This antibody targets the phosphorylated RELA protein, a key component of the NF-κB complex, which regulates genes involved in cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and stress responses. Phosphorylation at Ser281 modulates RELA’s transcriptional activity and nuclear translocation, making this antibody essential for investigating post-translational regulation of NF-κB .
RELA (p65) forms heterodimers with other NF-κB subunits (e.g., p50) to regulate gene expression. Phosphorylation at Ser281 is implicated in fine-tuning NF-κB activity, though its functional role is less characterized compared to other sites like Ser536 or Ser276. Detection of this modification helps elucidate context-specific signaling mechanisms, such as cytokine-induced activation or stress responses .
The Phospho-RELA (S281) Antibody has been validated for:
Western blotting: Detects phosphorylated RELA in lysates from stimulated cells.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes phospho-RELA in tissue sections.
Immunofluorescence (IF): Visualizes subcellular distribution (e.g., nuclear vs. cytoplasmic).
Flow cytometry (FCM): Quantifies phospho-RELA expression in cell populations .
While specific studies using this antibody are not publicly detailed in the provided sources, its design and validation data suggest utility in:
Pathway activation studies: Monitoring NF-κB activation in response to TNF-α or other stimuli.
Disease models: Investigating phosphorylated RELA in cancer, autoimmune diseases, or chronic inflammation.
Kinase/phosphatase assays: Identifying upstream regulators of Ser281 phosphorylation .
RELA (also known as NF-κB p65) is a subunit of the NF-κB transcription factor complex that regulates genes controlling inflammation, immune cell development, cell cycle, proliferation, and cell death . The NF-κB complex typically consists of a heterodimer of a Rel family member (RelA, c-Rel, or RelB) and either NF-κB1 or NF-κB2 subunits, with RelA and NF-κB1 being the most common pair .
Phosphorylation at S281 is part of the complex regulatory mechanism that controls RELA activity. While the specific consequence of S281 phosphorylation is not as extensively characterized as other sites, it appears to play a role in regulating RELA's function in a manner distinct from other phosphorylation sites. Research suggests it may modulate RELA's interaction with other proteins or its DNA binding specificity, similar to how phosphorylation at other serine residues affects RELA function .
RELA undergoes phosphorylation at multiple serine residues, each with distinct functional consequences:
Phosphorylation at S276 or S536 has been shown to enhance the assembly of phospho-RelA with the histone acetyltransferase p300, which increases acetylation at lysine 310 and ultimately enhances transcriptional activity . This demonstrates how phosphorylation can work in concert with other post-translational modifications to fine-tune RELA function.
Based on the search results, Phospho-RELA (S281) antibodies are employed in several key techniques:
Western blotting: For detection of phosphorylated RELA in cell or tissue lysates
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For visualization of phosphorylated RELA in tissue sections
Flow cytometry: For cellular analysis of phosphorylation status
The recommended dilutions for optimal results vary by application, typically 1:100-1:300 for IHC and 1:5000 for ELISA . These antibodies enable researchers to track the dynamic phosphorylation status of RELA in response to various stimuli, providing insights into NF-κB regulation under different physiological and pathological conditions.
Validating antibody specificity is critical for obtaining reliable results. For phospho-RELA (S281) antibodies, consider implementing the following validation strategies:
Phosphatase treatment control: Treat samples with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphorylation and confirm loss of antibody signal .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the phosphorylated peptide immunogen to block specific binding .
Phospho-mutant controls: Compare antibody reactivity between wild-type cells and those expressing S281A mutant RELA, which cannot be phosphorylated at this position .
Multiple technique validation: Confirm phosphorylation status using complementary techniques (e.g., Western blot, mass spectrometry) .
Stimulus-response validation: Verify expected changes in phosphorylation following treatment with known NF-κB activators like TNFα or PMA/Ionomycin .
For instance, one study evaluating phospho-antibodies found that "the rabbit monoclonal antibody D1R1R uniquely and robustly detected endogenous phosphorylated alpha-synuclein at Ser129 in rat primary culture of ENS without any non-specific bands" . Similar rigorous testing should be applied to phospho-RELA (S281) antibodies.
To optimize detection of S281 phosphorylation, researchers should consider:
Fixation and preservation: Immediate fixation is crucial as phosphorylation is often transient. For flow cytometry studies, one protocol recommends "immediately fixed using 20:1 ratio (9.5 mLs) of 4% FA diluted in 1× PBS for 10 minutes at room temperature to preserve phosphorylation status" .
Stimulation timing: NF-κB activation is highly dynamic. In one study, "TNFα induced both P-p65 and total p65 translocation significantly relative to time zero (untreated cells), with P-p65 peaking at 20 minutes, preceding a total p65 peak at 25 minutes" . Therefore, time course experiments are recommended.
Lysis conditions: Use phosphatase inhibitors (e.g., sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate) in lysis buffers to prevent dephosphorylation during sample preparation .
Sample handling: Minimize freeze-thaw cycles as recommended for antibody storage: "For short term storage and frequent use, store at 4°C for up to one month. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles" .
Control selection: Include both positive controls (cells stimulated with TNFα) and negative controls (unstimulated cells or phosphatase-treated samples) .
RELA undergoes multiple post-translational modifications that work in concert to regulate its activity. The interplay between these modifications creates a complex regulatory network:
Phosphorylation and acetylation crosstalk: Phosphorylation at S536 has been shown to stimulate acetylation on K310, enhancing transcriptional activity . It's possible that S281 phosphorylation similarly affects acetylation patterns.
Phosphorylation and ubiquitination: Some phosphorylation events can trigger ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. For RELA, "ubiquitinated by RNF182, leading to its proteasomal degradation. Degradation is required for termination of NF-kappa-B response" .
Phosphorylation and methylation interactions: "Monomethylated at Lys-310 by SETD6. Monomethylation at Lys-310 is recognized by the ANK repeats of EHMT1 and promotes the formation of repressed chromatin at target genes, leading to down-regulation of NF-kappa-B transcription factor activity. Phosphorylation at Ser-311 disrupts the interaction with EHMT1 without preventing monomethylation at Lys-310 and relieves the repression of target genes" .
Site-specific effects: Different phosphorylation sites have distinct effects. For instance, "The phosphorylation of serine 328 by Chk1 is triggered by DNA damage and regulates the interaction of p50 with specific NF-κB binding elements based on the κB-site nucleotide sequence" . Similar site-specific effects may exist for S281 phosphorylation.
Research to determine how S281 phosphorylation fits into this modification network would provide valuable insights into NF-κB regulation.
To investigate the functional consequences of S281 phosphorylation, researchers could employ:
Site-directed mutagenesis: Generate S281A (phospho-deficient) and S281D/E (phospho-mimetic) mutants to study the impact on RELA function . For example, "Reconstitution of RelA-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts with RelA S276A or RelA S536A decreased TNF-α-induced acetylation of lysine 310 and expression of the endogenous NF-κB-responsive E-selectin gene" .
Kinase identification: Use kinase inhibitors or knockdown/knockout approaches to identify the kinase(s) responsible for S281 phosphorylation, similar to how "phosphorylation of p105 at S903 and S907 by GSK3β" was identified .
DNA binding assays: Determine whether S281 phosphorylation affects DNA binding specificity using techniques like chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) or electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) .
Proteomic approaches: Use mass spectrometry-based methods to identify proteins that differentially interact with phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated S281 RELA .
Imaging flow cytometry: Apply techniques like those described in search result , which "demonstrate the application of IFC to simultaneously assess phosphorylation of p65 and its cellular localization" .
Gene expression profiling: Compare transcriptional responses in cells expressing wild-type versus S281 mutant RELA to identify genes specifically regulated by this phosphorylation site.
Phosphorylation of NF-κB subunits can lead to gene-specific effects on transcription. For instance, "NF-κB phosphorylation controls transcription in a gene-specific manner, offering new opportunities to selectively target NF-κB for therapeutic benefit" . Several mechanisms could explain how S281 phosphorylation might contribute to such specificity:
Sequence-specific DNA binding: Similar to how "S328 phosphorylation reduces the affinity of p50 for κB-sites with a cytosine, but not an adenine, at the -1 position" , S281 phosphorylation might affect RELA's affinity for specific DNA sequences.
Cofactor recruitment: Phosphorylation status can determine which cofactors interact with RELA. For example, "Interacts with HDAC1; the interaction requires non-phosphorylated RELA. Interacts with CBP; the interaction requires phosphorylated RELA" .
Chromatin modification patterns: Phosphorylated RELA might recruit different chromatin-modifying enzymes to specific promoters, as suggested by the finding that "Phosphorylation at Ser-276 by RPS6KA4 and RPS6KA5 promotes its transactivation and transcriptional activities" .
Integration with other signaling pathways: S281 phosphorylation might respond to specific cellular stimuli or stress conditions, allowing for context-dependent gene regulation.
Understanding these mechanisms would advance our knowledge of how NF-κB achieves specificity in its transcriptional responses despite regulating hundreds of genes.
Several factors can affect the reproducibility of phospho-RELA detection experiments:
Antibody quality: Different lots or sources may vary in specificity and sensitivity. "The D1R1R antibody uniquely and robustly detected endogenous phosphorylated protein...without any non-specific bands" , demonstrating the importance of antibody selection.
Phosphatase activity: Rapid dephosphorylation during sample preparation can lead to inconsistent results. "Following incubation, samples were immediately fixed...to preserve phosphorylation status" .
Stimulation protocols: The timing, concentration, and type of stimulus affect phosphorylation patterns. "TNFα induced both P-p65 and total p65 translocation significantly relative to time zero (untreated cells), with P-p65 peaking at 20 minutes" .
Fixation methods: Improper fixation can result in epitope masking or loss of phosphorylation signal. One study noted detection challenges "even when the transferred membrane is fixed with an optimized protocol" .
Cell culture conditions: Cell density, passage number, and serum conditions can influence baseline phosphorylation levels and responsiveness to stimuli.
Standardizing these variables is essential for obtaining consistent and reliable results.
Proper normalization is critical for accurate quantification of phosphorylation:
Total protein normalization: Compare phospho-RELA signal to total RELA levels to account for variations in total protein expression. "Cell-Based ELISA Kits...contain antibodies to measure both the phosphorylated and the total protein" .
Housekeeping protein controls: Use stable reference proteins like GAPDH or β-actin as loading controls for Western blot analyses.
Ratio-based quantification: "These two proteins are simultaneously detected in the same microplate well, allowing signals derived from the target protein to be normalized to that of the second protein. This permits corrections for well-to-well variation" .
Internal cellular controls: In flow cytometry or imaging studies, use unstimulated cells within the same sample as internal references.
Standard curve calibration: For quantitative ELISAs, generate standard curves using recombinant phosphorylated proteins when available.
These approaches help control for technical variations and enable meaningful comparisons across experimental conditions.
Recent technological advances offer new possibilities for investigating RELA phosphorylation:
Live-cell imaging with phospho-specific sensors: Genetically encoded biosensors that change conformation or FRET efficiency upon phosphorylation could enable real-time visualization of RELA S281 phosphorylation dynamics.
Single-cell phosphoproteomics: Emerging techniques allow measurement of phosphorylation events at the single-cell level, revealing heterogeneity within cell populations.
Imaging flow cytometry: As described in search result , this technique "demonstrate[s] the application of IFC to simultaneously assess phosphorylation of p65 and its cellular localization" .
CRISPR-based screens: Genome-wide or targeted screens could identify novel regulators of S281 phosphorylation.
Proximity labeling approaches: BioID or APEX2-based methods could identify proteins that interact specifically with phosphorylated RELA at S281.
These techniques promise to provide unprecedented insights into the spatial and temporal dynamics of RELA phosphorylation.
Insights into RELA S281 phosphorylation could inform novel therapeutic approaches:
Targeted inhibition: If S281 phosphorylation regulates specific subsets of NF-κB target genes, inhibitors targeting this modification could provide more selective anti-inflammatory effects than global NF-κB inhibitors. This aligns with the observation that "NF-κB phosphorylation controls transcription in a gene-specific manner, offering new opportunities to selectively target NF-κB for therapeutic benefit" .
Biomarker development: Phospho-S281 levels could serve as biomarkers for disease activity or treatment response in conditions involving dysregulated NF-κB signaling.
Combination therapies: Understanding how S281 phosphorylation interacts with other regulatory mechanisms could suggest effective drug combinations that target multiple aspects of NF-κB regulation.
Precision medicine approaches: If genetic variants affect S281 phosphorylation or its downstream effects, this could inform personalized treatment strategies for inflammatory or immune-mediated diseases.
The fundamental insights gained from studying S281 phosphorylation thus have potential translational implications that extend beyond basic research.