Immunogen Region: 1036–1085 amino acids of human EGFR
Epitope: Synthesized peptide around phosphorylation site Ser1071
Specificity Validation:
Cross-Reactivity: No observed cross-reactivity with non-phosphorylated EGFR isoforms
EGFR phosphorylation at Ser1071 is implicated in metabolic reprogramming in cancers. Key studies include:
Glycolytic Regulation: Phospho-EGFR (Ser1071) activates PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, stabilizing glucose transporters (e.g., GLUT1) and enhancing aerobic glycolysis in lung adenocarcinoma .
Enzyme Modulation: Direct phosphorylation of hexokinase (HK1) and pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) by EGFR increases glycolysis in breast cancer cells .
Elevated lactate production from EGFR-driven glycolysis inhibits cytotoxic T-cell activity, facilitating tumor immune escape .
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Clonality | Polyclonal (high affinity for phospho-epitope) |
| Purification | Affinity chromatography (sequential phospho/non-phospho columns) |
| Isotype | IgG |
EGFR phosphorylation at Ser1071 is a critical regulatory event:
Post-Translational Modifications: Triggers receptor dimerization, autophosphorylation, and downstream signaling (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, PI3K-AKT) .
Therapeutic Relevance: Dysregulated Ser1071 phosphorylation is observed in glioblastoma and lung cancers, correlating with poor prognosis .
EGFR Ser1071 phosphorylation represents a key post-translational modification in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. This specific phosphorylation occurs within a serine/threonine-rich region of the receptor that has been implicated in receptor trafficking and internalization. Research indicates that phosphorylation at Ser1071 accumulates more slowly after EGF stimulation compared to other phosphorylation sites involved in immediate signal transduction, suggesting its role in receptor regulation rather than initial signal propagation . The temporal dynamics of Ser1071 phosphorylation correlate with receptor internalization processes, indicating its potential involvement in the spatial-temporal control of EGFR trafficking and downstream signaling regulation.
Selection should be based on your specific research question and experimental design:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:1000 | Provides information on molecular weight and semi-quantitative data | Requires cell lysis, losing spatial information |
| ELISA | 1:5000 | Quantitative, high-throughput | No spatial resolution or visual confirmation |
| Cell-Based ELISA | According to kit instructions | Maintains cellular context, no lysate preparation needed | Limited to in vitro cultured cells |
For detecting physiological changes in Ser1071 phosphorylation, Western blotting is recommended due to its ability to distinguish specific bands at the expected molecular weight (150-160 kDa) . For quantitative high-throughput analysis, particularly when evaluating inhibitor effects or stimulation conditions across multiple samples, ELISA-based methods provide better standardization .
Most Phospho-EGFR (Ser1071) antibodies require careful storage to maintain specificity and activity:
Store at -20°C for long-term storage (up to one year)
For frequent use, store at 4°C for up to one month
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can degrade antibody performance
Most commercial antibodies are supplied in buffers containing glycerol (typically 50%), which prevents freezing at -20°C
Standard buffer composition includes phosphate buffered saline (without Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺), pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol
Upon receipt of a new antibody, it is advisable to aliquot the stock solution to minimize freeze-thaw cycles if the antibody will be used for multiple experiments over time.
Validation should include multiple complementary approaches:
Positive and negative controls:
Phosphatase treatment control:
Treat one sample with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphorylation
Compare with untreated sample - signal should disappear in phosphatase-treated sample
Peptide competition assay:
Cross-reactivity testing:
ELISA competition assays have demonstrated that recombinant extracellular domains of EGFR, but not related receptors (ErbB2, ErbB3, or ErbB4), compete for binding with Phospho-EGFR antibodies, confirming specificity .
Multiple normalization approaches are recommended for robust quantitative analysis:
When analyzing temporal dynamics of phosphorylation, normalization to total EGFR is particularly important as receptor levels may change due to degradation following EGF stimulation .
The p38 MAPK pathway plays a critical role in stress-induced EGFR internalization and recycling, with evidence suggesting direct involvement in Ser1071 phosphorylation:
Research has identified that EGF-induced phosphorylation at sites near Ser1071 (specifically Ser1039 and Thr1041) is blocked by SB-202190, a selective p38 inhibitor
This suggests coordinated phosphorylation involving Ser1071 and nearby residues in controlling EGFR trafficking
Experimental approach to investigate this relationship:
Pharmacological inhibition:
Pretreat cells with SB-202190 (p38 inhibitor) at 1-10 μM for 30-60 minutes
Stimulate with EGF (25 ng/mL)
Analyze Ser1071 phosphorylation by Western blot or ELISA
Genetic manipulation:
Use siRNA knockdown of p38α/β MAPK
Alternatively, express dominant-negative p38 constructs
Compare Ser1071 phosphorylation in control vs. p38-depleted cells
Quantitative analysis:
EGFR phosphorylation occurs with distinct temporal patterns at different sites:
| Phosphorylation Site | Peak Time After EGF | Associated Function |
|---|---|---|
| Tyr1110, Tyr1172, Tyr1197 | 1 minute | Immediate signal transduction |
| Tyr998 | >15 minutes | Receptor internalization |
| Ser991/Thr993 | 10 minutes | Receptor trafficking |
| Ser1071 | 10-15 minutes | Receptor trafficking/recycling |
Research using temporal profiling revealed that Ser1071 phosphorylation accumulates more slowly than tyrosine sites involved in immediate signaling events, suggesting its role in receptor downregulation rather than initial signal propagation .
To investigate these dynamics:
Stimulate cells with EGF (25 ng/mL)
Collect samples at multiple timepoints (0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes)
Analyze using either:
Western blotting with phospho-specific antibodies
Selected Reaction Monitoring mass spectrometry
Phospho-EGFR ELISAs with temporal sampling
Cell-Based ELISA systems offer advantages for studying EGFR phosphorylation in intact cells. Optimization strategies include:
Cell density optimization:
Determine optimal seeding density (typically >5000 cells per well)
Ensure even distribution across the plate
Allow sufficient time for adherence before treatments
Treatment conditions:
Serum-starve cells (0.1-0.5% serum) for 12-24 hours before stimulation
For EGF stimulation, use 10-50 ng/mL for 5-15 minutes
For inhibitor studies, pretreat cells before EGF addition
Multiple normalization methods implementation:
Validation across multiple cell lines:
Compare responses in cells with different EGFR expression levels
Include positive control cell lines (e.g., A431 with high EGFR expression)
The qualitative nature of Cell-Based ELISAs makes multiple normalization approaches particularly important for reliable data interpretation .
Phospho-EGFR (Ser1071) antibodies provide valuable tools for investigating aberrant EGFR signaling in cancer:
Mechanisms of EGFR-targeted therapy resistance:
Receptor trafficking alterations in cancer:
Assess whether altered Ser1071 phosphorylation correlates with abnormal receptor recycling
Compare primary vs. metastatic tumor samples for differences in phosphorylation patterns
Combination with other biomarkers:
Multiplex analysis with other EGFR phosphorylation sites
Correlate with downstream signaling markers (ERK, AKT, STAT phosphorylation)
Investigate relationship with p38 MAPK activity in tumor samples
Over-expression of EGFR has been reported in tumors of breast, lung, colon, cervix, ovary, esophagus and endometrium, making phosphorylation analysis relevant across multiple cancer types .
The serine/threonine-rich region of EGFR containing Ser1071 is implicated in receptor internalization and trafficking:
Evidence for involvement in endocytosis:
Experimental approaches to study Ser1071 in trafficking:
a) Site-directed mutagenesis:
Generate S1071A (phospho-deficient) EGFR mutants
Express in EGFR-null cells
Compare internalization rates with wild-type EGFR
b) Internalization assays:
Surface biotinylation of EGFR followed by internalization tracking
Flow cytometry-based endocytosis assays using fluorescently-labeled EGF
Confocal microscopy to visualize receptor trafficking
c) Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Investigate whether Ser1071 phosphorylation affects binding to endocytic adaptor proteins
Compare wild-type and S1071A mutant EGFR
Cross-talk with other phosphorylation sites:
EGFR phosphorylation can be induced by diverse stimuli beyond EGF, with potentially distinct patterns:
Growth factor comparisons:
Compare EGF with other EGFR ligands (TGF-α, amphiregulin, betacellulin, epiregulin, HB-EGF)
Analyze whether different ligands induce distinct patterns of Ser1071 phosphorylation
Stress and cytokine stimulation:
Transactivation pathways:
G-protein coupled receptor agonists can transactivate EGFR
Compare Ser1071 phosphorylation following GPCR activation vs. direct EGF stimulation
Serum-starve cells for 16-24 hours
Treat with various stimuli:
EGF (25 ng/mL)
Other EGFR ligands (25-50 ng/mL)
TNF-α (10-50 ng/mL)
UV irradiation (10-50 J/m²)
GPCR agonists (e.g., angiotensin II, 100 nM)
Collect samples at multiple timepoints (5-60 minutes)
Analyze Ser1071 phosphorylation by Western blot or ELISA
Compare temporal dynamics and magnitude of phosphorylation
Several cutting-edge technologies are advancing our ability to study phosphorylation dynamics:
Proximity ligation assays (PLA):
FRET-based biosensors:
Genetically encoded sensors can monitor EGFR phosphorylation in real-time
Enables visualization of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation dynamics in living cells
Could be developed for Ser1071-specific detection
Mass spectrometry advances:
Single-cell phosphoproteomics:
Emerging technology to analyze phosphorylation events at single-cell resolution
Could reveal heterogeneity in EGFR phosphorylation responses within populations
EGFR function is regulated by complex, interconnected post-translational modifications:
Cross-talk with tyrosine phosphorylation:
Investigate whether Ser1071 phosphorylation affects nearby tyrosine phosphorylation sites
Determine if tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) indirectly affect Ser1071 phosphorylation
Integration with ubiquitination:
Examine how Ser1071 phosphorylation relates to receptor ubiquitination
Determine whether it affects binding of E3 ubiquitin ligases (e.g., Cbl)
Interplay with glycosylation:
Study how receptor glycosylation affects accessibility of Ser1071 for phosphorylation
Determine if glycosylation patterns affect kinase recognition of this site
Multi-site phosphorylation patterns:
Apply phosphoproteomics to map the temporal sequence of phosphorylation events
Identify potential "phosphorylation barcodes" that direct specific receptor fates