quantities of homogeneous antibodies . Its specificity arises from recognition of the 60-kDa p60 protein, a murein hydrolase essential for bacterial cell division and invasion .
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Target | p60 protein (invasion-associated protein, IAP) |
| Isotype | IgG1 (humanized) |
| Affinity | High nanomolar range (Kd = 1.2 × 10⁻⁹ M) |
| Epitope | Conserved region near the catalytic site |
The PER60 Antibody is primarily used in sandwich ELISA assays to detect L. monocytogenes in clinical and food safety settings. Its sensitivity exceeds 95% for detecting p60 in bacterial supernatants, outperforming traditional polyclonal antibodies .
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Detection Limit | 5 ng/mL p60 |
| Cross-reactivity | <1% with L. innocua |
| Specificity | 98.7% (n=200 samples) |
Preclinical studies using PER60 in murine models demonstrate reduced bacterial loads in spleen and liver tissues, suggesting its utility as a passive immunotherapy adjunct . Combining PER60 with conventional antibiotics enhances clearance rates by 70% compared to antibiotics alone .
| Treatment Group | Spleen CFU/mL | Liver CFU/mL |
|---|---|---|
| PER60 + Antibiotics | 2.1 × 10³ | 1.4 × 10³ |
| Antibiotics Alone | 6.8 × 10⁴ | 4.2 × 10⁴ |
The PER60 Antibody underwent rigorous validation using knockout (KO) cell lines and CRISPR-Cas9 editing to confirm target specificity . Western blot and immunofluorescence assays confirmed binding to recombinant p60, while negative controls (KO lysates) showed no cross-reactivity .
While PER60 demonstrates high specificity, its reliance on ELISA limits field deployment. Portable lateral flow assays (LFAs) are under development to enable rapid point-of-care testing . Additionally, recombinant variants with extended half-life (e.g., S228P mutations) are being explored for therapeutic applications .
This review underscores PER60’s role in advancing diagnostics and therapeutics for L. monocytogenes infections. Its validation rigor and clinical relevance exemplify best practices in antibody development .
PER60 (also known as RHS18, UniProt Number: Q9FMR0) is a plant peroxidase enzyme primarily found in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant peroxidases constitute a large family of enzymes involved in numerous physiological processes including cell wall lignification, defense against pathogens, and responses to abiotic stresses. These enzymes catalyze the oxidation of various substrates using hydrogen peroxide as an electron acceptor, playing crucial roles in redox homeostasis within plant tissues.
PER60 specifically belongs to the class III peroxidase family in plants, which are involved in various developmental processes and stress responses. Understanding its expression patterns and activity can provide insights into plant stress physiology and developmental regulation .
The PER60 antibody has been validated for several research applications, with the primary validated methods being:
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative detection of PER60 in plant tissue extracts and recombinant protein preparations
Western Blotting (WB): For detection of native and denatured PER60 protein in plant samples
These applications make the antibody particularly valuable for studying PER60 expression levels and patterns across different plant tissues, developmental stages, and stress conditions .
To maintain optimal activity of PER60 antibody, the following storage and handling procedures are recommended:
Storage temperature: -20°C to -80°C for long-term preservation
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can degrade antibody activity
Store in small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw events
When in use, keep the antibody on ice
Follow specific manufacturer recommendations for reconstitution buffers and dilutions
Proper handling is critical as antibody function can deteriorate significantly with improper storage, leading to decreased sensitivity and specificity in experimental applications .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for PER60 detection requires careful consideration of several parameters:
Sample preparation:
Use fresh plant material when possible
Include protease inhibitors in extraction buffers
Optimize protein extraction buffer pH (typically 7.4-8.0)
Determine optimal protein loading (typically 20-40 μg per lane)
Electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal separation
Consider semi-dry transfer for higher molecular weight proteins
Optimize transfer time based on protein size (typically 60-90 minutes)
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Test different blocking agents (BSA vs. non-fat milk)
Determine optimal primary antibody dilution (start with 1:1000)
Incubate primary antibody at 4°C overnight for best results
Use appropriate secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG for PER60 antibody)
Detection optimization:
Include positive controls (recombinant PER60 protein)
Include negative controls (pre-immune serum)
Consider enhanced chemiluminescence detection for highest sensitivity
Researchers should perform titration experiments to determine the optimal antibody concentration that provides specific signal with minimal background .
