Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Mechanism of Action

Phosphorylation of ERα at Ser167 is mediated by kinases such as S6K1, RSK, and Aurora A . This modification enhances ERα-dependent transcriptional activity and cellular proliferation, contributing to resistance to endocrine therapies like tamoxifen . The phosphorylation status of Ser167 is also influenced by upstream signaling pathways, including the MAPK and PI3K/AKT cascades .

Applications

The antibody is widely used in preclinical and clinical research for:

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Assessing phosphorylation in breast tumor samples to predict response to endocrine therapy .

  • Western blotting (WB): Validating phosphorylation in cell lysates .

  • Flow cytometry (FCM): Analyzing phosphorylation in live or fixed cells .

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): Localizing phosphorylated ERα in cellular compartments (e.g., nucleus, cytoplasm) .

Prognostic Value

  • High phosphorylation at Ser167 correlates with improved survival in ER-positive breast cancer patients .

  • It predicts favorable response to endocrine therapies (e.g., tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors) .

Therapeutic Resistance

  • Ser167 phosphorylation is linked to reduced sensitivity to tamoxifen due to enhanced ERα activity .

Pathway Interactions

  • Co-occurs with activation of p90RSK and MAPK pathways, which are independently associated with better prognosis .

Research Highlights

  • S6K1-ERα Feedback Loop: S6K1 phosphorylates Ser167, while ERα reciprocally regulates S6K1 expression via estrogen signaling .

  • Tamoxifen Resistance: Phosphorylation at Ser167 disrupts tamoxifen’s ability to inhibit ERα, necessitating combination therapies .

