The tumor suppressor p53 is a master regulator of cellular stress responses, and its activity is modulated by phosphorylation at specific residues. Ser6 phosphorylation has been implicated in:
Enhanced transactivation of p21: Phospho-p53 (Ser6) facilitates p21 induction, a key mediator of cell cycle arrest. Studies show that p53-72R (arginine variant) exhibits higher Ser6 phosphorylation levels compared to p53-72P (proline variant), leading to stronger p21 expression and improved tumor suppression .
Cooperation with TGF-β signaling: TGF-β-dependent growth suppression requires p53 phosphorylation at Ser6. This modification enables p53 to synergize with TGF-β in activating p21, a mechanism critical for tumor suppression .
Structural and functional divergence: The codon 72 polymorphism (Arg/Pro) influences Ser6 phosphorylation efficiency, with p53-72R showing elevated phosphorylation under basal and DNA-damaged conditions (e.g., γ-ray or UV irradiation) .
This antibody is widely used in molecular and clinical research to study p53 activation dynamics. Key applications include:
DNA damage response: Ser6 phosphorylation is enhanced upon γ-ray irradiation, with p53-72R showing significantly higher phosphorylation than p53-72P .
TGF-β synergy: Ser6 phosphorylation is required for TGF-β to cooperatively induce p21 with p53, a process independent of p53’s DNA-binding activity .
Polymorphism-dependent activity: The p53-72R variant’s superior Ser6 phosphorylation correlates with increased tumor suppressor function, providing a molecular basis for cancer susceptibility differences .
p53 autoantibodies, including those targeting phosphorylated epitopes, are detected in 96% of cancer patients and may serve as early biomarkers .
The Invitrogen™ Phospho-p53 (Ser6) antibody is available for research use only (RUO) at 3157.00 SEK (valid until March 16, 2025) . Promotional discounts require bulk purchases (e.g., 33.33% off for three units using code "24111").
Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibody is a research reagent specifically designed to detect the tumor suppressor protein p53 (TP53) only when phosphorylated at the serine 6 residue. This antibody recognizes the specific peptide sequence surrounding the phosphorylated serine 6 site, typically the amino acid sequence P-Q-S(p)-D-P derived from human p53 . This high specificity allows researchers to distinguish between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of p53, enabling precise study of this particular post-translational modification in various experimental contexts. Importantly, these antibodies usually detect endogenous levels of p53 protein only when the Ser6 residue is phosphorylated .
Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibody has been validated for multiple laboratory techniques, enabling researchers to investigate p53 phosphorylation from different experimental angles:
The versatility of this antibody makes it valuable for comprehensive p53 phosphorylation analysis across multiple experimental platforms, allowing researchers to correlate findings between different methodological approaches.
Phosphorylation of p53 at Ser6 represents an important regulatory mechanism within the complex network of p53 post-translational modifications. The serine 6 residue is predominantly phosphorylated by Casein Kinase 1 delta (CK1δ) and Casein Kinase 1 epsilon (CK1ε) both in vitro and in vivo .
This modification plays several crucial roles:
It contributes to p53 activation in response to cellular stress signals, including DNA damage
It forms part of the N-terminal phosphorylation cascade that exhibits significant interdependency with other phosphorylation sites
It may influence p53's DNA binding capability and transcriptional activity
It operates within a coordinated phosphorylation network, with research showing that phosphorylation at sites like Ser15 can influence phosphorylation at other sites including Ser6
Research indicates that phosphorylation at Ser6 is part of the mechanism by which p53 "integrates" diverse stress signals to coordinate appropriate cellular responses .
Based on the available research data, Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibodies typically exhibit the following species reactivity profile:
| Species | Reactivity | Validation Status |
|---|---|---|
| Human (H) | Yes | Confirmed |
| Monkey (Mk) | Yes | Confirmed |
| Other mammals | Limited | Often predicted based on sequence homology but requires validation |
When selecting a Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibody for non-human, non-primate models, researchers should note that while the antibody might share 100% sequence homology with certain species, reactivity may not have been experimentally validated. Most commercial antibodies specify that use with species other than those explicitly listed is not covered under performance guarantees .
