EAP1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biological Context

EAP1 antibodies target the human protein Enhanced at Puberty 1 (EAP1), encoded by the RNF112 gene. EAP1 is a nuclear protein with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, functioning as a transcriptional coactivator for androgen receptor (AR)-mediated signaling . It plays roles in:

  • Pubertal development and hypothalamic reproductive control .

  • AR-dependent transcriptional regulation in prostate cancer .

  • Chromosome stability and DNA repair pathways .

Androgen Receptor Coregulation

EAP1 enhances AR transcriptional activity by acting as a coactivator. Key findings include:

  • DHT-Dependent Interaction: Proximity ligation assays (PLA) confirmed nuclear colocalization of EAP1 and AR in prostate cancer cells (LNCaP), with interaction strength increasing under dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation .

  • Gene Regulation: EAP1 knockdown via shRNA reduced expression of AR target genes (PSA, KLK2) by 60–80%, impairing prostate cancer cell proliferation .

Therapeutic Applications

  • Vaccine Development: Synthetic Candida albicans adhesin (Eap1)-exposed cells were used to create the AlgelCpG + EmEAP1 vaccine, which increased dendritic cell recruitment in lymph nodes by 18% (vs. 10–13% in controls) .

EAP1 in Prostate Cancer

StudyMethodResult
Reporter Assay PSA-Luc constructEAP1 increased DHT-induced AR activity 3-fold; C715A mutation abolished effect.
Chromatin IP PSA promoter analysisEAP1 recruited to PSA promoter in a DHT-dependent manner.

Hypothalamic Function

EAP1 is expressed in hypothalamic nuclei regulating puberty. Silencing EAP1 mRNA in neuronal cells disrupted reproductive endocrine pathways .

Technical Considerations

  • Validation: Antibody specificity is confirmed via knockout controls (e.g., loss of signal in EAP1 shRNA-treated cells) .

  • Limitations: EAP1-AR interactions are biochemically labile, requiring advanced methods like PLA for detection .

Future Directions

  • Investigating EAP1’s role in other hormone-dependent cancers (e.g., breast cancer).

  • Optimizing EAP1-targeted vaccines for antifungal or anticancer immunotherapy .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
EAP1 antibody; PGA47 antibody; CAALFM_C209530WA antibody; CaO19.1401 antibody; CaO19.8979 antibody; Cell wall adhesin EAP1 antibody; Enhanced adherence to polystyrene protein 1 antibody; GPI-anchored protein 47 antibody
Target Names
EAP1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
EAP1 Antibody targets a cell wall protein that mediates cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesion. This protein is essential for biofilm formation and plays a significant role in virulence.
Database Links
Protein Families
PGA18 family
Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall. Membrane; Lipid-anchor, GPI-anchor.

Q&A

What is EAP1 and how does it function across different organisms?

EAP1 refers to distinct proteins in different organisms with varied functions. In Candida albicans, EAP1 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored, glucan-cross-linked cell wall protein that mediates adhesion to polystyrene surfaces and epithelial cells, playing a crucial role in biofilm formation. The C. albicans EAP1 gene was identified based on its ability to restore adhesive properties when expressed in adhesion-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains .

In Staphylococcus aureus, the Extracellular Adherence Protein (Eap) functions as an important virulence factor with immunomodulating and antiangiogenic properties. Studies have demonstrated that antibodies against S. aureus Eap are prevalent in humans and correlate with the severity of S. aureus infections, suggesting its immunogenic nature .

In mammals, particularly primates, hypothalamic EAP1 (Enhanced at Puberty 1) serves as a transcriptional regulator involved in the neuroendocrine control of reproductive function. Research indicates it may control reproductive cyclicity by inhibiting downstream repressor genes involved in reproductive function regulation .

How can researchers distinguish between EAP1 proteins from different organisms?

Distinguishing between EAP1 proteins from different organisms requires careful consideration of molecular weight, structural features, and antigenic epitopes. For C. albicans EAP1, Western blot analysis reveals a characteristic pattern consistent with extensive glycosylation, showing bands at approximately 110-230 kDa. Researchers can confirm identity using HA-tagged Eap1p constructs and detection with anti-HA monoclonal antibodies .

For S. aureus Eap, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and Western blot techniques are commonly employed, with specific antibodies recognizing epitopes unique to this bacterial adhesin. Detection of human anti-Eap antibodies requires careful optimization of assay conditions to discriminate between immunoglobulin classes (IgM, IgG) .

In mammalian systems, hypothalamic EAP1 requires specific antibodies targeting unique epitopes not present in microbial EAP1 variants. Researchers routinely employ immunohistochemistry with specialized rabbit polyclonal antibodies (typically used at 1:8,000 dilution) to visualize EAP1-containing cells in brain tissue sections .

What are the recommended protocols for validating EAP1 antibody specificity?

Validation of EAP1 antibody specificity requires a multi-faceted approach. For C. albicans EAP1 antibodies, validation should include:

  • Western blot analysis using wild-type strains, eap1 deletion mutants, and complemented strains

  • Immunofluorescence microscopy comparing signal localization in wild-type versus mutant cells

  • Testing cross-reactivity with related fungal species

  • Pre-absorption controls with purified EAP1 protein

For S. aureus Eap antibodies, validation should include:

  • ELISA with purified Eap protein as a positive control

  • Western blot analysis with culture supernatants from wild-type S. aureus and Eap-deficient mutants

  • Testing for cross-reactivity with related staphylococcal species

  • Functional validation using phagocytosis assays with Eap-coated fluorescent microspheres

For mammalian EAP1 antibodies, validation approaches include:

  • Comparison of staining patterns in tissues with EAP1 knockdown via siRNA

  • Co-localization studies with known markers of EAP1-expressing cells

  • Absorption controls with synthetic EAP1 peptides

  • Western blot analysis of tissues from different developmental stages (given EAP1's role in puberty)

How can EAP1 antibodies be utilized to investigate biofilm formation in Candida albicans?

EAP1 antibodies serve as valuable tools for investigating biofilm formation in C. albicans through multiple experimental approaches. Researchers can use these antibodies to track EAP1 expression levels during different stages of biofilm formation, revealing that EAP1 expression is upregulated in biofilm-associated cells both in vitro and in vivo. This upregulation demonstrates a correlation between EAP1-mediated adhesion and the establishment of mature biofilms in clinically relevant contexts .

Immunofluorescence microscopy with EAP1 antibodies allows visualization of the protein's distribution within the cell wall during adhesion and biofilm development. By coupling this with flow chamber models, researchers can assess how mechanical forces affect EAP1 distribution and function during the attachment phase. The parallel plate flow chamber model mentioned in the literature has revealed that EAP1 expression is particularly crucial for biofilm formation under shear flow conditions, mimicking the vascular environment .

For in vivo studies, EAP1 antibodies enable the examination of protein expression in biofilms formed on implanted medical devices, such as central venous catheters. Using immunohistochemistry on catheter sections from animal models, researchers can correlate EAP1 expression patterns with biofilm architecture and resistance properties, providing insights into potential therapeutic targets for preventing device-associated infections .

What is the significance of anti-Eap antibody titers in Staphylococcus aureus infections?

The significance of anti-Eap antibody titers in S. aureus infections reveals important aspects of host-pathogen interactions. Clinical studies have demonstrated that patients with proven S. aureus infections exhibit significantly higher anti-Eap antibody titers compared to healthy controls, with particularly notable differences in immunoglobulin levels (IgM, P=0.007; IgG, P<0.0001). This finding suggests that Eap is highly immunogenic and consistently expressed during S. aureus infections .

More importantly, researchers have observed a correlation between antibody titers and disease severity. Patients with deep or severe S. aureus infections display higher anti-Eap antibody titers than those with superficial or mild disease. This correlation provides valuable diagnostic information and potential prognostic indicators for clinicians managing S. aureus infections .

How do EAP1 antibodies contribute to reproductive biology research?

EAP1 antibodies have become essential tools in reproductive biology research, particularly for investigating the neuroendocrine control of puberty and reproductive function. In hypothalamic research, EAP1 antibodies enable the visualization and quantification of EAP1-containing cells through immunohistochemistry, allowing researchers to map the distribution of this important transcriptional regulator within the brain regions responsible for reproductive control .

The application of EAP1 antibodies in co-localization studies has revealed important insights into the cellular networks regulating reproduction. By combining EAP1 immunostaining with antibodies against other key neuroendocrine markers such as kisspeptin, researchers can identify functional relationships between different neuronal populations. As described in the literature, sections can be incubated with eGFP antibodies and sheep polyclonal antibodies against kisspeptin (diluted 1:100,000) to understand how these systems interact .

Additionally, EAP1 antibodies are vital for validating experimental manipulations of EAP1 expression. In studies using lentiviral vectors encoding EAP1 siRNA, researchers can confirm the effectiveness of knockdown by comparing EAP1 immunoreactivity between cells expressing eGFP (indicating successful transduction) and control cells. This approach allows for quantitative assessment of EAP1 reduction in specific neuronal populations, enabling precise correlation between EAP1 expression levels and physiological outcomes related to reproductive function .

What are the optimal protocols for Western blot analysis of EAP1 proteins?

Optimal Western blot protocols for EAP1 proteins must account for the distinct characteristics of these proteins across different organisms. For C. albicans Eap1p, which is extensively glycosylated and GPI-anchored, specialized extraction methods are essential. Researchers should isolate yeast cell walls according to established methods such as those described by Mao et al. After harvesting cells by centrifugation, concentrated supernatant should be processed with 100-kDa-cutoff Microcon centrifugal filters to retain the high-molecular-weight Eap1p protein .

When preparing samples, it's crucial to include appropriate controls: wild-type C. albicans, eap1 deletion mutants, and strains expressing HA-tagged versions of Eap1p (with and without GPI anchor signals). For gel electrophoresis, gradient gels (4-15%) provide better resolution of the large, glycosylated Eap1p proteins. Transfer to PVDF membranes should be conducted at lower voltage for extended periods (15V overnight) to ensure complete transfer of high-molecular-weight proteins .

For S. aureus Eap detection, sample preparation should focus on culture supernatants where this secreted protein accumulates. Western blot analysis should employ monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies specific to S. aureus Eap, with appropriate blocking (10% goat serum in PBS) to minimize background. When analyzing human anti-Eap antibodies, serial dilutions of patient sera should be tested to determine optimal working dilutions for detecting both IgM and IgG responses. Detection systems using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies with enhanced chemiluminescence offer the sensitivity needed for detecting varied antibody responses across patient populations .

How can immunofluorescence techniques be optimized for EAP1 detection in different sample types?

Optimizing immunofluorescence techniques for EAP1 detection requires customization based on sample type and specific research questions. For C. albicans, cells should be cultured overnight to reach appropriate density (OD600 = 1.0), then blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS before incubation with primary antibodies. Anti-HA monoclonal antibodies (when using HA-tagged constructs) should be applied for 30 minutes, followed by anti-mouse antibody-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate for another 30 minutes. Visualization requires an inverted epifluorescence microscope with appropriate filter sets and image acquisition software .

For tissue sections in mammalian studies, particularly brain tissue containing hypothalamic EAP1, more complex protocols are necessary. Sections should be incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against EAP1 at a 1:8,000 dilution, which has been established as optimal for specific signal detection. For co-localization studies, additional primary antibodies such as mouse monoclonal antibodies against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:10,000 dilution) or GnRH neurons (HFU 4H3, 1:3,000) can be applied, followed by appropriate species-specific secondary antibodies (e.g., Alexa Fluor 594 chicken anti-mouse γ-globulin at 1:500 dilution) .

When conducting quantitative analysis of EAP1 immunoreactivity after in vivo manipulations such as lentiviral delivery of EAP1 siRNA, dual labeling approaches are essential. eGFP-positive cells (indicating successful viral transduction) should be identified with goat polyclonal antibodies against eGFP (1:2,000 dilution), while EAP1-containing cells are visualized with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against EAP1 (1:8,000 dilution). This approach allows direct comparison of EAP1 levels in transduced versus non-transduced cells within the same tissue section .

What strategies can address cross-reactivity in EAP1 antibody applications?

Addressing cross-reactivity challenges in EAP1 antibody applications requires systematic validation and optimization strategies. Pre-absorption controls represent a critical approach, where antibodies are incubated with purified EAP1 protein or synthetic peptides corresponding to the immunogen prior to application. This procedure can effectively remove antibodies that specifically bind EAP1, confirming that any remaining signal in immunoassays results from non-specific binding. For C. albicans EAP1 studies, comparing staining patterns between wild-type and eap1 deletion mutants provides definitive evidence of antibody specificity .

Genetic approaches offer powerful validation tools for antibody specificity. For instance, researchers studying C. albicans EAP1 can generate heterozygous (SPY316) and homozygous (SPY317) eap1 deletion mutants using PCR-mediated gene disruption methods. Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis of these strains, alongside strains complemented with the EAP1 gene (SPY315), can confirm that observed signals truly represent EAP1 rather than cross-reactive proteins .

For studies involving human anti-Eap antibodies from S. aureus infections, adsorption experiments with purified Eap protein can remove specific antibodies from serum samples. The resulting depleted sera should show significantly reduced binding in ELISA and Western blot assays. Additionally, comparative analysis using related Eap proteins from different S. aureus strains can help identify epitopes that might contribute to cross-reactivity. These approaches are particularly important when evaluating the potential of Eap as a vaccine candidate to ensure that measured antibody responses are truly specific to the target protein .

How can siRNA techniques complement antibody-based studies of EAP1?

RNA interference technologies provide powerful complementary approaches to antibody-based EAP1 studies, enabling functional validation and mechanistic insights. The design of effective siRNA sequences targeting EAP1 mRNA requires careful consideration of sequence specificity. As demonstrated in rhesus monkey EAP1 studies, researchers can test multiple siRNA sequences by cotransfecting them with expression vectors containing the EAP1 coding region in cell culture systems (such as COS-7 cells). Quantitative assessment of knockdown efficiency using RT-PCR with appropriate primers allows selection of the most effective sequences .

Lentiviral vector systems offer significant advantages for delivering EAP1 siRNA in both in vitro and in vivo applications. These vectors can be engineered to include enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) as a reporter gene, allowing visual identification of transduced cells. Advanced constructs containing multiple hairpin structures (such as EAP1-3hp with three identical siRNA sequences) can achieve more potent knockdown than single hairpin constructs (EAP1-1hp). The organization of these constructs includes specific restriction enzyme sites flanking each hairpin (e.g., XhoI, XbaI, BamHI, EcoRI) to facilitate cloning and verification .

The effectiveness of siRNA-based EAP1 knockdown must be validated using antibody-based techniques. Immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry with EAP1 antibodies allows direct visualization and quantification of protein reduction in siRNA-expressing cells (identified by eGFP fluorescence). This combined approach creates a powerful system for correlating EAP1 protein levels with functional outcomes, thereby establishing causal relationships rather than mere associations. For example, in reproductive biology research, this methodology can definitively connect hypothalamic EAP1 expression levels with physiological parameters of reproductive function .

What are common pitfalls in EAP1 antibody experiments and how can they be addressed?

Common pitfalls in EAP1 antibody experiments include challenges related to protein extraction, specificity validation, and signal interpretation. For C. albicans EAP1, which is GPI-anchored and extensively glycosylated, inadequate extraction methods can lead to false-negative results. Researchers should employ specialized cell wall isolation procedures and use concentrated supernatants with appropriate molecular weight cutoff filters (100-kDa) to ensure retention of the high-molecular-weight Eap1p protein .

