PKH3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Biological Role of PKH3

PKH3 is one of three yeast orthologs of mammalian 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1), alongside PKH1 and PKH2. These kinases phosphorylate substrates at conserved PDK1 sites, regulating processes such as cell wall integrity, stress response, and longevity . Notably, PKH3 was identified as a multicopy suppressor of cell wall defects in pkh1 ts pkh2Δ strains, suggesting functional redundancy among PDK1 orthologs .

Key substrates of PKH3 include:

  • Sch9: A protein kinase involved in nutrient signaling, ribosome biogenesis, and aging. Phosphorylation of Sch9 by PKH3 modulates its activity, linking PDK1 signaling to growth regulation .

  • Ypk1/Ypk2 and Pkc1: Kinases critical for maintaining cell membrane integrity .

PKH3 Antibody Applications

While the provided sources do not explicitly describe a commercially available PKH3 antibody, antibodies targeting yeast kinases are typically generated using recombinant protein fragments or synthetic peptides. Based on analogous antibody development workflows , hypothetical applications for a PKH3-specific antibody would include:

ApplicationPurpose
Western blottingDetect PKH3 expression levels in yeast lysates under varying conditions.
ImmunoprecipitationIsolate PKH3-interacting proteins to map signaling networks.
ImmunofluorescenceLocalize PKH3 within yeast cells to study its spatial regulation.
Functional studiesValidate PKH3 knockout or overexpression strains via protein quantification.

Phosphorylation of Sch9

PKH3 contributes to Sch9 activation, as shown in studies where combined deletions of PKH1 and PKH2 led to lethality, partially rescued by PKH3 overexpression . Quantitative analyses reveal:

KinaseSubstratePhosphorylation SiteFunctional Outcome
PKH3Sch9T570Regulates ribosome biogenesis .
PKH1/PKH2Ypk1/Pkc1Hydrophobic motifMaintains cell wall integrity .

Experimental Tools for PKH3 Studies

The plasmid pKH3 (Addgene #12555) is a mammalian expression vector with a 3xHA tag, enabling epitope-tagged PKH3 expression for antibody-based detection . Key features include:

FeatureDetail
BackbonepBR322
Cloning sitesXbaI, BamHI (5'); EcoRI (3')
Antibody compatibilityAnti-HA (for tagged PKH3 detection)
Bacterial resistanceAmpicillin (100 µg/mL)

Future Directions

The absence of direct references to a PKH3-specific antibody underscores the need for custom antibody development. Future studies could:

  1. Characterize PKH3’s structure-function relationships using crystallography.

  2. Explore cross-species PDK1 conservation via comparative kinase assays.

  3. Develop therapeutic strategies targeting PDK1 pathways in human diseases.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
PKH3 antibody; YDR466W antibody; Serine/threonine-protein kinase PKH3 antibody; EC 2.7.11.1 antibody; Pkb-activating kinase homolog 3 antibody
Target Names
PKH3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
PKH3 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that may phosphorylate the same target substrates as PKH1 and PKH2, two upstream activators of Protein Kinase C1 (PKC1).
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YDR466W

STRING: 4932.YDR466W

Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, Ser/Thr protein kinase family

Q&A

What determines antibody specificity and how is it characterized?

Antibody specificity is primarily determined by the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), particularly the heavy chain CDR3 (HCDR3) and light chain CDR3 (LCDR3). These regions form the antigen-binding site and make direct contact with epitopes. Recent structural analyses have shown that antibodies targeting the same epitope often display convergent structural features despite being encoded by different germline genes .

The characterization of antibody specificity typically involves:

  • Binding assays such as ELISA or biolayer interferometry (BLI) to assess reactivity to target antigens

  • Cross-reactivity testing against related antigens

  • Epitope mapping through crystallography, cryo-EM, or mutational analysis

  • Neutralization assays for antibodies targeting pathogens

For example, research on influenza H1N1 antibodies demonstrated that structurally convergent "anchor antibodies" bound to highly conserved epitopes in the membrane-proximal region of hemagglutinin (HA), allowing broad neutralization of diverse viral strains .

What are optimal storage conditions for research antibodies?

Proper storage is crucial for maintaining antibody functionality and extending shelf life. Based on standard protocols:

Storage ConditionTemperatureDurationAdditivesNotes
Long-term storage-20°CUp to 1 year50% glycerolAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Working solution4°C1-2 weeks0.02% sodium azideStore in small aliquots
TransportOn iceShort-termN/AAvoid temperature fluctuations

Most commercial antibodies are supplied in PBS containing stabilizers like glycerol and preservatives like sodium azide . Storage recommendations are typically antibody-specific, so always follow manufacturer guidelines for optimal results.

How do polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies differ in research applications?

Both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies serve valuable but distinct purposes in research:

Polyclonal antibodies, like the PAX3 polyclonal antibody described in the search results, recognize multiple epitopes on the target antigen . They are:

  • Generated in host animals (often rabbits) immunized with target antigens

  • Typically affinity-purified using epitope-specific immunogens

  • Useful for detecting endogenous levels of proteins in applications like Western blotting

  • Less affected by minor changes in the target protein

Monoclonal antibodies, such as the structurally convergent antibodies against influenza HA, recognize single epitopes with high specificity . They offer:

  • Consistent performance across batches

  • Reduced background and cross-reactivity

  • Better suited for therapeutic applications

  • More sensitive to epitope changes

The selection between these types depends on the research objectives, target characteristics, and required specificity level.

How do structural features of CDRs contribute to antibody function?

The three-dimensional structure of CDRs plays a crucial role in determining antibody function, beyond just sequence variability. Recent structural analyses have revealed remarkable insights:

Anchor antibodies against influenza H1 demonstrate how structurally convergent features can arise from diverse germline genes (VH3-23, VH3-30, VH3-30-3, and VH3-48 paired with VK3-11 and VK3-15) . Key structural elements include:

  • A consistent 10-residue LCDR3 containing a conserved N93WPP95a motif that adopts a W-shaped conformation

  • HCDR3 loops that engage specific hydrophobic pockets in the target epitope

  • Hydrogen bond networks formed between conserved residues (Q27, S32) and antibody CDR loops

Alanine scanning mutagenesis has demonstrated that these structural features are functionally critical. Substituting key hydrophobic residues in HCDR3 dramatically reduced or eliminated binding, confirming their importance in antibody-antigen interaction .

What experimental approaches can validate antibody specificity and functionality?

Comprehensive validation is essential when characterizing a new antibody. Advanced approaches include:

  • Binding analysis via biolayer interferometry (BLI): Quantifies binding kinetics and affinity to target antigens. In studies of anchor antibodies, BLI demonstrated broad reactivity to H1N1 HAs isolated between 1934 and 2019 .

  • Structural determination: X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy at resolutions of 2.4-3.2Å provides atomic-level detail of antibody-antigen interactions, revealing binding modes and contact residues .

  • Alanine scanning mutagenesis: Systematically replacing key residues with alanine to identify critical interaction points. For example, substituting hydrophobic residues in HCDR3 of anchor antibodies reduced binding affinity, particularly when targeting hydrophobic pockets in the epitope .

  • Neutralization assays: In vitro micro-neutralization assays can assess functional activity. Anchor antibodies demonstrated variable neutralization potency against different viral strains (0.1-1 μg/ml), comparable to broadly neutralizing antibodies like FI6v3 .

  • Epitope conservation analysis: Bioinformatic assessment of epitope conservation across viral strains. Contact residues for anchor antibodies showed high conservation across H1N1 HAs from 1918-2023, explaining their broad reactivity .

How are AI-based approaches transforming antibody design and discovery?

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing antibody research by reducing reliance on serum-isolated antibodies, which traditionally involves resource-intensive and time-consuming processes:

The PALM-H3 (Pre-trained Antibody generative large Language Model) represents a breakthrough in de novo antibody generation, enabling the creation of artificial CDRH3 sequences with specific antigen-binding properties . This approach:

  • Uses pre-training on large datasets of unpaired antibody sequences

  • Employs the Roformer architecture, which improves interpretability through attention mechanisms

  • Fine-tunes the model on antigen-antibody affinity datasets

  • Generates novel CDRH3 sequences with predicted binding specificity

Complementing this, the A2binder model pairs antigen epitope sequences with antibody sequences to predict binding specificity and affinity with high precision . In validation studies, PALM-H3-generated antibodies demonstrated:

  • High binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins

  • Potent neutralization capability against multiple variants (wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and XBB)

  • Effective targeting of emerging variants

These AI approaches fundamentally change antibody discovery by providing insights into design principles and reducing dependence on natural antibody repertoires.

What factors influence epitope accessibility and antibody binding in vivo?

