PHYL1.1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of PHYLAntibody

PHYL1.1 antibody is a specialized immunological tool targeting the PHYL1.1 protein, a phytolongin isoform involved in secretory pathway dynamics in plant cells. PHYL1.1 is a non-SNARE protein localized primarily at the plasma membrane (PM) and Golgi apparatus, playing roles in intracellular trafficking . The antibody enables researchers to study PHYL1.1’s subcellular localization, interactions, and functional mechanisms in plant biology and phytoplasma infection studies .

Development and Validation of PHYLAntibody

The antibody is typically produced using recombinant PHYL1.1 protein fragments as immunogens, followed by affinity purification. Key validation steps include:

  • Western blotting: Detects PHYL1.1 at ~14 kDa in plant extracts .

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP): Confirms interactions with proteins like IMP (invasion-associated microtubule-severing protein) in infected Catharanthus roseus tissues .

  • Cross-linking assays: Validates transient interactions using bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3) to stabilize PHYL1.1–IMP complexes .

Table 1: Key Parameters for PHYL1.1 Antibody Usage

ApplicationDilutionMethodTarget OrganismReference
Western blotting1:5,000SDS-PAGE, PVDF transferC. roseus
Immunoprecipitation1:5,000Protein A/G agarosePhytoplasma-infected plants

Subcellular Localization Studies

PHYL1.1 antibody has been critical in mapping the protein’s trafficking route:

  • ER export: Blocking Sar1 GTPase mutants (GDP/GTP-locked) retains PHYL1.1 in the ER, confirmed via co-expression with Golgi markers (e.g., ST-RFP) .

  • Secretory pathway dependence: Overexpression of SNAREs (Sec22, Memb11) inhibits PHYL1.1 transport, highlighting its reliance on ER–Golgi machinery .

Table 2: Mutations Affecting PHYL1.1 Trafficking

MutationEffect on LocalizationExperimental Evidence
Y48FER retentionLoss of PM localization in Arabidopsis
Sec12 OEPartial ER trappingCo-localization with ER markers

Protein Interaction Analysis

  • IMP binding: PHYL1.1 antibody confirmed weak, transient interactions with IMP via co-IP and cross-linking assays, suggesting a role in phytoplasma virulence .

  • MADS-domain protein degradation: PHYL1.1 antibody detected reduced SEP3 and AP1 levels in co-expression studies, implicating PHYL1.1 in floral development disruptions .

Key Research Findings

  1. Role in Phytoplasma Pathogenesis: PHYL1.1 interacts with host proteins like GLN2 and APX4, potentially altering amino acid biosynthesis and oxidative stress responses during infection .

  2. Trafficking Motifs: The Y48F49 motif in PHYL1.1’s LD domain is essential for ER export, while its absence reroutes the protein to degradation pathways .

  3. Therapeutic Target Potential: PHYL1.1’s interaction with IMP offers insights for designing inhibitors against phytoplasma-induced diseases like phyllody .

Limitations and Future Directions

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
PHYL1.1 antibody; At4g10170 antibody; F28M11.90 antibody; Phytolongin Phyl1.1 antibody
Target Names
PHYL1.1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
PHYL1.1 Antibody targets a non-SNARE longin protein that plays a crucial role in membrane trafficking mechanisms.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT4G10170

STRING: 3702.AT4G10170.1

UniGene: At.33648

Protein Families
Synaptobrevin family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass type IV membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the molecular mechanism of PHYL1.1 Antibody in phytoplasma pathogenesis?

PHYL1.1 Antibody targets the immunodominant membrane protein (IMP) associated with phytoplasma pathogenesis, which plays a critical role in regulating interactions with host cellular structures such as F-actin . Structural studies have revealed that PHYL1 interacts with IMP through specific binding modes, facilitating the formation of complexes that disrupt normal cellular functions . This interaction has been shown to mediate ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of host proteins, leading to phenotypic changes such as leafy flower formation . Experimental approaches such as protein-protein docking and cross-linking assays have demonstrated the ability of PHYL1 to bind IMP at specific lysine residues, forming stable complexes detectable via SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis .

How can researchers optimize experimental protocols for studying PHYL1-mediated protein interactions?

To study PHYL1-mediated protein interactions effectively, researchers should employ a combination of biochemical and structural approaches. Recombinant protein purification followed by immunoprecipitation assays can be used to identify interacting partners of PHYL1 . Cross-linking agents such as bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3) are instrumental in stabilizing transient interactions, allowing for their visualization through SDS-PAGE and subsequent Western blotting . High-throughput sequencing techniques can further elucidate specificity profiles by analyzing binding modes across diverse ligand combinations . Additionally, computational modeling tools like HDOCK can predict interaction sites and binding affinities, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying PHYL1-mediated effects .

What are the challenges in designing antibodies with high specificity for PHYL1-related targets?

Designing antibodies with high specificity for PHYL1-related targets involves overcoming challenges such as epitope similarity and experimental artifacts in selection processes . High-throughput sequencing combined with biophysics-informed computational models offers a solution by enabling the identification of distinct binding modes associated with specific ligands . Phage display experiments can be employed to select antibody variants from libraries optimized for specificity profiles, ensuring discrimination between chemically similar epitopes . Validation experiments are crucial to assess the predictive power of computational models and refine antibody designs for enhanced target specificity .

What experimental techniques are recommended for validating PHYL1-antibody specificity?

Validation of PHYL1-antibody specificity requires a multifaceted approach combining biochemical assays, structural modeling, and computational analysis. Western blotting using anti-PHYL1 antibodies at optimized dilutions (e.g., 1:5000) can confirm target recognition under controlled conditions . Immunoprecipitation followed by LC-MS/MS provides detailed insights into antibody-target interactions at the molecular level . Computational models trained on experimental data from phage display campaigns can predict binding profiles and suggest modifications to improve specificity . Additionally, fluorescence microscopy can visualize cellular localization changes induced by antibody binding, offering direct evidence of functional specificity .

How do computational models enhance our understanding of PHYL1-antibody interactions?

Computational models play a pivotal role in deciphering complex interaction networks involving PHYL1-antibodies. By integrating data from phage display experiments and structural analyses, these models identify distinct binding modes associated with specific ligands or epitopes . Such models enable researchers to predict outcomes for untested ligand combinations and generate novel antibody sequences tailored to desired specificity profiles . Optimization algorithms minimize energy functions related to undesired interactions while enhancing affinity for target ligands, thereby refining antibody designs for experimental applications .

What are the implications of ubiquitination mediated by PHYL1 in host-pathogen interactions?

PHYL1-mediated ubiquitination significantly impacts host-pathogen interactions by promoting proteasomal degradation of key host proteins involved in cellular regulation . This process disrupts normal signaling pathways and leads to phenotypic alterations such as leafy flower formation observed in infected plants . Structural studies have revealed that PHYL1 interacts with RAD23 proteins to facilitate ubiquitination, highlighting its role as a pathogenic effector that manipulates host cellular machinery for its advantage . Understanding this mechanism provides valuable insights into developing strategies for mitigating phytoplasma-induced diseases.

Can structural modeling predict potential off-target effects of PHYL1 antibodies?

Structural modeling is an essential tool for predicting potential off-target effects of PHYL1 antibodies. By analyzing binding modes at atomic resolution, researchers can identify epitopes shared between target proteins and non-target molecules that may lead to cross-reactivity . Computational approaches such as docking simulations provide confidence scores that quantify binding affinity and specificity, enabling researchers to assess risks associated with off-target interactions before conducting experiments . These predictions help refine antibody designs to minimize unintended effects while maximizing therapeutic or diagnostic efficacy.

How does high-throughput sequencing contribute to antibody development against PHYL1?

High-throughput sequencing revolutionizes antibody development against PHYL1 by providing extensive coverage of library compositions used in selection experiments . This technique enables researchers to identify variants that bind specifically to target ligands while excluding undesired ones based on sequence data analysis . Combined with computational modeling, high-throughput sequencing facilitates the generation of customized antibodies with predefined specificity profiles suitable for diverse research applications involving PHYL1-related targets .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.