PHA2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Key Observations from Search Results

  • Antibody nomenclature: The term "PHA2" does not align with standard antibody naming conventions (e.g., "adalimumab," "ipilimumab") or target-specific designations (e.g., "anti-PD-L1," "anti-EphA2") in the provided sources .

  • Potential typographical errors: The term may represent a misspelling or formatting inconsistency. For example, "EphA2" (Ephrin type-A receptor 2) is extensively discussed in cancer therapeutics , but no "PHA2" variant is mentioned.

  • Absence in databases: None of the clinical-stage antibodies in phase 2/3 trials (e.g., Lu AF82422, felzartamab) or commercialized therapies (e.g., pembrolizumab, bevacizumab) correlate with this designation .

Hypothetical Scenarios for "PHA2 Antibody"

If "PHA2" refers to an experimental or proprietary antibody, the following possibilities exist based on nomenclature conventions:

CategoryPotential InterpretationEvidence in Search Results
Target-basedHypothetical target (e.g., "PH domain-containing protein A2")No matches in indexed studies [1–12].
Platform-basedPhage display-derived antibody (e.g., "PhAb-2")Phage display libraries focus on VHHs/scFvs .
Clinical candidateUndisclosed developmental candidate (not yet published or in early-phase trials)No phase 1–3 trials listed .

Recommendations for Further Investigation

  1. Verify nomenclature: Confirm the correct spelling, target, or platform associated with "PHA2."

  2. Explore analogous antibodies: If targeting EphA2 or similar receptors, review existing candidates (e.g., MEDI-547 , EphA2-targeting phage antibodies ).

  3. Consult proprietary databases: Non-public developmental pipelines or internal industry reports may contain relevant data not indexed here.

Data Table: Antibodies with Similar Nomenclature or Targets

AntibodyTargetFormatDevelopment StageKey FindingsSource
MEDI-547EphA2IgG1-ADCPreclinicalInduced EphA2 degradation; halted due to toxicity in phase 1 .
Lu AF82422α-synucleinIgG1 monoclonalPhase 2Modest efficacy in MSA; well-tolerated .
FelzartamabCD38IgG1Phase 2Reduced antibody-mediated rejection in transplant patients .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
PHA2 antibody; YNL316C antibody; N0351Putative prephenate dehydratase antibody; PDT antibody; EC 4.2.1.51 antibody; Phenylalanine-requiring protein 2 antibody
Target Names
PHA2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: sce:YNL316C

STRING: 4932.YNL316C

Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is PLA2R antibody and what is its significance in membranous nephropathy?

PLA2R antibody is an autoantibody that targets the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor expressed on podocytes. This receptor has been identified as a major target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN), which is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The binding of these circulating autoantibodies to PLA2R initiates formation of subepithelial immune deposits and complement activation, leading to alterations in the basement membrane structure and damage to the filtration barrier, ultimately causing proteinuria . Understanding these pathophysiological mechanisms has significantly advanced our knowledge of MN etiology beyond simply classifying cases as idiopathic or secondary.

How prevalent is anti-PLA2R antibody in different forms of membranous nephropathy?

Research in Chinese populations has demonstrated that anti-PLA2R antibodies are detected in approximately 82% of patients with idiopathic MN using standard Western blot techniques. In contrast, these antibodies show remarkably low prevalence in secondary MN cases:

Type of MNNumber of PatientsAnti-PLA2R PositivePercentage
Idiopathic MN604981.7%
Lupus MN2015.0%
HBV-associated MN1616.3%
Tumor-associated MN10330.0%

This distinct distribution pattern highlights the potential utility of anti-PLA2R as a biomarker for differentiating idiopathic from secondary forms of MN . The higher percentage seen in tumor-associated MN (30%) may represent coincidental occurrence of idiopathic MN in patients with cancer rather than a true causal relationship.

What immunoglobulin subclasses predominate in anti-PLA2R autoantibodies?

Research consistently demonstrates that IgG4 is the predominant subclass of anti-PLA2R antibodies in idiopathic MN patients. This finding aligns with the observation that IgG4 is also the primary immunoglobulin subclass found in glomerular deposits of these patients . While IgG4 dominates the response, studies have observed weaker reactivity with other IgG subclasses in most cases. This subclass distribution is immunologically significant as it suggests specific mechanisms of immune dysregulation in idiopathic MN that differ from those typically observed in antibody responses to foreign antigens.

What methods are used to detect anti-PLA2R antibodies in research settings?

Several methodological approaches have been developed for anti-PLA2R detection:

  • Western Blotting with Human Glomerular Extract (HGE): This standard method uses native glomerular PLA2R as substrate. Anti-PLA2R antibodies are visualized as a 185-kD protein band. This technique serves as the reference standard in many studies .

  • Western Blotting with Recombinant PLA2R: Cell-expressed recombinant human PLA2R can also be used as substrate. The recombinant protein typically appears smaller than native PLA2R due to incomplete glycosylation in vitro .

  • Enhanced Sensitivity Assays: Modified Western blot protocols with increased sensitivity can detect very low titers of anti-PLA2R antibodies that might be missed by standard methods. In one study, this approach identified low titers in 10 of 11 idiopathic MN patients who were initially negative by standard assay .

  • Deglycosylation Testing: Treatment with peptide N-glycosidase F shifts PLA2R mobility to approximately 145 kD. Confirming that antibodies recognize both glycosylated and deglycosylated forms helps validate specificity .

How does glycosylation affect PLA2R antibody recognition?