Antibody specificity issues represent another significant challenge. False-positive results can occur due to cross-reactivity with related proteins or non-specific binding. To address this, researchers should include comprehensive controls including genetic knockouts (such as the eap1/eap1 mutant SPY317), heterozygous strains (SPY316), and complemented strains (SPY315). When using epitope-tagged constructs, such as HA-tagged Eap1p, comparing constructs with and without GPI anchor signals (pHAEAP1 versus pHAEAP1.NOGPI) can provide insights into protein localization and processing .

Signal interpretation challenges arise particularly in complex samples such as biofilms or tissue sections with variable EAP1 expression. To address this, quantitative approaches including fluorescence intensity measurements should be complemented with careful analysis of protein distribution patterns. When studying anti-Eap antibodies in human samples, establishing appropriate baselines from healthy controls is essential for meaningful interpretation of patient results. The observation that all tested humans (both patients and controls) have detectable anti-Eap antibodies, with higher titers in patients with severe infections, highlights the importance of quantitative rather than qualitative assessment .

How can researchers optimize EAP1 antibody dilutions for different applications?

Optimizing EAP1 antibody dilutions requires systematic titration experiments tailored to specific applications and sample types. For immunofluorescence detection of C. albicans Eap1p, primary antibodies (such as anti-HA monoclonal antibodies) typically work well at dilutions of 1:500 to 1:1000, followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies at 1:500 dilution. When visualizing the cell surface localization of Eap1p, blocking with 10% goat serum in PBS before antibody application helps minimize non-specific binding .

For immunohistochemical detection of mammalian EAP1 in brain tissue sections, more dilute antibody concentrations are typically optimal. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against EAP1 have been successfully used at 1:8,000 dilution, providing specific signal with minimal background. When combined with antibodies against other neuronal markers, such as GnRH neurons (using the mouse monoclonal antibody HFU 4H3 at 1:3,000), or glial markers like GFAP (at 1:10,000), careful optimization of each antibody in the multiplex staining protocol is essential .

In Western blot applications, optimal antibody dilutions depend on the abundance of the target protein and the detection system employed. For detecting anti-Eap antibodies in human serum samples, ELISA assays typically employ serial dilutions to determine endpoint titers. When analyzing patient versus control samples, standardized dilution series (typically starting at 1:100 and extending to 1:12,800) allow quantitative comparison of antibody levels. The significant differences observed between patients with S. aureus infections and healthy controls (IgM, P=0.007; IgG, P<0.0001) highlight the importance of appropriate dilution selection for revealing biologically meaningful differences .

What controls are essential for validating EAP1 antibody experiments?

Robust experimental design for EAP1 antibody applications requires multiple levels of controls to ensure validity and reproducibility. Genetic controls represent the gold standard for antibody validation. In C. albicans studies, these include:

  • Wild-type strains expressing normal levels of Eap1p

  • Heterozygous EAP1 deletion mutants (e.g., SPY316) with reduced expression

  • Homozygous deletion mutants (e.g., SPY317) lacking Eap1p expression

  • Complemented strains (e.g., SPY315) with restored Eap1p expression

For mammalian EAP1 studies utilizing siRNA approaches, essential controls include:

  • Non-targeting siRNA constructs (such as mutated luciferase siRNA)

  • Varying levels of knockdown (comparing single hairpin versus triple hairpin constructs)

  • Correlation of eGFP reporter expression with EAP1 reduction in dual-labeling experiments

  • Measurement of housekeeping genes (such as cyclophilin) as internal controls for RNA quantification

In clinical studies of anti-Eap antibodies, critical controls include:

  • Healthy human serum samples as negative controls

  • Stratification of patient samples by infection severity

  • Species-matched but antibody-negative samples (such as mouse sera, which lack anti-Eap antibodies)

  • Functional validation using phagocytosis assays with Eap-coated fluorescent microspheres

Additionally, procedural controls such as secondary-only controls for immunofluorescence, isotype controls for polyclonal antibodies, and pre-absorption controls with purified antigen provide essential quality assurance for EAP1 antibody experiments across all applications.

