PLG Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Composition and Mechanism

PLG Antibody: Targets plasminogen, a glycoprotein precursor of plasmin involved in fibrinolysis and extracellular matrix remodeling .
FITC Conjugation: Covalently binds FITC to lysine residues or free amine groups of the antibody via thiourea linkages (Figure 1) .

Conjugation ParameterTypical Specification
FITC:Antibody Molar Ratio5:1 to 20:1 (optimized per batch)
Emission Spectrum495 nm (excitation), 525 nm (emission)
Stability2–8°C, protected from light

Applications in Research

FITC-conjugated PLG antibodies are used for:

  • Immunofluorescence (IF): Localizing plasminogen in tissue sections or cultured cells .

  • Flow Cytometry (FCM): Quantifying PLG expression on cell surfaces .

  • Western Blotting: Detecting PLG in protein lysates (requires validation due to potential denaturation) .

ApplicationRecommended DilutionBuffer
IF (IHC-P)1:50–1:200PBS with 10% FBS
FCM1:20–1:100PBS with 1% BSA

Conjugation Optimization

Key parameters for optimal labeling:

  • pH: 9.5 (carbonate-bicarbonate buffer enhances FITC reactivity) .

  • Protein Concentration: 25 mg/ml minimizes aggregation .

  • Purification: Gel filtration or dialysis removes unbound FITC .

Molar F/P Ratio Calculation:
F/P=2.77×A495A2800.35×A495\text{F/P} = \frac{2.77 \times A_{495}}{A_{280} - 0.35 \times A_{495}}
Where A495A_{495} and A280A_{280} are absorbance values of the conjugate .

Quality Control Metrics

  • Fluorescein-to-Protein (F/P) Ratio: 1–6 (higher ratios increase nonspecific binding) .

  • Purity: >90% by SDS-PAGE (contaminants reduce signal-to-noise) .

  • Functional Validation: Compare staining intensity in PLG-positive vs. negative controls .

Limitations and Troubleshooting

  • Photobleaching: Minimize light exposure during experiments .

  • Batch Variability: Pre-test each lot for F/P ratio and background signal .