PLA2R is heavily glycosylated, with the native protein appearing at approximately 185 kD on Western blot. Deglycosylation with peptide N-glycosidase F reduces its apparent molecular weight to approximately 145 kD. Research in both American and Chinese cohorts has demonstrated that anti-PLA2R antibodies from idiopathic MN patients can recognize both the glycosylated and deglycosylated forms of PLA2R . This finding is methodologically important for two reasons: (1) it confirms the specificity of the antibody-antigen interaction by demonstrating recognition of the protein backbone rather than solely glycan epitopes, and (2) it indicates that recombinant PLA2R with potentially different glycosylation patterns might still be useful for diagnostic assay development.

How do anti-PLA2R antibody levels correlate with disease activity in MN?

Research indicates a significant association between anti-PLA2R antibody titers and disease activity in idiopathic MN. In patients who achieved clinical remission after treatment, anti-PLA2R antibodies were negative in 17 of 21 patients (81%) using standard detection methods . When enhanced sensitivity techniques were applied, low titers were detected in 7 of these patients. Conversely, patients with persistent high titers despite clinical remission were prone to disease relapse, suggesting that antibody levels may predict future disease activity .

How can researchers interpret discrepancies between anti-PLA2R levels and clinical presentations?

When analyzing discrepancies between antibody levels and clinical parameters, researchers should consider:

  • Temporal Dynamics: Immunological activity (antibody production) may precede or resolve before clinical manifestations (proteinuria) change.

  • Threshold Effects: A certain level of immune complex formation may be required before clinical manifestations appear.

  • Structural Legacy: Established glomerular damage may continue to cause proteinuria even after immunological activity subsides.

  • Heterogeneity in Pathophysiology: Some patients might have additional or alternative disease mechanisms beyond PLA2R autoimmunity.

Research has shown no significant difference in glomerular IgG4 staining between patients with high versus low titers of anti-PLA2R antibodies, suggesting complex relationships between antibody levels, immune complex formation, and tissue damage .

What distinguishes primary from secondary anti-PLA2R-positive membranous nephropathy?

While anti-PLA2R antibodies are predominantly associated with idiopathic MN, they occasionally appear in cases classified as secondary MN based on clinical associations. Research findings suggest several possible explanations:

  • In lupus-associated and HBV-associated MN cases with anti-PLA2R antibodies, glomerular IgG4 deposits were observed, similar to idiopathic MN. These deposits were absent in anti-PLA2R-negative cases of secondary MN .

  • HBV-associated MN patients with anti-PLA2R antibodies showed poor response to antiviral therapy, whereas those without anti-PLA2R typically achieved complete remission with such treatment .

  • The coincidence of tumor-associated MN and anti-PLA2R positivity may represent the simultaneous occurrence of idiopathic MN and cancer rather than a causal relationship, particularly since more than 50% of idiopathic MN patients are between 40-60 years of age, which is also an age group with high cancer prevalence .

These observations suggest that some cases classified as "secondary" MN based on clinical associations may actually represent concurrent idiopathic MN with a coincidental disorder rather than true secondary disease.

What are the challenges in developing human monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic applications?

While our focus is on autoantibodies in disease pathogenesis, understanding the challenges in therapeutic monoclonal antibody development provides valuable context for researchers. Key obstacles include:

  • Source Material Limitations: Finding immune donors, risk of adventitious agents in human-derived blood products, and significant lot-to-lot variability in donor pools make consistent production difficult .

  • Humanization Complexities: Engineering mouse antibodies through "variable domain resurfacing" to eliminate potentially immunogenic sites is laborious and does not guarantee success .

  • Functional Translation: Many antibody fragments bind antigen but fail to mediate desired functions such as virus neutralization, making high-throughput screening challenging .

  • Alternative Approaches: Novel techniques like sorting circulating human plasmablasts have shown promise for isolating antibodies in certain contexts, but their applicability across different disease states remains unclear .

What additional target antigens might be involved in membranous nephropathy pathogenesis?

While PLA2R is a major target antigen in idiopathic MN, research suggests the autoimmune process may target multiple antigens in the initial or later disease phases. Recent studies have reported other potential target antigens in idiopathic MN, though these were not specifically observed in the anti-PLA2R antibody detection studies referenced . Several possibilities exist:

  • Cryptic Epitopes: Some epitopes may not be revealed under standard extraction and electrophoretic conditions used in current assays.

  • Secondary Autoantigens: Antibodies to intracellular enzymes might develop as a consequence of podocyte damage initiated by anti-PLA2R, potentially contributing to ongoing injury .

  • Technical Limitations: Current assay methods may not detect all relevant autoantibodies, particularly those with low titer or affinity.

Understanding the complete autoantigen profile in MN remains an important research frontier that may improve diagnosis and reveal new therapeutic targets.

How might anti-PLA2R antibody monitoring influence treatment decisions in clinical research?

The association between anti-PLA2R levels and disease activity suggests potential applications in treatment decision-making:

  • Predicting Spontaneous Remission: Patients with declining antibody titers might be candidates for conservative management.

  • Treatment Response Assessment: Early changes in antibody levels following immunosuppressive therapy might predict clinical response before changes in proteinuria become apparent.

  • Relapse Prediction: Persistent or recurrent antibody positivity despite clinical remission might identify patients at high risk for relapse who require longer or more intensive therapy .

  • Treatment Cessation Guidance: Complete disappearance of antibodies might help identify patients in whom immunosuppression can be safely reduced or withdrawn.

Clinical research protocols incorporating serial anti-PLA2R measurements could help establish evidence-based algorithms for using this biomarker in treatment decision-making.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.