Phospho-RPS6 (Ser235) Antibody is a research tool designed to specifically detect the phosphorylated form of the S6 Ribosomal Protein at serine 235. This antibody is crucial for studying cellular signaling pathways as ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6) is a major component of the small 40S ribosomal subunit implicated in mRNA decoding . RPS6 serves as a critical downstream substrate of multiple signaling cascades, including mTORC1 and MAPK/ERK pathways.
Methodologically, this antibody enables researchers to:
Monitor activation of the mTOR and ERK signaling pathways
Assess translational regulation in response to various stimuli
Examine cell growth and proliferation mechanisms
Evaluate metabolic responses in different experimental conditions
The significance lies in that RPS6 phosphorylation enhances its affinity for the m7GpppG cap complex, promoting translation initiation and increasing cellular protein synthesis capacity .
Phosphorylation of RPS6 follows a hierarchical and sequential pattern:
Initial phosphorylation begins at Ser-236
Sequential phosphorylation then occurs at Ser-235, Ser-240, Ser-244, and Ser-247
This ordered phosphorylation process is regulated by at least two distinct kinase families:
| Phosphorylation Site | Primary Kinases | Signaling Pathway |
|---|---|---|
| Ser235/236 | p70 S6K, RSK | mTORC1, ERK |
| Ser240/244 | p70 S6K | mTORC1 |
| Ser247 | Casein Kinase 1 (CK1) | Independent pathway |
The dual phosphorylation at Ser235/236 can occur through both mTORC1-dependent mechanisms via p70 S6 kinase (S6K1) and mTORC1-independent mechanisms via p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSK) activated by extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) . This dual regulation makes these sites particularly informative for monitoring multiple signaling inputs.
Based on validated research applications, Phospho-RPS6 (Ser235) antibodies can be utilized in multiple experimental techniques:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Sample Types |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | 1:1000 - 1:50000 | Cell lysates, tissue extracts |
| Immunofluorescence (IF/ICC) | 1:800 - 1:4000 | Cultured cells, tissue sections |
| Flow Cytometry (FC) | 1:50 - 1:200 | Fixed/permeabilized cells |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC-P) | 1:100 - 1:1200 | Paraffin-embedded tissues |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | 1:100 | Cell lysates, tissue extracts |
| ELISA | 1:5000 | Purified proteins, cell extracts |
For optimal results in western blotting, it is recommended to use treatment conditions that activate mTOR or ERK pathways, such as insulin stimulation, IGF-1 treatment, or Calyculin A (phosphatase inhibitor) treatment . When performing immunofluorescence or flow cytometry, treatment with 100 nM Calyculin A for 30 minutes has been validated to produce optimal signal .
Proper validation of phospho-specific antibodies is critical. Follow these methodological approaches:
Phosphatase treatment controls:
Split your sample and treat half with lambda phosphatase
The phospho-signal should be eliminated in the treated sample
Stimulation/inhibition experiments:
Stimulate cells with insulin, IGF-1, or serum to increase phosphorylation
Treat cells with mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin, Torin1) or MEK inhibitors (U0126, PD0325901) to decrease phosphorylation
Compare treated vs. untreated samples by western blotting
Mutation analysis:
Peptide competition:
Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing phospho-peptide
Signal should be blocked in subsequent applications
Research has demonstrated that introducing individual Ser → Ala mutations at codons 235, 236, 240, 244, and 247 of RPS6 and expressing the mutant proteins in cells provides excellent specificity controls for phospho-specific antibodies .
The hierarchical phosphorylation of RPS6 creates a sophisticated regulatory mechanism:
Cap-binding enhancement: Phosphorylation enhances RPS6 affinity for the m7GpppG cap, facilitating translation initiation complex assembly
Bidirectional influence: Research indicates a bidirectional interaction where:
Selective mRNA translation: Phosphorylated RPS6 preferentially enhances translation of:
mRNAs containing 5' terminal oligopyrimidine (TOP) tracts
mRNAs encoding ribosomal proteins and translation factors
Cellular outcomes: The level of RPS6 phosphorylation directly impacts:
Notably, mutation of Ser-247 inhibits phosphorylation of Ser-240 and Ser-244 but has no effect on phosphorylation of Ser-235/236, suggesting independent regulatory mechanisms for different phosphorylation clusters .
