FLT1 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that binds VEGFA, VEGFB, and PGF. Its activation involves autophosphorylation at tyrosine residues, including Tyr1213, which is critical for downstream signaling. The antibody specifically recognizes FLT1 phosphorylated at Tyr1213, enabling researchers to study receptor activation in physiological and pathological processes .
| Phosphorylation Site | Interaction Partners | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Tyr1169 | PLCG | Signaling cascade activation |
| Tyr1213 | PIK3R1, PTPN11, GRB2 | PI3K/AKT pathway modulation |
| Tyr1333 | CBL, NCK1, CRK | Endocytosis and degradation |
The antibody is a rabbit polyclonal, affinity-purified product with high specificity for phosphorylated Tyr1213. Key features include:
Applications: Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF/ICC), and ELISA .
Reactivity: Validated for human, mouse, and rat; predicted for pig, bovine, horse, rabbit, and dog .
Molecular Weight: Detects a ~130–150 kDa band in WB, corresponding to full-length phosphorylated FLT1 .
The antibody is widely used to study FLT1 signaling in:
Cancer: Tracking receptor activation in tumor angiogenesis .
Diabetic Retinopathy: Investigating endothelial dysfunction .
Embryonic Development: Studying receptor regulation of vasculature .
Prototypical Experiment:
R&D Systems’ antibody (AF4170) was used to detect phosphorylated FLT1 in pervanadate-treated HUVECs via WB, confirming activation under oxidative stress conditions .
Phosphorylation at Tyr1213 facilitates interactions with signaling adaptors, initiating pathways like:
Specificity: Ensure proper blocking to minimize cross-reactivity with non-phosphorylated FLT1 or other tyrosine kinases.
Sample Preparation: Use reducing conditions for WB to maintain epitope integrity .
Storage: Freeze-thaw cycles degrade antibody performance; aliquot and store at -20°C .
This antibody remains a critical tool for elucidating FLT1’s role in angiogenesis and disease, with applications spanning basic research to therapeutic target validation. Researchers should consult vendor protocols and optimize conditions for their experimental models.
Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) refers to the FLT1 protein (also known as VEGFR1) when phosphorylated at the tyrosine 1213 residue. This specific phosphorylation site is considered the main auto-phosphorylation site responsible for activation of intracellular signaling pathways downstream of VEGFR1. The significance of this phosphorylation lies in its role as a critical marker of receptor activation following ligand binding. Tyrosine 1213 phosphorylation occurs when VEGFR1 binds to its ligands, primarily VEGF-A and PlGF, triggering signal transduction cascades that regulate angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and cell migration . For researchers studying vascular development, tumor angiogenesis, or inflammatory responses, detecting phosphorylation at this specific residue provides crucial information about the activation status of VEGFR1 signaling in their experimental systems.
FLT1 (Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) and VEGFR1 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1) refer to the same protein. FLT1 is the official gene name, while VEGFR1 describes its functional role as a receptor for VEGF. The protein is also sometimes referred to as FLT, FRT, or vascular permeability factor receptor . This receptor belongs to the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family and contains an extracellular domain with seven immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane segment, and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain . In scientific literature, both terms are used interchangeably, but VEGFR1 is often preferred when discussing the protein in the context of VEGF signaling pathways and angiogenesis research, while FLT1 may be more commonly used in genetic contexts or when referring specifically to the gene.
Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) antibodies have been validated for several experimental applications:
The antibody has been most extensively validated for Western blot applications, where it has been shown to detect a specific band for Phospho-VEGFR1/Flt-1 (Y1213) at approximately 130-140 kDa under reducing conditions . When selecting an application, researchers should consider the specific antibody formulation and follow the manufacturer's recommended protocols for optimal results.
Tyrosine 1213 is regarded as the main auto-phosphorylation site responsible for activation of intracellular pathways downstream of VEGFR1 . Unlike VEGFR2, VEGFR1 exhibits weak tyrosine kinase activity upon ligand binding, making the phosphorylation events particularly significant for understanding its signaling mechanisms.