  • Cross-Reactivity: Validate specificity using knockout cell lines .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship products within 1-3 business days after receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For specific delivery details, please consult your local distributor.
Synonyms
Plasmin antibody; Plasmin heavy chain A antibody; Plasmin light chain B antibody; Plasminogen antibody; PLG antibody; PLMN_HUMAN antibody
Target Names
PLG
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plasmin, a proteolytic enzyme, plays a crucial role in various physiological processes. It dissolves fibrin in blood clots, contributing to fibrinolysis. Moreover, it participates in embryonic development, tissue remodeling, tumor invasion, and inflammation. Plasmin weakens the walls of the Graafian follicle during ovulation. It activates urokinase-type plasminogen activator, collagenases, and several complement zymogens, such as C1 and C5. Its cleavage of fibronectin and laminin leads to cell detachment and apoptosis. It also cleaves fibrin, thrombospondin, and von Willebrand factor. Its role in tissue remodeling and tumor invasion may be modulated by CSPG4. Plasmin binds to cells. Angiostatin, an angiogenesis inhibitor, blocks neovascularization and the growth of primary and metastatic tumors in vivo.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Apo(a) attenuates cell-surface plasmin-mediated conversion of Glu- to Lys-plasminogen. PMID: 29990619
  2. Urinary angiostatin and VCAM-1 are predictive of specific histological changes in concurrent lupus nephritis renal biopsies. PMID: 29076253
  3. No association was found between the AgP risk variant rs4252120 and CP. However, a haplotype block downstream of PLG showed shared association with CP and AgP. PMID: 28548211
  4. A genetic risk profile of thromboembolism in a Family was identified with homozygous alleles in F12 (rs1801020) and F13 (rs5985). PMID: 27976734
  5. Plasminogen and pSTAT3 are significantly associated with LI, suggesting they may represent signaling nodes or biomarkers of pathways common to postlactational involution and LI. PMID: 28752190
  6. A rare non-conservative missense mutation was newly identified in exon 9 of the PLG gene. PMID: 29548426
  7. Plasminogen binds to the cell surface-exposed proteins of Candida parapsilosis. PMID: 28651026
  8. Plasmin cleaves surface-bound CCL21 to release the C-terminal peptide responsible for CCL21 binding to glycosaminoglycans on the extracellular matrix and cell surfaces, generating the soluble form. PMID: 27301418
  9. Analysis of plasminogen genetic variants in multiple sclerosis patients has been reported. PMID: 27194806
  10. Enolase of Mtb is present on its surface and binds human plasminogen with high affinity. PMID: 27569900
  11. The mechanism for plasminogen/M protein binding uncovered may facilitate targeting of group A Streptococcus pyogenes virulence factors for disease management. PMID: 28724633
  12. t-PA binds to Lys91 in the MBP NH2-terminal region and PLG binds to Lys122 in the MBP COOH-terminal region. This proximity promotes the activation of PLG by t-PA. PMID: 28648598
  13. In the presence of platelet polyphosphate and the downstream substrate fibrin, alphaFXIIa is a highly efficient and favorable plasminogen activator. PMID: 27694320
  14. Plasmin(ogen) serves as a favorable biomarker for prediction of survival in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. PMID: 27935848
  15. A new pathway for bradykinin formation in patients with HAE has been identified, in which FXII is cleaved and activated by plasmin. PMID: 27130860
  16. VWF susceptibility to plasmin proteolysis at K1491-R1492 is modulated by local N-linked glycan expression within A1A2A3, and specifically inhibited by heparin binding to the A1 domain. PMID: 28279966
  17. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and mature BMPs, further cleaved by serum proteases, induce cell cycle entry by dedifferentiating newt muscle cells. PMID: 28350991
  18. Plasminogen and P4HA2 are involved in vascular remodeling and angiogenesis, suggesting their high relevance to the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this type of vasculitis. PMID: 28041642
  19. Plasminogen and OxPL-PLG levels were lower in patients presenting with an acute MI compared to those with stable CAD and also in those with atherothrombotic MI (Type 1) versus those with non-atherothrombotic MI (Type 2). PMID: 26510751
  20. While carriers with PLG:p.Ala620Thr exhibit low plasminogen activity, this is not a predisposing variant for aHUS. Individuals with dysplasminogenemia are not at significantly increased risk of aHUS. PMID: 27194432
  21. Five novel plasminogen gene mutations have been discovered in Turkish patients with type I plasminogen deficiency. PMID: 26340456
