Phospho-ATR (Ser428) Antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody developed against a KLH-conjugated peptide corresponding to human ATR phosphorylated at Ser428 . Key attributes include:
ATR (Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase) is a serine/threonine kinase central to DNA damage repair and replication stress responses. Phosphorylation at Ser428 occurs during activation, enabling ATR to:
Coordinate repair pathways by phosphorylated substrates like BRCA1, CHEK1, and p53 .
Stabilize replication forks and mediate histone H2A.X phosphorylation .
Serve as a biomarker for DNA damage-induced checkpoint signaling .
Inactivation of ATR or defective phosphorylation contributes to genomic instability disorders like Seckel syndrome .
Western Blot Analysis: Detects phosphorylated ATR in UV- or IR-treated HeLa, COS1, and other cell lines (1:200 dilution) .
Functional Studies: Used to dissect ATR’s role in DNA repair, replication fork stability, and apoptosis .
Diagnostic Potential: Detects aberrant ATR activation in cancer or tissues with defective DNA repair .
Specificity Validation:
The antibody is integral to methods for profiling ATR activation in diseases like cancer. Patent US7906297B2 highlights its utility in:
Detecting phosphorylated ATR (Ser428) in biological samples (e.g., serum, tumor biopsies) .
Screening ATR inhibitors by monitoring phosphorylation changes .
ATR (Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein) is a ~300 kDa serine/threonine kinase that plays a critical role in DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoint activation. ATR is activated in response to various forms of DNA damage, particularly single-stranded DNA breaks that can arise from replication stress or UV radiation. Phosphorylation at Serine 428 represents one of the key post-translational modifications associated with ATR activation. This phosphorylation event is considered a biomarker for active ATR signaling in the DNA damage response pathway, making antibodies against this phospho-site valuable tools for investigating cellular responses to genotoxic stress .
Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibodies are typically rabbit polyclonal antibodies that specifically recognize ATR when phosphorylated at Serine 428. These antibodies have the following general specifications:
The antibodies are typically generated using synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to the region surrounding Serine 428 of human ATR protein .
These antibodies are commonly validated through multiple approaches:
Western blotting using positive controls such as UV-irradiated cell lysates (HeLa, COS1), which triggers ATR phosphorylation
Peptide competition assays comparing binding with phospho-peptides versus non-phospho peptides
Cross-reactivity testing across multiple species
Specificity assessment in various cell types with known ATR expression levels
Validation typically demonstrates an approximately 260-300 kDa band corresponding to phosphorylated ATR that can be competed away using the specific phosphopeptide but not with non-phosphorylated peptide .
Sample Preparation:
Collect cells at exponential growth phase
If studying DNA damage response, treat cells with DNA damaging agents (e.g., UV radiation, hydroxyurea)
Wash cells with cold PBS
Lyse cells in a buffer containing phosphatase inhibitors to preserve phosphorylation status
Centrifuge lysate and collect supernatant
Quantify protein concentration
Western Blotting Protocol:
Load 10-20 μg of lysate per lane on 6-8% SDS-PAGE gels (optimized for high molecular weight proteins)
Transfer proteins to PVDF membrane (extended transfer time recommended for large proteins)
Block membrane with 5% BSA in TBST (not milk, as it contains phosphatases)
Incubate with Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibody at 1:1000 dilution overnight at 4°C
Wash membrane 3-5 times with TBST
Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence detection system
Critical Considerations:
Due to the high molecular weight of ATR (300 kDa), use low percentage gels and extend transfer time
Always include phosphatase inhibitors throughout sample preparation
Consider using positive controls (UV-irradiated lysates) and negative controls
For antibodies supporting IHC applications , the following optimization steps are recommended:
Tissue Preparation:
Use freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections
Consider testing both heat-induced and enzymatic antigen retrieval methods
Staining Protocol:
Deparaffinize and rehydrate sections
Perform antigen retrieval (citrate buffer pH 6.0 or EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
Block endogenous peroxidase with 3% H₂O₂
Apply protein block (5% normal goat serum)
Incubate with primary antibody at 1:100-1:200 dilution (optimize for your tissue)
Use appropriate detection system (HRP-polymer or biotin-streptavidin)
Counterstain, dehydrate, and mount
Controls and Validation:
Include positive control tissues with known ATR activation
Use phosphatase-treated serial sections as negative controls
Consider dual staining with total ATR antibody to confirm specificity
Several treatments can reliably induce ATR phosphorylation at Ser428:
UV irradiation (10-50 J/m²) with 1-2 hour recovery time
Hydroxyurea (2-5 mM for 4-24 hours)
Aphidicolin (1-5 μg/ml for 12-24 hours)
Camptothecin (1-5 μM for 2-4 hours)
Cisplatin (10-50 μM for 12-24 hours)
UV irradiation is often considered the gold standard for ATR activation and is commonly used in validation studies . The most effective treatment may vary by cell type, so optimization is recommended when establishing a new experimental system.
