Phospho-LIMK2 (Thr505) antibodies are typically produced in rabbits using synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to the Thr505 phosphorylation site. Key attributes include:
These antibodies are validated for multiple experimental techniques:
Western Blot (WB): Detects endogenous phosphorylated LIMK2 at ~72 kDa .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC-P): Used in paraffin-embedded tissues .
Immunofluorescence (IF)/Immunocytochemistry (ICC): Confirmed in cellular models .
Example results from GeneTex (GTX50187) :
| Lane | Sample | Reactivity | Blocking Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HeLa (PMA-treated) | Positive | None |
| 2 | Mouse brain tissue | Positive | None |
| 3 | Rat brain tissue | Positive | None |
| 4–6 | N-peptide blocked | Negative | Non-phosphopeptide |
| 7–9 | P-peptide blocked | Negative | Phosphopeptide |
Specificity: Binds exclusively to LIMK2 phosphorylated at Thr505; non-reactive with non-phosphorylated LIMK2 or LIMK1 (unless cross-reactive antibodies are used) .
Cross-Reactivity Warning: Some antibodies (e.g., #3841) may recognize both LIMK1 (Thr508) and LIMK2 (Thr505) due to sequence homology, but independent validation is required .
LIMK2 phosphorylation at Thr505 is essential for its activation by upstream kinases like ROCK or PAK. This activation promotes cofilin phosphorylation, thereby inhibiting actin depolymerization and modulating cell motility and morphology . Key studies include:
Functional Role: LIMK2 knockout models show defects in cytoskeletal reorganization .
Disease Relevance: Dysregulated LIMK2 activity is implicated in cancer metastasis and neurological disorders .
LIMK2 (LIM domain kinase 2) is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a critical role in cytoskeletal dynamics, particularly in regulating actin filament stability. LIMK2 belongs to a family of proteins containing LIM motifs, which are typically involved in cell fate determination and growth control .
Phosphorylation at Threonine 505 represents an activation marker for LIMK2, indicating that the kinase has been switched to its catalytically active state. When phosphorylated at Thr505, LIMK2 can phosphorylate downstream targets, most notably cofilin, which regulates the stabilization of F-actin structures . This phosphorylation event is therefore a key indicator of active cytoskeletal reorganization processes within the cell, including those involved in cell motility, morphogenesis, and various cellular responses to external stimuli .
Phospho-LIMK2 (Thr505) Antibody serves multiple experimental applications in research:
Western Blotting: Commonly used at dilutions between 1:500-1:1000 to detect activated LIMK2 in cell or tissue lysates . This technique allows quantification of phosphorylation levels under different experimental conditions.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Applied at dilutions of 1:50-1:100 to visualize the tissue and cellular distribution of phosphorylated LIMK2 .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Enables subcellular localization studies of activated LIMK2, particularly in relation to cytoskeletal structures .
ELISA: Used at higher dilutions (approximately 1:10000) for quantitative analysis of phosphorylated LIMK2 levels .
Immunocytochemistry: Allows for detailed cellular localization studies of activated LIMK2 .
For optimal preservation of antibody activity:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can reduce antibody efficacy
When working with the antibody, keep it on ice or at 4°C
Most formulations are supplied in PBS with stabilizers, and this buffer composition should be maintained
Follow manufacturer's guidelines for specific lot information
For western blotting applications, prepare working dilutions fresh before use
Monitor expiration dates provided by manufacturers
Western Blot Protocol for Phospho-LIMK2 (Thr505) Detection:
Sample Preparation:
Gel Electrophoresis and Transfer:
Antibody Incubation:
Detection:
Validation Controls:
Run parallel blots with total LIMK2 antibody to normalize phospho-signals
Include phosphatase-treated samples as negative controls
Experimental Design Strategies:
Temporal Analysis:
Pathway Dissection:
Employ specific inhibitors to target upstream kinases:
ROCK inhibitors (Y-27632)
PAK inhibitors
Staurosporine (broad kinase inhibitor)
Use genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) to knock down pathway components
Subcellular Localization:
Combine phospho-LIMK2 detection with subcellular fractionation
Use dual immunofluorescence to co-localize phospho-LIMK2 with cytoskeletal markers or upstream activators
Functional Correlation:
Pair phosphorylation analysis with functional readouts:
Actin polymerization assays
Cell migration assays
Morphological analyses
Quantification Methods:
Employ densitometry for western blots
Use high-content imaging for immunofluorescence quantification
Consider phospho-flow cytometry for single-cell analysis
Possible Causes:
Insufficient phosphorylated protein
Degradation due to phosphatase activity
Suboptimal antibody concentration
Solutions:
Possible Causes:
Cross-reactivity with LIMK1 (high homology)
Insufficient blocking
Degradation products
Solutions:
Extend blocking time using 5% BSA in TBST
Perform antibody validation with LIMK2 knockdown samples
Run parallel blots with total LIMK2 antibody to confirm band identity
Optimize wash steps (increase number and duration)
Possible Causes:
Rapid dephosphorylation during sample preparation
Cell density variations
Serum components affecting baseline phosphorylation
Solutions:
Standardize cell culture conditions
Ensure rapid sample processing with pre-chilled buffers
Consider using phosphatase inhibitor cocktails with multiple inhibitors
Normalize to total protein and total LIMK2 levels
Possible Causes:
Low abundance of phosphorylated form
Cell type-specific expression patterns
Solutions:
Use enrichment strategies (immunoprecipitation before western blot)
Consider more sensitive detection methods (chemiluminescent substrates)
Load more total protein (up to 50-60 μg per lane)
Validation Approaches:
Phosphatase Treatment Control:
Treat half of your sample with lambda phosphatase
Run treated and untreated samples side-by-side
The phospho-specific band should disappear in treated samples
Stimulation/Inhibition Controls:
Use ROCK activators to increase LIMK2 phosphorylation
Use ROCK inhibitors to decrease phosphorylation
Compare band intensities across conditions
Genetic Validation:
Use LIMK2 siRNA or CRISPR knockout models
The specific band should be absent in knockout samples
Consider LIMK2 T505A mutant transfection (non-phosphorylatable)
Peptide Competition:
Pre-incubate antibody with phospho-peptide containing the Thr505 sequence
This should abolish specific binding
Cross-Reactivity Assessment:
Despite their structural similarities, LIMK1 and LIMK2 exhibit distinct functional characteristics when phosphorylated:
Phosphorylation Comparison:
| Feature | Phospho-LIMK1 (Thr508) | Phospho-LIMK2 (Thr505) |
|---|---|---|
| Upstream Kinases | Primarily PAK1, ROCK | Primarily ROCK, less PAK1 |
| Tissue Distribution | Enriched in neural tissues | More broadly expressed, enriched in testis |
| Subcellular Localization | Predominantly cytoplasmic | Cytoplasmic and nuclear |
| Developmental Functions | CNS development, dendritic spine morphology | Broader tissue development |
| Substrate Preference | Cofilin-1 preference | Acts on both cofilin-1 and cofilin-2 |
While both phosphorylated kinases regulate actin dynamics through cofilin phosphorylation, expression patterns suggest they have different functions during development . LIMK1 has been more strongly implicated in neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells, where it appears to interfere with events downstream of MAPK activation . A truncated form of LIMK2 has been identified in adult testis, suggesting tissue-specific functions .
Research using knockout models demonstrates that these kinases are not completely redundant, and their phosphorylation states correlate with distinct cellular processes.
Key Regulatory Pathways:
Rho/ROCK Pathway:
Primary upstream regulator of LIMK2 phosphorylation
Experimental manipulation:
RhoA activators (lysophosphatidic acid, calpeptin)
ROCK inhibitors (Y-27632, Fasudil)
Expression of constitutively active or dominant-negative RhoA constructs
p21-activated Kinase (PAK) Pathway:
Secondary regulator of LIMK2
Experimental manipulation:
Rac1/Cdc42 activators
PAK inhibitors (IPA-3, PF-3758309)
Constitutively active PAK1 expression
Myotonic Dystrophy Kinase-Related CDC42-Binding Kinase (MRCK):
Alternative LIMK2 activator
Less studied but important in certain contexts
Manipulated through CDC42 pathway modulation
Cross-talk with Other Pathways:
MAPKs may indirectly regulate LIMK2 phosphorylation
PI3K/Akt pathway can modulate ROCK activity and thus LIMK2 phosphorylation
Calcium signaling affects RhoA activation
Experimental Approaches to Study Pathway Regulation:
Pharmacological:
Use pathway-specific inhibitors or activators
Design dose-response and time-course experiments
Genetic:
Employ siRNA knockdowns of pathway components
Use dominant-negative or constitutively active constructs
CRISPR-mediated gene editing of regulatory components
Physiological Stimuli:
Growth factors (PDGF, EGF)
Mechanical stimulation (stretch, shear stress)
ECM components that activate integrin signaling
Integrated Research Approaches:
Live-Cell Imaging Combined with Fixed-Cell Phospho-Analysis:
Track actin dynamics in living cells using fluorescent reporters
Fix cells at key timepoints for phospho-LIMK2 immunostaining
Correlate temporal changes in phosphorylation with observed cytoskeletal rearrangements
Super-Resolution Microscopy Applications:
Use techniques like STORM or PALM to co-localize phospho-LIMK2 with cytoskeletal structures
Analyze nanoscale spatial relationships between activated LIMK2 and its substrates
Functional Cytoskeletal Assays:
Actin Turnover: Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of actin structures
Migration Analysis: Wound healing or single-cell tracking with phospho-LIMK2 status
3D Matrix Studies: Invasion assays correlated with LIMK2 activation
Mechanical Measurements: Atomic force microscopy to correlate cell stiffness with LIMK2 phosphorylation
Biochemical Activity Correlation:
Measure cofilin phosphorylation status (Ser3) as a direct downstream effect
Assess F-actin/G-actin ratios in samples with differing phospho-LIMK2 levels
Use actin co-sedimentation assays to measure polymerization dynamics
Multi-Omics Integration:
Correlate phosphoproteomics data for LIMK2 with other cytoskeletal regulators
Integrate transcriptomics to identify co-regulated networks
Use systems biology approaches to model temporal relationships
Systematic Approach to Resolving Contradictions:
Technical Verification:
Confirm antibody specificity with appropriate controls
Validate results using alternative detection methods
Ensure phosphorylation is preserved during sample preparation
Standardize quantification methods across experiments
Biological Context Evaluation:
Cell Type Differences: LIMK2 function may vary between cell types
Confluence/Density Effects: Cell density affects actin dynamics and baseline phosphorylation
ECM Composition: Different substrates can alter basal phosphorylation states
Growth Factor Environment: Serum components influence LIMK2 regulation
Temporal Considerations:
Phosphorylation is dynamic - contradictory results may reflect different time points
Design detailed time-course experiments (seconds to hours)
Consider oscillatory patterns in signaling pathways
Pathway Crosstalk Analysis:
Map interconnections between LIMK2-regulating pathways
Consider compensatory mechanisms activated by experimental perturbations
Evaluate feedback loops that may complicate interpretation
Isoform-Specific Effects:
Evaluation Framework:
Quantitative Benchmarks:
Fold-Change Threshold: Generally, >1.5-2 fold changes are considered biologically meaningful
Statistical Significance: Apply appropriate statistical tests with multiple comparisons correction
Reproducibility: Consistent results across independent experiments
Functional Correlation:
Changes in phospho-LIMK2 should correlate with:
Altered cofilin phosphorylation status
Measurable changes in F-actin organization
Phenotypic outcomes (e.g., migration rate, morphology changes)
Dose-Response Relationships:
Graded stimuli should produce proportional phosphorylation responses
Establish EC50 values for different stimuli
Temporal Dynamics:
Evaluate persistence of phosphorylation (transient vs. sustained)
Match kinetics to known biological processes
Consider rapid cycling between phosphorylated/dephosphorylated states
Comparative Analysis:
Compare with published literature values
Benchmark against known physiological activators
Consider relative changes compared to other phosphorylation events in the same pathway
Current research frontiers exploring LIMK2 phosphorylation include:
Role in Disease Contexts:
Cancer invasion and metastasis mechanisms
Neurodegenerative disorders involving cytoskeletal dysfunction
Cardiac and vascular remodeling pathologies
Regulatory Mechanisms Beyond Thr505:
Additional phosphorylation sites affecting LIMK2 function
Interplay between phosphorylation and other post-translational modifications
Scaffold proteins that organize LIMK2 signaling complexes
Tissue-Specific Functions:
Specialized roles in neurons vs. epithelial cells vs. immune cells
Developmental stage-specific regulation and function
Stem cell-specific cytoskeletal regulation
Subcellular Compartmentalization:
Nuclear functions of phosphorylated LIMK2
Association with specific actin structures (lamellipodia, filopodia, stress fibers)
Role at cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion sites
Technological Innovations:
Biosensors for real-time LIMK2 activity monitoring
Optogenetic approaches to spatiotemporally control LIMK2 activation
Single-cell analysis of phosphorylation heterogeneity
Integration Strategies:
Multi-level Analysis Framework:
Link molecular events (LIMK2 phosphorylation) to cellular behaviors
Connect cellular behaviors to tissue-level functions
Relate tissue functions to organismal physiology
Interdisciplinary Methodologies:
Combine biochemical approaches with biophysical measurements
Integrate computational modeling with experimental validation
Apply systems biology approaches to position LIMK2 in broader networks
Technological Integration:
Correlative light and electron microscopy to link phospho-signals to ultrastructure
Microfluidic systems to control microenvironment while analyzing phosphorylation
Organ-on-chip platforms to study LIMK2 in tissue-like contexts
Translational Applications:
Drug discovery targeting LIMK2 phosphorylation
Biomarker development based on phospho-LIMK2 status
Therapeutic approaches to modulate cytoskeletal dynamics
Comparative Biology Perspectives:
Evolutionary conservation of LIMK2 regulation across species
Cell-type specific adaptations of the LIMK2 pathway
Specialized cytoskeletal regulation in diverse biological contexts