  22. A novel plasminogen gene mutation, deficiency of plasminogen antigen and activity, and anti-plasminogen IgG and IgA antibodies were identified in a patient with adult-onset ligneous conjunctivitis. PMID: 25674820
  23. S. aureus NCTC 8325-4 adheres to immobilized plasminogen in vitro, and this adhesion may be mediated by a C-terminal fragment of the PBP3 protein [PBP3]. PMID: 27488131
  24. PLG functions as a molecular bridge between tricellulin and streptococcal surface enolase (SEN). The wild type strain efficiently translocated across the epithelial monolayer, accompanied by cleavage of transmembrane junctional proteins. PMID: 26822058
  25. Tubulointerstitial plasmin is associated with inflammation leading to renal fibrosis, which can cause the decline in renal function observed in patients with IgA nephropathy. PMID: 25971850
  26. Plasminogen binding and activation by different glycolytic enzymes of M. pneumoniae play a role in successful colonization of the human respiratory tract. PMID: 26667841
  27. Reduced proteolytic activity of plasmin on structures of growing thrombi, rather than on complement activation fragments, explains the association of plasminogen deficiency with aHUS. PMID: 26637181
  28. Zinc modulates fibrinolysis by attenuating tPA-mediated plasminogen activation and plasmin-induced fibrin degradation. PMID: 25789495
  29. These results indicate that FXIIIa activity can be modulated by fibrinolytic enzymes, suggesting that changes in fibrinolytic activity may influence cross-linking of blood proteins. PMID: 26359437
  30. Plasmin cleavage of iC3b provides a complement regulatory pathway as efficient as FI/CR1 but does not require a cellular cofactor. PMID: 25556624
  31. PLG is the third replicated shared genetic risk factor of atherosclerosis and periodontitis. PMID: 25466412
  32. Data show that preincubation with plasminogen, wild-type group A Streptococcus (GAS) NS88.2 degraded complement C3b. PMID: 23969887
  33. While the presence of plasminogen did not affect the factor I cofactor activity of C4BP, the activation of plasminogen by urokinase-type plasminogen activator to active plasmin was significantly augmented in the presence of C4BP. PMID: 26067271
  34. These studies demonstrate that GAS virulence can be explained by disparate hPg activation by SK2a and SK2b coupled with the coinherited M-proteins of these strains. PMID: 26070561
  35. PAM activated Plasminogen Glycoform II. PMID: 26029848
  36. High plasma fibrinogen and low plasminogen are associated with poor survival in CTEPH patients without modern therapy. PMID: 24909805
  37. Data indicate that different subpopulations of platelets harbor plasminogen through diverse mechanisms. PMID: 25712989
  38. Manganese transport protein C (MntC) is an extracellular matrix- and plasminogen-binding protein. PMID: 25409527
  39. This review highlights the importance of the best-characterized components of the PLG/PLA cascade in the pathogenesis of cancer, focusing on the role of the cell surface-PLG receptors (PLG-R). [review] PMID: 25407528
  40. Increased IGF-II, TGF-beta1 and VEGF-A and its receptor in malignant tumor tissue, as well as increased plasmin release from proenzyme and MMP-3 activation, are apparently associated with the formation of pathogenic mechanisms of vasculature development. PMID: 25993872
  41. Angiostatin may play a role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. PMID: 24205998
  42. The results suggest that EF-Tu and Eno serve as surface receptors for B. longum NCC2705 binding to human plasminogen. PMID: 24840471
  43. Human plasmin activity loss results from the C-terminal lysine-dependent redistribution of enzyme molecules on a fibrin surface. PMID: 25222106
  44. Genome-wide association analyses revealed common DNA variants in PLG, LPA, and near SIGLEC14 that contribute to plasma plasminogen level variation. PMID: 25208887
  45. ANG interacts with the plasminogen activation system at the leading edges of breast cancer cell surfaces and facilitates interactions of uPAR with uPA to regulate plasmin formation and cell migration. PMID: 24457100
  46. Reduced plasminogen binding and delayed activation render gamma'-fibrin more resistant to lysis than gammaA-fibrin. PMID: 25128532
  47. Binding of streptokinase Lys(414) to plasminogen kringle 4 plays a role in recognition of plasminogen by streptokinase. PMID: 25138220
  48. The surface-displayed enolase, which serves as a major pneumococcal plasminogen receptor, was identified as a key factor for plasminogen-mediated bacterial attachment in infection analyses with Streptococcus pneumoniae. PMID: 23906818
  49. The results demonstrate that Bacteroides fragilis Bfp60 surface adhesin is responsible for the recognition of laminin and plasminogen-plasmin activation. PMID: 23850366
  50. It is proposed that plasminogen activation on endothelial cells acts as a natural backup for ADAMTS13 to degrade obstructive platelet-VWF complexes. PMID: 24449821

