Host Species: Rabbit (polyclonal IgG)
Immunogen: Recombinant P. gingivalis peptidylarginine deiminase (44–556AA)
Reactivity: Specific to P. gingivalis; no cross-reactivity with human proteins reported
Molecular Weight: Predicted 63 kDa (observed 63 kDa in WB)
While no PG_1424-FITC conjugate is commercially documented, standard FITC conjugation protocols involve:
Activation: Incubate purified IgG with FITC isomer I (pH 9.5, 25 mg/ml IgG, 30–60 minutes at 25°C) .
Purification: Remove unbound FITC via gel filtration or dialysis .
Quality Control: Assess fluorescein-to-protein (F/P) ratio (optimal range: 2–6 moles FITC per mole IgG) .
Critical parameters for functional conjugates:
Periodontal Pathogenesis: Detects peptidylarginine deiminase activity, which promotes bacterial survival in acidic oral environments by ammonia production .
Autoimmunity Studies: Citrullinated proteins generated by this enzyme are implicated in rheumatoid arthritis .
KEGG: pgi:PG_1424
STRING: 242619.PG1424
PG_1424 refers to peptidylarginine deiminase from Porphyromonas gingivalis, an enzyme that deiminates the guanidino group of C-terminal arginine residues on various peptides including vasoregulatory peptides. This bacterial enzyme has gained significant research interest due to its potential role in periodontal disease pathogenesis and possible links to systemic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. The antibody against this protein serves as a critical tool for investigating P. gingivalis infection mechanisms and host-pathogen interactions .
The FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody with the following technical specifications:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Target | Peptidylarginine deiminase (PG_1424) |
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Conjugate | FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) |
| Reactivity | Porphyromonas gingivalis |
| Excitation/Emission | 499/515 nm |
| Laser Line | 488 nm |
| Immunogen | Recombinant P. gingivalis Peptidylarginine deiminase (44-556 AA) |
| Purity | >95%, Protein G purified |
| Form | Liquid |
| Buffer Composition | 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, 0.03% Proclin-300, 50% glycerol |
This antibody is designed for research applications requiring direct fluorescent detection of the PG_1424 protein .
The FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody has been validated for several research applications:
Immunofluorescence (IF): For direct visualization of PG_1424 in fixed cells or tissue sections
Immunocytochemistry (ICC): For cellular localization studies
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detection in tissue sections
Flow cytometry (FACS): For quantitative analysis of cellular populations expressing PG_1424
ELISA: For quantitative detection in solution
When designing experiments, researchers should optimize antibody dilutions for each specific application. While the unconjugated version has been validated for Western blot applications, additional optimization may be required when using the FITC-conjugated version for this purpose .
The FITC fluorophore may slightly increase the molecular weight of the antibody complex
FITC has optimal fluorescence at neutral to basic pH (7-9) and may show reduced fluorescence in acidic environments
FITC is susceptible to photobleaching compared to some newer fluorophores
The antibody's binding capacity is generally preserved, but validation experiments comparing conjugated versus unconjugated versions are recommended for critical applications
For applications requiring extreme sensitivity or where background fluorescence is a concern, parallel experiments with unconjugated primary followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies may provide useful comparison data 4 .
Sample preparation is critical for successful experiments with FITC-conjugated PG_1424 antibody:
For cell cultures:
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes at room temperature)
Permeabilize with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 if intracellular targets are of interest
Block with 1-5% BSA or 5-10% normal serum from a species different from the host of the primary antibody
Apply antibody at optimized concentration (typically starting at 1:100-1:500 dilution)
Minimize exposure to light during and after antibody incubation to prevent photobleaching
For tissue sections:
Use freshly cut sections (5-8 μm thickness recommended)
Deparaffinize completely if using paraffin-embedded tissues
Perform antigen retrieval if necessary (method should be optimized based on target)
Block endogenous biotin/avidin if using related detection systems
Include steps to reduce autofluorescence (Sudan Black B treatment may help)
For both sample types, include appropriate negative controls (isotype control with FITC) and consider counterstaining nuclei with DAPI or similar dyes that don't overlap with FITC spectrum .
