PG_1424 Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Properties

Host Species: Rabbit (polyclonal IgG)
Immunogen: Recombinant P. gingivalis peptidylarginine deiminase (44–556AA)
Reactivity: Specific to P. gingivalis; no cross-reactivity with human proteins reported
Molecular Weight: Predicted 63 kDa (observed 63 kDa in WB)

ParameterValue
ApplicationsELISA (1:2,000–1:10,000), WB (1:500–1:5,000)
Storage Buffer50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), 0.03% Proclin 300
Purification>95% purity via Protein G chromatography
FunctionDeiminates arginine residues to citrulline, generating ammonia

Hypothetical FITC Conjugation Methodology

While no PG_1424-FITC conjugate is commercially documented, standard FITC conjugation protocols involve:

  1. Activation: Incubate purified IgG with FITC isomer I (pH 9.5, 25 mg/ml IgG, 30–60 minutes at 25°C) .

  2. Purification: Remove unbound FITC via gel filtration or dialysis .

  3. Quality Control: Assess fluorescein-to-protein (F/P) ratio (optimal range: 2–6 moles FITC per mole IgG) .

Critical parameters for functional conjugates:

  • pH: ≥9.0 for efficient amine group reactivity .

  • Antibody Integrity: Avoid aggregation during labeling .

Research Applications

  • Periodontal Pathogenesis: Detects peptidylarginine deiminase activity, which promotes bacterial survival in acidic oral environments by ammonia production .

  • Autoimmunity Studies: Citrullinated proteins generated by this enzyme are implicated in rheumatoid arthritis .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Specificity Concerns: Polyclonal antibodies may exhibit batch variability; epitope mapping is advised for critical studies .

  • Therapeutic Potential: Inhibiting peptidylarginine deiminase could reduce P. gingivalis virulence, warranting further tool development .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship products within 1-3 business days of receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
PG_1424Peptidylarginine deiminase antibody; EC 3.5.3.- antibody
Target Names
PG_1424
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody deiminates the guanidino group of C-terminal arginine residues on various peptides, including the vasoregulatory peptide-hormone bradykinin, resulting in the formation of ammonia and a citrulline residue. This process may contribute to the growth of pathogens in the periodontal pocket by producing ammonia, which has a protective effect during acidic cleaning cycles in the mouth.
Database Links

KEGG: pgi:PG_1424

STRING: 242619.PG1424

Protein Families
Agmatine deiminase family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is PG_1424 and why is it significant in research?

PG_1424 refers to peptidylarginine deiminase from Porphyromonas gingivalis, an enzyme that deiminates the guanidino group of C-terminal arginine residues on various peptides including vasoregulatory peptides. This bacterial enzyme has gained significant research interest due to its potential role in periodontal disease pathogenesis and possible links to systemic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. The antibody against this protein serves as a critical tool for investigating P. gingivalis infection mechanisms and host-pathogen interactions .

What are the key specifications of the PG_1424 Antibody with FITC conjugation?

The FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody with the following technical specifications:

ParameterSpecification
TargetPeptidylarginine deiminase (PG_1424)
Host SpeciesRabbit
ClonalityPolyclonal
ConjugateFITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate)
ReactivityPorphyromonas gingivalis
Excitation/Emission499/515 nm
Laser Line488 nm
ImmunogenRecombinant P. gingivalis Peptidylarginine deiminase (44-556 AA)
Purity>95%, Protein G purified
FormLiquid
Buffer Composition0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, 0.03% Proclin-300, 50% glycerol

This antibody is designed for research applications requiring direct fluorescent detection of the PG_1424 protein .

What are the validated applications for PG_1424 Antibody, FITC conjugated?

The FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody has been validated for several research applications:

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): For direct visualization of PG_1424 in fixed cells or tissue sections

  • Immunocytochemistry (ICC): For cellular localization studies

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detection in tissue sections

  • Flow cytometry (FACS): For quantitative analysis of cellular populations expressing PG_1424

  • ELISA: For quantitative detection in solution

When designing experiments, researchers should optimize antibody dilutions for each specific application. While the unconjugated version has been validated for Western blot applications, additional optimization may be required when using the FITC-conjugated version for this purpose .

How does FITC conjugation affect the functionality of PG_1424 antibody compared to unconjugated versions?

  • The FITC fluorophore may slightly increase the molecular weight of the antibody complex

  • FITC has optimal fluorescence at neutral to basic pH (7-9) and may show reduced fluorescence in acidic environments

  • FITC is susceptible to photobleaching compared to some newer fluorophores

  • The antibody's binding capacity is generally preserved, but validation experiments comparing conjugated versus unconjugated versions are recommended for critical applications

For applications requiring extreme sensitivity or where background fluorescence is a concern, parallel experiments with unconjugated primary followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies may provide useful comparison data 4 .