Understanding the dual regulation of RPS6 phosphorylation is essential for experimental interpretation:
| Feature | mTORC1→S6K Pathway | ERK→RSK Pathway |
|---|---|---|
| Primary phosphorylation sites | All sites (Ser235/236/240/244/247) | Primarily Ser235/236 |
| Response to rapamycin | Highly sensitive | Resistant |
| Nutrient dependency | Strongly regulated by amino acids | Less affected by nutrients |
| Growth factor dependency | Requires prolonged stimulation | Rapid and transient activation |
| Energy status sensitivity | Inhibited by low energy (via AMPK) | Less sensitive to energy status |
Methodological approach to distinguish between pathways:
Use rapamycin (mTORC1 inhibitor) to block S6K-mediated phosphorylation
Use MEK inhibitors to block RSK-mediated phosphorylation
Examine temporal dynamics - ERK/RSK activation is typically faster than mTORC1/S6K
Monitor additional pathway-specific substrates (e.g., 4E-BP1 for mTORC1)
The phosphorylation of RPS6 at Ser235/236 can occur independently of mTORC1 via RSK, making these sites less specific markers for mTORC1 activity compared to Ser240/244 phosphorylation .
Phospho-RPS6 antibodies serve as valuable tools in cancer research:
Biomarker applications:
Resistance mechanism studies:
Identify bypass mechanisms in mTOR inhibitor-resistant tumors
Map cross-talk between PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways
Detect feedback activation of alternative signaling routes
Methodology for therapeutic evaluation:
When analyzing clinical samples, researchers should standardize tissue handling procedures, as phospho-epitopes can be rapidly lost during sample processing. Immediate fixation and validated extraction protocols are essential for reliable results.
Optimized protocol for flow cytometry with Phospho-RPS6 antibodies:
Cell preparation:
Fixation and permeabilization:
Antibody staining:
Detection and analysis:
For direct detection, use fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (PE, BV421, PE/Cy7)
For indirect detection, use appropriate secondary antibodies
Include isotype controls and unstimulated/inhibitor-treated cells as controls
For multi-parameter analysis, compatible fluorochrome-conjugated Phospho-RPS6 antibodies include PE, PE/Cyanine7, PerCP/Cyanine5.5, and Brilliant Violet 421™, allowing flexibility in panel design .
| Challenge | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High background signal | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking (5% BSA), optimize antibody dilution (1:1000-1:2000) |
| Weak or absent signal | Rapid dephosphorylation | Add phosphatase inhibitors, minimize processing time |
| Variable results between experiments | Inconsistent cell stimulation | Standardize stimulation protocols, include positive controls |
| Multiple bands in western blot | Cross-reactivity or degradation | Use phospho-peptide competition, ensure fresh lysates with protease inhibitors |
| Discrepancies between applications | Method-specific epitope availability | Optimize fixation and antigen retrieval for each application |
For western blotting applications, researchers should note that the observed molecular weight of RPS6 is approximately 32-35 kDa, which is slightly higher than the calculated molecular weight of 29 kDa due to post-translational modifications .
When troubleshooting immunofluorescence experiments, remember that different fixation methods can affect epitope accessibility. Paraformaldehyde fixation (4%, 10-15 minutes) followed by permeabilization with Triton X-100 (0.1%, 5 minutes) generally provides good results for phospho-epitopes .
Proper storage and handling are essential for maintaining antibody performance:
Storage conditions:
Buffer composition:
Stability considerations:
Handling precautions:
Avoid contamination by using sterile technique
Protect conjugated antibodies from prolonged light exposure
Centrifuge vials briefly before opening to collect solution at the bottom
Following manufacturer recommendations for specific products is always advisable, as formulations may vary between suppliers.
Recent advancements have expanded the utility of Phospho-RPS6 antibodies:
Single-cell phospho-profiling:
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) incorporates metal-tagged Phospho-RPS6 antibodies
Single-cell RNA-seq combined with protein epitope profiling (CITE-seq) allows correlation of phosphorylation state with transcriptome
High-dimensional flow cytometry panels incorporate up to 30 parameters including multiple phospho-proteins
Spatial phospho-proteomics:
Multiplexed immunofluorescence with tyramide signal amplification enhances sensitivity
Imaging mass cytometry allows subcellular localization of phosphorylated RPS6
Digital spatial profiling correlates phospho-signal with tissue microenvironment
Live-cell dynamics:
Proximity ligation assays monitor real-time changes in RPS6 phosphorylation
Phospho-specific intrabodies track pathway activation in living cells
These emerging methodologies allow researchers to move beyond bulk analysis to understand signaling heterogeneity at single-cell resolution and within spatial contexts, providing deeper insights into pathway regulation in complex tissues and tumors.