How might EAP1 antibodies contribute to therapeutic development?

EAP1 antibodies hold significant potential for therapeutic development across multiple disease contexts. For C. albicans infections, antibodies targeting EAP1 could disrupt biofilm formation, a critical virulence mechanism associated with antimicrobial resistance and persistent infections. Since research has demonstrated that EAP1 expression is required for biofilm formation both in vitro and in vivo, particularly in clinically relevant models such as central venous catheter infections, therapeutic antibodies blocking EAP1-mediated adhesion could prevent the initial colonization of medical devices .

For reproductive disorders related to hypothalamic dysfunction, antibodies against EAP1 could serve as valuable diagnostic tools. Given EAP1's role in controlling reproductive cyclicity by inhibiting downstream repressor genes involved in reproductive function, measuring EAP1 levels in appropriate biological samples might provide insights into the mechanistic basis of certain reproductive disorders. Additionally, the siRNA approaches developed for EAP1 research could eventually translate into therapeutic strategies for conditions associated with dysregulated EAP1 expression .

What novel techniques are emerging for EAP1 detection and functional analysis?

Emerging technologies are expanding the toolkit for EAP1 research beyond traditional antibody applications. CRISPR-based approaches offer precise genome editing capabilities for creating targeted modifications to EAP1 genes, allowing functional studies with unprecedented specificity compared to siRNA approaches. Additionally, CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) and CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) systems enable modulation of EAP1 expression without altering the underlying genetic sequence, providing valuable complementary approaches to antibody-based protein detection.

Advanced imaging techniques such as super-resolution microscopy (SIM, STED, PALM/STORM) are enhancing visualization of EAP1 localization at subcellular resolution. When combined with traditional antibody-based detection, these approaches can reveal detailed patterns of EAP1 distribution within cell walls, biofilms, or neuronal structures that remain invisible to conventional microscopy. For biofilm studies in particular, confocal laser scanning microscopy with 3D reconstruction capabilities allows visualization of EAP1 distribution throughout the complex architecture of mature biofilms.

Multiplexed protein detection systems, including mass cytometry (CyTOF) and multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI), enable simultaneous detection of EAP1 along with dozens of other proteins of interest. These approaches provide comprehensive analysis of protein expression networks, particularly valuable for understanding how EAP1 interacts with other components of regulatory systems in both microbial and mammalian contexts. For clinical applications, such as monitoring anti-Eap antibody responses, advanced serological approaches including phage display technology can identify specific antigenic epitopes recognized by antibodies from different patient populations.

How can researchers integrate EAP1 antibody data with other -omics approaches?

Integrating EAP1 antibody data with multi-omics approaches creates powerful systems for comprehensive understanding of EAP1 biology. Combining antibody-based protein detection with transcriptomic analysis provides insights into post-transcriptional regulation. For example, comparing EAP1 mRNA levels (measured by RT-PCR with primers such as forward 5′-GCAACCGCGCCGAGGAA-3′ and reverse 5′-GTACTTGAAACCCGAGGATAGG-3′) with protein abundance detected by antibodies can reveal regulatory mechanisms affecting translation efficiency or protein stability .

Proteomics approaches complement antibody-based detection by providing unbiased profiles of protein expression changes associated with EAP1 manipulation. Following siRNA-mediated EAP1 knockdown, mass spectrometry-based proteomics can identify downstream effectors and regulatory networks influenced by EAP1 function. This approach is particularly valuable for discovering novel pathways through which EAP1 influences cellular processes in both microbial and mammalian systems.

For clinical applications, integrating measurements of anti-Eap antibody titers with host genomic data and microbial genomics could reveal host-pathogen interactions influencing S. aureus infection outcomes. The observation that patients with deep or severe infections show higher anti-Eap antibody titers than those with superficial or mild disease suggests potential correlations with host genetic factors affecting immune responses. Similarly, analyzing the genetic diversity of eap genes across S. aureus clinical isolates in relation to patient antibody responses could identify variants associated with enhanced virulence or immune evasion.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.