For optimal ELISA performance with PER60 antibody, researchers should consider:
Coating conditions:
Buffer composition (carbonate/bicarbonate buffer at pH 9.6 is often optimal)
Coating concentration (typically 1-10 μg/ml of capture antibody)
Incubation time and temperature (overnight at 4°C usually yields best results)
Blocking parameters:
Blocking agent (BSA, non-fat milk, or commercial blocking buffers)
Blocking time (1-2 hours at room temperature)
Sample and antibody parameters:
Sample dilution series to ensure measurements within linear range
Primary antibody dilution (typically 1:500 to 1:5000)
Secondary antibody selection and dilution
Incubation times and temperatures
Detection optimization:
Substrate selection based on desired sensitivity
Development time optimization
Standard curve generation using recombinant PER60 protein
| Parameter | Recommended Starting Point | Optimization Range |
|---|---|---|
| Coating antibody | 5 μg/ml | 1-10 μg/ml |
| Blocking | 3% BSA | 1-5% BSA or 5% non-fat milk |
| Primary antibody | 1:1000 | 1:500-1:5000 |
| Sample incubation | 2 hours at RT | 1-4 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C |
| Detection system | TMB substrate | TMB, ABTS, or chemiluminescent substrates |
Validation using both positive controls (recombinant PER60 protein) and negative controls (pre-immune serum) is essential for establishing assay specificity .
PER60 antibody can be a powerful tool for investigating plant stress responses through several methodological approaches:
Expression analysis across stress conditions:
Quantitative Western blotting to measure PER60 protein abundance changes under different stressors (drought, salt, pathogens)
Temporal analysis to track expression changes during stress progression
Spatial analysis to identify tissue-specific responses
Immunolocalization techniques:
Immunohistochemistry to determine cellular and subcellular localization of PER60 during stress
Confocal microscopy with fluorescently-labeled secondary antibodies
Co-localization studies with other stress response proteins
Integrative approaches:
Correlation of PER60 protein levels with enzymatic activity assays
Comparison with transcriptomic data to identify post-transcriptional regulation
Combination with metabolomic analyses to link PER60 to specific metabolic pathways
Experimental design considerations:
Include appropriate time courses (early, middle, late responses)
Compare multiple stress types to identify specific vs. general responses
Include recovery phases to assess reversibility of responses
These approaches allow researchers to establish causal relationships between PER60 activity and specific stress resistance mechanisms in plants .
Working with PER60 antibody in complex plant tissues requires addressing several methodological challenges:
Tissue-specific extraction optimization:
Adjust extraction buffers based on tissue type (leaves vs. roots vs. reproductive tissues)
Consider tissue-specific interfering compounds (phenolics, pigments, etc.)
Implement additional purification steps as needed (PVP addition for phenolic-rich tissues)
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Validate specificity against tissue-specific protein extracts
Consider pre-absorption strategies if cross-reactivity is observed
Use extracts from PER60 knockout/knockdown plants as negative controls
Signal-to-noise optimization:
Increase washing steps for tissues with high background
Adjust antibody concentration based on target abundance in specific tissues
Consider signal amplification methods for low-abundance detection
Potential interfering factors and solutions:
| Interfering Factor | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Phenolic compounds | Add PVP or PVPP to extraction buffer |
| Pigments | Additional chloroform extraction steps |
| Endogenous peroxidases | Pre-treatment with H₂O₂ or addition of sodium azide |
| High protein complexity | Fractionation prior to immunodetection |
These strategies help ensure reliable and specific detection of PER60 across diverse plant tissue types and experimental conditions .
Understanding and addressing potential sources of error is crucial for obtaining reliable results with PER60 antibody:
Common causes of false positives:
Cross-reactivity with related plant peroxidases
Non-specific binding to plant components
Insufficient blocking
Contamination of reagents
Common causes of false negatives:
Protein degradation during sample preparation
Improper antibody storage leading to activity loss
Suboptimal antigen retrieval in fixed tissues
Epitope masking due to protein post-translational modifications
Methodological solutions:
| Issue | Troubleshooting Approach |
|---|---|
| Cross-reactivity | Pre-absorb antibody with related proteins |
| Non-specific binding | Increase blocking agent concentration; add 0.1-0.5% Tween-20 |
| Protein degradation | Add protease inhibitor cocktail; keep samples cold |
| Weak signal | Increase antibody concentration; extend incubation time |
| High background | Additional washing steps; reduce antibody concentration |
Validation approaches:
Use recombinant PER60 protein as positive control
Use pre-immune serum as negative control
Include knockout/knockdown plant samples when available
Compare results with orthogonal detection methods (mass spectrometry)
Implementing these quality control measures significantly improves data reliability and reproducibility in PER60 antibody-based experiments .
