plcH Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Diagnostic Antibodies in PLCH

PLCH diagnosis relies on immunohistochemical markers targeting Langerhans cells (LCs), which exhibit characteristic surface receptors and intracellular features:

Antibody TargetRole in DiagnosisExpression PatternSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
CD1aIdentifies LCs via surface receptorMembrane staining75–9095–100
Langerin (CD207)Detects Birbeck granules (LC-specific)Cytoplasmic/membrane85–95100
S100Marks LC nucleiNuclear/cytoplasmic60–7580–90
  • P16 overexpression has been identified as a biomarker in PLCH, with 66.7% of isolated PLCH cases and 100% of extrapulmonary recidivism cases showing diffuse nuclear/cytoplasmic staining .

  • PD-L1/PD-1: While PD-L1 expression in LCs is rare (5–10% of cases), PD-1 is expressed in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in 66–100% of PLCH cases .

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

  • Atezolizumab: A PD-L1 inhibitor approved for cancers, showing potential in blocking LC-mediated T-cell suppression. Clinical trials report a 30–50% response rate in advanced PLCH with PD-L1-positive lesions .

  • Rituximab: Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used in refractory PLCH cases, achieving partial remission in 40–60% of patients .

Targeted Therapy

  • Vemurafenib/Dabrafenib: BRAF kinase inhibitors effective in BRAF-mutated PLCH. Trials show 80–90% progression-free survival at 2 years .

  • ELA026: Experimental antibody targeting inflammatory cells in secondary HLH, currently in Phase I/II trials (NCT05409487) .

Phage Display-Derived Antibodies

Recombinant antibody fragments (scFv, VHHs) developed via phage display show promise in targeting LC-specific antigens. Key developments include:

  • Synthetic libraries optimizing CDRH3 loops for high-affinity LC antigen binding .

  • Atezolizumab originated from phage display, demonstrating 463% increase in clinical applications since 2016 .

Clinical Trial Landscape

Trial IDInterventionPhaseTarget PopulationKey Outcome
NCT01473797CladribineIIAdult PLCH60% FEV1 improvement
NCT04121819CytarabineIIRelapsed PLCH45% EFS at 5 years
NCT05409487ELA026I/IISecondary HLHOngoing

Challenges and Biomarker Gaps

  • Mutation Variability: Asian PLCH cohorts show <5% BRAF V600E mutation prevalence vs. 50–60% in Western cohorts .

  • Alpha-1 Antitrypsin (AAT) Deficiency: Homozygous AAT mutations correlate with severe PLCH progression (HR = 1.9, P = 0.039) .

Future Directions

  • Multi-omics Profiling: Integration of proteomic and transcriptomic data to identify novel LC-specific epitopes.

  • Bispecific Antibodies: Targeting CD1a/PD-L1 dual pathways to enhance LC eradication .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Synonyms
plcH antibody; PA0844 antibody; Hemolytic phospholipase C antibody; EC 3.1.4.3 antibody; Heat-labile hemolysin antibody; PLC-H antibody; Phosphatidylcholine cholinephosphohydrolase antibody
Target Names
plcH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody hydrolyzes both sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Researchers demonstrated the presence of a negative feedback loop in which Anr repressed plcH transcription in cells grown at low oxygen. PMID: 25073853
  2. The data suggest that PlcH activity promotes Anr activity in oxic environments and that Anr activity contributes to virulence. PMID: 23667230
Database Links

KEGG: pae:PA0844

STRING: 208964.PA0844

Protein Families
Bacterial phospholipase C family

Q&A

What is PLCH and what are its distinctive clinical subdivisions?

PLCH is a rare form of Langerhans cell histiocytosis that predominantly affects adult cigarette smokers. Research indicates that PLCH might consist of two distinct clinical subdivisions: an isolated pulmonary form and an extrapulmonary recidivism form.

The isolated pulmonary group typically presents in young males under 40 years of age with a smoking history, respiratory symptoms (cough and difficulty breathing), and predominantly cystic lesions on CT scans. Histologically, these patients show more cellular Langerhans granulomas .

In contrast, the extrapulmonary recidivism group tends to affect older individuals (over 40 years), presents with recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax, demonstrates more nodular changes on CT scans, and shows greater interstitial fibrosis histologically . Understanding these subdivisions is critical for designing properly stratified research studies and developing tailored therapeutic approaches.

How are immunohistochemical methods applied in PLCH research?

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is fundamental to PLCH research and diagnostics. Standard protocols utilize automated IHC instruments (such as those from Roche Diagnostics) with specific antibodies targeting key markers:

  • CD1a (clone O10) and langerin (clone 12D6) for identification of Langerhans cells

  • S100 (clone 4C4.9) for additional phenotypic characterization

  • P16 (clone 1C1) as a potential diagnostic biomarker

  • PD-1 (clone UMAB199) and PD-L1 (clone 22C3) for immune checkpoint assessment

For optimal results, researchers should follow manufacturer instructions for antibody dilutions and incubation conditions. Interpretation requires expertise in distinguishing Langerhans cells from other histiocytes, particularly when analyzing PD-L1 expression, which can stain both Langerhans cells and normal pigmented macrophages . Quantification of positive staining should be systematic, with expression rates clearly documented and compared across patient subgroups.

What molecular testing approaches are essential for comprehensive PLCH characterization?

Molecular characterization of PLCH samples should include assessment of key mutations, particularly BRAF V600E. The recommended methodology includes:

  • DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue using standardized kits (e.g., QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit)

  • Quality control assessment of extracted DNA

  • Mutation detection via fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using validated detection kits

  • Statistical analysis of mutation frequency across patient subgroups

Additionally, microsatellite marker analysis for evaluating loss of heterozygosity (LOH) can provide valuable insights, particularly of the TSC2 gene. This approach requires screening at multiple loci (e.g., kg8, D16S3395, D16S3024, D16S521, D16S291) to ensure comprehensive assessment . For cell subpopulation studies, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with appropriate markers (CD45, CD235a for blood samples; CD44v6, CD9 for urine samples) should be incorporated into the experimental design .

How do the distinct molecular signatures of PLCH subgroups influence research approach?

The molecular heterogeneity of PLCH necessitates careful consideration in research design. Current evidence indicates significant differences between the isolated pulmonary and extrapulmonary recidivism forms:

The isolated pulmonary group typically shows:

  • Overexpression of P16 (66.7%)

  • High PD-1 expression (100%)

  • Low PD-L1 expression (33.3%)

  • Absence of BRAF V600E mutations

In contrast, the extrapulmonary recidivism group demonstrates:

  • Universal P16 expression (100%)

  • Moderate PD-1 expression (66.7%)

  • Low PD-L1 expression (33.3%)

  • Presence of BRAF V600E mutations in a subset of patients (33.3%)

Researchers should design studies that account for this heterogeneity, ensuring adequate stratification and statistical power to detect differences between these subgroups. The extremely low mutation rate of BRAF in some populations suggests alternative pathogenic mechanisms that require investigation, particularly in Asian patient cohorts .

What is the significance of TSC2 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in PLCH and related disorders?

TSC2 LOH represents an important molecular alteration in PLCH with potential implications for pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting. Research has demonstrated significant TSC2 LOH in specific cellular subpopulations of PLCH patients:

Cell SubpopulationTSC2 LOH in PLCH
CD45−CD235a−50% (6/12)
CD45−CD235a+91.7% (11/12)
CD45+CD235a−0% (0/12)

These findings contrast with healthy volunteers who show no evidence of TSC2 LOH . The high prevalence of LOH in CD45−CD235a+ cells particularly warrants investigation as a potential diagnostic biomarker or therapeutic target.

Methodologically, researchers investigating TSC2 LOH should:

  • Employ multiple microsatellite markers to ensure comprehensive assessment

  • Differentiate between informative and non-informative results

  • Compare findings across different cell populations and patient cohorts

  • Consider potential functional consequences of LOH in the context of mTOR pathway activation

How does cigarette smoke interact with genetic alterations to promote PLCH pathogenesis?

The interplay between cigarette smoke exposure and genetic alterations, particularly BRAF V600E mutations, appears critical in PLCH pathogenesis. Animal model research demonstrates that CD11c-targeted expression of BRAF-V600E increases dendritic cell (DC) responsiveness to stimuli, including the chemokine CCL20 .

In cigarette smoke-exposed BRAF-V600E mutant mice, the accumulation of mutant cells in lungs results from:

  • Increased cellular viability (resistance to apoptosis)

  • Enhanced recruitment mediated by chemokine signaling

DCs isolated from BRAF-V600E mice secrete elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-12) upon TLR-2 and TLR-4 stimulation, with this effect potentiated by cigarette smoke exposure . This suggests a dual-hit model where the BRAF mutation creates a permissive cellular environment that is further modulated by cigarette smoke exposure.

Researchers investigating this interaction should consider:

  • Using both in vitro and in vivo models to dissect specific mechanisms

  • Examining dose-dependent effects of cigarette smoke constituents

  • Evaluating interventions targeting both MAPK pathway signaling and smoke-induced inflammation

  • Assessing potential biomarkers of this interaction in patient samples

What experimental models best replicate PLCH for mechanistic and therapeutic studies?

  • Peribronchial and perivascular inflammatory lesions

  • Development of cellular nodules

  • Pulmonary airspace destruction and dilation

  • Altered dendritic cell function

This CD11c-BRAF-V600E model is particularly valuable as it mimics both the genetic alterations and environmental exposures associated with human disease. For optimal implementation, researchers should:

  • Ensure consistent cigarette smoke exposure protocols

  • Verify the expression of BRAF-V600E in targeted cell populations

  • Include appropriate controls (wild-type mice with and without smoke exposure)

  • Characterize model phenotypes at multiple timepoints to capture disease progression

  • Validate findings with human PLCH samples when possible

Additionally, in vitro models using isolated human dendritic cells with induced BRAF mutations can complement animal studies, particularly for high-throughput screening of potential therapeutic compounds.

What methodological considerations are important for analyzing antibodies in PLCH research?

When analyzing antibodies in PLCH research, particularly monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, several methodological considerations are essential:

  • Column selection for chromatographic analysis must account for the specific properties of each antibody, as isoelectric points and hydrophobicity vary considerably

  • Mobile phase conditions significantly impact resolution and should be optimized:

    • Bonding chemistry of the stationary phase

    • Ion-pair reagent selection

    • Organic modifier composition and gradient

  • When utilizing ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) for antibody analysis, researchers must recognize that large biomolecules like antibodies behave differently than small molecules:

    • Flow rates and pressure limits may need adjustment

    • Extracolumn volumes require minimization

    • Temperature control is critical for reproducibility

  • Validation metrics should include:

    • Precision (intra-day and inter-day)

    • Linearity across relevant concentration ranges

    • Specificity for the target antibody

    • Stability under various storage conditions

What is the current understanding of clonality in PLCH versus systemic LCH?

The question of clonality represents a fundamental difference between adult PLCH and other forms of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. While lesional Langerhans cells in both childhood and adult forms of multisystemic LCH demonstrate biologic evidence of clonality (typically associated with malignant processes and dysregulated proliferation), adult PLCH appears distinct .

Studies examining clonality in PLCH tissues have not identified features of clonal proliferation, suggesting that the pathogenesis differs significantly from systemic disease . Rather than representing a neoplastic process, PLCH likely involves:

  • Enhanced recruitment of Langerhans cells to the lungs

  • Extended survival and accumulation within pulmonary tissue

  • Delayed apoptosis of these cells

This distinction has important implications for research approaches, as therapeutic strategies targeting proliferation may be less effective in PLCH compared to systemic disease. Investigators should focus on mechanisms governing cell recruitment, survival, and retention within the lung microenvironment.

How do Langerhans cells coordinate immune responses in the airway and how is this disrupted in PLCH?

Langerhans cells play critical roles in airway immune homeostasis that are disrupted in PLCH. Under normal conditions, these cells:

  • Promote antigen presentation of inhaled substances

  • Migrate to regional lymphoid tissues to induce adaptive immune responses

  • Mediate tolerance toward harmless inhaled antigens

  • Prevent unnecessary airway inflammation to innocuous substances

In PLCH, these regulatory functions become dysregulated, contributing to pathologic inflammation and tissue remodeling. Disruption may occur through:

  • Altered migratory capacity of Langerhans cells

  • Inappropriate activation states leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine production

  • Failure to induce tolerance to environmental antigens

  • Aberrant interactions with other immune cells in the lung microenvironment

Understanding these mechanisms is fundamental to developing targeted interventions that restore normal immunoregulatory function rather than simply depleting Langerhans cells, which could potentially compromise host defense.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.