PHF1 Antibody (Catalog: 15663-1-AP) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal IgG antibody targeting the Plant Homeodomain Finger Protein 1 (PHF1), a chromatin-modifying enzyme involved in epigenetic regulation and DNA repair .
PHF1 recruits PRC2 to deposit repressive H3K27me3 marks, silencing genes involved in oncogenesis and stem cell differentiation .
PHF1 localizes to double-strand breaks and facilitates non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) by interacting with DNA repair proteins like 53BP1 .
PRC2 Recruitment: PHF1 binds H3K36me3 and enhances PRC2-mediated gene repression, critical in cancer progression .
p53 Regulation: Stabilizes p53 by inhibiting MDM2-mediated ubiquitination, promoting apoptosis in damaged cells .
| Condition | PHF1 Role |
|---|---|
| Cancer | Overexpression linked to tumor suppression via p53 stabilization . |
| Neurodegeneration | Implicated in DNA repair defects in Alzheimer’s models . |
| Application | Dilution Range | Validated Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:1,000–1:6,000 | C2C12 cells, mouse heart/liver tissue |
| IHC | 1:250–1:1,000 | Mouse stomach/heart tissue (TE buffer antigen retrieval) |
KEGG: pho:PH1536
STRING: 70601.PH1536
PH1536 Antibody (CSB-PA026349ZA01FHX) is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against recombinant Pyrococcus horikoshii PH1536 protein. It specifically targets the PH1536 protein from Pyrococcus horikoshii (strain ATCC 700860 / DSM 12428 / JCM 9974 / NBRC 100139 / OT-3) . As a polyclonal antibody, it recognizes multiple epitopes on the target antigen, which can provide robust detection even if some epitopes are modified or masked in experimental conditions.
The antibody is produced through immunization of rabbits with the recombinant PH1536 protein and is subsequently purified using Antigen Affinity methods to ensure high specificity. This IgG isotype antibody is provided in liquid form and is primarily intended for research applications in archaeal protein studies.
PH1536 Antibody should be stored at either -20°C or -80°C upon receipt to maintain optimal activity and stability . Importantly, repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can lead to antibody denaturation and loss of binding capacity.
For optimal storage practices:
Aliquot the antibody into smaller volumes based on expected usage to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Store aliquots in polypropylene tubes rather than glass to prevent protein adsorption
Ensure proper temperature monitoring of freezers to avoid temperature fluctuations
When handling, keep the antibody on ice and return to storage promptly
Record date of receipt, aliquoting, and first use for each vial
The storage buffer (0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4) has been formulated to enhance stability during storage, with glycerol acting as a cryoprotectant to minimize damage during freezing .
Before incorporating PH1536 Antibody into critical experiments, thorough validation is essential to ensure reliable results. A comprehensive validation approach should include:
Positive control testing: Use the provided recombinant immunogen protein (200μg) as a positive control to confirm antibody functionality
Negative control testing: Utilize the provided pre-immune serum (1ml) as a negative control to establish background levels and confirm specificity
Concentration titration: Perform a dilution series to determine optimal antibody concentration for each application
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against related proteins to confirm specificity for PH1536
Reproducibility testing: Perform replicate experiments to ensure consistent results
Similar to the approach used in validating anti-HPA-15b antibodies in clinical settings, testing on multiple days with different antigen preparations can help establish reliability and consistency of results .
PH1536 Antibody has been validated for the following applications:
| Application | Validated | Recommended Dilution | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Yes | 1:1000-1:5000 | Colorimetric/Fluorescent |
| Western Blot | Yes | 1:500-1:2000 | Chemiluminescence |
This antibody has been specifically tested and validated for ELISA and Western Blot applications to ensure identification of the PH1536 antigen . Each application requires specific optimization for maximum sensitivity and specificity.
For novel applications not listed above, preliminary validation experiments are strongly recommended, following similar principles to those employed in validating other research antibodies, such as the approach used for anti-SARS-CoV-2 or anti-PhtD antibodies, which required extensive testing to confirm specificity and functionality .