References

  1. Phosphorylation of ER-α Ser167 as a prognostic marker

  2. Bioss USA Product Specifications

  3. Ser167 phosphorylation in breast cancer prognosis

  4. S6K1-ERα interaction

  5. Cell Signaling Technology Antibody Details

Product Specs

Form
Supplied at 1.0mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg2+ and Ca2+), pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol.
Lead Time
Generally, we can ship the products within 1-3 business days after receiving your orders. Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery time.
Synonyms
7*/654 isoform antibody; 7*/819 2 isoform antibody; 7*/822 isoform antibody; 8*/901 isoform antibody; 8*/941 isoform antibody; DKFZp686N23123 antibody; ER alpha antibody; ER antibody; ER-alpha antibody; Era antibody; ESR antibody; ESR1 antibody; ESR1_HUMAN antibody; ESRA antibody; Estradiol receptor antibody; Estrogen nuclear receptor alpha antibody; Estrogen receptor 1 antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha 3*,4,5,6,7*/822 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha delta 3*,4,5,6,7*,8*/941 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha delta 3*,4,5,6,7*/819 2 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha delta 4 +49 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha delta 4*,5,6,7*/654 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha delta 4*,5,6,7,8*/901 isoform antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha E1 E2 1 2 antibody; Estrogen receptor alpha E1 N2 E2 1 2 antibody; Estrogen receptor antibody; ESTRR antibody; NR3A1 antibody; Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group A member 1 antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a nuclear hormone receptor that plays a critical role in regulating gene expression. It is involved in the modulation of cellular proliferation and differentiation in target tissues. The steroid hormones and their receptors are crucial in the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. Ligand-dependent nuclear transactivation occurs through either direct homodimer binding to a palindromic estrogen response element (ERE) sequence or association with other DNA-binding transcription factors, such as AP-1/c-Jun, c-Fos, ATF-2, Sp1 and Sp3, to mediate ERE-independent signaling. Ligand binding triggers a conformational change, facilitating subsequent or combinatorial association with multiprotein coactivator complexes through LXXLL motifs of their respective components. Mutual transrepression occurs between ERα and NF-kappa-B in a cell-type specific manner. ERα decreases NF-kappa-B DNA-binding activity and inhibits NF-kappa-B-mediated transcription from the IL6 promoter, displacing RELA/p65 and associated coregulators from the promoter. ERα is recruited to the NF-kappa-B response element of the CCL2 and IL8 promoters and can displace CREBBP. It is present with NF-kappa-B components RELA/p65 and NFKB1/p50 on ERE sequences. ERα can also act synergistically with NF-kappa-B to activate transcription involving respective recruitment adjacent response elements; the function involves CREBBP. ERα can activate the transcriptional activity of TFF1. Additionally, it mediates membrane-initiated estrogen signaling involving various kinase cascades. ERα is essential for MTA1-mediated transcriptional regulation of BRCA1 and BCAS3.; It is involved in the activation of NOS3 and endothelial nitric oxide production. Isoforms lacking one or several functional domains are thought to modulate transcriptional activity by competitive ligand or DNA binding and/or heterodimerization with the full-length receptor. ERα binds to ERE and inhibits isoform 1.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Estrogen-induced miR-191 was identified as a direct upstream regulator of DAB2 in ER-positive breast cancer cells. PMID: 29247596
  2. This study provides comprehensive whole-genome insights that can contribute to a deeper understanding of the biological roles of ER1 in breast cancer. PMID: 30301189
  3. The study found a relationship between rs2046210 and rs3803662, and the risk of developing breast cancer in Vietnamese women. The A allele was identified as the risk allele for both rs2046210 (OR [95% CI] = 1.43 [1.14 - 1.78], P = 0.0015) and rs3803662 (OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.16 - 1.83], P = 0.001). The conclusion is that two polymorphisms, rs2046210 in ESR1 and rs3803662 in TNRC9, are associated with breast cancer risk in the Vietnamese population. PMID: 30078824
  4. This research demonstrates that Estrogen receptor alpha can enhance the odonto/osteogenic differentiation of stem cells from apical papilla via ERK and JNK MAPK pathways. PMID: 30069950
  5. No association between polymorphisms in genes encoding estrogen receptors (ESR1 and ESR2) and excreted BPA levels was found in orthodontic patients after bracket bonding. PMID: 29961922
  6. Analysis of genome-wide ER binding sites revealed that mutant ER exhibits unique recruitment, mediating the allele-specific transcriptional program. PMID: 29438694
  7. This study describes RNF8 as a co-activator of ERα that increases ERα stability via a post-transcriptional pathway. It provides new insights into the mechanisms by which RNF8 promotes cell growth in ERα-positive breast cancer. PMID: 28216286
  8. Reduced expression of ERβ1 in female ERα-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma patients is associated with greater disease progression. PMID: 29655286
  9. The study observed a heterogeneous distribution of ERα and ERβ in deep infiltrating endometriosis. PMID: 29383962
  10. ER-alpha36/EGFR signaling loop promotes growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PMID: 29481815
  11. This study aimed to determine the presence and localization of estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and androgen receptors (ARs) in both healthy and varicose vein wall cells and their relationship with gender. PMID: 30250632
  12. Estrogen receptor-alpha was expressed only in women and showed a positive correlation with the amount of fungi in oral paracoccidioidomycosis, while progesterone receptor was observed in both genders and exhibited no correlation with estrogen receptor-alpha or fungi counting. PMID: 29796757
  13. ERα upregulates vinculin expression in breast cancer cells; Loss of vinculin promotes amoeboid features of cancer cells. PMID: 28266545
  14. Polymorphisms in ESR1 and ESR2 genes do not predict in vitro fertilization outcome. PMID: 29916276
  15. High ESR1 expression is associated with metastasis in breast cancer. PMID: 29187405
  16. The G/G XbaI genotype of ESR1 gene is associated with breast cancer risk. PMID: 29893332
  17. miR-221 may impair the protective effect of estrogen in degenerated cartilaginous endplate cells through targeting estrogen receptor alpha. PMID: 29529124