Optimal working dilutions and incubation conditions vary by application:
| Application | Recommended Dilution Range | Incubation Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Immunofluorescence | 1:50-1:200 | 1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C |
| Flow Cytometry | 1:50-1:100 | 30-60 minutes at 4°C in the dark |
| ELISA | 1:2000-1:10000 | 1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C |
| Western Blot | 1:500-1:5000 | 1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C |
These ranges serve as starting points and should be optimized for specific experimental conditions. Temperature, incubation time, and buffer composition can all affect binding efficiency. For critical experiments, a titration series is recommended to determine the optimal antibody concentration that provides maximum specific signal with minimal background .
FITC-conjugated antibodies require careful storage to maintain both antibody functionality and fluorophore activity:
Store at -20°C in the dark, avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles
For frequent use, prepare small working aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw events
Add a protein stabilizer such as 1% BSA if not already present in the formulation
Protect from light exposure during all handling steps by using amber tubes or wrapping containers in aluminum foil
For long-term storage (>6 months), -80°C may provide better preservation of activity
When thawing, allow the antibody to equilibrate completely to room temperature before opening to prevent condensation
Monitoring the fluorescence intensity of stored antibodies periodically using consistent standards can help track potential degradation over time. Significant loss of signal may indicate the need for a fresh antibody preparation .
To assess concentration and activity after storage:
Protein concentration measurement:
Spectrophotometric measurement at 280 nm (adjust for FITC contribution)
BCA or Bradford assay (with appropriate standards)
Fluorophore activity assessment:
Measure fluorescence intensity at 515-520 nm (with 488-495 nm excitation)
Compare to reference standards measured under identical conditions
Functional activity assessment:
Perform a titration experiment with known positive control samples
Compare staining patterns and intensity to previous successful experiments
Include side-by-side comparison with a freshly obtained antibody when possible
The fluorophore-to-protein ratio (F/P ratio) is another important parameter to monitor, as it indicates the degree of labeling. Optimal F/P ratios typically range from 3-8 FITC molecules per antibody. Ratios outside this range may result in either insufficient signal (too low) or quenching effects and increased non-specific binding (too high) .
Distinguishing specific signal from autofluorescence requires systematic controls and optimization:
Essential controls:
FITC-conjugated isotype control antibody (same host species, same Ig class)
Unstained samples to assess natural autofluorescence
Secondary antibody-only controls if using indirect detection methods
Known negative samples (tissues/cells lacking the target)
Autofluorescence reduction strategies:
Pretreat samples with 0.1-1% Sudan Black B in 70% ethanol (10 minutes)
Use 0.1-1% sodium borohydride solution for 10 minutes (especially effective for fixed tissues)
Employ spectral unmixing on confocal microscopes capable of this function
Consider time-gated detection systems that can separate FITC signal from shorter-lived autofluorescence
Signal enhancement approaches:
Optimize antigen retrieval methods (if applicable)
Extend antibody incubation time at 4°C
Use signal amplification systems compatible with FITC detection
Advanced imaging techniques such as fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) can also help distinguish between specific antibody binding and background autofluorescence based on fluorescence decay characteristics 4 .
Signal variability can arise from multiple sources when using FITC-conjugated antibodies:
| Variability Source | Potential Solutions |
|---|---|
| Photobleaching | Use anti-fade mounting media; minimize exposure time; capture images from unexposed areas first |
| pH sensitivity | Maintain consistent buffer pH (7.2-8.0 optimal for FITC); avoid acidic environments |
| Fixation artifacts | Standardize fixation protocols; validate with multiple fixation methods |
| Antibody degradation | Prepare fresh working dilutions; store properly; include positive controls |
| Batch-to-batch variation | Purchase sufficient quantity from single lot for critical studies; validate each new lot |
| Sample processing differences | Standardize all steps from collection to staining; process experimental groups in parallel |
| Instrument variation | Use calibration beads; maintain consistent PMT/gain settings; include fluorescent standards |
For quantitative applications, implementing normalization strategies is essential. This may include normalizing to cell number, total protein content, or reference genes/proteins known to be stably expressed across experimental conditions. Regular instrument calibration and the use of fluorescence standards can also help ensure consistent measurements across experiments .