Several technical factors can affect Phospho-ATR (Ser428) detection:
Protein Degradation: ATR is a large protein susceptible to degradation. Ensure complete protease inhibitor cocktails are used during sample preparation.
Loss of Phosphorylation: Phosphorylation can be lost during sample preparation. Always include phosphatase inhibitors (sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate, β-glycerophosphate) in lysis buffers.
Insufficient Activation: The stimulus may not have effectively activated ATR. Verify activation using known stimuli like UV irradiation as positive controls.
Inefficient Transfer: Large proteins like ATR (300 kDa) transfer inefficiently. Use lower percentage gels (6-8%), extend transfer time, or consider wet transfer methods.
Antibody Specificity Issues: Confirm the antibody recognizes your species of interest. Some Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibodies have limited cross-reactivity .
Signal Detection Limitations: ATR may be expressed at low levels. Consider using enhanced chemiluminescence substrates or increase protein loading.
To distinguish between specific and non-specific signals:
Molecular Weight Verification: Phospho-ATR should appear at approximately 300 kDa. Bands at other molecular weights may represent non-specific binding or degradation products.
Peptide Competition: Perform peptide competition assays using the phospho-peptide immunogen. The specific band should disappear when the antibody is pre-incubated with the phosphopeptide but remain with the non-phosphopeptide .
Validation with Multiple Antibodies: Confirm results using different Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibody clones or antibodies against other ATR phosphorylation sites.
Knockdown/Knockout Controls: Use ATR siRNA knockdown or CRISPR knockout cells as negative controls.
Activation/Inhibition Treatments: The signal should increase with ATR-activating treatments (UV, replication stress) and decrease with ATR kinase inhibitors.
To maintain optimal antibody performance:
Storage Temperature: Store antibodies at 2-8°C for short-term (1 year) or aliquot and store at -20°C for long-term storage .
Avoid Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles can degrade antibodies. Prepare small aliquots before freezing.
Working Dilution Storage: Diluted antibody can typically be stored at 4°C for up to one week. For longer storage, add preservatives like sodium azide (0.05%).
Contamination Prevention: Use sterile technique when handling antibodies to prevent microbial contamination.
Centrifugation Before Use: Briefly centrifuge antibody vials before opening to collect liquid at the bottom and avoid material in the cap.
Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibodies can be employed in several advanced applications:
Kinetics of ATR Activation: Monitor the temporal dynamics of ATR phosphorylation following DNA damage by performing time-course experiments with various genotoxic agents.
Pathway Analysis: Use Phospho-ATR (Ser428) antibodies in combination with antibodies against downstream targets (Chk1, p53, H2AX) to characterize the complete signaling cascade.
Drug Response Studies: Evaluate how novel chemotherapeutic compounds affect ATR phosphorylation status as a biomarker of DNA damage response activation.
Synthetic Lethality Screening: Identify genes or compounds that, when combined with ATR inhibition, produce synergistic cell death in cancer cells.
Cell Cycle Analysis: Combine with cell cycle markers to determine when during the cell cycle ATR becomes phosphorylated in response to specific stressors.
Research has demonstrated that ATR phosphorylation is crucial for mediating responses to replication stress and maintaining genomic stability, making it a valuable biomarker for research in cancer biology and DNA damage response mechanisms .