  18. Results showed that NAT1 and ESR1 expression were increased in primary breast tumor samples compared with normal breast tissue samples, and in ER+ primary breast tumors compared with ER- tumors. Additionally, NAT1 and ESR1 expression appear to have overlapping regulation. PMID: 29901116
  19. All patients without ESR1 mutations detected by molecular barcode next-generation sequencing (MB-NGS) were found to have no mutations by ddPCR. In conclusion, MB-NGS successfully detected ESR1 mutations in cfDNA with a higher sensitivity of 0.1% than conventional NGS and was considered clinically useful as ddPCR. PMID: 28905136
  20. An association between the presence of particular genotypes at the three ESR1 polymorphisms (rs2234693, rs6902771, rs7774230) and one ESR2 polymorphism (rs3020449), and the presence of metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women was observed. PMID: 30049354
  21. The study found a higher frequency of ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations in plasma compared to serum in 33 MBC patients; therefore, serum samples should not be considered the preferred source of cfDNA. PMID: 29689710
  22. These results suggest that miR-125a-3p can function as a novel tumor suppressor in ER(+) breast cancer by targeting CDK3, which may be a potential therapeutic approach for TamR breast cancer therapy. PMID: 28939591
  23. A significant finding of this study is that one in five (20%) patients with breast cancer BM had a receptor discrepancy between the primary tumor and the subsequent BM, with loss of hormone receptors (ER and/or PR) expression, and gain of HER2 overexpression as the most commonly observed changes. PMID: 28975433
  24. This study reports a nodal role of IGF-IR in the regulation of ERα-positive breast cancer cell aggressiveness and the regulation of expression levels of several extracellular matrix molecules. PMID: 28079144
  25. The associations between PvuII (T>C) and XbaI (A>G) polymorphisms of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS), are reported. PMID: 29883973
  26. The ERα gene appears to play a key role in stress urinary incontinence in the premenopausal period. PMID: 29769420
  27. This study reports the first discovery of naturally occurring ESR1 (Y537C) and ESR1 (Y537S) mutations in MCF7 and SUM44 ESR1-positive cell lines after acquisition of resistance to long-term-estrogen-deprivation (LTED) and subsequent resistance to fulvestrant (ICIR). Mutations were enriched with time, impacted ESR1 binding to the genome and altered the ESR1 interactome. PMID: 29192207
  28. Concomitant high expression of ERα36, GRP78 and GRP94 is associated with aggressive papillary thyroid cancer behavior and may be used as a predictor for extrathyroid extension, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. PMID: 29368272
  29. Estrogen receptor-1 is a key regulator of HIV-1 latency that imparts gender-specific restrictions on the latent reservoir. PMID: 30061382
  30. Down-regulation of ESR1 gene expression was enhanced by the development of breast cancer. PMID: 29543921
  31. The aim of this study was to assess whether fibrosis markers, estrogen receptor (ER)α and the stromal derived factor (SDF)1/CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) axis are abnormally expressed in Intrauterine adhesions endometrium. PMID: 29568895
  32. The frequency of alleles and genotypes of polymorphisms FSHR(-29G/A) and ESRI (XbaI A/G) in women with normal to poor response did not have significant correlation. PMID: 29526845
  33. Each estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta gene polymorphism might have different impact on postmenopausal osteoporosis risk and bone mineral density in various ethnicities. PMID: 29458346
  34. The results suggest that minor allele A of ESR1 gene is associated with the development of arterial hypertension in men. PMID: 29658078
  35. The study found that tamoxifen treatment induced a decrease in PRMT2 and an increase in ER-alpha36 as well as ER-alpha36-mediated non-genomic effect in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. PMID: 29620287
  36. ESR1 mutations are not associated with clinical resistance to fulvestrant in breast cancer patients. PMID: 27174596
  37. Overexpression of COPS5, through its isopeptidase activity, leads to ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation of NCoR, a key corepressor for ERα and tamoxifen-mediated suppression of ERα target genes. PMID: 27375289
  38. ESR alpha PvuII and XbaI polymorphisms have no association with systemic lupus erythematosus. The combination of the TC/AA and CC/GG genotypes were associated with SLE susceptibility. PMID: 29356461
  39. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in endometrial carcinoma (EC) were significantly higher than those in the paracarcinoma tissue and control. PMID: 29081408
  40. ESR1 promoter methylation was an independent risk factor and had a high value to predict 28-day mortality from acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. PMID: 29082740
  41. By analyzing different estrogen receptor-alpha(ER-a)-positive and ER-a-negative breast cancer cell lines, the study defined the role of CCN5 in the leptin-mediated regulation of growth and invasive capacity. PMID: 29370782
  42. This study identified ESR1 as a direct target of miR-301a-3p. PMID: 29763890
  43. This study reports the presence of ESR1 methylation in plasma ctDNA of patients with HGSC for the first time. The agreement between ESR1 methylation in primary tumors and paired ctDNA is statistically significant. PMID: 29807696
  44. This study reports the development of a novel class of ERa AF2 inhibitors, which have the potential to effectively inhibit ERa activity by a unique mechanism and to circumvent the issue of mutation-driven resistance in breast cancer. PMID: 29462880
  45. The P2X7R rs3751143 and ER-alpha PvuII two-locus interaction confers a significantly high susceptibility to osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women. PMID: 28884379
  46. Alcohol consumption may have differential effects on concordant and discordant receptor subtypes of breast cancer. PMID: 29353824
  47. ERα and ERβ mRNA expression was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in tumor tissues relative to their paired normal mucosa and correlated inversely with survival outcome. PMID: 29390981
  48. High ESR1 expression is associated with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. PMID: 28124274
  49. Oral administration of RAD140 substantially inhibited the growth of AR/ER(+) breast cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Activation of AR and suppression of ER pathway, including the ESR1 gene, were seen with RAD140 treatment. PMID: 28974548
  50. Polymorphism in the ERα gene is associated with an increased risk for advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse. However, polymorphism in the LAMC1 gene does not seem to be associated with such risk. PMID: 29241914