For optimal Western Blot results with PH1536 Antibody, follow this methodological approach:
Sample preparation:
Extract proteins from Pyrococcus horikoshii or recombinant systems expressing PH1536
Denature samples in SDS-PAGE loading buffer (containing β-mercaptoethanol) at 95°C for 5 minutes
Load 20-50μg of total protein per lane
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Separate proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane (0.45μm pore size)
Confirm transfer efficiency with reversible staining (Ponceau S)
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Block membrane with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with PH1536 Antibody (1:1000 dilution) in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with TBST, 5 minutes each
Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour at room temperature
Wash 3× with TBST, 5 minutes each
Detection and analysis:
Apply ECL substrate and image using appropriate detection system
Include positive control (recombinant immunogen) and molecular weight markers
Expected molecular weight should be verified against database information for PH1536
Controls and validation:
Run pre-immune serum at the same dilution on a duplicate blot as a negative control
Include lysate lacking PH1536 as a specificity control
This protocol draws on standard Western blotting principles, similar to those used for other research antibodies, while accounting for the specific properties of the PH1536 Antibody .
To optimize PH1536 Antibody for ELISA applications, consider the following methodological approach:
Plate preparation:
Coat high-binding 96-well plates with purified recombinant PH1536 protein (2-5μg/ml) in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C
Alternatively, for indirect ELISA, coat with samples containing the target protein
Blocking and antibody addition:
Block with 1-3% BSA in PBS for 1-2 hours at room temperature
Create a dilution series of PH1536 Antibody (starting from 1:500 to 1:10,000) in blocking buffer
Add 100μl of each dilution to appropriate wells and incubate for 2 hours at room temperature
Wash 4× with PBST
Detection:
Add HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 hour at room temperature
Wash 4× with PBST
Develop with TMB substrate and read absorbance at 450nm after stopping reaction with H₂SO₄
Optimization parameters:
Test multiple antibody concentrations to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Vary blocking agents (BSA, casein, non-fat milk) to minimize background
Test different incubation times and temperatures
Optimize washing steps to reduce background while maintaining signal
Quality control:
Always include a standard curve using recombinant PH1536 protein
Include wells with pre-immune serum as negative controls
Calculate coefficient of variation between replicate wells (target CV < 10%)
This approach incorporates best practices from antibody-based assay development, similar to those used in developing sensitive detection methods for other research antibodies .
When working with PH1536 Antibody, several factors can contribute to false results:
Causes of false positives:
Cross-reactivity: As a polyclonal antibody, PH1536 Antibody may recognize epitopes on proteins structurally similar to PH1536. Always include appropriate negative controls and pre-immune serum comparisons .
Non-specific binding: Insufficient blocking or inadequate washing can lead to high background. Optimize blocking conditions and consider adding 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to wash buffers.
Denatured protein interactions: The antibody may recognize normally inaccessible epitopes exposed in denatured proteins. Verify results using multiple detection methods.
Secondary antibody issues: HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies can bind non-specifically to certain samples. Include secondary-only controls in each experiment.
Causes of false negatives:
Epitope masking: Post-translational modifications or protein-protein interactions may block antibody access to epitopes. Consider different extraction or denaturation methods.
Insufficient antigen: Low expression levels of PH1536 may result in signals below detection threshold. Increase sample concentration or use more sensitive detection methods.
Antibody degradation: Improper storage or repeated freeze-thaw cycles can reduce antibody activity. Store according to recommendations and use fresh aliquots .
Incompatible buffers: Certain buffer components may interfere with antibody-antigen binding. Test alternative buffer systems if negative results persist.
Cross-reactivity is a common challenge with polyclonal antibodies like PH1536 Antibody. Here are methodological approaches to address this issue:
Pre-absorption techniques:
Incubate the antibody with lysates lacking PH1536 (from related species) to absorb cross-reactive antibodies
Remove bound antibodies by centrifugation or affinity methods
Test the pre-absorbed antibody against your target sample
Epitope competition assays:
Pre-incubate the antibody with excess recombinant PH1536 protein
Apply this mixture to your assay; specific signals should be significantly reduced
Non-specific signals that persist indicate cross-reactivity
Validation across multiple assays:
Confirm results using orthogonal methods (e.g., if positive in Western blot, verify with ELISA)
Cross-reactivity patterns often differ between native and denatured detection methods
Comparative analysis:
Test samples from PH1536-knockout or depleted systems as negative controls
Use recombinant PH1536 protein as positive control
Compare signal patterns and intensities between controls and test samples
Increased stringency protocols:
Use higher dilutions of primary antibody (1:2000-1:5000)
Increase salt concentration in wash buffers (up to 500mM NaCl)
Add non-ionic detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100) to reduce non-specific interactions
This approach draws on techniques similar to those used to validate the specificity of other research antibodies, like those developed for pneumococcal protein detection or platelet antigens .
Robust experimental design with PH1536 Antibody requires comprehensive controls:
Essential positive controls:
Recombinant PH1536 protein: The supplied recombinant immunogen (200μg) serves as the ideal positive control, confirming antibody functionality
Pyrococcus horikoshii lysate: Wild-type organism expressing native PH1536 provides validation in the natural context
Concentration gradient: Serial dilutions of positive control samples establish the detection range and sensitivity
Essential negative controls:
Pre-immune serum: The supplied pre-immune serum (1ml) establishes background and non-specific binding levels
Secondary antibody only: Reveals background from secondary antibody binding
Lysates from organisms lacking PH1536: Demonstrates specificity across species barriers
Procedural controls:
Loading/extraction controls: Housekeeping proteins verify equal loading and extraction efficiency
Blocking peptide competition: Antibody pre-incubated with excess target peptide should show reduced specific binding
Technical replicates: Minimum of three replicates to establish reproducibility and calculate statistical significance
Application-specific controls:
| Application | Recommended Control | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | Molecular weight markers | Confirm target band size |
| ELISA | Standard curve with recombinant protein | Quantification reference |
| Immunoprecipitation | IgG isotype control | Account for non-specific protein binding |
This control strategy incorporates approaches similar to those used in validating other research antibodies, such as the anti-HPA-15b antibodies evaluated in international collaborative studies .
PH1536 Antibody offers valuable capabilities for investigating archaeal proteins, particularly those from hyperthermophilic organisms like Pyrococcus horikoshii. Methodological approaches include:
Comparative proteomics:
Use PH1536 Antibody to track protein expression across growth conditions
Compare protein levels between wild-type and mutant strains
Investigate protein expression changes in response to environmental stressors
Correlate PH1536 levels with biochemical or phenotypic data
Protein localization studies:
Employ immunofluorescence microscopy with PH1536 Antibody to determine subcellular localization
Combine with organelle markers to confirm localization patterns
Compare localization under different growth or stress conditions
Use cell fractionation followed by Western blotting to biochemically validate microscopy findings
Protein-protein interaction analysis:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation with PH1536 Antibody to identify interaction partners
Use cross-linking approaches to capture transient interactions
Validate interactions through reciprocal pull-downs and mass spectrometry
Map interaction domains through truncated protein constructs
Evolutionary biology investigations:
Examine PH1536 conservation across archaeal species using cross-reactivity testing
Correlate structural conservation with functional conservation
Investigate adaptive changes in protein structure across extremophiles
These approaches build upon strategies used for other research antibodies in microbial research, such as those developed for specific bacterial antigens , while accounting for the unique properties of archaeal systems.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) with PH1536 Antibody requires careful methodological planning:
Lysate preparation optimization:
Use gentle lysis buffers (e.g., 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) to preserve protein-protein interactions
Include protease inhibitors (PMSF, leupeptin, aprotinin) to prevent degradation
Consider detergent selection carefully: NP-40 or Triton X-100 (0.5-1%) preserves most interactions, while harsher detergents may disrupt them
For thermophilic archaeal proteins, optimize lysis temperature to maintain native conformations
Antibody coupling strategies:
Direct approach: Couple PH1536 Antibody to protein A/G beads or magnetic beads
Indirect approach: Add antibody to lysate, then capture with protein A/G beads
Pre-clear lysates with beads alone to reduce non-specific binding
Cross-link antibody to beads (using BS3 or DMP) to prevent antibody co-elution
Control experiments:
Input control: Save a fraction of pre-IP lysate
Negative control: Pre-immune serum or irrelevant IgG
Reciprocal IP: If possible, IP with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Validation: Confirm identified interactions using alternative methods (e.g., proximity ligation assay)
Washing and elution optimization:
Optimize wash stringency to remove non-specific binders while retaining specific interactions
Test gradient of salt concentrations (150-500mM NaCl)
Consider competing peptide elution for increased specificity
For sensitive interactions, include stabilizing agents (e.g., 5-10% glycerol)
Detection methods:
Western blot: Probe for specific suspected interaction partners
Mass spectrometry: For unbiased identification of all potential interactors
Functional assays: Test activity of co-immunoprecipitated complexes
This protocol incorporates best practices from co-IP methodologies used with other research antibodies, such as those applied in malaria research for protein complex identification .
Epitope mapping with PH1536 polyclonal antibody requires specialized approaches to identify the specific binding regions:
Peptide array analysis:
Generate overlapping peptides (15-20 amino acids) spanning the entire PH1536 protein sequence
Synthesize peptides on membranes or glass slides
Probe with PH1536 Antibody at optimized dilution (1:1000-1:3000)
Detect binding using HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and chemiluminescence
Positive signals identify epitope-containing regions
Recombinant fragment analysis:
Create a series of truncated PH1536 protein constructs
Express and purify fragments using bacterial or cell-free systems
Perform Western blot analysis with PH1536 Antibody
Compare binding patterns to identify epitope-containing regions
Further refine by testing smaller sub-fragments
Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Expose PH1536 protein to deuterated buffer with and without antibody binding
Monitor changes in deuteration patterns by mass spectrometry
Regions protected from exchange represent potential epitopes
Validate findings using site-directed mutagenesis
Computational epitope prediction and validation:
Use algorithms to predict surface-exposed, hydrophilic regions of PH1536
Generate synthetic peptides based on predictions
Test antibody binding to these peptides via ELISA
Confirm findings through competitive binding assays
Cross-competition assays:
For polyclonal antibodies like PH1536 Antibody, epitope clustering can be determined
Pre-incubate protein with one set of antibodies, then probe with labeled PH1536 Antibody
Reduced binding indicates overlapping epitopes
This approach draws on methodologies similar to those used for epitope mapping of other functional antibodies, such as those targeting malaria invasion proteins or pneumococcal antigens .
When considering research approaches for archaeal proteins like PH1536, multiple methodologies can be evaluated:
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Complementarity with PH1536 Antibody |
|---|---|---|---|
| PH1536 Antibody | - Specific detection in complex samples - Compatible with multiple applications - Detects native protein forms | - Limited to PH1536 detection - May have some cross-reactivity - Dependent on epitope accessibility | Baseline methodology |
| Mass Spectrometry | - Unbiased protein identification - Quantitative capabilities - Can detect post-translational modifications | - Requires specialized equipment - May miss low-abundance proteins - Complex sample preparation | Confirms antibody specificity and identifies interaction partners |
| CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing | - Studies protein function through deletion - Creates precise genetic modifications - Enables phenotypic analysis | - Technical challenges in archaeal systems - Off-target effects - Requires genetic manipulation systems | Validates antibody specificity using knockout controls |
| Fluorescent Protein Tagging | - Real-time protein visualization - Tracks dynamic processes - Enables live-cell imaging | - Tag may interfere with function - Requires genetic modification - Background autofluorescence | Validates localization patterns observed with immunofluorescence |
| Recombinant Protein Expression | - Produces pure protein for analysis - Enables structural studies - Allows in vitro activity assays | - May not reflect native conditions - Challenging for insoluble proteins - May lack post-translational modifications | Provides positive controls for antibody validation |
This comparative analysis helps researchers select complementary methods for comprehensive study of archaeal proteins, similar to the multi-method approaches used in other microbial research fields .