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 9071

OMIM: 173350

KEGG: hsa:5340

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000308938

UniGene: Hs.143436

Involvement In Disease
Plasminogen deficiency (PLGD)
Protein Families
Peptidase S1 family, Plasminogen subfamily
Subcellular Location
Secreted. Note=Locates to the cell surface where it is proteolytically cleaved to produce the active plasmin. Interaction with HRG tethers it to the cell surface.
Tissue Specificity
Present in plasma and many other extracellular fluids. It is synthesized in the liver.

Q&A

What is FITC conjugation and why is it important for antibody labeling in PLG-related research?

FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) conjugation is a chemical process that covalently attaches fluorescein molecules to free amino groups of proteins, including antibodies. The reaction creates stable conjugates that can be detected through fluorescence-based techniques. FITC has an absorption maximum at 495 nm and emission maximum at 525 nm, making it ideal for immunofluorescence applications . In PLG-related research, FITC-conjugated antibodies enable visualization and quantification of target antigens, facilitating the study of immune responses to PLG vaccine formulations. The fluorophore's high quantum efficiency and stability make it particularly valuable for tracking cellular interactions and antigen recognition in PLG vaccine studies .

What are the optimal buffer conditions for FITC conjugation to antibodies used in PLG research?

For optimal FITC conjugation to antibodies in PLG research, the reaction should be performed in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.3-9.0) without any amine-containing compounds. The protein solution must be free of amines such as Tris, glycine, or sodium azide, as these inhibit the labeling reaction . If the antibody is stored in PBS, add 1M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer to a final concentration of 0.1M (e.g., 0.1 ml of 1M buffer to 0.9 ml IgG solution at 5.0 mg/ml) . The alkaline environment improves the reactivity of amino groups by increasing the proportion of unprotonated primary amines. Temperature control is also crucial, with conjugation typically performed at room temperature (20-25°C) for 1-2 hours to maintain both efficient conjugation and antibody functionality .

How do I determine the optimal FITC-to-antibody ratio for PLG-related experiments?

Determining the optimal FITC-to-antibody ratio is critical for successful experimental outcomes. For initial optimization, test three different molar ratios of FITC to antibody: 5:1, 10:1, and 20:1. These typically result in fluorescein-to-protein (F/P) ratios of 1-2, 2-4, and 3-6, respectively . For standard IgG (MW 150,000), dissolve the appropriate amount of FITC in DMSO and add to the antibody solution as described in conjugation protocols. After purification, calculate the F/P ratio spectrophotometrically using the formula:

Molar F/P=2.77×A495A280(0.35×A495)\text{Molar F/P} = \frac{2.77 \times A_{495}}{A_{280} - (0.35 \times A_{495})}

For PLG-related flow cytometry experiments, an F/P ratio of 2-4 is often optimal, balancing brightness with minimal non-specific binding. Higher F/P ratios (>6) typically increase background fluorescence and reduce quantum yield due to self-quenching effects .

What purification methods are most effective for FITC-conjugated antibodies used in PLG vaccine research?

For purifying FITC-conjugated antibodies used in PLG vaccine research, gel filtration chromatography is the most effective method as it efficiently separates conjugated antibodies from unreacted FITC . The protocol involves:

  • Use of pre-packed Sephadex G-25M columns equilibrated with PBS (pH 7.4)

  • Loading the reaction mixture (not exceeding 2.5% of the column volume)

  • Eluting with PBS and collecting the first colored fraction containing the conjugated antibody

  • Discarding subsequent fractions that contain unreacted FITC

For more precise separation, especially for specific F/P ratio fractions, HPLC with size exclusion columns can be employed. After purification, the addition of 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide helps preserve conjugate stability during storage at 2-8°C, protected from light . For PLG vaccine research where precise antigen detection is critical, this purification approach ensures minimal background interference during flow cytometric analysis of immune responses .

How should I design controls for flow cytometry experiments using FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine studies?

Designing robust controls for flow cytometry experiments using FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine studies is essential for accurate data interpretation. The following control strategy is recommended:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Unstained cellsEstablish autofluorescence baselineCells without any antibody treatment
Isotype controlAssess non-specific bindingFITC-conjugated isotype-matched irrelevant antibody
Single-color controlsCompensation calculationEach fluorophore alone on appropriate cells
FMO controlGate setting for FITC-positive cellsAll fluorophores except FITC
Biological negative controlValidate specificityNon-immunized or non-treated samples
Biological positive controlVerify staining procedureKnown positive samples for target antigens

In PLG vaccine studies, it's particularly important to include controls that distinguish vaccine-induced immune cells from background populations. For instance, when analyzing tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, proper gating strategies should be employed as demonstrated in studies combining PLG vaccines with checkpoint inhibitors—first distinguishing cells from debris by forward and side scatter, then selecting singlet cells, followed by dead cell exclusion, and finally identifying specific cell populations using appropriate markers .

How do varying F/P ratios affect the performance of FITC-conjugated antibodies in analysis of immune responses to PLG vaccines?

The fluorescein-to-protein (F/P) ratio significantly impacts the performance of FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine immune response analysis. Experimental data shows a non-linear relationship between F/P ratio and optimal detection:

F/P RatioSignal StrengthBackgroundDetection SensitivityApplication Suitability
1-2ModerateVery lowGood for rare antigensIdeal for detecting low-abundance targets in PLG vaccine studies
2-4HighLowOptimal for most applicationsBest balance for analyzing T cell subtypes in PLG responses
4-6Very highModerateGood for abundant antigensSuitable for detecting strong vaccine responses
>6VariableHighCompromised by self-quenchingNot recommended due to increased non-specific binding

At higher F/P ratios (>6), the phenomenon of fluorophore self-quenching becomes pronounced, where closely packed FITC molecules absorb each other's emission, reducing quantum yield . Additionally, heavily labeled antibodies often exhibit increased non-specific binding, creating misleading results particularly when analyzing subtle changes in T cell populations following PLG vaccination . When studying the critical CD8+/Treg ratio in tumor microenvironments after PLG vaccination, an F/P ratio of 2-4 typically provides the clearest discrimination between cell populations while maintaining specificity .

What are effective troubleshooting approaches for weak signals when using FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine flow cytometry?

When encountering weak signals with FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine flow cytometry experiments, systematic troubleshooting is essential. The following methodological approaches address common causes:

  • Conjugation efficiency issues:

    • Verify F/P ratio spectrophotometrically (see formula in section 1.3)

    • Ensure reaction pH was 8.3-9.0 during conjugation

    • Check if buffer contained amine compounds that inhibited conjugation

    • Confirm antibody concentration was sufficient (typically 1-5 mg/ml)

  • Sample preparation problems:

    • Increase antibody concentration during staining (titrate to determine optimal concentration)

    • Lengthen incubation time (try 45-60 minutes instead of 30 minutes)

    • Ensure samples were protected from light throughout processing

    • Verify cell permeabilization was adequate if detecting intracellular targets

  • Instrument and technical factors:

    • Check cytometer laser alignment and FITC detector voltage settings

    • Verify appropriate filter sets are being used (bandpass filter centered at 525-530 nm)

    • Ensure compensation is correctly applied if using multiple fluorophores

    • Consider photobleaching effects if sample analysis was delayed

  • Biological considerations:

    • Confirm target antigen expression hasn't been downregulated by PLG vaccine treatment

    • Assess timing of analysis, as immune markers may fluctuate following vaccination

    • Consider using fresh rather than fixed samples if signal remains weak

For PLG vaccine studies specifically, where detection of activated T cells is critical, increasing staining temperature to 37°C for 30 minutes can enhance binding to activation markers like CD107a and intracellular cytokines like IFNγ, which are essential for assessing cytotoxic T cell functionality .

How should I interpret changes in T cell populations detected with FITC-conjugated antibodies following PLG vaccination combined with checkpoint inhibition?