PG_1424 Antibody with FITC conjugation can be effectively incorporated into multiplex immunofluorescence strategies:
Spectral considerations:
FITC excitation/emission (499/515 nm) pairs well with red fluorophores (e.g., Cy3, Texas Red) and far-red fluorophores (e.g., Cy5, AlexaFluor 647)
Avoid fluorophores with significant spectral overlap like TRITC (tetramethylrhodamine)
Consider using nuclear counterstains like DAPI or Hoechst that are spectrally distinct
Sequential staining approaches:
For multiple antibodies from the same host species, employ sequential staining with intermediate blocking steps
Consider tyramide signal amplification (TSA) methods for enhanced sensitivity and multiplexing capability
Advanced multiplexing technologies:
Spectral imaging systems that can separate overlapping fluorophores
Cyclic immunofluorescence methods that allow sequential rounds of staining and imaging
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) using metal-conjugated antibodies for high-dimensional analysis
Analysis considerations:
Implement appropriate compensation controls for spectral overlap
Use colocalization analysis tools to assess spatial relationships between targets
Consider machine learning approaches for complex pattern recognition in multiplex data
When designing multiplex panels, always validate antibodies individually before combining them to ensure specificity and optimal working conditions for each target .
Several advanced microscopy techniques can enhance detection sensitivity:
Confocal laser scanning microscopy:
Provides optical sectioning to reduce out-of-focus background
Allows precise colocalization studies with other fluorophores
Optimal pinhole settings (1 Airy unit) balance resolution and signal intensity
Structured illumination microscopy (SIM):
Offers super-resolution capabilities (~100 nm lateral resolution)
Enhances contrast by eliminating out-of-focus light
Particularly useful for subcellular localization studies
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy:
Achieves lateral resolution of ~30-80 nm
Requires photostable fluorophores (FITC may require careful optimization)
Enables visualization of nanoscale protein distribution patterns
Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy:
Excellent for membrane or near-membrane localized targets
Reduces background by exciting only a thin (~100 nm) optical section
Particularly useful for studying surface expression or membrane dynamics
Light sheet fluorescence microscopy:
Minimizes photobleaching and phototoxicity
Ideal for 3D imaging of thick specimens or live cells
Enables long-term imaging with reduced fluorophore degradation
For quantitative applications, detector linearity, dynamic range, and noise characteristics should be carefully considered and calibrated. Integration of image analysis pipelines using software like ImageJ/FIJI, CellProfiler, or commercial packages can further enhance quantitative capabilities 4 .
Robust statistical analysis of fluorescence data requires consideration of several factors:
For immunofluorescence image analysis:
Measure integrated density or mean fluorescence intensity within defined regions of interest
Subtract background using adjacent negative areas or isotype controls
Normalize to cell number, area, or reference proteins as appropriate
For multiple conditions, employ ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni, etc.)
Consider non-parametric alternatives (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney) if normality assumptions are violated
For flow cytometry data:
Report median fluorescence intensity (MFI) rather than mean when distributions are non-normal
Calculate signal-to-noise ratio using isotype controls
For population analyses, use appropriate gating strategies validated with fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls
Employ biexponential transformation for visualizing data with wide dynamic range
Consider dimensionality reduction techniques (tSNE, UMAP) for complex multiparameter analyses
General statistical considerations:
Perform power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes
Report effect sizes along with p-values
Use appropriate multiple comparison corrections for large-scale analyses
Consider biological replicates rather than just technical replicates
Validate findings using orthogonal methods when possible
Software platforms like FlowJo, FCS Express, or R packages (flowCore, flowStats) for flow cytometry, and ImageJ, CellProfiler, or QuPath for image analysis provide powerful tools for implementing these approaches .