To build a comprehensive understanding of PH1536 protein, researchers should consider these complementary approaches:
Transcriptomic analysis:
RT-qPCR to quantify PH1536 mRNA levels
RNA-Seq to examine expression in different conditions
Compare protein levels (via PH1536 Antibody) with mRNA levels to identify post-transcriptional regulation
Methodology: Extract total RNA using TRIzol or equivalent methods optimized for archaeal samples, perform reverse transcription with random hexamers, and quantify using gene-specific primers
Structural biology techniques:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for high-resolution structure
Circular dichroism spectroscopy for secondary structure analysis
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for dynamics
These approaches provide context for epitope locations detected by PH1536 Antibody
Activity assays:
Develop biochemical assays based on predicted PH1536 function
Use PH1536 Antibody to immunodeplete protein and assess functional impact
Compare wild-type activity with recombinant protein activity
Protein-protein interaction screens:
Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid systems
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX)
Validate interactions identified through these methods using co-IP with PH1536 Antibody
In silico analysis:
Homology modeling based on related proteins
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional domains
Evolutionary analysis to identify conserved regions
Guide experimental design by predicting antibody-accessible regions
This multi-method approach incorporates strategies similar to those used in comprehensive studies of other microbial proteins, such as those in pneumococcal and malaria research .
Like all research tools, PH1536 Antibody has inherent limitations that researchers should recognize and address:
Batch-to-batch variability:
Limitation: As a polyclonal antibody, PH1536 Antibody may show batch-to-batch differences in epitope recognition and affinity
Solution: Validate each new lot against previous lots using standardized samples and protocols
Methodology: Perform side-by-side Western blots or ELISAs with previous and new lots, calculating relative sensitivities and specificities
Limited species cross-reactivity:
Limitation: PH1536 Antibody is raised against Pyrococcus horikoshii protein and may not recognize orthologs from distantly related species
Solution: Test cross-reactivity systematically against proteins from related archaeal species
Methodology: Create a panel of lysates from diverse archaeal species and test recognition patterns via Western blot
Potential non-specific binding:
Limitation: Polyclonal antibodies may recognize epitopes on unrelated proteins
Solution: Implement rigorous controls and pre-absorption protocols
Methodology: Pre-incubate antibody with lysates from organisms lacking PH1536 to absorb cross-reactive antibodies
Limited application validation:
Epitope masking in native conditions:
Limitation: Some epitopes may be inaccessible in certain experimental conditions
Solution: Use multiple detection methods that access different epitopes
Methodology: Compare results from native (immunoprecipitation) and denaturing (Western blot) conditions to identify context-dependent recognition
These approaches to addressing limitations draw on strategies similar to those employed in other antibody validation studies, such as the international collaborative studies for antibody standardization .
PH1536 Antibody represents a valuable tool for archaeal protein research with several promising future applications:
Extremophile adaptation studies: PH1536 Antibody can help track protein expression and modifications in Pyrococcus horikoshii under extreme conditions, providing insights into archaeal adaptation mechanisms at the molecular level.
Evolutionary proteomics: By examining potential cross-reactivity with homologous proteins across archaeal species, researchers can map evolutionary conservation and divergence patterns of this protein family.
Structural biology integration: Combining antibody epitope mapping with structural studies could reveal functionally significant domains within PH1536, particularly in relation to thermostability mechanisms.
Archaeal systems biology: PH1536 Antibody could serve as one component in larger-scale studies mapping protein interaction networks in archaeal systems, similar to approaches used in bacterial and eukaryotic systems.
Biotechnology applications: Understanding PH1536's properties through antibody-based studies may reveal biotechnologically valuable features, potentially applicable to enzyme engineering for industrial processes requiring thermostable proteins.
These future directions build upon established approaches in antibody-based research while addressing the unique challenges and opportunities presented by archaeal systems research .