Integration of Phospho-RPS6 analysis into multi-omics workflows:
Proteogenomic integration:
Correlate RPS6 phosphorylation with:
Mutational status of pathway components (mTOR, PI3K, PTEN, etc.)
Expression of upstream regulators
Translation efficiency of specific mRNA subsets
Metabolomics connections:
Link RPS6 phosphorylation status to:
Amino acid availability and utilization
Energy metabolites (ATP/AMP ratio)
Lipid metabolism signatures
Methodological approach:
Fixed/frozen sample splitting for parallel omics analysis
Single-cell multi-omics to correlate phospho-status with other molecular features
Sequential antibody stripping and reprobing for multiplexed phospho-profiling
Data integration frameworks:
Pathway analysis incorporating phosphorylation events
Correlation networks linking phospho-signals to transcriptome and metabolome
Machine learning approaches to identify predictive phospho-signatures
The integration of phospho-specific antibody data with other omics approaches enables systems-level understanding of how RPS6 phosphorylation impacts cellular homeostasis across various physiological and pathological conditions.
When selecting between these options:
For mTORC1 pathway specificity, choose Ser240/244 antibodies
For detecting both mTORC1 and MAPK/ERK inputs, use Ser235/236 antibodies
For distinguishing between single vs. dual phosphorylation events, compare Ser235-specific with Ser235/236 antibodies
For quantitative applications like flow cytometry, monoclonal antibodies generally provide more consistent results
Research has demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies offer higher reproducibility across experiments, while polyclonal antibodies may provide higher sensitivity but with greater lot-to-lot variation .
Comparing recombinant and conventional antibody production methods:
| Feature | Recombinant Antibodies | Conventional Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| Production method | DNA technology in defined expression systems | Immunization of animals |
| Batch-to-batch consistency | Extremely high (genetically identical) | Variable (especially polyclonals) |
| Defined sequence | Complete sequence knowledge | Limited or unknown sequence information |
| Specificity | Highly controlled through selection | May contain mixed specificities |
| Customization potential | Easily engineered for specific applications | Limited to natural immune response |
| Ethical considerations | Reduced animal usage after initial development | Ongoing animal requirements |
| Storage stability | Generally more stable | May show more variable stability |
Several commercially available Phospho-RPS6 antibodies now utilize recombinant technology, including:
Recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies for improved reproducibility
Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) for enhanced tissue penetration
Engineered antibody formats for specialized applications
Methodologically, researchers should consider:
Recombinant antibodies for longitudinal studies requiring consistent reagents
Recombinant technology for rare phospho-epitopes difficult to raise conventionally
Engineered formats for challenging applications (intracellular delivery, multiplexing)
The transition to recombinant antibody technology represents an important advancement in phospho-specific detection, addressing many limitations of traditional antibody production methods.
Based on extensive research experience and published literature, these best practices are recommended:
Selection criteria:
Choose antibodies validated in your specific application
Select phosphorylation sites appropriate for your research question (pathway-specificity)
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different phosphorylation sites for comprehensive analysis
Experimental design:
Always include appropriate positive controls (stimulated samples)
Incorporate negative controls (phosphatase-treated, inhibitor-treated, non-phosphorylatable mutants)
Standardize sample collection and processing to minimize phospho-epitope loss
Reporting standards:
Validation requirements:
Demonstrate specificity through multiple approaches (western blot, phosphatase treatment)
Confirm expected molecular weight (~32 kDa for RPS6)
Validate response to known pathway activators and inhibitors
These consensus guidelines ensure robust, reproducible results when using Phospho-RPS6 antibodies in translational research settings.
Emerging trends and future directions include:
Advanced antibody engineering:
Bispecific antibodies detecting multiple phosphorylation states simultaneously
Antibody-based biosensors for real-time pathway monitoring
Enhanced membrane-permeable formats for live-cell applications
Expanded clinical applications:
Standardized IHC protocols for patient stratification
Companion diagnostics for mTOR/PI3K pathway inhibitors
Minimally invasive monitoring of treatment response
Technology integration:
AI-assisted image analysis for quantitative phospho-profiling
Automated high-content screening platforms
Point-of-care phospho-protein testing for personalized medicine
Novel detection modalities:
CRISPR-based detection systems linked to phospho-recognition domains
Digital protein quantification with single-molecule resolution
Label-free detection systems for dynamic pathway analysis