Interpreting T cell population changes detected with FITC-conjugated antibodies after PLG vaccination with checkpoint inhibition requires careful analysis of multiple parameters. Based on research findings, several key principles should guide interpretation:

The CD8+/Treg ratio within tumors is a critical indicator of effective vaccination. PLG vaccination alone typically induces approximately 3,000 cytotoxic T cells per mm² of tumor tissue. When combined with anti-PD-1 treatment, this increases 3.7-fold, while anti-CTLA-4 combination produces over 24,000 CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells per mm² of tumor . The intratumoral ratio of CD8+ effectors to Tregs can triple with PD-1 antibody administration compared to vaccination alone, while anti-CTLA-4 with vaccination results in a 15-fold increase (from 2.3 to 35.9) .

When analyzing flow cytometry data, it's essential to examine not only percentages but absolute numbers of different T cell subsets. Additionally, functional markers such as IFNγ production and CD107a (a degranulation marker) should be assessed to determine if the increased T cell infiltration correlates with enhanced cytotoxic activity . The timing of analysis is also crucial—peak T cell responses typically occur 5-14 days post-vaccination, with significant differences between treatment groups becoming apparent around day 14 .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing flow cytometry data from FITC-labeled cells in PLG vaccine studies?

  • Preprocessing considerations:

    • Transform data logarithmically to account for the log-normal distribution typical in flow cytometry measurements

    • Apply consistent gating strategies across all samples and experimental groups

    • Remove outliers only based on predefined criteria, not post-hoc examination

  • Between-group comparisons:

    • For comparing treatment effects (e.g., PLG vaccine alone vs. PLG+anti-CTLA-4):

      • Use one-way ANOVA followed by appropriate post-hoc tests (e.g., Tukey's) for multiple group comparisons

      • Apply non-parametric alternatives (Kruskal-Wallis) when normality assumptions are violated

    • For datasets with multiple variables (e.g., different T cell markers):

      • Consider multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) to account for correlations between variables

      • Use Bonferroni or Holm-Bonferroni corrections when performing multiple comparisons

  • Correlation analyses:

    • Employ Pearson's correlation coefficient to assess relationships between continuous variables (e.g., T cell counts vs. tumor size)

    • Use Spearman's rank correlation for non-normally distributed data

    • Consider regression analysis to model relationships between immunological parameters and outcomes

  • Survival analysis:

    • Apply Kaplan-Meier estimators with log-rank tests to compare survival outcomes between treatment groups

    • Use Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of continuous variables (e.g., CD8+/Treg ratios) on survival

In PLG vaccine studies, treatment groups typically require n=5-8 animals per group to achieve sufficient statistical power (β=0.8) with α=0.05 for detecting biologically meaningful differences in T cell populations or tumor growth . Presenting both individual data points and measures of central tendency with error bars (standard deviation or standard error) enables readers to assess both statistical significance and biological variability.

How can I optimize antibody concentrations for dual labeling when one antibody is FITC-conjugated in PLG vaccine flow cytometry?

Optimizing antibody concentrations for dual labeling with a FITC-conjugated antibody in PLG vaccine flow cytometry requires a systematic titration approach. The following methodology ensures optimal signal-to-noise ratios for accurate identification of cell populations:

  • Initial titration of individual antibodies:

    • Prepare serial dilutions of the FITC-conjugated antibody (typically 0.1-10 μg/ml)

    • Test each concentration on appropriate positive and negative control samples

    • Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio for each concentration

    • Select the concentration that provides maximum signal separation with minimal background

    • Repeat separately for the second antibody with its respective fluorophore

  • Cross-titration matrix:

    • Create a matrix testing different concentrations of both antibodies together

    • Assess for spectral overlap and fluorescence compensation requirements

    • Evaluate signal integrity compared to single-stain controls

    • Check for any unexpected effects from antibody interaction

  • Competition assessment:

    • If both antibodies target potentially proximal epitopes, test for competitive binding

    • Compare dual-stained samples with single-stained controls to ensure consistent staining patterns

    • If competition occurs, consider sequential staining protocols

For optimal identification of oligodendroglial populations in PLG vaccine studies, researchers have successfully used dual positive staining approaches (e.g., A2B5+PDGFRα+ for early OPCs, A2B5+NG2+ for intermediate OPCs) with FITC-conjugated antibodies . When studying naturally occurring autoantibody-secreting B1 cells, careful titration of FITC-conjugated anti-α-Synuclein antibody has been critical for accurate identification of these rare populations .

What methodological approaches maximize detection sensitivity when using FITC-conjugated antibodies to identify rare immune cell populations in PLG vaccine studies?

Maximizing detection sensitivity for rare immune cell populations with FITC-conjugated antibodies in PLG vaccine studies requires a multifaceted methodological approach:

  • Sample enrichment techniques:

    • Implement density gradient centrifugation to remove erythrocytes and dead cells

    • Use magnetic bead pre-enrichment for target cell populations

    • Apply negative selection to remove abundant cell types before staining

    • Consider cell sorting for pre-enrichment when analyzing extremely rare populations

  • Optimized staining protocol:

    • Increase staining volume while maintaining antibody concentration to reduce non-specific binding

    • Extend incubation time to 45-60 minutes at 4°C for surface markers

    • Include Fc receptor blocking reagents to prevent non-specific binding

    • Implement stringent washing steps using buffers containing 0.1% sodium azide and 1% BSA

  • Instrument optimization:

    • Increase event collection (≥500,000 events) to capture sufficient rare cells

    • Optimize PMT voltages specifically for FITC detection

    • Use quality control beads to ensure consistent day-to-day instrument performance

    • Apply area scaling for doublet discrimination to avoid false positives

  • Analysis strategies:

    • Employ a sequential gating strategy beginning with "dump channels" to exclude irrelevant cells

    • Use Boolean gating to identify complex phenotypes

    • Apply probability contour plots rather than dot plots for better visualization of rare events

    • Consider dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g., tSNE, UMAP) for complex datasets

This approach has been successfully applied to detect naturally occurring autoantibodies (nAbs)-secreting B1 cells, which are extremely rare and highly specific. Researchers used a precise gating strategy to isolate only CD20+ CD27+ CD43+ CD69− IgG+ and target antigen-positive B cells from larger populations . In PLG vaccine studies, these techniques enable the identification and characterization of antigen-specific T cells that may represent less than 0.1% of the total T cell population but are critical for evaluating vaccine efficacy.

How does PLG formulation affect the binding efficacy of FITC-conjugated antibodies in immunological assays?

PLG formulation characteristics significantly impact the binding efficacy of FITC-conjugated antibodies in immunological assays through multiple mechanisms:

  • Surface charge effects:
    The polymer composition of PLG vaccines (lactide:glycolide ratio) determines surface charge, which can influence antibody binding kinetics. More acidic formulations (higher glycolide content) may transiently alter the microenvironment pH, potentially affecting FITC fluorescence intensity which is pH-sensitive. Research indicates optimal antibody binding occurs with PLG formulations having lactide:glycolide ratios between 50:50 and 75:25 .

  • Protein adsorption dynamics:
    PLG particles can adsorb proteins non-specifically, potentially sequestering FITC-conjugated antibodies or their targets. This phenomenon is particularly relevant when analyzing cells directly extracted from PLG vaccine sites, where residual polymer particles may be present. Pre-washing samples with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 can minimize this interference .

  • Adjuvant interactions:
    When PLG vaccines incorporate adjuvants, these immunostimulatory molecules can modulate receptor expression on target cells. For example, CpG-containing PLG vaccines significantly upregulate co-stimulatory molecules on dendritic cells, requiring adjusted titration of FITC-conjugated antibodies targeting these markers to prevent signal saturation .

  • Microenvironmental modifications:
    PLG vaccines create unique immunological microenvironments that can alter antigen processing and presentation. When combined with checkpoint inhibitors like anti-CTLA-4, these effects are amplified, resulting in dynamic changes to surface marker expression that may require adaptive titration of FITC-conjugated antibodies over the course of the immune response .

When analyzing T cells isolated from PLG vaccine sites versus draining lymph nodes or tumors, these factors necessitate site-specific optimization of staining protocols to account for the differential effects of PLG formulation on antibody binding efficacy across these microenvironments .

How can FITC-conjugated antibodies be optimally employed to characterize the immune response dynamics in PLG cancer vaccine studies?

FITC-conjugated antibodies can be strategically employed to characterize immune response dynamics in PLG cancer vaccine studies through a comprehensive temporal and spatial analysis approach:

For temporal dynamics monitoring, establish baseline immunophenotyping prior to vaccination, then implement scheduled analyses at key timepoints (days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-vaccination). This timeline captures the initiation, peak, and contraction phases of the immune response . Use FITC-conjugated antibodies against both activation markers (CD25, CD69, CD44) and exhaustion markers (PD-1, LAG-3, TIM-3) to track the functional evolution of T cells responding to PLG vaccination.

Spatially, analyze cells from four critical compartments: the vaccination site, tumor microenvironment, draining lymph nodes, and peripheral blood. This multi-compartment analysis reveals the mobilization and trafficking patterns of immune cells. Research has shown that PLG vaccination significantly enhances CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltration into tumors (approximately 3,000 cytotoxic T cells per mm² of tumor), with even greater infiltration when combined with checkpoint inhibitors .

To comprehensively characterize functional responses, employ FITC-conjugated antibodies against IFNγ and CD107a, which serve as indicators of cytotoxic activity . This approach enables correlation between phenotypic changes and functional capacity, providing mechanistic insights into how PLG vaccines mediate tumor regression.

What recent methodological advances improve the stability and performance of FITC-conjugated antibodies in long-term PLG vaccine studies?

Recent methodological advances have significantly enhanced the stability and performance of FITC-conjugated antibodies in long-term PLG vaccine studies:

  • Advanced conjugation chemistries:
    The development of site-specific conjugation technologies enables precise control of FITC attachment sites on antibodies, replacing traditional random lysine-based conjugation. This approach maintains consistent F/P ratios and preserves antigen binding capacity, resulting in more reproducible staining across experimental timepoints . The Lightning-Link® technology exemplifies this advancement, allowing FITC conjugation in under 20 minutes with 30 seconds hands-on time while achieving 100% antibody recovery .

  • Stabilizing formulations:
    Novel storage buffers incorporating antioxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid derivatives) and photo-stabilizers significantly extend the shelf-life of FITC-conjugated antibodies. These formulations prevent fluorophore degradation and maintain consistent brightness over extended experimental periods . For long-term PLG vaccine studies spanning several months, this stability is crucial for generating comparable data across timepoints.

  • Cryopreservation compatibility:
    Methodological refinements now allow for reliable cryopreservation of samples for batched analysis without compromising FITC signal integrity. This approach involves careful optimization of freezing media composition, controlled cooling rates, and standardized thawing protocols to maintain cellular phenotype and fluorescence intensity . When combined with appropriate controls, this enables retrospective analysis of samples collected throughout PLG vaccine studies, reducing inter-assay variability.

  • Microfluidic-based analysis platforms:
    The integration of FITC-conjugated antibody staining with microfluidic technologies enables analysis of limited samples with enhanced sensitivity. These platforms require minimal sample volumes while providing high-resolution data, particularly valuable for monitoring immune responses in localized microenvironments surrounding PLG vaccine deposits .

These methodological advances collectively support more robust longitudinal tracking of immune responses in PLG vaccine studies, facilitating better characterization of the relationship between early immunological changes and long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.