The phosphorylation process occurs as follows:
Binding of ligands (VEGF-A or PlGF) to VEGFR1
Receptor dimerization
Auto-phosphorylation at multiple tyrosine residues, including Tyr1213
Activation of downstream pathways, including Erk1/2 phosphorylation
This phosphorylation is essential for VEGFR1's roles in angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, inflammatory responses, and monocyte migration. In pathological contexts like glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), VEGFR1 phosphorylation at Tyr1213 has been observed in highly VEGFR-1-expressing cell lines upon exposure to exogenous VEGF-A or PlGF, suggesting its importance in tumor-associated angiogenesis .
Research has shown that:
VEGF-A binds to both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, while PlGF binds exclusively to VEGFR1
In U87-derived cells over-expressing VEGFR-1, both ligands induced significant phosphorylation at Tyr1213
Anti-PlGF antibodies only partially affected growth factor-induced VEGFR-1 auto-phosphorylation at Tyr1213, suggesting differential mechanisms
The D16F7 monoclonal antibody prevents VEGFR-1 auto-phosphorylation in response to both ligands, indicating a common pathway that can be blocked
These differences are important for researchers designing experiments to study VEGFR1 activation, as the choice of stimulating ligand may influence the experimental outcomes and interpretation of results.
Following phosphorylation at Tyr1213, VEGFR1 activates several downstream signaling cascades that regulate cellular responses. The primary pathway identified in the research literature is the MAPK/ERK pathway:
Phosphorylation of VEGFR1 at Tyr1213 leads to downstream phosphorylation of Erk1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2)
This activation can be counteracted by treatment with specific antibodies like D16F7
The activated ERK pathway contributes to cell migration, proliferation, and survival
Other potential downstream effects of Tyr1213 phosphorylation include:
Activation of PI3K/Akt pathway components
Regulation of inflammatory responses
Promotion of cell motility and invasion
Contribution to angiogenic processes
The specific downstream effects may vary depending on cell type and experimental conditions, making it important for researchers to validate the relevant pathways in their specific experimental systems.
VEGFR1/FLT1 contains multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites, each potentially contributing to different aspects of receptor function. While Tyr1213 is considered a main auto-phosphorylation site, other sites include Tyr1048, Tyr1169, Tyr1327, and Tyr1333.
Tyr1213 phosphorylation appears to be particularly important for VEGFR1 signaling in the context of tumor angiogenesis and progression. Research in glioblastoma models has shown that this phosphorylation site becomes active upon ligand binding and contributes to downstream signaling events . The relative importance of different phosphorylation sites may vary depending on cellular context and experimental conditions.
When studying phosphorylation at Tyr1213 of VEGFR1/FLT1, implementing appropriate controls is crucial for experimental validity:
Pervanadate treatment: Cell lines (such as HUVEC) treated with pervanadate (100 μM for 10 minutes) show enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation and can serve as positive controls
VEGF-A or PlGF stimulation: Cells expressing VEGFR1 stimulated with VEGF-A or PlGF (typically 50 ng/ml) for short periods
Unstimulated cells: Cells maintained in serum-free or low-serum conditions without growth factor stimulation
Phosphatase treatment: Treating samples with phosphatases to remove phosphorylation
Blocking peptide controls: Using the phosphopeptide immunogen to demonstrate antibody specificity
Comparison with total VEGFR1 antibody detection to determine the proportion of phosphorylated receptor
Use of species- and isotype-matched control antibodies (e.g., mouse IgG1) in parallel experiments
VEGFR1 knockdown or knockout cells to confirm signal specificity
These controls help ensure that detected signals are specific to phosphorylated Tyr1213 and not due to non-specific antibody binding or experimental artifacts.
Proper sample preparation is critical for successful detection of Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213). The following protocol incorporates best practices from multiple sources:
Cell Stimulation:
Lysis Procedure:
Rapidly place cells on ice and wash with ice-cold PBS containing phosphatase inhibitors
Lyse cells directly in buffer containing:
1% NP-40 or Triton X-100
20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)
150 mM NaCl
1 mM EDTA
Phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate)
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Sample Processing:
Scrape cells thoroughly and transfer to microcentrifuge tubes
Incubate on ice for 30 minutes with occasional vortexing
Centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C
Collect supernatant and determine protein concentration
Add SDS-PAGE sample buffer and heat at 95°C for 5 minutes
Maintaining phosphorylation status throughout sample preparation is essential, so all steps should be performed quickly and samples kept cold with appropriate phosphatase inhibitors.
For optimal Western blot analysis using Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) antibodies, follow these detailed recommendations based on published protocols:
Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Use freshly prepared samples whenever possible
Use 7.5% or 4-12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels due to the large size of VEGFR1 (130-140 kDa)
Run under reducing conditions using standard Laemmli buffer with 5% β-mercaptoethanol or DTT
Transfer to PVDF membrane (preferred over nitrocellulose for phosphorylated proteins)
Use wet transfer at 30V overnight at 4°C or 100V for 2 hours with cooling
Verify transfer efficiency with reversible protein staining
Block membrane with 5% BSA (not milk, which contains phosphatases) in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Incubate with primary antibody diluted in 5% BSA/TBST:
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Wash 4-5 times with TBST, 5 minutes each
Incubate with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG) at 1:5000 - 1:10000 in 5% BSA/TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Wash 4-5 times with TBST, 5 minutes each
Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents
This protocol is optimized for preserving phosphorylation status and achieving specific detection of phospho-VEGFR1 at Tyr1213.
When troubleshooting phospho-specific antibody experiments, consider these common issues and solutions:
| Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Cross-reactivity | - Increase washing frequency and duration - Optimize antibody dilution - Use blocking peptide controls |
| Excessive antibody | - Decrease antibody concentration - Reduce incubation time |
| Membrane issues | - Use fresh membranes - Ensure adequate blocking - Consider different membrane types |
| Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Inconsistent stimulation | - Standardize growth factor quality and stimulation protocol - Use internal controls to normalize phosphorylation |
| Cell density variations | - Maintain consistent cell density between experiments - Standardize starvation conditions |
| Antibody variability | - Use the same lot of antibody when possible - Include standard samples across experiments |
By systematically addressing these issues, researchers can improve detection of Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) in their experimental systems.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for phospho-specific antibodies. For Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) antibodies, implement these validation steps:
Stimulation/Inhibition Experiments:
Peptide Competition Assays:
Genetic Approaches:
Use VEGFR1/FLT1 knockdown or knockout models
Create Tyr1213 point mutants (Y1213F) to prevent phosphorylation
Compare wild-type vs. mutant receptor phosphorylation
Cross-Validation with Alternative Methods:
Confirm phosphorylation using mass spectrometry
Use in vitro kinase assays with purified components
Employ alternative phospho-specific antibodies from different manufacturers
Functional Validation:
These validation approaches provide multiple lines of evidence for antibody specificity and increase confidence in experimental results.
When applying Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) antibodies across different species, researchers should consider:
Sequence Conservation:
Validation Requirements:
Always validate antibody performance in your specific species of interest
Check the amino acid sequence surrounding Tyr1213 in your target species
Use positive controls from the species being studied
Species-Specific Considerations:
| Species | Considerations | Recommended Dilutions | Known Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Most extensively validated | Follow manufacturer recommendations | Generally reliable |
| Mouse | Well-validated in multiple tissues | May require optimization | Higher background in some tissues |
| Rat | Validated in several studies | May require higher concentrations | Limited validation in some systems |
| Bovine/Goat/Sheep | Limited validation | Requires extensive optimization | Potential for non-specific binding |
Technical Adaptations:
Adjust antibody concentrations for different species
Optimize blocking conditions to minimize background
Consider longer incubation times for less-validated species
Perform additional controls when working with non-standard species
By carefully considering these factors, researchers can effectively apply Phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) antibodies across different experimental systems and species.
To effectively capture dynamic changes in FLT1 Tyr1213 phosphorylation, consider this experimental approach:
Time-Course Analysis:
Quantification Approach:
Normalize phospho-FLT1 (Tyr1213) signal to total FLT1 levels
Use image analysis software to quantify band intensities
Present data as fold-change relative to baseline
Include statistical analysis across multiple experiments
Experimental Controls:
Advanced Analysis Methods:
Consider phospho-flow cytometry for single-cell analysis
Implement immunofluorescence to observe spatial distribution of phosphorylated receptor
Use proximity ligation assays to detect interaction with downstream effectors
This systematic approach allows researchers to capture the temporal dynamics of Tyr1213 phosphorylation and correlate them with downstream signaling events.
Understanding Tyr1213 phosphorylation has significant implications for angiogenesis research:
Mechanistic Insights:
Therapeutic Relevance:
Blocking Tyr1213 phosphorylation (e.g., with D16F7 mAb) prevents downstream signaling
This approach may be more effective than targeting individual ligands, as it blocks responses to both VEGF-A and PlGF
Combining VEGFR1 phosphorylation inhibitors with other anti-angiogenic approaches may enhance therapeutic efficacy
Research Applications:
Monitoring Tyr1213 phosphorylation can serve as a readout for testing novel anti-angiogenic compounds
It allows differentiation between compounds that block receptor-ligand binding versus those that inhibit kinase activity
The phosphorylation status can be used to evaluate resistance mechanisms to anti-angiogenic therapies
Pathological Contexts:
By focusing on this specific phosphorylation event, researchers can develop more targeted approaches to modulating angiogenesis in both experimental and therapeutic contexts.
The detection of phosphorylated Tyr1213 varies across experimental models due to differences in VEGFR1 expression levels, activation mechanisms, and technical considerations:
Several emerging technologies hold promise for advancing research on VEGFR1/FLT1 Tyr1213 phosphorylation:
Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches:
Targeted mass spectrometry for absolute quantification of phosphorylated vs. non-phosphorylated peptides
Phosphoproteomics for studying global changes in phosphorylation networks following VEGFR1 activation
SILAC or TMT labeling for comparative analysis across experimental conditions
Advanced Microscopy Techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize receptor clustering and colocalization with signaling partners
Live-cell FRET-based biosensors to monitor phosphorylation dynamics in real-time
Correlative light and electron microscopy to relate phosphorylation events to subcellular structures
Single-Cell Technologies:
Single-cell phospho-proteomics to capture heterogeneity in VEGFR1 signaling
Phospho-flow cytometry with improved sensitivity for phospho-epitopes
Spatial transcriptomics combined with phospho-protein detection
Computational Approaches:
Machine learning algorithms to predict phosphorylation dynamics from multi-omics data
Systems biology modeling of VEGFR1 signaling networks
In silico screening for compounds that specifically target Tyr1213 phosphorylation
These technologies promise to provide deeper insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics, regulation, and functional consequences of VEGFR1 Tyr1213 phosphorylation in normal and pathological contexts.
Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of VEGFR1 Tyr1213 phosphorylation has significant implications for therapeutic development:
Targeted Inhibition Strategies:
Development of compounds specifically blocking Tyr1213 phosphorylation without affecting other receptor functions
Design of peptide-based inhibitors mimicking the Tyr1213 region to compete for kinase activity
Allosteric modulators that prevent conformational changes required for Tyr1213 phosphorylation
Dual-Targeting Approaches:
Combining Tyr1213 phosphorylation inhibitors with other anti-angiogenic strategies
Targeting both VEGFR1 and downstream effectors (e.g., ERK pathway components)
Developing bispecific antibodies that simultaneously block ligand binding and phosphorylation
Biomarker Development:
Using Tyr1213 phosphorylation status as a biomarker for therapy selection
Monitoring phosphorylation changes to predict resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies
Developing companion diagnostics based on phosphorylation patterns
Translational Considerations:
Establishing the relationship between in vitro phosphorylation inhibition and in vivo efficacy
Determining optimal biological contexts for targeting this phosphorylation event
Developing strategies to overcome potential resistance mechanisms