Understanding the spatial context of epitopes is crucial for predicting antibody efficacy in vivo. Recent research highlights several important considerations:

  • Conformational dynamics: Target proteins often adopt multiple conformations in physiological conditions. Anchor antibodies targeting influenza HA may have improved accessibility when the HA is tilted relative to the viral membrane .

  • Epitope location: Membrane-proximal epitopes may be less accessible due to steric hindrance. The anchor region of influenza HA represents a relatively conserved epitope that maintains accessibility despite its proximity to the membrane .

  • Glycosylation patterns: Carbohydrate modifications can shield potential epitopes from antibody recognition.

  • Viral escape mechanisms: Under selective pressure, pathogens evolve mutations in antibody epitopes. The stem region of influenza HA has accumulated mutations allowing escape from broadly neutralizing antibodies .

  • Tissue penetration: Larger antibody formats may have limited access to certain anatomical compartments compared to smaller formats.

Researchers should consider these factors when designing therapeutic antibodies or vaccine strategies to target specific epitopes.

How can researchers optimize antibody dilutions for Western blotting and ELISA?

Determining optimal antibody concentrations is essential for balancing signal strength and background. For example, the PAX3 Polyclonal Antibody has recommended dilutions of 1:500-2000 for Western blotting and 1:5000-20000 for ELISA . To systematically establish optimal dilutions:

  • Perform titration experiments:

    • For Western blotting: Test a dilution series (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000)

    • For ELISA: Create a standard curve with serial dilutions (e.g., 1:1000 to 1:100,000)

  • Include proper controls:

    • Positive control: Sample known to express the target

    • Negative control: Sample lacking the target

    • Secondary antibody-only control: To assess non-specific binding

  • Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio:

    • Select the dilution that maximizes specific signal while minimizing background

    • Consider signal intensity, specificity, and reproducibility

  • Account for target abundance:

    • Low-abundance proteins may require higher antibody concentrations

    • Highly expressed proteins allow for more dilute antibody solutions

The optimal dilution may vary based on the specific application, sample type, and detection method, necessitating empirical determination for each experimental system.

What strategies can resolve common issues with antibody cross-reactivity?

Cross-reactivity represents a significant challenge in antibody-based research. Several approaches can minimize this problem:

  • Pre-absorption with irrelevant antigens:

    • Incubate the antibody with potential cross-reactive antigens

    • Remove bound antibodies before applying to the experimental sample

  • Epitope-specific purification:

    • Affinity-purify antibodies using epitope-specific immunogens, as described for the PAX3 polyclonal antibody

    • This enriches for antibodies specific to the target epitope

  • Validation in knockout/knockdown systems:

    • Test antibodies in samples where the target protein is genetically deleted or suppressed

    • Signal absence confirms specificity

  • Competing peptide assays:

    • Block antibody binding with excess peptide containing the target epitope

    • This should eliminate specific signals but not cross-reactive ones

  • Alternative detection methods:

    • Confirm findings using antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Use orthogonal approaches like mass spectrometry for validation

These approaches are particularly important when studying protein families with high sequence homology or when investigating tissues with complex protein expression profiles.

How might structural convergence in antibodies inform vaccine design?

The discovery of structurally convergent antibodies targeting conserved epitopes has significant implications for next-generation vaccine design:

Convergent anchor antibodies against influenza H1N1, despite being derived from different vaccine strategies and encoded by diverse germline genes, display similar binding modes and broad neutralization capabilities . This suggests that:

  • Vaccines could be designed to specifically elicit antibodies with these conserved structural features

  • Immunogens could be engineered to present conserved epitopes in their native conformation

  • Vaccination strategies might focus on sequential immunization with different antigens that select for convergent antibody responses

The anchor epitope in influenza HA represents an example of a conserved target that could inform rational vaccine design. Similar structural convergence has been observed in antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 (with the YYDRxG motif in HCDR3) and HIV (antibodies targeting the CD4 binding site) .

What role will AI play in predicting antibody escape mutations?

As AI approaches for antibody design advance, they also create opportunities for predicting viral escape mutations:

The PALM-H3 and A2binder models demonstrate how deep learning can capture complex relationships between antibody sequences and their binding properties . Future applications could include:

  • Computational epitope scanning: Systematically predicting the impact of viral mutations on antibody binding

  • Escape mutation forecasting: Identifying probable evolutionary pathways that would allow pathogens to evade antibody recognition

  • Antibody resilience engineering: Designing antibodies that maintain binding despite mutations in target epitopes

  • Variant-proof vaccine design: Creating immunogens that elicit antibodies targeting multiple conserved epitopes

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.