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 3467

OMIM: 133430

KEGG: hsa:2099

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000206249

UniGene: Hs.208124

Involvement In Disease
Estrogen resistance (ESTRR)
Protein Families
Nuclear hormone receptor family, NR3 subfamily
Subcellular Location
[Isoform 1]: Nucleus. Cytoplasm. Cell membrane; Peripheral membrane protein; Cytoplasmic side.; Nucleus. Golgi apparatus. Cell membrane. Note=Colocalizes with ZDHHC7 and ZDHHC21 in the Golgi apparatus where most probably palmitoylation occurs. Associated with the plasma membrane when palmitoylated.
Tissue Specificity
Widely expressed. Not expressed in the pituitary gland.; [Isoform 3]: Widely expressed, however not expressed in the pituitary gland.

Q&A

What exactly does the Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody detect?

The Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody specifically detects endogenous levels of Estrogen Receptor alpha (ESR1) protein only when phosphorylated at the Serine 167 position . This specificity is crucial for studying the phosphorylation state of the receptor independent of total receptor expression levels. The antibody recognizes a specific epitope around the phosphorylated Ser167 residue, typically within the amino acid range 136-185 of the human ESR1 protein . This high specificity allows researchers to distinguish between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of the receptor, enabling detailed studies of ESR1 activation states in various biological contexts.

The antibody's specificity is typically assured through careful design of the immunogen, which is a synthesized peptide derived from the human Estrogen Receptor-alpha sequence surrounding the phosphorylation site of Ser167 . Most commercially available antibodies against this epitope are polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits, purified through affinity chromatography using epitope-specific immunogens to ensure high specificity for the phosphorylated form of the receptor .

What is the biological significance of ESR1 phosphorylation at Serine 167?