What are the optimal sample preparation methods when using FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody?

Sample preparation is critical for successful experiments with FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody:

For cell cultures:

  • Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes at room temperature)

  • Permeabilize with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 if intracellular targets are of interest

  • Block with 1-5% BSA or 5-10% normal serum from a species different from the host of the primary antibody

  • Apply antibody at optimized concentration (typically starting at 1:100-1:500 dilution)

  • Minimize exposure to light during and after antibody incubation to prevent photobleaching

For tissue sections:

  • Use freshly cut sections (5-8 μm thickness recommended)

  • Deparaffinize completely if using paraffin-embedded tissues

  • Perform antigen retrieval if necessary (method should be optimized based on target)

  • Block endogenous biotin/avidin if using related detection systems

  • Include steps to reduce autofluorescence (Sudan Black B treatment may help)

For both sample types, include appropriate negative controls (isotype control with FITC) and consider counterstaining nuclei with DAPI or similar dyes that don't overlap with FITC spectrum .

What dilution ranges and incubation parameters work best for different applications?

Optimal working dilutions and incubation conditions vary by application:

ApplicationRecommended Dilution RangeIncubation Conditions
Immunofluorescence1:50-1:2001-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C
Flow Cytometry1:50-1:10030-60 minutes at 4°C in the dark
ELISA1:2000-1:100001-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C
Western Blot1:500-1:50001-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C

These ranges serve as starting points and should be optimized for specific experimental conditions. Temperature, incubation time, and buffer composition can all affect binding efficiency. For critical experiments, a titration series is recommended to determine the optimal antibody concentration that provides maximum specific signal with minimal background .

What are the best practices for long-term storage of FITC-conjugated antibodies to maintain fluorescence integrity?

FITC-conjugated antibodies require careful storage to maintain both antibody functionality and fluorophore activity:

  • Store at -20°C in the dark, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • For frequent use, prepare small working aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw events

  • Add a protein stabilizer such as 1% BSA if not already present in the formulation

  • Protect from light exposure during all handling steps by using amber tubes or wrapping containers in aluminum foil

  • For long-term storage (>6 months), -80°C may provide better preservation of activity

  • When thawing, allow the antibody to equilibrate completely to room temperature before opening to prevent condensation

Monitoring the fluorescence intensity of stored antibodies periodically using consistent standards can help track potential degradation over time. Significant loss of signal may indicate the need for a fresh antibody preparation .

How can researchers accurately assess the concentration and activity of FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody after storage?

To assess concentration and activity after storage:

  • Protein concentration measurement:

    • Spectrophotometric measurement at 280 nm (adjust for FITC contribution)

    • BCA or Bradford assay (with appropriate standards)

  • Fluorophore activity assessment:

    • Measure fluorescence intensity at 515-520 nm (with 488-495 nm excitation)

    • Compare to reference standards measured under identical conditions

  • Functional activity assessment:

    • Perform a titration experiment with known positive control samples

    • Compare staining patterns and intensity to previous successful experiments

    • Include side-by-side comparison with a freshly obtained antibody when possible

The fluorophore-to-protein ratio (F/P ratio) is another important parameter to monitor, as it indicates the degree of labeling. Optimal F/P ratios typically range from 3-8 FITC molecules per antibody. Ratios outside this range may result in either insufficient signal (too low) or quenching effects and increased non-specific binding (too high) .

How can researchers differentiate between specific PG_1424 signal and background autofluorescence when using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

Distinguishing specific signal from autofluorescence requires systematic controls and optimization:

  • Essential controls:

    • FITC-conjugated isotype control antibody (same host species, same Ig class)

    • Unstained samples to assess natural autofluorescence

    • Secondary antibody-only controls if using indirect detection methods

    • Known negative samples (tissues/cells lacking the target)

  • Autofluorescence reduction strategies:

    • Pretreat samples with 0.1-1% Sudan Black B in 70% ethanol (10 minutes)

    • Use 0.1-1% sodium borohydride solution for 10 minutes (especially effective for fixed tissues)

    • Employ spectral unmixing on confocal microscopes capable of this function

    • Consider time-gated detection systems that can separate FITC signal from shorter-lived autofluorescence

  • Signal enhancement approaches:

    • Optimize antigen retrieval methods (if applicable)

    • Extend antibody incubation time at 4°C

    • Use signal amplification systems compatible with FITC detection

Advanced imaging techniques such as fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) can also help distinguish between specific antibody binding and background autofluorescence based on fluorescence decay characteristics 4 .

What are the most common causes of signal variability when using FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody, and how can they be addressed?

Signal variability can arise from multiple sources when using FITC-conjugated antibodies:

Variability SourcePotential Solutions
PhotobleachingUse anti-fade mounting media; minimize exposure time; capture images from unexposed areas first
pH sensitivityMaintain consistent buffer pH (7.2-8.0 optimal for FITC); avoid acidic environments
Fixation artifactsStandardize fixation protocols; validate with multiple fixation methods
Antibody degradationPrepare fresh working dilutions; store properly; include positive controls
Batch-to-batch variationPurchase sufficient quantity from single lot for critical studies; validate each new lot
Sample processing differencesStandardize all steps from collection to staining; process experimental groups in parallel
Instrument variationUse calibration beads; maintain consistent PMT/gain settings; include fluorescent standards

For quantitative applications, implementing normalization strategies is essential. This may include normalizing to cell number, total protein content, or reference genes/proteins known to be stably expressed across experimental conditions. Regular instrument calibration and the use of fluorescence standards can also help ensure consistent measurements across experiments .

How can PG_1424 Antibody, FITC conjugated be utilized in multiplex immunofluorescence experiments?

PG_1424 Antibody with FITC conjugation can be effectively incorporated into multiplex immunofluorescence strategies:

  • Spectral considerations:

    • FITC excitation/emission (499/515 nm) pairs well with red fluorophores (e.g., Cy3, Texas Red) and far-red fluorophores (e.g., Cy5, AlexaFluor 647)

    • Avoid fluorophores with significant spectral overlap like TRITC (tetramethylrhodamine)

    • Consider using nuclear counterstains like DAPI or Hoechst that are spectrally distinct

  • Sequential staining approaches:

    • For multiple antibodies from the same host species, employ sequential staining with intermediate blocking steps

    • Consider tyramide signal amplification (TSA) methods for enhanced sensitivity and multiplexing capability

  • Advanced multiplexing technologies:

    • Spectral imaging systems that can separate overlapping fluorophores

    • Cyclic immunofluorescence methods that allow sequential rounds of staining and imaging

    • Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies for high-dimensional analysis

  • Analysis considerations:

    • Implement appropriate compensation controls for spectral overlap

    • Use colocalization analysis tools to assess spatial relationships between targets

    • Consider machine learning approaches for complex pattern recognition in multiplex data

When designing multiplex panels, always validate antibodies individually before combining them to ensure specificity and optimal working conditions for each target .

What advanced microscopy techniques are most suitable for maximizing the detection sensitivity of FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody?

Several advanced microscopy techniques can enhance detection sensitivity:

  • Confocal laser scanning microscopy:

    • Provides optical sectioning to reduce out-of-focus background

    • Allows precise colocalization studies with other fluorophores

    • Optimal pinhole settings (1 Airy unit) balance resolution and signal intensity

  • Structured illumination microscopy (SIM):

    • Offers super-resolution capabilities (~100 nm lateral resolution)

    • Enhances contrast by eliminating out-of-focus light

    • Particularly useful for subcellular localization studies

  • Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy:

    • Achieves lateral resolution of ~30-80 nm

    • Requires photostable fluorophores (FITC may require careful optimization)

    • Enables visualization of nanoscale protein distribution patterns

  • Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy:

    • Excellent for membrane or near-membrane localized targets

    • Reduces background by exciting only a thin (~100 nm) optical section

    • Particularly useful for studying surface expression or membrane dynamics

  • Light sheet fluorescence microscopy:

    • Minimizes photobleaching and phototoxicity

    • Ideal for 3D imaging of thick specimens or live cells

    • Enables long-term imaging with reduced fluorophore degradation

For quantitative applications, detector linearity, dynamic range, and noise characteristics should be carefully considered and calibrated. Integration of image analysis pipelines using software like ImageJ/FIJI, CellProfiler, or commercial packages can further enhance quantitative capabilities 4 .

What statistical approaches are recommended for quantifying PG_1424 expression levels from FITC-based immunofluorescence or flow cytometry data?

Robust statistical analysis of fluorescence data requires consideration of several factors:

  • For immunofluorescence image analysis:

    • Measure integrated density or mean fluorescence intensity within defined regions of interest

    • Subtract background using adjacent negative areas or isotype controls

    • Normalize to cell number, area, or reference proteins as appropriate

    • For multiple conditions, employ ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni, etc.)

