PLM2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
PLM2 antibody; YDR501W antibody; Protein PLM2 antibody; Plasmid maintenance protein 2 antibody
Target Names
PLM2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets proteins that bind to the promoters of genes involved in the G1/S (start) transition. These genes primarily function in DNA synthesis and repair, chromosome segregation, nuclear division, and transcription.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YDR501W

STRING: 4932.YDR501W

Protein Families
PLM2/TOS4 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is the PLA2R antibody and what role does it play in membranous nephropathy?

The M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody targets the PLA2R antigen expressed on glomerular podocytes. The discovery of PLA2R as a major antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) was a breakthrough that established iMN as an autoimmune disease. Subsequent studies confirmed that antibodies against PLA2R are present in approximately 70-75% of incident iMN patients, making them highly specific biomarkers for this condition .

The presence of these antibodies supports a diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy, while their absence may suggest secondary causes. The antibody-antigen interaction leads to immune complex formation on the glomerular basement membrane, triggering complement activation and subsequent podocyte injury, resulting in the characteristic proteinuria seen in membranous nephropathy.

How are PLA2R antibodies detected in clinical and research settings?

Several methodologies are available for detecting anti-PLA2R antibodies, each with distinct advantages:

  • Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing (IFT): Highly sensitive for detecting low-level antibodies, but less quantitative

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Provides better quantification and is more suitable for monitoring antibody levels over time

  • Time-Resolved Fluorescence Immunoassays: Offers high sensitivity for quantitative detection of antibodies targeting specific domains

These methods can be used complementarily. For example, IFT can confirm low-level positive results from ELISA testing, enhancing diagnostic confidence . Research has shown variability between assays, with reasonable correlation but significant within-patient variation between methods .

What is the correlation between PLA2R antibody levels and clinical parameters?

PLA2R antibody levels demonstrate a remarkable correlation with disease activity. Key findings include:

  • Changes in antibody levels parallel clinical disease activity

  • Disappearance of antibodies precedes and predicts subsequent decrease in proteinuria

  • High antibody titers associate with a lower likelihood of spontaneous remission

  • A "time lag" exists between antibody decline and proteinuria reduction

  • Complete immunological remission (antibody disappearance) typically precedes clinical remission by several months

This temporal relationship makes antibody monitoring valuable for predicting treatment response before clinical parameters change, potentially allowing earlier treatment modification if needed.

How do domain-specific PLA2R antibodies influence disease outcomes?

Recent research has shifted toward analyzing epitope specificity of anti-PLA2R antibodies, moving beyond total antibody concentration. The PLA2R protein contains multiple domains that can be targeted by antibodies, and emerging evidence suggests that domain-specific analysis provides enhanced prognostic information:

  • Domain-specific antibody levels may have greater predictive value for remission compared with total PLA2R-antibody level

  • Different epitope recognition patterns may correlate with disease severity and treatment response

  • Quantitative detection of IgG/IgG4 targeting specific PLA2R epitopes serves as valuable biomarkers for evaluating treatment effectiveness

Researchers are now developing prediction models incorporating domain-specific antibody data to improve prognostication for patients with membranous nephropathy.

What methodological considerations are important when measuring PLA2R antibodies?

Researchers should consider several methodological factors when designing studies involving PLA2R antibody measurements:

  • Assay selection: Different assays may yield different results, with IFT potentially more sensitive than ELISA for low antibody levels

  • Timing of measurement: Antibody levels can fluctuate with disease activity and treatment

  • IgG subclass analysis: Though IgG4 predominates, measuring total IgG versus IgG4 may yield different results

  • Quality control: Including appropriate controls and standardized protocols is essential

  • Correlation with clinical data: Interpreting antibody results requires clinical context

Studies have shown that although there is generally good correlation between different quantitative assays, within-patient variation can be quite high, necessitating consistent methodology throughout longitudinal studies .

How can PLA2R antibody measurement be used to guide therapeutic decisions?

PLA2R antibody measurements offer valuable guidance for clinical management:

Treatment initiation decisions:

  • High baseline antibody levels correlate with lower spontaneous remission rates (4% versus 38%)

  • Patients with high antibody titers may benefit from earlier immunosuppressive therapy

Treatment monitoring:

  • Decreasing antibody levels during therapy predict subsequent clinical improvement

  • Persistent antibody positivity despite treatment may indicate inadequate immunosuppression

Treatment duration guidance:

  • End-of-therapy antibody status predicts long-term outcomes, with antibody-negative patients showing higher rates of persistent remission (67% versus 13%)

  • These findings suggest treatment duration could potentially be guided by changes in antibody levels

Relapse prediction:

  • Reappearance of antibodies may precede clinical relapse, allowing preemptive intervention

Can PLA2R antibody testing replace kidney biopsy for diagnosing membranous nephropathy?

The high specificity of PLA2R antibodies for primary membranous nephropathy has raised questions about the necessity of kidney biopsy in antibody-positive patients. Current evidence suggests:

  • PLA2R antibody testing may be sufficient to diagnose MN in certain clinical scenarios, particularly when biopsy is contraindicated

  • The presence of PLA2R antibodies in a patient with clinical features consistent with MN provides high diagnostic confidence

  • Future studies may provide further data on diagnostic accuracy that could potentially eliminate the need for kidney biopsy in PLA2R antibody-positive patients by 2025

How effective is PLA2R antibody testing in excluding secondary causes of membranous nephropathy?

The literature presents somewhat equivocal findings regarding PLA2R antibodies in secondary MN:

  • Antibodies are rarely found in proteinuric patients with lupus nephritis (2 of 86 cases)

  • Small case series suggest antibodies can be detected in approximately 20% of patients with hepatitis B/C virus, sarcoidosis, malignancy, or hematologic disorders

  • A case report demonstrated a patient with MN secondary to an IgG3 paraprotein that had antibody activity directed against PLA2R, providing evidence for the pathogenicity of PLA2R antibodies

These findings highlight the complexity of distinguishing primary from secondary MN based solely on antibody status, emphasizing the need for comprehensive clinical evaluation.

What advancements in antibody validation and standardization are needed?

Antibody validation remains a significant challenge in research:

  • The Human Protein Atlas project found that more than half of commercial antibodies tested were not suitable for immunohistochemistry

  • Orthogonal validation strategies that compare antibody staining to protein/gene expression using antibody-independent methods like mass spectroscopy are recommended

  • Multiple samples with varied protein expression are needed to establish statistically significant correlations between different approaches

  • Immunocapture followed by mass spectroscopy can identify captured proteins, though distinguishing between true targets and interaction partners can be challenging

Research communities have established several initiatives to improve antibody validation, including the Human Cell Differentiation Molecules organization and YCharOS, which disseminate validation data through platforms like F1000, Zenodo, and the RRID portal .

How might protein language models enhance antibody research?

Recent advances in computational biology offer promising approaches for antibody research:

  • Protein language models (PLMs) like ESM2, ProtT5, and Antiberty can be trained to predict antibody properties including polyreactivity

  • These models have demonstrated robust performance on canonical monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and single-domain Fc constructs

  • PLMs outperformed models built using molecular descriptors calculated from AlphaFold 2 predicted structures

  • Such computational approaches could complement experimental methods for antibody validation and characterization

The application of these technologies to predict PLA2R antibody behavior could potentially accelerate research and clinical translation in membranous nephropathy.

What challenges remain in standardizing PLA2R antibody measurements for clinical and research applications?

Despite significant progress, several challenges persist:

  • Different commercial assays may yield different results

  • Within-patient variation between assays can be high, complicating longitudinal monitoring

  • Changes in antibody levels over time may differ depending on the assay used

  • Subtle differences exist between total IgG and IgG4 measurements, with some patients testing positive with one assay but negative with another

Prospective studies directly comparing and calibrating available assays in a quantitative manner are needed to address these challenges and establish standardized approaches .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.