Phosphorylation of ESR1 at Serine 167 represents a critical post-translational modification that regulates estrogen receptor function and signaling. This phosphorylation event is particularly significant as it probably enhances the transcriptional activity of the receptor . In the context of breast cancer, phosphorylation at Ser167 has emerged as a potential predictive biomarker for response to endocrine therapy, as indicated by clinical studies . This modification appears to be part of the complex regulatory network that modulates estrogen receptor activity in both normal physiology and pathological conditions.

The phosphorylation of Ser167 is mediated by various kinases including cyclin A/CDK2 and CK1, representing integration points between estrogen signaling and other cellular pathways . Additionally, this phosphorylation site can be affected by growth factor signaling networks, providing a mechanism for crosstalk between estrogen receptor function and other signaling cascades. The dynamic regulation of this modification contributes to the context-dependent activity of estrogen receptors in different tissues and under different physiological or pathological conditions.

How does ESR1 Ser167 phosphorylation relate to other post-translational modifications of the receptor?

ESR1 undergoes multiple post-translational modifications that collectively determine its activity, stability, and cellular localization. Phosphorylation at Ser167 is just one of several phosphorylation events that regulate receptor function. Other key phosphorylation sites include Ser118, which is also extensively studied in the context of receptor activation . These phosphorylation events may occur independently or in coordination, creating a complex code that fine-tunes receptor activity in response to various stimuli.

Beyond phosphorylation, ESR1 is subject to other modifications including glycosylation, ubiquitination, palmitoylation, and methylation . For instance, ESR1 can be ubiquitinated by STUB1/CHIP and deubiquitinated by OTUB1, processes that regulate receptor stability and turnover. The receptor can also be dimethylated by PRMT1 at Arg-260, which may influence its cellular localization . Palmitoylation by ZDHHC7 and ZDHHC21 facilitates plasma membrane targeting and is required for rapid intracellular signaling via ERK and AKT kinases . These diverse modifications form an intricate regulatory network that modulates ESR1 function in different cellular contexts and in response to various stimuli.

What are the optimal conditions for using Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody in Western blotting?

When using Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody for Western blotting, researchers should optimize several key parameters to ensure specific and sensitive detection. Based on manufacturer recommendations, appropriate dilution ranges typically fall between 1:500 and 1:2000 . The antibody performs optimally when detecting the 66 kDa ESR1 protein (calculated molecular weight) , although researchers should be aware that alternative splicing can generate multiple isoforms of ESR1 with different molecular weights .

Sample preparation is crucial for maintaining phosphorylation status. Tissues or cells should be lysed in buffers containing phosphatase inhibitors to prevent dephosphorylation during processing. Use of PVDF membranes is recommended, as demonstrated in published protocols . For enhanced sensitivity, researchers may employ enhanced chemiluminescence substrate mixtures such as SuperSignal WestPico Chemiluminescent Substrate . Proper blocking (typically with 5% BSA in TBST rather than milk, which contains phosphatases) and appropriate controls are essential for result validation. A control detecting total ESR1 should be run in parallel to normalize phosphorylation signals to total protein levels, enabling accurate quantification of the phosphorylation state.

What are the recommended protocols for immunohistochemical detection of phospho-ESR1 (Ser167)?

For immunohistochemical applications, the Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody can be used to detect phosphorylated receptor in both paraffin-embedded (IHC-p) and frozen tissue sections (IHC-f) . Based on published research and manufacturer guidelines, dilution ratios typically range from 1:50 to 1:300 for IHC applications . The choice of dilution should be empirically determined for each experimental system and may vary depending on the specific antibody formulation, tissue type, and fixation method.

Antigen retrieval is a critical step for detecting phospho-epitopes in fixed tissues. Heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) is commonly employed. Tissue sections should be deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval before blocking endogenous peroxidase activity and non-specific binding sites. For detection systems, researchers can use horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by DAB chromogen for visualization . Appropriate positive and negative controls should always be included, such as tissues known to express phosphorylated ESR1 and sections where the primary antibody is omitted. For quantification, scoring systems based on staining intensity and percentage of positive cells can be employed, as is common in breast cancer research.

How can researchers validate the specificity of Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring reliable research results, particularly with phospho-specific antibodies. Several complementary approaches can be employed to confirm the specificity of Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody. First, researchers should conduct peptide competition assays, where the antibody is pre-incubated with the phosphorylated peptide used as the immunogen before application to the sample. This should abolish specific binding if the antibody is truly phospho-specific .

Another critical validation method involves using phosphatase treatment controls. Samples can be divided and one portion treated with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphorylation groups. A true phospho-specific antibody will show diminished or absent signal in the phosphatase-treated sample compared to the untreated control. Additionally, researchers can use cellular models where phosphorylation at Ser167 is either enhanced through treatment with estradiol or growth factors known to activate this site, or reduced through kinase inhibitors that block the relevant phosphorylation pathways.

For genetic validation, siRNA or CRISPR knockout of ESR1 should eliminate all signal when using the phospho-specific antibody in ESR1-expressing cells. Finally, comparing results across different detection methods (e.g., Western blot, IHC, IF) and different antibody clones targeting the same phospho-epitope can provide further confidence in antibody specificity and experimental results.

How does phosphorylation of ESR1 at Ser167 relate to breast cancer prognosis and treatment response?

Phosphorylation of ESR1 at Serine 167 has emerged as a significant biomarker in breast cancer research with important clinical implications. Research has demonstrated that this specific phosphorylation event is predictive of response to endocrine therapy in patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer . The phosphorylation status at this site provides valuable information beyond mere expression levels of the estrogen receptor, potentially helping to stratify patients who are more likely to benefit from hormonal treatments.

Studies examining primary breast carcinomas from patients with metastatic disease have shown correlations between phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) status and clinical outcomes. Patients with tumors exhibiting higher levels of ESR1 phosphorylation at Ser167 may show different response patterns to various endocrine therapies, including selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors . This phosphorylation event appears to be linked to the activation of specific downstream pathways that influence tumor behavior and therapeutic response. The mechanism likely involves altered transcriptional activity of the receptor when phosphorylated at this site, as phosphorylation is known to enhance transcriptional function .

What techniques can be combined with Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody for comprehensive signaling pathway analysis?

To comprehensively analyze signaling pathways involving phosphorylated ESR1, researchers can employ multiple complementary techniques alongside Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody detection. Multiplex immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry allows simultaneous detection of phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) along with other phosphorylated signaling proteins, such as components of the PI3K/AKT or MAPK pathways, which may be involved in receptor phosphorylation. This approach can reveal spatial relationships between different activated pathways within tissue sections.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody can identify genomic binding sites specifically occupied by the phosphorylated form of the receptor, potentially revealing distinct transcriptional programs regulated by this active form. Combining this with RNA-seq analysis provides comprehensive insights into the transcriptional consequences of ESR1 phosphorylation at Ser167. Additionally, proximity ligation assays (PLA) can detect interactions between phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) and specific coregulatory proteins, helping to elucidate how phosphorylation affects protein-protein interactions.

Phosphoproteomics approaches, including mass spectrometry-based techniques, can map broader phosphorylation networks that are active concurrently with ESR1 Ser167 phosphorylation. This systems-level analysis can reveal how ESR1 phosphorylation fits into larger signaling networks and identify potential therapeutic targets within these pathways. Reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) offer a high-throughput method to analyze multiple phosphorylated proteins simultaneously across many samples, facilitating correlation analyses between phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) and other signaling nodes.

What factors might affect phosphorylation status of ESR1 during sample preparation?

Maintaining the phosphorylation status of ESR1 during sample preparation is critical for accurate analysis. Several factors can significantly impact phosphorylation detection. First and foremost, the time between tissue acquisition or cell harvesting and sample fixation or lysis is crucial. Phosphorylation states can change rapidly post-mortem or after cell harvesting due to ongoing phosphatase activity. Immediate snap-freezing of tissues or rapid lysis of cells is recommended to preserve phosphorylation status .

The composition of lysis or fixation buffers is equally important. Buffers must contain effective phosphatase inhibitor cocktails that target multiple classes of phosphatases (e.g., serine/threonine phosphatases, tyrosine phosphatases, and acid phosphatases). Commercial phosphatase inhibitor cocktails are available and should be freshly added to buffers before use. Additionally, sample handling temperature affects enzymatic activity; all processing steps should ideally be performed at 4°C to minimize phosphatase activity.

For tissue samples, the fixation method and duration significantly impact phospho-epitope preservation. Extended formalin fixation can mask phospho-epitopes, necessitating optimization of antigen retrieval protocols. For cells in culture, treatment conditions prior to harvesting, including serum starvation, growth factor stimulation, or drug treatments, can dramatically alter ESR1 phosphorylation states. Consistent and well-documented sample handling procedures are essential for reliable and reproducible phosphorylation analysis across experiments.

What are common causes of false positive or negative results when using Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody?

Several technical and biological factors can lead to inaccurate results when working with Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody. False positive results may arise from non-specific binding of the antibody to other phosphorylated proteins with similar epitopes. This can be particularly problematic with polyclonal antibodies, which contain multiple antibody clones with varying specificities . Cross-reactivity with other phosphorylated serine residues in similar sequence contexts should be carefully considered when interpreting results.

Insufficient blocking or inappropriate blocking agents can also contribute to background signal and false positives. When detecting phospho-epitopes, researchers should typically use BSA for blocking rather than milk, as milk contains phosphatases that might dephosphorylate the target protein during incubation steps. Additionally, endogenous peroxidase activity in tissues or cells can generate false positive signals in peroxidase-based detection systems if not properly quenched.

False negative results frequently stem from inadequate preservation of phosphorylation during sample preparation, as discussed previously. Additionally, epitope masking due to protein-protein interactions or conformational changes may prevent antibody binding. This can be particularly relevant for nuclear receptors like ESR1, which form complexes with numerous coregulatory proteins. Insufficient antigen retrieval in fixed tissues is another common cause of false negatives. The optimal antigen retrieval method may need to be empirically determined for each tissue type and fixation protocol.

How can the dilution ranges of Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody be optimized for different applications?

The optimal antibody dilution varies significantly across different applications and must be empirically determined for each experimental system. According to manufacturer recommendations and published research, typical dilution ranges include: Western blotting (1:500-1:2000), immunohistochemistry (1:100-1:300), immunofluorescence (1:50-200), and ELISA (1:20000) . These ranges serve as starting points, and researchers should perform titration experiments to determine the optimal concentration for their specific samples and conditions.

For Western blotting, a dilution series should be tested while keeping all other parameters constant. The optimal dilution provides a strong specific signal for the target protein (66 kDa for ESR1) with minimal background. For IHC applications, optimization should evaluate different antibody concentrations alongside various antigen retrieval methods, as these factors interact to determine staining quality . A good IHC protocol produces distinct nuclear staining in ER-positive cells with minimal cytoplasmic or stromal background.

When optimizing immunofluorescence protocols, both antibody concentration and incubation conditions (time and temperature) should be systematically varied. Lower dilutions (higher antibody concentrations) may be required for detecting low-abundance phosphorylated proteins, but this increases the risk of non-specific binding. Including appropriate positive controls (samples known to contain phosphorylated ESR1 at Ser167) and negative controls (samples treated with phosphatases or from ESR1-negative tissues) is essential for accurate protocol optimization.

How can Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody be used to study endocrine resistance mechanisms?

The Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody serves as a powerful tool for investigating mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer, a significant clinical challenge affecting many patients with ER-positive disease. Research has demonstrated that phosphorylation of ESR1 at Ser167 is predictive of response to endocrine therapy, suggesting its involvement in treatment sensitivity pathways . By using this antibody to monitor phosphorylation levels in cell line models and patient samples before and after development of resistance, researchers can identify changes in ESR1 activation states associated with therapeutic failure.

The antibody can be employed in time-course experiments examining how ESR1 phosphorylation patterns change during the development of resistance to various endocrine therapies, including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, or aromatase inhibitors. Such studies may reveal whether altered phosphorylation is an early event in resistance development or a consequence of other molecular changes. Additionally, combining phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) detection with analysis of upstream kinases known to target this site can illuminate which signaling pathways become dysregulated during resistance development.

In patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models or organoid cultures from endocrine-resistant tumors, the antibody can help assess the efficacy of novel combination therapies targeting both ESR1 and the kinases responsible for its phosphorylation. Immunohistochemical analysis of serial biopsies from patients undergoing endocrine therapy, using optimized protocols with this antibody , may identify early phosphorylation changes predictive of impending resistance, potentially allowing for timely therapeutic intervention.

What insights can Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody provide about ESR1 function in non-breast tissues?

While estrogen receptor research has predominantly focused on breast cancer, ESR1 plays important roles in multiple tissues throughout the body. The Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody can help illuminate tissue-specific phosphorylation patterns and their functional consequences in diverse physiological and pathological contexts. In the reproductive system beyond the breast, including ovaries, uterus, and placenta, patterns of ESR1 phosphorylation may reveal tissue-specific regulatory mechanisms and how these relate to reproductive disorders.

In the cardiovascular system, estrogen signaling through ESR1 has protective effects on vascular endothelium and heart muscle. Using Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody in vascular tissue samples can help elucidate how sex-specific cardioprotection operates at the molecular level and how it might be therapeutically enhanced. Similarly, in bone, where estrogen prevents osteoporosis, tissue-specific patterns of ESR1 phosphorylation may explain differential responses to estrogen in osteoblasts versus osteoclasts.

The central nervous system contains widespread ESR1 expression with important roles in neuroprotection, cognition, and neuroendocrine regulation. Applying the antibody in brain tissue sections can map region-specific phosphorylation patterns and potentially reveal how these correlate with neuronal function or pathology. In neurodegenerative conditions with known sex differences in prevalence or progression, such as Alzheimer's disease, ESR1 phosphorylation status might provide insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches.

How does phosphorylation at Ser167 affect ESR1 interaction with transcriptional coregulators?

Phosphorylation of ESR1 at Ser167 has significant implications for how the receptor interacts with its extensive network of coregulatory proteins. This post-translational modification is known to enhance the transcriptional activity of the receptor , likely by modulating its ability to recruit specific coactivators to target gene promoters. The location of Ser167 within the receptor's structure places it in a region that can influence both DNA binding and interaction with transcriptional machinery.

Research suggests that phosphorylation at this site may enhance ESR1 binding to certain coactivators containing LXXLL motifs, such as members of the p160 family (SRC-1, SRC-2, SRC-3). These interactions are crucial for assembling the multiprotein complexes required for efficient transcriptional activation. Additionally, phosphorylation may affect the receptor's interaction with other transcription factors such as AP-1/c-Jun, c-Fos, ATF-2, Sp1, and Sp3, potentially influencing ERE-independent signaling pathways .

The relationship between ESR1 phosphorylation and coregulator recruitment can be studied using techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with the Phospho-ESR1 (Ser167) Antibody, followed by analysis of associated coregulators. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments comparing wild-type ESR1 with phosphomimetic (S167E) and phospho-dead (S167A) mutants can further elucidate how this modification affects protein-protein interactions. Understanding these molecular mechanisms has significant implications for developing novel therapeutic approaches targeting specific ESR1 functions in various diseases.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.