    • Consider non-parametric alternatives (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney) if normality assumptions are violated

  • For flow cytometry data:

    • Report median fluorescence intensity (MFI) rather than mean when distributions are non-normal

    • Calculate signal-to-noise ratio using isotype controls

    • For population analyses, use appropriate gating strategies validated with fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls

    • Employ biexponential transformation for visualizing data with wide dynamic range

    • Consider dimensionality reduction techniques (tSNE, UMAP) for complex multiparameter analyses

  • General statistical considerations:

    • Perform power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes

    • Report effect sizes along with p-values

    • Use appropriate multiple comparison corrections for large-scale analyses

    • Consider biological replicates rather than just technical replicates

    • Validate findings using orthogonal methods when possible

Software platforms like FlowJo, FCS Express, or R packages (flowCore, flowStats) for flow cytometry, and ImageJ, CellProfiler, or QuPath for image analysis provide powerful tools for implementing these approaches .

How can researchers definitively validate the specificity of PG_1424 Antibody staining patterns in experimental systems?

Comprehensive validation of antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Genetic validation:

    • Use knockout/knockdown systems (CRISPR-Cas9, siRNA) to eliminate target expression

    • Employ overexpression systems to confirm signal increase with increased target expression

    • Compare staining patterns across species/strains with known sequence differences

  • Biochemical validation:

    • Perform peptide competition assays to block specific binding

    • Use multiple antibodies against different epitopes of the same protein

    • Confirm size/molecular weight by parallel Western blot analysis

    • Verify identity by immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

  • Contextual validation:

    • Compare staining patterns with known biological distribution of the target

    • Confirm expected changes in response to treatments that alter target expression

    • Validate colocalization with known interacting partners

    • Compare results with published literature using different antibodies

  • Technical validation:

    • Include appropriate positive and negative controls in every experiment

    • Perform titration experiments to determine optimal concentration

    • Compare results across multiple detection methods (IF, WB, ELISA)

    • Assess batch-to-batch consistency with reference standards

For definitive validation, a combination of these approaches provides the strongest evidence for antibody specificity. Documentation of validation experiments is essential for publication and reproducibility .

How can PG_1424 Antibody, FITC conjugated be integrated into high-throughput screening or automated imaging platforms?

Integration into high-throughput platforms requires optimization of several parameters:

  • Automated staining platforms:

    • Optimize antibody concentration to minimize consumption while maintaining signal quality

    • Standardize washing steps to reduce background while ensuring consistent signal

    • Validate stability of the antibody under automated handling conditions

    • Implement positive controls on each plate/slide to monitor staining consistency

  • High-content imaging systems:

    • Develop robust segmentation algorithms to identify positive cells/structures

    • Implement autofocus routines that work reliably with FITC-stained specimens

    • Create analysis pipelines that extract multiple parameters (intensity, localization, morphology)

    • Validate that image acquisition settings remain within the linear range of detection

  • Quality control measures:

    • Include fluorescent standards for intensity calibration across plates/batches

    • Implement automated outlier detection algorithms

    • Monitor photobleaching effects during extended automated imaging sessions

    • Design plate layouts to control for position effects

  • Data management considerations:

    • Implement metadata standards that capture all experimental variables

    • Develop data storage solutions that preserve original images alongside analysis results

    • Create visualization tools that enable exploration of multiparametric data

    • Consider machine learning approaches for complex pattern recognition

High-throughput approaches are particularly valuable for screening bacterial strain collections, host-pathogen interaction studies, or drug response profiling related to P. gingivalis infections .

What are the emerging applications of PG_1424 antibody in studying host-pathogen interactions and potential links to systemic diseases?

The PG_1424 antibody is becoming an important tool for investigating several emerging research areas:

  • Periodontal disease mechanisms:

    • Tracking P. gingivalis invasion and persistence in oral epithelial cells

    • Monitoring peptidylarginine deiminase expression under different growth conditions

    • Studying biofilm formation dynamics and bacterial community interactions

    • Evaluating antimicrobial therapeutic efficacy against P. gingivalis

  • Rheumatoid arthritis connections:

    • Investigating the "bacterial citrullination hypothesis" linking P. gingivalis to autoimmunity

    • Tracking bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase activity in joint tissues

    • Studying cross-reactivity between bacterial and human citrullinated proteins

    • Evaluating preventive strategies targeting bacterial enzymes

  • Cardiovascular disease associations:

    • Detecting P. gingivalis components in atherosclerotic plaques

    • Studying endothelial cell responses to bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase

    • Investigating inflammatory pathways activated by bacterial components

    • Evaluating oral health interventions on cardiovascular outcomes

  • Advanced methodological applications:

    • Live cell imaging of host-pathogen interactions

    • Intravital microscopy to track bacterial dissemination in animal models

    • Multiomics approaches combining imaging with transcriptomics/proteomics

    • Developing point-of-care diagnostics for P. gingivalis detection

These emerging applications highlight the importance of specific and well-validated antibodies like FITC-conjugated PG_1424 for advancing our understanding of the role of oral pathogens in systemic health .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.