Comprehensive validation of antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:
Genetic validation:
Use knockout/knockdown systems (CRISPR-Cas9, siRNA) to eliminate target expression
Employ overexpression systems to confirm signal increase with increased target expression
Compare staining patterns across species/strains with known sequence differences
Biochemical validation:
Perform peptide competition assays to block specific binding
Use multiple antibodies against different epitopes of the same protein
Confirm size/molecular weight by parallel Western blot analysis
Verify identity by immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Contextual validation:
Compare staining patterns with known biological distribution of the target
Confirm expected changes in response to treatments that alter target expression
Validate colocalization with known interacting partners
Compare results with published literature using different antibodies
Technical validation:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls in every experiment
Perform titration experiments to determine optimal concentration
Compare results across multiple detection methods (IF, WB, ELISA)
Assess batch-to-batch consistency with reference standards
For definitive validation, a combination of these approaches provides the strongest evidence for antibody specificity. Documentation of validation experiments is essential for publication and reproducibility .
Integration into high-throughput platforms requires optimization of several parameters:
Automated staining platforms:
Optimize antibody concentration to minimize consumption while maintaining signal quality
Standardize washing steps to reduce background while ensuring consistent signal
Validate stability of the antibody under automated handling conditions
Implement positive controls on each plate/slide to monitor staining consistency
High-content imaging systems:
Develop robust segmentation algorithms to identify positive cells/structures
Implement autofocus routines that work reliably with FITC-stained specimens
Create analysis pipelines that extract multiple parameters (intensity, localization, morphology)
Validate that image acquisition settings remain within the linear range of detection
Quality control measures:
Include fluorescent standards for intensity calibration across plates/batches
Implement automated outlier detection algorithms
Monitor photobleaching effects during extended automated imaging sessions
Design plate layouts to control for position effects
Data management considerations:
Implement metadata standards that capture all experimental variables
Develop data storage solutions that preserve original images alongside analysis results
Create visualization tools that enable exploration of multiparametric data
Consider machine learning approaches for complex pattern recognition
High-throughput approaches are particularly valuable for screening bacterial strain collections, host-pathogen interaction studies, or drug response profiling related to P. gingivalis infections .
The PG_1424 antibody is becoming an important tool for investigating several emerging research areas:
Periodontal disease mechanisms:
Tracking P. gingivalis invasion and persistence in oral epithelial cells
Monitoring peptidylarginine deiminase expression under different growth conditions
Studying biofilm formation dynamics and bacterial community interactions
Evaluating antimicrobial therapeutic efficacy against P. gingivalis
Rheumatoid arthritis connections:
Investigating the "bacterial citrullination hypothesis" linking P. gingivalis to autoimmunity
Tracking bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase activity in joint tissues
Studying cross-reactivity between bacterial and human citrullinated proteins
Evaluating preventive strategies targeting bacterial enzymes
Cardiovascular disease associations:
Detecting P. gingivalis components in atherosclerotic plaques
Studying endothelial cell responses to bacterial peptidylarginine deiminase
Investigating inflammatory pathways activated by bacterial components
Evaluating oral health interventions on cardiovascular outcomes
Advanced methodological applications:
Live cell imaging of host-pathogen interactions
Intravital microscopy to track bacterial dissemination in animal models
Multiomics approaches combining imaging with transcriptomics/proteomics
Developing point-of-care diagnostics for P. gingivalis detection
These emerging applications highlight the importance of specific and well-validated antibodies like FITC-conjugated PG_1424 for advancing our understanding of the role of oral pathogens in systemic health .