PEX11A Antibody, Biotin conjugated, is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against epitopes in the PEX11A protein. Biotin conjugation enables efficient detection via streptavidin-based systems (e.g., streptavidin-HRP or fluorescent streptavidin) in assays like Western blot (WB), ELISA, and immunoprecipitation (IP).
The antibody recognizes specific regions of PEX11A:
PEX11A regulates peroxisome division and interacts with coatomer proteins (COPA, COPB2) and PEX19 . Phosphorylation at specific residues (e.g., Ser165/167 in yeast Pex11p) modulates its activity, promoting peroxisomal proliferation under nutrient stress .
Western Blot: Detects endogenous PEX11A at ~28 kDa in human cell lysates .
ELISA: Used in sandwich assays with streptavidin-HRP for quantification .
Cross-Reactivity: Predicted homology with cow (79%), dog (79%), and pig (77%) .
Sample Preparation: Lysates (25 µg/lane) in SDS-PAGE buffer.
Primary Antibody: Dilute PEX11A Biotin antibody (1:500–2,000) in blocking buffer (3% milk/TBST) .
Coating: Capture antibody (e.g., PEX11A non-conjugated) on plates.
Detection: Biotin-conjugated PEX11A antibody (1:5,000–20,000) + streptavidin-HRP/substrate .
Epitope Dependency: Antibodies targeting different regions (e.g., AA 110–190 vs. 106–219) may show variable specificity .
Post-Translational Modifications: Phosphorylation states may influence detection efficiency .
Cross-Reactivity: Verify species specificity, as some antibodies react with non-human targets .
PEX11A (Peroxisomal Biogenesis Factor 11 alpha) is a peroxisomal membrane protein of approximately 28 kDa that plays a crucial role in peroxisomal proliferation. PEX11A functions to:
Promote membrane protrusion and elongation on the peroxisomal surface
Regulate peroxisome division through direct mechanisms rather than indirect metabolic effects
Potentially mediate binding of coatomer proteins to the peroxisomal membrane
Research using genetic knockout models demonstrates that PEX11 proteins are unique in their ability to promote peroxisome division across multiple species. Importantly, PEX11 overexpression experiments conclusively show that it promotes peroxisome division even in the absence of peroxisomal metabolic activity, indicating that PEX11A affects organelle abundance directly rather than through metabolic pathways .
When working with biotin-conjugated PEX11A antibodies, researchers should optimize several parameters:
Dilution Optimization:
For ELISA applications: Begin with 1:500-1:2,000 dilution ranges and perform titration experiments to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratios
Optimal dilutions/concentrations should be determined empirically by each investigator as performance may vary between antibody lots
Buffer Conditions:
Standard buffers contain: 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), 0.03% Proclin-300, and 50% glycerol
Note that Proclin is a POISONOUS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE which should be handled by trained staff only
Storage and Stability:
Store at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt
Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles to maintain antibody functionality
If aliquoting is necessary, prepare single-use volumes to prevent degradation
Control Experiments:
Include appropriate isotype controls: Rabbit IgG is the appropriate control for polyclonal PEX11A antibodies
Validate antibody specificity using PEX11A knockout or knockdown cells when possible
Distinguishing between PEX11 isoforms requires careful attention to antibody selection and validation protocols:
Sequence Homology Considerations:
The three human PEX11 isoforms (PEX11α, PEX11β, and PEX11γ) share conserved domains but have distinct N-terminal regions
Multiple sequence alignment analysis reveals that the N-terminal PEX19 binding site (BS1) is highly conserved among species but varies between isoforms
Antibody Selection Strategy:
Choose antibodies raised against non-conserved regions to ensure specificity
The antibody described in the search results targets amino acids 106-219 of human PEX11A , a region that contains unique sequences
Validation Methods:
Perform Western blot analysis with recombinant proteins of all three isoforms to confirm specificity
Validate with genetic models: use cells overexpressing or lacking specific PEX11 isoforms
Consider yeast two-hybrid analysis for interaction studies, as demonstrated for the binding of human PEX11β N-terminal fragment with full-length human PEX19
Functional Differentiation:
Different PEX11 isoforms show distinct functional properties that can be used for identification:
PEX11α is particularly responsive to peroxisome proliferators
PEX11β knockout has more severe phenotypes than PEX11α knockout in mice
PEX11γ has not shown clear interaction with PEX19 in some experimental systems
When planning immunohistochemistry experiments with PEX11A antibodies, researchers should consider:
Tissue Preparation and Fixation:
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues require appropriate antigen retrieval methods
For PEX11A detection, citrate buffer (pH 6.0) heat-induced epitope retrieval is often effective
Optimize fixation time as overfixation may mask epitopes
Antibody Validation Controls:
Positive controls: Include tissues known to express PEX11A (liver, kidney proximal tubules)
Negative controls: Use tissues from PEX11A knockout models or omit primary antibody
Peptide competition assays can confirm specificity
Detection Systems:
For biotin-conjugated antibodies, use streptavidin-based detection systems
Be aware of potential endogenous biotin interference in certain tissues (liver, kidney)
Consider avidin/biotin blocking steps for tissues with high endogenous biotin
Co-localization Studies:
Pair with established peroxisomal markers (catalase, PEX14) for confirmation of peroxisomal localization
Use confocal microscopy for precise co-localization analysis
Quantify peroxisome abundance by counting peroxisomes per cell section (reference range: ~230 ± 52 peroxisomes per section in wild-type cells)
PEX11A antibodies serve as powerful tools for investigating peroxisome proliferation through several methodological approaches:
Overexpression Studies:
Track peroxisome morphological changes following PEX11A overexpression
Use PEX11A antibodies to confirm expression levels by Western blot
Combine with fluorescent peroxisomal markers (e.g., DsRed-SKL) to visualize peroxisome abundance changes
Kinetic Analysis:
Monitor temporal changes in peroxisome morphology and abundance
Previous studies have identified three kinetically distinct steps in PEX11β-induced peroxisome proliferation observable within 1.5-2 hours after expression
Mutagenesis Approaches:
Generate PEX11A mutants lacking specific domains or binding sites
Use antibodies to confirm expression and localization of mutant proteins
Key mutations to consider include those affecting PEX19 binding sites (e.g., L35P mutation in the conserved N-terminal region)
Knockout/Knockdown Experiments:
Compare peroxisome abundance in wild-type vs. PEX11A-deficient cells
Quantitative analysis shows PEX11β−/− cells have approximately half the peroxisome abundance compared to wild-type cells (128 ± 32 vs. 230 ± 52 peroxisomes per section)
Use antibodies to confirm knockout/knockdown efficiency
Research has revealed important connections between PEX11A and disease states:
Hypertension and Kidney Disease:
Pex11a deficiency impairs the abundance of functional peroxisomes in proximal tubule cells
This deficiency aggravates tubulointerstitial damage and hypertension
Peroxisomes play a critical role in the pathological process of chronic kidney disease
Metabolic Pathway Disruptions:
PEX11β−/− mice show partial deficiency in two distinct peroxisomal metabolic pathways:
These deficiencies likely result from indirect effects on peroxisome membrane structure or dynamics
Experimental Approaches:
Use PEX11A antibodies to quantify protein levels in disease models
Employ tissue-specific knockout models to elucidate organ-specific roles
Combine with metabolomic analysis to identify affected pathways
Therapeutic Implications:
Pex11a and the peroxisome system represent potential novel therapeutic targets for prevention of hypertensive chronic kidney disease
Screening compounds that enhance PEX11A expression or function may have therapeutic value
The interaction between PEX19 and PEX11A is critical for peroxisomal targeting and can be investigated through several methodologies:
Peptide Array Analysis:
Synthesize overlapping 15-mer peptides with 2-amino acid shifts covering the PEX11A sequence
Probe with purified GST-PEX19 fusion proteins
Immunodetect binding using anti-GST antibodies
Consider binding positive when at least three consecutive peptide spots show interaction
Binding Site Mapping:
Research has identified three potential PEX19 binding sites (BS) in Trypanosoma brucei PEX11:
BS1: amino acids 13-35 (N-terminal, cytosolic)
BS2: amino acids 77-99 (near first transmembrane domain)
Mutagenesis Studies:
Generate PEX11A deletion mutants lacking specific binding sites
Create point mutations in conserved residues (e.g., L35P mutation)
Assess effects on:
Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis:
Use as validation method for identified binding sites
Results from studies with human PEX11 family members:
| PEX11 Isoform | Interaction with PEX19 | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| HsPEX11α N-term | Weak/negative | Limited evidence for interaction |
| HsPEX11β N-term | Positive | Clear interaction with full-length HsPEX19 |
| HsPEX11γ N-term | Negative | No detectable expression of fusion protein |
Western blot optimization for PEX11A detection requires attention to several technical parameters:
Sample Preparation:
For membrane proteins like PEX11A, use appropriate extraction buffers containing mild detergents
Consider specialized membrane protein extraction kits
Load approximately 25μg protein per lane for optimal detection
Antibody Dilutions:
Secondary antibody: 1:10,000 dilution (HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for rabbit polyclonal antibodies)
Blocking Conditions:
Alternative blocking agents: 5% BSA may provide better results for phospho-specific antibodies
Detection System:
For biotin-conjugated antibodies, use streptavidin-HRP conjugates
Standard HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies work for unconjugated primary antibodies
ECL-based detection systems provide good sensitivity for PEX11A detection
Expected Results:
Validate specificity by comparing multiple cell lines
Consider using PEX11A knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Historical controversy exists regarding whether PEX11 proteins directly regulate metabolism or primarily affect peroxisome division. Several experimental approaches can address this question:
Metabolic Activity in PEX11-Overexpressing Cells:
Express PEX11 in cells lacking functional peroxisomal β-oxidation pathway
Compare peroxisome abundance in these cells versus controls
Studies show that PEX11 overexpression promotes peroxisome division even in the absence of peroxisomal metabolic activity (e.g., in pox1 mutant yeast lacking acyl-CoA oxidase)
Analysis of Multiple Metabolic Pathways:
Examine various peroxisomal metabolic functions in PEX11-deficient models
PEX11β knockout mice show deficiencies in multiple unrelated pathways (ether lipid synthesis and very long chain fatty acid oxidation)
This suggests an indirect effect rather than direct regulation of specific enzymes
Peroxisome Abundance in Metabolite-Free Conditions:
Culture PEX11β+/+ and PEX11β−/− cells in serum-free medium (lacking peroxisomal metabolic substrates)
Quantify peroxisome abundance by immunofluorescence
PEX11β−/− cells show reduced peroxisome abundance (~50%) even without metabolic substrates
Timing of Events:
Establish temporal relationship between PEX11 expression, peroxisome division, and metabolic changes
Use inducible expression systems to control timing of PEX11 expression
Monitor metabolic and morphological parameters with time-course experiments
The N-terminal PEX19 binding site of PEX11 shows evolutionary conservation and functional significance:
Conservation Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment reveals conservation of the N-terminal PEX19 binding site (BS1) among diverse species including parasites, yeast, humans, and plants
This conservation suggests fundamental importance to PEX11 function
Functional Studies:
In Trypanosoma brucei: Deletion of BS1 reduces steady-state protein levels but some PEX11 still targets to glycosomes
In yeast: The L35P mutation in the conserved binding site abolishes interaction with PEX19 and causes protein instability and mislocalization to mitochondria
In humans: Of the three PEX11 isoforms, only PEX11β shows clear interaction with PEX19 through its N-terminal region
Localization Studies:
Wild-type PEX11-GFP targets to peroxisomes (co-localizes with DsRed-SKL peroxisomal marker)
PEX11-GFP with L35P mutation partially mislocalizes to tubular structures identified as mitochondria (confirmed by MitoTracker staining)
Immunoblot analysis shows dramatically reduced steady-state levels of the L35P mutant protein
Mechanistic Model: