Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied at 1.0 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg2+ and Ca2+), pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol.
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship the products within 1-3 business days after receiving your order. Delivery time may vary depending on the method of purchase or location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery times.
Synonyms
Avian erythroblastic leukemia viral (v erb b) oncogene homolog antibody; Cell growth inhibiting protein 40 antibody; Cell proliferation inducing protein 61 antibody; EGF R antibody; EGFR antibody; EGFR_HUMAN antibody; Epidermal growth factor receptor (avian erythroblastic leukemia viral (v erb b) oncogene homolog) antibody; Epidermal growth factor receptor (erythroblastic leukemia viral (v erb b) oncogene homolog avian) antibody; Epidermal growth factor receptor antibody; erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 1 antibody; ERBB antibody; ERBB1 antibody; Errp antibody; HER1 antibody; mENA antibody; NISBD2 antibody; Oncogen ERBB antibody; PIG61 antibody; Proto-oncogene c-ErbB-1 antibody; Receptor tyrosine protein kinase ErbB 1 antibody; Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB-1 antibody; SA7 antibody; Species antigen 7 antibody; Urogastrone antibody; v-erb-b Avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogen homolog antibody; wa2 antibody; Wa5 antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that plays a crucial role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. It binds to a variety of ligands belonging to the EGF family, including EGF, TGFA/TGF-alpha, AREG, epigen/EPGN, BTC/betacellulin, epiregulin/EREG and HBEGF/heparin-binding EGF. Upon ligand binding, EGFR undergoes homo- and/or heterodimerization and autophosphorylation on key cytoplasmic residues. This triggers the recruitment of adapter proteins like GRB2, which in turn activates complex downstream signaling cascades. EGFR activates at least four major downstream signaling pathways: RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, PI3 kinase-AKT, PLCgamma-PKC, and STATs modules. It may also activate the NF-kappa-B signaling pathway. Moreover, EGFR directly phosphorylates other proteins like RGS16, activating its GTPase activity and potentially coupling EGFR signaling to G protein-coupled receptor signaling. EGFR also phosphorylates MUC1, enhancing its interaction with SRC and CTNNB1/beta-catenin. EGFR positively regulates cell migration by interacting with CCDC88A/GIV, which retains EGFR at the cell membrane following ligand stimulation, promoting EGFR signaling and triggering cell migration. EGFR plays a vital role in enhancing learning and memory performance. Isoform 2 of EGFR may act as an antagonist of EGF action. Furthermore, EGFR serves as a receptor for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hepatocytes, facilitating HCV entry. EGFR mediates HCV entry by promoting the formation of CD81-CLDN1 receptor complexes that are essential for HCV entry and by enhancing membrane fusion of cells expressing HCV envelope glycoproteins.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Amphiregulin contained in non-small-cell lung carcinoma-derived exosomes induces osteoclast differentiation through the activation of EGFR pathway. PMID: 28600504
  2. Combine vorinostat with an EGFRTKI to reverse EGFRTKI resistance in NSCLC. PMID: 30365122
  3. The feasibility of using the radiocobalt labeled antiEGFR affibody conjugate ZEGFR:2377 as an imaging agent. PMID: 30320363
  4. In comparison of all transfection complexes, 454 lipopolyplexes modified with the bidentate PEG-GE11 agent show the best, EGFR-dependent uptake as well as luciferase and NIS gene expression into PMID: 28877405
  5. EGFR amplification was higher in the OSCC group than in the control group (P=0.018) and was associated with advanced clinical stage (P=0.013), regardless of age. Patients with EGFR overexpression had worse survival rates, as did patients who had T3-T4 tumors and positive margins. EGFR overexpression has a negative impact on disease progression. PMID: 29395668
  6. Clonal analysis shows that the dominant JAK2 V617F-positive clone in Polycythemia Vera harbors EGFR C329R substitution, thus this mutation may contribute to clonal expansion. PMID: 28550306
  7. Baseline Circulating tumor cell count could be a predictive biomarker for EGFR-mutated and ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer , which allows for better guidance and monitoring of patients over the course of molecular targeted therapies. PMID: 29582563
  8. High EGFR expression is associated with cystic fibrosis. PMID: 29351448
  9. These results suggest a mechanism for EGFR inhibition to suppress respiratory syncytial virus by activation of endogenous epithelial antiviral defenses PMID: 29411775
  10. This study detected the emergence of T790M mutation within the EGFR cDNA in a subset of erlotinib resistant PC9 cell models through Sanger sequencing and droplet digital PCR-based methods, demonstrating that T790M mutation can emerge via de novo events following treatment with erlotinib. PMID: 29909007
  11. The present study demonstrated that miR145 regulates the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. PMID: 30226581
  12. Among NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI, those with T790M mutations were found to frequently also show 19 dels, compared to T790M-negative patients. In addition, T790M-positive patients had a longer PFS. Therefore, screening these patients for T790M mutations may help in improving survival. PMID: 30150444
  13. High EGFR expression is associated with Breast Carcinoma. PMID: 30139236
  14. Results showed that CAV-1 could promote anchorage-independent growth and anoikis resistance in detached SGC-7901 cells, which was associated with the activation of Src-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor-integrin beta signaling as well as the phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signaling pathways PMID: 30088837
  15. Our results indicate that FOXK2 inhibits the malignant phenotype of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma and acts as a tumor suppressor possibly through the inhibition of EGFR. PMID: 29368368
  16. EGFR mutation status in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients altered significantly PMID: 30454543
  17. Different Signaling Pathways in Regulating PD-L1 Expression in EGFR Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma PMID: 30454551
  18. Internal tandem duplication of kinase domain delineates a genetic subgroup of congenital mesoblastic nephroma transcending histological subtypes PMID: 29915264
  19. The expression level of EGFR increased along with higher stages and pathologic grades of BTCC, and the obviously increased expression of HER-2 was statistically associated with clinical stages and tumor recurrence. In addition, the expression level of HER-2 increased along with the higher clinical stage of BTCC. EGFR expression and HER-2 levels were positively associated in BTCC samples. PMID: 30296252
  20. Results show that GGA2 interacts with EGFR cytoplasmic domain to stabilize its expression and reducing its lysosomal degradation. PMID: 29358589
  21. Combination therapy of apatinib with icotinib for primary acquired resistance to icotinib may be an option for patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations, but physicians must also be aware of the side effects caused by such therapy. PMID: 29575765
  22. Herein we report a rare case presenting as multiple lung adenocarcinomas with four different EGFR gene mutations detected in three lung tumors. PMID: 29577613
  23. Study supports the involvement of EGFR, HER2 and HER3 in BCC aggressiveness of and in tumor differentiating towards different histological subtypes. PMID: 30173251
  24. The ratio of sFlt-1/sEGFR could be used as a novel candidate biochemical marker in monitoring the severity of preterm preeclampsia. sEndoglin and sEGFR may be involved in the pathogenesis of small for gestational age in preterm preelampsia. PMID: 30177039
  25. Study confirmed prognostic effect of EGFR and VEGFR2 for recurrent disease and survival rates in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. PMID: 30066848
  26. The data indicate that diagnostic or therapeutic chest radiation may predispose patients with decreased stromal PTEN expression to secondary breast cancer, and that prophylactic EGFR inhibition may reduce this risk. PMID: 30018330
  27. Suggest a unique regulatory feature of PHLDA1 to inhibit the ErbB receptor oligomerization process and thereby control the activity of receptor signaling network. PMID: 29233889
  28. Study observed the occurrence of not only EGFR C797S mutation but also L792F/Y/H in three NSCLC clinical subjects with acquired resistance to osimertinib treatment PMID: 28093244
  29. Data show that the expression level of epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (EGFL7) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in invasive growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas (GHPA) was much higher than that of non-invasive GHPA. PMID: 29951953
  30. Concurrent mutations, in genes such as CDKN2B or RB1, were associated with worse clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR active mutations. PMID: 29343775
  31. ER-alpha36/EGFR signaling loop promotes growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells PMID: 29481815
  32. High EGFR expression is associated with colorectal cancer. PMID: 30106444
  33. High EGFR expression is associated with gefitinib resistance in lung cancer. PMID: 30106446
  34. High EGFR expression is associated with tumor-node-metastasis in nonsmall cell lung cancer. PMID: 30106450
  35. Data suggest that Thr264 in TRPV3 is key ERK1 phosphorylation site mediating EGFR-induced sensitization of TRPV3 to stimulate signaling pathways involved in regulating skin homeostasis. (TRPV3 = transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member-3; ERK1 = extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor) PMID: 29084846
  36. The EGFR mutation frequency in Middle East and African patients is higher than that shown in white populations but still lower than the frequency reported in Asian populations. PMID: 30217176
  37. EGFR-containing exosomes derived from cancer cells could favour the development of a liver-like microenvironment promoting liver-specific metastasis. PMID: 28393839
  38. The results reveal that the EGF-STAT3 signaling pathway promotes and maintains colorectal cancer (CRC)stemness. In addition, a crosstalk between STAT3 and Wnt activates the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway, which is also responsible for cancer stemness. Thus, STAT3 is a putative therapeutic target for CRC treatment. PMID: 30068339
  39. This result indicated that T790M mutation is not only associated with EGFR-TKI resistance but also may play a functional role in the malignant progression of lung adenocarcinoma. PMID: 29887244
  40. LOX regulates EGFR cell surface retention to drive tumour progression. PMID: 28416796
  41. In a Han Chinese population, EGFR gene polymorphisms, rs730437 and rs1468727 and haplotype A-C-C were shown to be possible protective factors for the development of Alzheimer's Disease. PMID: 30026459
  42. EGFR proteins at different cellular locations in lung adenocarcinoma might influence the biology of cancer cells and are an independent indicator of more favorable prognosis and treatment response. PMID: 29950164
  43. Here we report the crystal structure of EGFR T790M/C797S/V948R in complex with EAI045, a new type of EGFR TKI that binds to EGFR reversibly and not relying on Cys 797. PMID: 29802850
  44. Overexpression of miR-452-3p promoted cell proliferation and mobility and suppressed apoptosis. MiR-452-3p enhanced EGFR and phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) expression but inhibited p21 expression level. MiR-452-3p promoted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)cell proliferation and mobility by directly targeting the CPEB3/EGFR axis PMID: 29332449
  45. This study shows that the D2A sequence of the UPAR induces cell growth through alphaVbeta3 integrin and EGFR. PMID: 29184982
  46. BRAF and EGFR inhibitors are able to synergize to increase cytotoxic effects and decrease stem cell capacities in BRAF(V600E)-mutant colorectal cancer cells PMID: 29534162
  47. This study confirms a direct correlation between MSI1 and EGFR and may support the important role of MSI1 in activation of EGFR through NOTCH/WNT pathways in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PMID: 30202417
  48. Three lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy can prolong survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Elderly patients can benefit from TKI therapy. EGFR mutation-positive patients can benefit from second-line or third-line TKI therapy. PMID: 29266865
  49. EGFR 19Del and L858R mutations are good biomarkers for predicting the clinical response of EGFR-TKIs. 19Del mutations may have a better clinical outcome. PMID: 29222872
  50. HMGA2-EGFR constitutively induced a higher level of phosphorylated STAT5B than EGFRvIII. PMID: 29193056
Database Links

HGNC: 3236

OMIM: 131550

KEGG: hsa:1956

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000275493

UniGene: Hs.488293

Involvement In Disease
Lung cancer (LNCR); Inflammatory skin and bowel disease, neonatal, 2 (NISBD2)
Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, Tyr protein kinase family, EGF receptor subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Golgi apparatus membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Nucleus membrane; Single-pass type I membrane protein. Endosome. Endosome membrane. Nucleus.; [Isoform 2]: Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Ubiquitously expressed. Isoform 2 is also expressed in ovarian cancers.

Q&A

What is Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) and what is its significance in cellular signaling?

Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) refers to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that has been phosphorylated at the threonine 693 position. EGFR is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that plays crucial roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Phosphorylation at specific residues, including Thr693, regulates EGFR activity and downstream signaling pathways. The significance of Thr693 phosphorylation lies in its role as a potential biomarker for disease progression and treatment response, particularly in certain cancer types. Recent research has demonstrated that phosphorylation at this site may serve as a predictor of tumor recurrence, highlighting its importance in clinical research applications . Understanding this specific phosphorylation event provides critical insights into EGFR-related diseases and may help identify new therapeutic targets .

How does phosphorylation at Thr693 differ from other EGFR phosphorylation sites?

While EGFR contains multiple phosphorylation sites, Thr693 phosphorylation has distinct characteristics and regulatory functions. Unlike many tyrosine phosphorylation sites that directly recruit signaling proteins, Thr693 phosphorylation appears to play a regulatory role that impacts receptor trafficking, nuclear localization, and potentially modulates receptor tyrosine kinase activity. Research indicates that nuclear localization of pEGFR T693 may have prognostic significance, distinguishing it from membrane-bound EGFR phosphorylation events . The phosphorylation at Thr693 has been specifically associated with tumor recurrence in non-functioning pituitary adenomas, suggesting a unique role in tumor biology that differs from other phosphorylation sites . Unlike the tyrosine phosphorylation events that were initially characterized when EGFR was first identified as a receptor tyrosine kinase, threonine phosphorylation represents a distinct regulatory mechanism .

What are the primary detection methods for Phospho-EGFR (Thr693)?

Several methodologies can be employed to detect and quantify Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) in research contexts:

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Allows visualization of pEGFR T693 in tissue sections, enabling assessment of both expression levels and subcellular localization. This technique is particularly valuable for clinical samples and has been used to evaluate pEGFR T693 in tumor specimens .

  • Western Blotting (WB): Provides quantitative assessment of pEGFR T693 levels in cell or tissue lysates, allowing comparison between different experimental conditions or patient samples .

  • Immunofluorescence/Immunocytochemistry (IF/ICC): Enables subcellular localization studies to determine whether pEGFR T693 is present in the nucleus, cytoplasm, or membrane compartments .

  • Colorimetric Cell-Based ELISA: Offers a high-throughput method for quantifying pEGFR T693 levels in cell cultures, particularly useful for screening studies or drug response assessments .

For optimal results, researchers should select detection methods based on their specific experimental questions and sample types, with appropriate validation using positive and negative controls.

How should samples be prepared for immunohistochemical detection of Phospho-EGFR (Thr693)?

For immunohistochemical detection of pEGFR T693, careful sample preparation is essential to preserve phosphoepitopes while maintaining tissue morphology. Based on established protocols:

  • Fixation: Tissues should be fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24-48 hours, as overfixation can mask phosphoepitopes while underfixation may result in tissue degradation.

  • Processing and Embedding: Standard paraffin embedding procedures are suitable, but excessive heat should be avoided as it may dephosphorylate proteins.

  • Sectioning: Tissue sections of 3-5 μm thickness are optimal for pEGFR T693 detection.

  • Antigen Retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) is typically required to expose phosphoepitopes masked during fixation.

  • Blocking: Phosphate-specific blocking steps are critical to reduce background and increase specificity.

In research settings, tissue microarrays have been effectively used for high-throughput analysis of pEGFR T693 expression across multiple samples. For example, in studies of non-functioning pituitary adenomas, researchers accessed tissue microarrays from patients undergoing adenomectomy and performed IHC to determine the expression of nuclear pEGFR T693 . The intensity of staining can be scored on a scale (0=no, 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=high intensity) with the percentage of positively stained cells recorded to calculate an h-score .

What are the recommended controls and validation approaches for Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) antibody experiments?

Rigorous controls and validation are essential for generating reliable data with phospho-specific antibodies:

  • Positive Controls:

    • EGF-stimulated cell lines with known EGFR expression (e.g., A-431 epidermoid carcinoma cells)

    • Tissues with documented pEGFR T693 expression (e.g., certain pituitary adenoma samples)

  • Negative Controls:

    • EGFR-knockout cell lines

    • Primary antibody omission controls

    • Phosphatase-treated samples to confirm phospho-specificity

  • Validation Approaches:

    • Peptide competition assays using phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides

    • Correlation with other detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)

    • Phosphatase treatment before antibody application

    • siRNA knockdown of EGFR to confirm specificity

  • Specificity Testing:

    • Western blot verification of a single band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 175 kDa for EGFR)

    • Testing reactivity across multiple species if cross-species applications are planned

For research applications, antibodies should be validated for each specific application (WB, IHC, IF/ICC) as performance can vary between applications even for the same antibody .

How is the h-score calculated for Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) expression studies?

The h-score is a semi-quantitative method used to assess both the intensity and extent of immunohistochemical staining. For pEGFR T693 expression studies:

  • Calculation Formula: h-score = Σ(i × Pi)
    Where:

    • i = intensity score (0, 1, 2, or 3)

    • Pi = percentage of cells with that intensity (0-100%)

  • Interpretation Range: h-scores typically range from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating stronger and more widespread expression.

  • Application in Research:
    In studies of non-functioning pituitary adenomas, h-scores have been calculated as the product of staining intensity and the number of positively staining cells . This approach has revealed significant differences between recurrent and non-recurrent tumor samples.

  • Cut-off Determination:
    ROC analysis can be used to determine clinically relevant h-score cut-offs. For example, research has identified an h-score cutoff of 89.8 as being significantly associated with recurrence in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (sensitivity 80%, specificity 78%, AUC 0.84, p<0.0001) .

  • Data Analysis:
    Statistical comparisons of h-scores between different groups (e.g., recurrent vs. non-recurrent tumors) can provide valuable insights into the clinical relevance of pEGFR T693 expression.

GrouppEGFR T693 h-score (Mean ± SD)p-value
Recurrent NFPAs122.1 ± 6<0.0001
Non-recurrent NFPAs81.54 ± 3.3

This quantitative approach enables objective comparison between sample groups and correlation with clinical outcomes .

How is Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) expression associated with tumor recurrence in non-functioning pituitary adenomas?

Research has revealed significant associations between pEGFR T693 expression and tumor recurrence in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs):

  • Expression Patterns:

    • pEGFR T693 positivity was observed in 95.7% of recurrent NFPAs compared to 81% of non-recurrent NFPAs (p=0.02)

    • h-scores were significantly higher in recurrent NFPAs (122.1 ± 6) compared to non-recurrent NFPAs (81.54 ± 3.3, p<0.0001)

  • Predictive Value:

    • pEGFR T693 positivity significantly predicted recurrence in NFPAs (HR=4.9, CI 2.8-8.8, p<0.0001)

    • ROC analysis identified an h-score cutoff of 89.8 as being significantly associated with recurrence (sensitivity 80%, specificity 78%, AUC 0.84, p<0.0001)

  • Follow-up Considerations:

    • The median follow-up period in the study was 123 months (IQR 72-159)

    • Recurrence was observed in 46.1% of patients during this follow-up period

  • Clinical Implications:

    • pEGFR T693 may serve as a valuable biomarker for risk stratification of NFPA patients

    • Patients with high pEGFR T693 expression might benefit from more rigorous follow-up

    • The nuclear localization of pEGFR T693 suggests potential roles in transcriptional regulation and disease progression

These findings suggest that pEGFR T693 could serve as a clinically relevant predictor of recurrence in NFPAs, potentially informing post-surgical management strategies .

Is there an association between Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) expression and demographic or clinical parameters?

Research has investigated potential associations between pEGFR T693 expression and various demographic and clinical parameters:

This data suggests that pEGFR T693 expression is independently associated with tumor recurrence, rather than being a surrogate marker for other demographic or clinical parameters. The consistent expression across different age groups, genders, and tumor sizes indicates that pEGFR T693 may represent a fundamental biological process related to tumor recurrence rather than a secondary phenotype .

What is the subcellular localization of Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) and its functional significance?

The subcellular localization of pEGFR T693 provides important insights into its functional roles:

  • Nuclear Localization:

    • Research has specifically examined nuclear pEGFR T693 levels in relation to tumor recurrence, suggesting important nuclear functions

    • Nuclear translocation of phosphorylated EGFR represents a non-canonical signaling mechanism distinct from traditional membrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinase activity

  • Functional Implications:

    • Nuclear pEGFR may directly regulate gene expression by acting as a transcriptional co-factor

    • The threonine 693 phosphorylation may play a role in regulating EGFR nuclear translocation or retention

    • Nuclear pEGFR T693 could influence cell proliferation, apoptosis resistance, and DNA repair mechanisms

  • Detection Methodologies:

    • Immunohistochemical analysis is particularly valuable for assessing nuclear pEGFR T693, as it preserves spatial information about protein localization

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting can provide quantitative assessment of pEGFR T693 distribution between nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane compartments

    • Immunofluorescence approaches offer high-resolution visualization of pEGFR T693 localization patterns

Understanding the nuclear localization of pEGFR T693 is critical for interpreting its biological significance and developing targeted therapeutic approaches. The association between nuclear pEGFR T693 and tumor recurrence suggests that this localization pattern may have distinct prognostic implications .

How can phosphoproteomic approaches complement antibody-based detection of Phospho-EGFR (Thr693)?

Phosphoproteomic approaches offer complementary insights to antibody-based detection methods:

  • Mass Spectrometry-Based Identification:

    • Phosphoproteomics can provide unbiased identification of phosphorylation events

    • Previous mass-spectrometry based studies identified 2.6-fold hyperphosphorylation of EGFR at threonine 693 position in recurrent NFPAs

    • These findings were subsequently validated using antibody-based approaches

  • Multi-Phosphorylation Site Analysis:

    • Phosphoproteomics can simultaneously detect multiple phosphorylation sites on EGFR

    • This enables comprehensive assessment of phosphorylation patterns and potential cross-talk between phosphorylation events

    • Correlation between different phosphorylation sites can provide insights into regulatory mechanisms

  • Integration with Antibody-Based Methods:

    • Initial phosphoproteomic screening can identify candidate phosphorylation sites for targeted antibody studies

    • Antibody-based methods can then be used for high-throughput analysis in larger cohorts

    • The combination provides both discovery power and validation capability

  • Limitations and Considerations:

    • Phosphoproteomic approaches typically require specialized equipment and expertise

    • Sample preparation is critical for preserving phosphorylation status

    • Bioinformatic analysis of phosphoproteomic data requires sophisticated computational approaches

The complementary use of phosphoproteomics and antibody-based detection represents a powerful approach for studying EGFR phosphorylation events, as demonstrated by the progression from initial mass spectrometry identification to subsequent antibody validation in studies of pEGFR T693 in NFPAs .

What factors may contribute to false-positive or false-negative results when detecting Phospho-EGFR (Thr693)?

Several technical and biological factors can affect the reliability of pEGFR T693 detection:

  • Potential Causes of False-Positive Results:

    • Cross-reactivity with other phosphorylated proteins or phosphorylation sites

    • Inadequate blocking procedures leading to non-specific antibody binding

    • Post-collection phosphorylation due to delayed sample processing

    • Over-development of immunohistochemical signals

    • Edge artifacts in tissue sections

  • Potential Causes of False-Negative Results:

    • Epitope masking during fixation or processing

    • Dephosphorylation during sample collection or preparation

    • Suboptimal antigen retrieval protocols

    • Insufficient primary antibody concentration or incubation time

    • Sample degradation affecting phosphoepitope integrity

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Implement rapid sample collection and preservation protocols

    • Use phosphatase inhibitors during sample preparation

    • Validate antibody specificity using appropriate controls

    • Optimize antigen retrieval methods for phospho-epitopes

    • Consider multiple detection methods for confirmation

  • Verification Approaches:

    • Replicate experiments with independent antibody lots or clones

    • Confirm results using alternative detection technologies

    • Correlate antibody-based results with functional assays or phosphoproteomic data

Awareness of these potential pitfalls and implementation of appropriate controls is essential for generating reliable data on pEGFR T693 expression and its clinical correlations .

How should researchers address data variability in Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) expression studies?

Data variability is a common challenge in phospho-protein studies that requires systematic approaches:

  • Standardization Strategies:

    • Develop standardized protocols for sample collection, processing, and analysis

    • Include reference standards in each experimental batch

    • Implement consistent scoring methods such as the h-score calculation

    • Normalize data to appropriate housekeeping proteins or total EGFR levels

  • Statistical Approaches:

    • Use appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution (parametric vs. non-parametric)

    • Implement multivariable analysis to control for confounding factors

    • Consider Cox proportional hazards model analysis for survival data

    • Report variance measures (standard deviation, interquartile range) alongside central tendency

  • Experimental Design Considerations:

    • Include sufficient biological and technical replicates

    • Power studies appropriately based on expected effect sizes

    • Use randomization and blinding where applicable

    • Consider batch effects in study design and analysis

  • Reporting Practices:

    • Document the range of observed values alongside mean/median

    • Report antibody validation data and specificity tests

    • Present raw data alongside processed results when possible

    • Disclose limitations and potential sources of variability

In the context of NFPA studies, researchers have addressed variability by implementing h-score calculations, establishing clear cutoff values through ROC analysis, and using appropriate statistical approaches including Cox proportional hazards modeling for recurrence prediction .

How can researchers integrate Phospho-EGFR (Thr693) data with other molecular markers for comprehensive tumor profiling?

Integrative approaches enhance the value of pEGFR T693 data in tumor characterization:

  • Multi-Marker Panels:

    • Combine pEGFR T693 assessment with other EGFR phosphorylation sites

    • Integrate with downstream signaling pathway components

    • Include complementary markers such as Ki-67 proliferation index

    • Develop comprehensive molecular signatures with enhanced predictive power

  • Correlation Analyses:

    • Assess relationships between pEGFR T693 and other established prognostic markers

    • Determine whether pEGFR T693 provides independent prognostic information

    • Identify potential functional interactions between different signaling pathways

  • Multivariate Modeling:

    • Develop multivariate models incorporating pEGFR T693 and other relevant clinical and molecular parameters

    • Use machine learning approaches to identify optimal marker combinations

    • Validate predictive models in independent cohorts

  • Biological Pathway Integration:

    • Place pEGFR T693 in the context of EGFR signaling networks

    • Map relationships between pEGFR T693 and related cellular processes

    • Connect phosphorylation events to downstream functional outcomes

Integrative approaches have been employed in NFPA studies where variables demonstrating significant association with recurrence on univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors . This approach enables more comprehensive patient stratification and potentially more precise therapeutic targeting.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.