The Phospho-HIST1H1D (T179) Antibody is a polyclonal antibody produced in rabbits that specifically recognizes the phosphorylated form of Histone H1.3 (HIST1H1D) at threonine 179. It is generated using a synthetic phosphopeptide immunogen corresponding to the sequence surrounding phospho-Thr179 derived from Human Histone H1.3 . This antibody allows researchers to study a crucial post-translational modification involved in chromatin structure regulation and gene expression control. The specific recognition of this phosphorylation site makes it a valuable tool for investigating dynamic changes in histone modifications during various cellular processes.
According to product specifications, the Phospho-HIST1H1D (T179) Antibody has been validated for multiple experimental applications:
ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): Recommended dilution 1:2000-1:10000
IF (Immunofluorescence): Recommended dilution 1:20-1:200
The antibody has demonstrated specific staining in immunofluorescence experiments with HeLa cells, where cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and blocked in 10% normal Goat Serum before overnight incubation with the antibody at 4°C .
For optimal preservation of antibody activity, the Phospho-HIST1H1D (T179) Antibody should be stored according to manufacturer specifications:
Storage temperature: -20°C
Storage buffer: 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can compromise antibody function
For long-term storage, consider aliquoting the antibody to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Successful immunofluorescence with this phospho-specific antibody requires careful attention to several critical parameters:
Fixation and preservation of phosphorylation: Phospho-epitopes are sensitive to dephosphorylation during sample processing. Use 4% formaldehyde fixation as validated for this antibody , and include phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers.
Permeabilization optimization: The validated protocol uses 0.2% Triton X-100 . Different cell types may require adjustment of permeabilization conditions to ensure antibody accessibility to nuclear antigens without destroying epitope integrity.
Blocking conditions: 10% normal Goat Serum has been validated for this antibody . The blocking agent should be compatible with the secondary antibody species to minimize background.
Antibody dilution titration: While the recommended range is 1:20-1:200 for IF , researchers should perform a dilution series experiment to determine the optimal concentration for their specific experimental system.
Controls: Include both positive controls (cells with known HIST1H1D T179 phosphorylation) and negative controls (phosphatase-treated samples or blocking peptide competition) to validate specificity.
Verifying antibody specificity is essential for obtaining reliable research data. Consider these validation approaches:
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the phosphorylated peptide used as the immunogen. A specific signal should be blocked by this competition.
Phosphatase treatment control: Treat parallel samples with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphate groups. The antibody signal should be significantly reduced or eliminated in these samples.
Genetic validation: Use CRISPR/Cas9 to generate T179A mutation in HIST1H1D, which prevents phosphorylation at this site. This mutant should not be detected by the antibody.
Cross-validation with other techniques: Confirm the presence of phosphorylation at T179 using complementary techniques like mass spectrometry.
Western blot specificity: If adapting for Western blot, verify that the antibody detects a single band of the appropriate molecular weight (approximately 22 kDa for histone H1.3).
For quantitative analysis of this histone modification, researchers can employ several strategies:
Immunofluorescence quantification: Measure fluorescence intensity across multiple cells using digital image analysis software. Normalize to appropriate controls such as total HIST1H1D staining or DNA content.
ELISA-based quantification: Develop a quantitative ELISA using this antibody at the recommended dilutions (1:2000-1:10000) . This provides more precise quantification compared to semi-quantitative methods.
ChIP-sequencing analysis: Use the antibody in ChIP experiments followed by next-generation sequencing to map genome-wide distribution of T179 phosphorylation and quantify enrichment at specific genomic loci.
Mass spectrometry: For absolute quantification, develop a targeted mass spectrometry approach with isotope-labeled internal standards, which allows precise quantification of phosphorylation stoichiometry.
Flow cytometry adaptation: Optimize the antibody for flow cytometry applications to quantify phosphorylation levels across large cell populations and enable single-cell analysis.
Histone H1 phosphorylation plays crucial roles in chromatin dynamics and gene expression:
Chromatin structure modulation: Phosphorylation of histone H1 affects its interaction with linker DNA and nucleosomes, generally decreasing its affinity for DNA and promoting chromatin decompaction . The T179 site is located in the C-terminal domain, which is critical for DNA binding.
Cell cycle regulation: Histone H1 phosphorylation increases progressively during the cell cycle, with minimal levels in G1 and maximal levels during mitosis . T179 phosphorylation likely contributes to chromatin condensation during mitosis.
Transcriptional regulation: By altering chromatin accessibility, T179 phosphorylation may influence the binding of transcription factors and other regulatory proteins to DNA, thus affecting gene expression patterns .
Crosstalk with other histone modifications: HIST1H1D T179 phosphorylation may participate in the "histone code" by influencing or being influenced by other histone modifications, creating a complex regulatory network for chromatin function .
Understanding the relationship between different phosphorylation sites provides valuable insights into histone function:
Site-specific biological roles: Different phosphorylation sites on histone H1 variants may serve distinct functions. For comparison, phosphorylation at T146 of HIST1H1D , T17 of Histone H1.3/H1.4 , and T3 of HIST1H1E have all been identified, but likely have different biological impacts.
Temporal patterns: Various phosphorylation sites may show distinct temporal patterns during the cell cycle or in response to cellular stimuli. While some sites may be constitutively phosphorylated, others might show dynamic changes in response to specific signals.
Kinase specificity: Different kinases target specific phosphorylation sites. CDK1/CDK2 are known to phosphorylate several sites on histone H1, but other kinases such as PKA, PKC, or Aurora kinases may have site-specific preferences.
Functional domains: T179 is located in the C-terminal domain of HIST1H1D, which is primarily responsible for DNA binding and chromatin condensation. Phosphorylation in this region likely affects these functions differently than modifications in other domains.
To investigate dynamic changes in this phosphorylation:
Time-course experiments: Design time-course experiments following treatment with specific stimuli (e.g., cell cycle synchronization, DNA damage, differentiation signals) and analyze T179 phosphorylation at multiple time points.
Pharmacological approaches: Use specific kinase or phosphatase inhibitors to identify enzymes responsible for T179 phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in response to stimuli.
Live-cell imaging: Develop phospho-specific biosensors based on the epitope recognized by this antibody to monitor T179 phosphorylation dynamics in living cells.
Single-cell analysis: Combine immunofluorescence using this antibody with single-cell technologies to capture cell-to-cell variability in phosphorylation responses.
Integration with other datasets: Correlate T179 phosphorylation changes with transcriptomic, proteomic, or other epigenomic data to understand the functional consequences of this modification.
Common challenges with phospho-histone antibodies include:
Weak or no signal:
Ensure phosphorylation is preserved by using phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers
Optimize antibody concentration (try the upper end of the recommended range: 1:20 for IF)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C as validated)
Consider signal amplification methods for low-abundance phosphorylation sites
High background:
Non-specific binding:
Include additional controls, particularly peptide competition
Use more stringent washing conditions
Pre-absorb antibody with non-phosphorylated peptide to remove antibodies that recognize the unmodified form
Inconsistent results:
Standardize all aspects of sample preparation
Use fresh aliquots of antibody to avoid freeze-thaw degradation
Carefully control the timing of experimental procedures, especially for dynamic phosphorylation events
For studying multiple histone modifications simultaneously:
Co-immunofluorescence strategies:
When combining with other primary antibodies, select those raised in different host species to allow specific secondary antibody detection
If using multiple rabbit antibodies, consider direct labeling techniques or sequential immunostaining with thorough blocking between rounds
Validate that antibody binding is not sterically hindered when multiple antibodies target the same histone molecule
Sequential ChIP approaches:
Develop ChIP-reChIP protocols to investigate co-occurrence of T179 phosphorylation with other histone modifications at specific genomic loci
Ensure antibody elution is complete between rounds to prevent carryover signals
Mass spectrometry integration:
Enrich phosphorylated histones using the antibody, then analyze by mass spectrometry to identify co-occurring modifications
Develop targeted methods to quantify specific combinations of modifications
Controls for multiplexing:
Include single-antibody controls alongside multiplexed experiments
Verify that signal intensity for each antibody is not affected by the presence of other antibodies
The Phospho-HIST1H1D (T179) Antibody can be leveraged with cutting-edge technologies:
CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag approaches: These techniques offer higher resolution and lower background than traditional ChIP and require less starting material, enabling studies of rare cell populations or limited clinical samples.
Single-cell epigenomics: Adapt protocols for single-cell analysis to map T179 phosphorylation heterogeneity across individual cells within populations.
Super-resolution microscopy: Combine with techniques like STORM, PALM, or STED to visualize the spatial distribution of T179 phosphorylation at nanoscale resolution within the nucleus.
Proximity labeling approaches: Use the antibody in combination with proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX) to identify proteins that specifically interact with the T179-phosphorylated form of HIST1H1D.
CRISPR screens: Integrate with CRISPR screening approaches to identify genes that affect T179 phosphorylation levels, potentially revealing new regulatory mechanisms.
Liquid-phase separations: Investigate how T179 phosphorylation influences the participation of HIST1H1D in phase-separated nuclear condensates, a growing area in chromatin biology research.