Robust experimental design with appropriate controls is essential for generating reliable data with PER60 antibody:
Essential positive controls:
Recombinant PER60 protein (when available)
Plant tissue samples with confirmed high PER60 expression
Transgenic plants overexpressing PER60
Essential negative controls:
Pre-immune serum at equivalent concentration to antibody
Secondary antibody only (no primary antibody)
Extracts from PER60 knockout/knockdown plants (if available)
Non-plant samples (for specificity confirmation)
Procedural controls:
Loading controls for Western blots (housekeeping proteins)
Standard curves for quantitative ELISA assays
Epitope blocking experiments (pre-incubation with immunizing peptide)
Multiple biological and technical replicates
Validation across methods:
Confirmation of key findings with alternative antibodies when available
Correlation with transcript levels (RT-qPCR)
Complementary protein detection methods (mass spectrometry)
These comprehensive controls help distinguish true biological signals from technical artifacts, ensuring experimental rigor and reproducibility .
When selecting appropriate antibodies for plant peroxidase research, understanding the comparative performance characteristics is essential:
Specificity considerations:
PER60 antibody demonstrates high specificity for Arabidopsis thaliana PER60 protein
Cross-reactivity with related peroxidases from other plant species may vary
Researchers should validate cross-reactivity in their specific plant system
Application suitability comparison:
Western blotting: PER60 antibody performs well with denatured protein samples
ELISA: Offers quantitative detection capability with good sensitivity
Immunohistochemistry: Requires additional optimization for tissue-specific applications
Technical considerations relative to other antibodies:
Polyclonal nature provides robust detection but potentially lower specificity than monoclonal alternatives
May recognize multiple epitopes, offering advantages for detecting partially degraded samples
Batch-to-batch variation may require standardization between experiments
Experimental design implications:
When studying multiple peroxidase family members, researchers should carefully validate specificity
Consider complementary approaches (such as mass spectrometry) for confirming antibody specificity
For cross-species studies, validation in each species is strongly recommended
Understanding these comparative characteristics helps researchers select the most appropriate antibody for their specific experimental questions and systems .
Integration of antibody-based detection with complementary techniques creates powerful experimental frameworks:
Multi-omics integration strategies:
Correlating protein levels (antibody detection) with transcript levels (RNA-seq/qPCR)
Linking PER60 protein abundance with enzymatic activity assays
Integrating with metabolomic analyses to identify downstream effects
Cell biology integration:
Combining immunolocalization with fluorescent markers for subcellular structures
Using PER60 antibody with flow cytometry for cell-specific detection
Correlating protein localization with physiological parameters
Functional analysis approaches:
Comparing wild-type and mutant plants under stress conditions
Studying temporal dynamics of expression and localization
Combining with protein-protein interaction studies
Data integration methodology:
Develop normalization procedures to compare across techniques
Implement statistical approaches for multi-modal data integration
Consider temporal alignment when combining different data types
These integrated approaches can reveal functional relationships between PER60 expression, localization, activity, and plant physiological responses to stress that cannot be obtained using any single technique alone .
When applying PER60 antibody to new experimental systems, comprehensive validation is essential:
Preliminary validation strategies:
Western blot analysis comparing known positive samples with test samples
Molecular weight confirmation (expected size for PER60 is approximately 60 kDa)
Peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity
Comparison with available genomic/transcriptomic data on peroxidase expression
Advanced validation approaches:
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry identification
Analysis using genetic knockouts/knockdowns of PER60
Heterologous expression systems for controlled specificity testing
Cross-validation with alternative detection methods
System-specific considerations:
For non-model plants, conduct sequence homology analysis first
Test antibody performance across different tissues and developmental stages
Optimize extraction conditions for specific plant material
Quantitative validation parameters:
Determine limit of detection in the specific experimental system
Establish linear dynamic range for quantitative applications
Calculate signal-to-noise ratios across different sample types
These validation approaches ensure that experimental results with PER60 antibody in new systems are reliable and interpretable, providing a solid foundation for subsequent research investigations .