For robust experimental design, incorporate these controls:
For Western Blotting:
Negative Control: ATR inhibitor-treated cells or ATR knockdown/knockout cells
Phosphatase Control: Lysate treated with lambda phosphatase to demonstrate phospho-specificity
Loading Control: Antibody against housekeeping protein or total ATR
For Immunohistochemistry:
Positive Control Tissue: Tissues with known ATR activation (e.g., certain tumors)
Negative Control Staining: Primary antibody omission or isotype control
Phosphatase-Treated Control: Serial section treated with phosphatase
Antibody Validation Control: Peptide competition
For Drug Studies:
Vehicle Control: Cells treated with solvent alone
Time Course Control: Multiple time points to capture activation kinetics
Dose Response Control: Multiple concentrations to determine sensitivity
Pathway Validation: Parallel assessment of known ATR substrates (e.g., phospho-Chk1)
Advanced multiplexed applications include:
Multi-Color Immunofluorescence:
Co-stain for Phospho-ATR (Ser428) with other DDR markers (γH2AX, 53BP1, Rad51)
Use spectrally distinct fluorophores for simultaneous detection
Perform quantitative image analysis to correlate different markers at the single-cell level
Flow Cytometry Application:
Combine with cell cycle markers (propidium iodide, DAPI) and other DDR proteins
Analyze correlations between ATR activation and cell cycle phase
Evaluate heterogeneity in cellular responses to DNA damage
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Detect interactions between phosphorylated ATR and partner proteins
Visualize active ATR complexes at sites of DNA damage
Quantify interactions in different subcellular compartments
Mass Cytometry (CyTOF):
Label ATR with metal-conjugated antibodies
Perform high-dimensional analysis with 30+ DDR markers simultaneously
Create comprehensive profiles of DDR pathway activation
Sequential Immunoblotting:
Strip and reprobe membranes to detect multiple phospho-proteins
Create comprehensive signaling profiles from limited samples
Establish activation hierarchies within signaling cascades
For accurate quantification:
Capture Optimal Images: Ensure signals are within the linear dynamic range of your detection system, avoiding saturation.
Normalization Approaches:
Normalize to total ATR protein (ideal but requires stripping and reprobing)
Normalize to loading controls (GAPDH, β-actin), though these may not be ideal due to the size difference
Consider normalizing to total protein using stain-free gels or Ponceau S staining
Quantification Method:
Use densitometry software (ImageJ, Image Lab, etc.)
Define consistent region of interest for all bands
Subtract background from an adjacent area
Calculate relative intensity compared to control samples
Statistical Analysis:
Perform experiments in biological triplicates minimum
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Present data as fold change relative to control conditions
Presentation Format:
Show representative blots with molecular weight markers
Include quantification graphs with error bars
Clearly state normalization method in figure legends
Several considerations may affect data interpretation:
Temporal Dynamics: ATR phosphorylation is dynamic and time-dependent. A negative result at a single time point may miss the activation window.
Cell Type Variations: Different cell types show varying baseline levels and induction kinetics of ATR phosphorylation. Direct comparisons between cell types should be made cautiously.
Protein Expression Levels: Overexpression systems may show different phosphorylation patterns than endogenous proteins. Confirm key findings in systems with physiological expression levels.
Indirect Activation: Some stimuli may activate ATR indirectly through other pathways. Use pathway inhibitors to confirm the direct relationship between stimulus and ATR phosphorylation.
Partial Activation: Phosphorylation at Ser428 represents only one aspect of ATR activation. Consider examining multiple phosphorylation sites and downstream targets for a complete picture.
Threshold Effects: ATR signaling may exhibit threshold effects where small changes in phosphorylation translate to significant biological outcomes. Quantitative analysis is essential.
Complex Formation: ATR functions in complexes with other proteins (e.g., ATRIP). Phosphorylation may not directly correlate with functional activity without considering complex formation.
To develop comprehensive DDR profiles:
Multi-marker Analysis: Combine Phospho-ATR (Ser428) data with other DDR markers:
Upstream sensors (RPA, ATRIP, TOPBP1)
Downstream effectors (Phospho-Chk1, Phospho-p53)
Parallel pathways (ATM-Chk2 axis)
DNA repair markers (γH2AX, 53BP1, Rad51)
Pathway Visualization Tools:
Use pathway mapping software (Ingenuity, Cytoscape) to visualize relationships
Create heat maps showing activation patterns across conditions
Apply principal component analysis to identify key determinants of response
Temporal Integration:
Develop timeline models of DDR activation
Identify sequential activation patterns
Determine rate-limiting steps in response pathways
Functional Correlation:
Correlate phosphorylation patterns with functional outcomes (cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, DNA repair efficiency)
Establish predictive biomarker signatures for specific outcomes
Identify threshold levels associated with cellular decision points
Single-Cell Approaches:
Recognize that population averages may mask important cellular heterogeneity
Implement single-cell analyses where possible to capture the full spectrum of responses
Identify distinct cellular subpopulations with unique DDR pathway configurations
By integrating these approaches, researchers can move beyond single-marker analysis to develop systems-level understanding of DNA damage response mechanisms.