The phosphorylation status of p53 significantly influences its interactions with key regulatory proteins, particularly with MDM2, which targets p53 for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Unlike the well-characterized effect of Ser15 and Ser20 phosphorylation on disrupting p53-MDM2 interaction, Ser6 phosphorylation's role appears more nuanced.
Research indicates that N-terminal phosphorylations show significant interdependency. Specifically, phosphorylation at Ser6 and Ser9 by CK1δ and CK1ε occurs both in vitro and in vivo and may work in concert with other modifications to regulate p53 function .
The interdependency suggests that Ser6 phosphorylation may influence p53's protein interactions through:
Contributing to a conformational change in the N-terminal domain
Setting up sequential phosphorylation events at other sites
Participating in a phosphorylation code that modulates interaction strength with binding partners
Potentially influencing p53's transcription factor activity through altered protein complex formation
For definitive analysis of how Ser6 phosphorylation affects protein interactions, researchers should consider employing phosphomimetic (S6D or S6E) or phospho-deficient (S6A) mutants in interaction studies alongside phospho-specific antibodies.
Robust validation of antibody specificity is essential for reliable research outcomes. For Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibody, the following positive controls are recommended:
A comprehensive validation protocol should include:
Parallel Western blots with both phospho-specific and total p53 antibodies
Phosphatase treatment of one sample set to demonstrate loss of signal
Using siRNA/shRNA against p53 to confirm signal specificity
If possible, testing reactivity in cells expressing p53 with Ser6-to-Ala mutation
These controls help ensure that any observed signal genuinely represents p53 phosphorylated at Ser6 rather than non-specific binding or cross-reactivity with other phosphorylated residues.
The phosphorylation of p53 at Ser6 is mediated primarily by specific kinases that respond to various cellular stress conditions:
Research indicates that different stresses activate distinct kinase pathways that target specific p53 phosphorylation sites. For example, ionizing radiation activates phosphorylation pathways that are distinct from those activated by viral infection or metabolic stress . The study by Craig et al. (2009) demonstrated that distinct stresses trigger different kinase signaling pathways for p53 activation, suggesting a complex regulatory network for integrating diverse stress signals .
For investigating the specific kinases responsible for Ser6 phosphorylation in different contexts, researchers can employ selective CK1 inhibitors alongside temporal analysis of phosphorylation events following various cellular stresses.
The significant interdependency among p53 phosphorylation sites presents important considerations for experimental design:
Research has specifically demonstrated that "mutation of Ser15 to alanine blocked phosphorylation at Ser9, Thr18 and Ser20 after ionizing radiation" . Similar interdependencies exist throughout the p53 modification network, making single-site studies potentially misleading when interpreted in isolation.
For robust experimental design:
Consider multiple phosphorylation sites simultaneously
Employ time-course experiments to track modification sequences
Use multiplexed detection methods when possible
Validate findings using both site-specific mutations and kinase manipulations
Interpret single-site studies with appropriate caution
Understanding this interdependency is crucial for accurate interpretation of p53 phosphorylation studies and their biological significance in cellular responses to stress.
Optimizing detection of p53 Ser6 phosphorylation requires attention to several key methodological factors:
For Western blotting specifically:
Run gradient gels for optimal p53 separation (typically appears at 53 kDa)
Include positive controls such as UV-irradiated or chemically-treated cells known to induce Ser6 phosphorylation
Always run parallel blots with antibodies against total p53 to normalize for total protein levels
Consider membrane stripping optimization if probing for multiple phosphorylation sites
Implement quantitative analysis using appropriate software and statistical methods
For immunostaining applications:
Optimize fixation methods to preserve phospho-epitopes (generally, paraformaldehyde is preferred over methanol)
Consider antigen retrieval methods carefully, as some may cause dephosphorylation
Use tyramide signal amplification for enhanced sensitivity when detecting low-abundance phosphorylated forms
When facing inconsistent results with Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) Antibody, consider these systematic troubleshooting approaches:
Additional methodological considerations include:
The timing of sample collection is critical, as phosphorylation can be transient
Process all samples identically and rapidly to prevent differential dephosphorylation
Consider the cell type and p53 status (wild-type vs. mutant) when interpreting results
For critical experiments, validate findings with multiple detection methods
By systematically addressing these factors, researchers can significantly improve the consistency and reliability of results obtained with Phospho-TP53 (Ser6) antibodies.
Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding is crucial for reliable results. Consider these validation approaches:
| Validation Strategy | Methodology | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Peptide Competition | Pre-incubate antibody with excess phosphorylated vs. non-phosphorylated peptides | Signal should be blocked by phospho-peptide but not by non-phospho-peptide |
| Phosphatase Treatment | Treat one sample set with lambda phosphatase | Signal should be eliminated or significantly reduced |
| Genetic Controls | Compare signal in p53-null cells vs. wild-type cells | Signal should be absent in p53-null cells |
| Antibody Validation | Test multiple antibodies against the same epitope | Consistent pattern should emerge with validated antibodies |
For critical experiments requiring absolute confidence in specificity:
Include both positive and negative controls in each experiment
Verify the molecular weight of detected bands (p53 typically appears at 53 kDa)
For immunostaining, include secondary-only controls and isotype controls
Consider additional validation through mass spectrometry for definitive phosphosite identification
These validation steps help ensure that observed signals genuinely represent p53 phosphorylated at Ser6 rather than experimental artifacts or cross-reactivity.
Understanding the temporal dynamics of p53 Ser6 phosphorylation requires sophisticated methodological approaches:
| Approach | Methodology | Advantages |
|---|---|---|
| Time-Course Analysis | Collect samples at multiple timepoints following stress | Allows tracking of phosphorylation kinetics in relation to other events |
| Pulse-Chase | Combine with protein synthesis inhibitors | Distinguishes newly synthesized from modified existing p53 |
| Quantitative Phosphoproteomics | Mass spectrometry at different timepoints | Comprehensive analysis of multiple modifications simultaneously |
| Live-Cell Imaging | Fluorescent biosensors for phosphorylated proteins | Real-time visualization in living cells |
When designing temporal studies:
Include appropriate early timepoints (minutes) to capture initial phosphorylation events
Extend to later timepoints (hours) to observe downstream effects
Consider cell cycle synchronization if cell cycle effects are a concern
Use multiple stressors to compare phosphorylation kinetics under different conditions
Correlate phosphorylation dynamics with functional outcomes (e.g., target gene expression)
A study by Craig et al. demonstrated that different stresses induced distinct kinetics and pathways for p53 phosphorylation, highlighting the importance of temporal analysis in understanding p53 regulation .
Investigating how Ser6 phosphorylation affects p53's transcriptional activity requires multi-faceted approaches:
| Approach | Methodology | Insights Provided |
|---|---|---|
| ChIP-seq | Chromatin immunoprecipitation with phospho-specific antibodies | Identifies genomic binding sites of phosphorylated p53 |
| RNA-seq | Transcriptome analysis with phosphomimetic mutants | Reveals gene expression changes dependent on phosphorylation |
| Reporter Assays | Luciferase reporters with p53 response elements | Quantifies transcriptional activity differences |
| Protein-Protein Interaction | Co-IP with transcriptional machinery components | Identifies how phosphorylation affects co-factor recruitment |
Experimental design considerations:
Compare wild-type p53 with phosphomimetic (S6D/S6E) and phospho-deficient (S6A) mutants
Consider the impact of combined mutations at multiple phosphorylation sites
Analyze both canonical p53 target genes and global transcriptional effects
Correlate phosphorylation status with chromatin accessibility and histone modifications
Examine cell type-specific effects, as transcriptional outcomes may vary by cellular context
These approaches can reveal how Ser6 phosphorylation contributes to p53's selective activation of specific gene sets under different stress conditions.
The field of p53 post-translational modifications continues to evolve, with several promising research directions for Ser6 phosphorylation: