pmp31 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction

The P-31 antibody is a mouse monoclonal antibody developed to study glomerular epithelial cells (podocytes) in the kidney. It specifically targets a 250 kDa protein (p250) associated with intermediate filaments, which are critical for podocyte structural integrity . This antibody has been instrumental in elucidating podocyte function in both normal and pathological conditions.

Key Discoveries

AspectFindingMethod
Target LocalizationCo-localizes with vimentin intermediate filaments at podocyte cytoskeleton intersections .Immunogold staining
Developmental RoleAppears in immature podocytes during the S-shaped body stage of kidney development .Immunohistochemistry
Disease ImplicationsOverexpression observed in puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis, correlating with enhanced desmin levels .Immunoblotting and histology

Functional Insights

The P-31 antibody has revealed that p250 is integral to podocyte resilience. In disease models (e.g., puromycin-induced nephrosis), p250 upregulation may counteract cytoskeletal disruption, suggesting adaptive mechanisms .

Podocyte Biology Research

  • Cytoskeletal Dynamics: P-31 facilitates studies of intermediate filament organization in podocytes, critical for maintaining glomerular filtration barrier integrity .

  • Disease Modeling: Used to track podocyte stress responses in nephrotic syndrome and fibrotic kidney diseases .

Diagnostic Potential

  • Biomarker Development: p250 expression levels could serve as indicators of podocyte injury or repair in chronic kidney disease (CKD) .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
pmp31; mug75; SPCC1183.09c; Plasma membrane proteolipid 31; Meiotically up-regulated gene 75 protein
Target Names
pmp31
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a role in meiosis.
Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0057 (PMP3) family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is PMP22 and what cellular functions does it regulate?

PMP22 (Peripheral Myelin Protein 22), also known as Growth Arrest-Specific Protein 3 (GAS3), is a 17,891 Da transmembrane glycoprotein primarily expressed in the peripheral nervous system. It plays critical roles in myelination processes and growth regulation within Schwann cells . The protein is involved in maintaining myelin stability and structure, with mutations in the PMP22 gene associated with various hereditary neuropathies. At the molecular level, PMP22 contributes to cell membrane integrity and intercellular communication in peripheral nerves. Research suggests it participates in cellular growth regulation pathways, particularly in myelinating cells, where precise expression levels are crucial for normal nerve function.

What experimental applications are suitable for PMP22 antibodies?

PMP22 antibodies have demonstrated efficacy across multiple experimental applications. Western blotting (1:500-1:1000 dilution) allows for detection of endogenous PMP22 protein in various tissue and cell lysates, including human cell lines (THP1, MDAMB435) and mouse tissues (brain, liver) . Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at 1:100-1:200 dilution is effective for visualizing PMP22 distribution in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, particularly in neural tissues where expression is highest. Immunoprecipitation (IP) protocols (1:10-1:100 dilution) enable isolation of PMP22 and associated protein complexes for downstream analysis . Other potential applications include immunofluorescence for subcellular localization studies and flow cytometry for quantifying expression in specific cell populations, though optimization for these techniques may be required.

What tissues and disease models are most relevant for PMP22 antibody research?

PMP22 antibody research is particularly relevant in peripheral nerve tissues, with over 524 publications documenting its application in nerve studies . Other significant tissue contexts include muscle (159 publications), brain (122 publications), ganglia (30 publications), and embryonic tissues (21 publications) . From a disease perspective, PMP22 antibodies are frequently utilized in studies of peripheral nervous system disorders, particularly Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (586 publications) and other hereditary sensory and motor neuropathies (613 publications) . Demyelinating diseases (140 publications) and animal disease models (103 publications) also represent important research areas where PMP22 antibodies provide valuable insights into pathological mechanisms . When designing experiments, researchers should consider these established tissue and disease contexts to maximize the relevance of their findings.

How should researchers optimize Western blot protocols for PMP22 detection?

For optimal Western blot detection of PMP22, researchers should implement several key methodological considerations. Sample preparation should include efficient membrane protein extraction techniques, as PMP22 is a transmembrane protein that requires appropriate solubilization. Use RIPA or NP-40 based lysis buffers supplemented with protease inhibitors, and avoid excessive heating which may cause aggregation of membrane proteins. For gel electrophoresis, 12-15% polyacrylamide gels are recommended to effectively resolve the relatively small 17,891 Da PMP22 protein .

During antibody incubation, use the recommended dilution range (1:500-1:1000) in 5% BSA or non-fat milk blocking solution . Include a positive control sample from tissues known to express PMP22 abundantly (peripheral nerve, brain tissue) alongside experimental samples. For visualization, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) systems typically provide sufficient sensitivity, though signal amplification systems may be beneficial for detecting low expression levels. If non-specific bands appear, optimize blocking conditions and consider using gradient gels to better resolve proteins in the target molecular weight range.

What factors affect the specificity and sensitivity of PMP22 antibodies in immunohistochemistry?

Multiple factors influence both the specificity and sensitivity of PMP22 antibodies in immunohistochemical applications. Antigen retrieval methodology significantly impacts epitope accessibility - heat-mediated retrieval with sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) has demonstrated effectiveness for PMP22 detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues . Primary antibody concentration requires careful optimization, with recommended dilutions between 1:100-1:200, adjusting based on tissue type and fixation protocol .

Detection system selection affects sensitivity, with HRP-conjugated compact polymer systems showing good results for PMP22 visualization using DAB as the chromogen, followed by hematoxylin counterstaining . Cross-reactivity potential with related proteins should be evaluated, particularly with other myelin-associated proteins that may share structural similarities. Validation through multiple approaches is essential - compare staining patterns against known PMP22 expression profiles and confirm specificity using knockdown/knockout controls or competing peptide assays. For multi-labeled experiments, spectral overlap must be carefully controlled when combining PMP22 antibodies with other neural markers.

How can researchers validate PMP22 antibodies to ensure reproducible results?

A multi-faceted validation approach is essential for ensuring PMP22 antibody reliability and experimental reproducibility. Begin with basic characterization by confirming the antibody recognizes the expected molecular weight protein (approximately 17.9 kDa) via Western blot in positive control tissues like peripheral nerve or brain samples . Evaluate antibody specificity through peptide competition assays, where pre-incubation with the immunizing peptide should abolish specific signal if the antibody is truly target-specific.

Assess cross-species reactivity by testing the antibody against samples from multiple species if relevant to your research; the antibody described in the search results demonstrates reactivity with human, mouse, rat, and bovine samples . For genetic validation, compare antibody reactivity in wild-type versus PMP22 knockout/knockdown models, which should show corresponding signal reduction. Perform lot-to-lot consistency testing when acquiring new antibody batches by comparing staining patterns and signal intensities under identical conditions. Document all validation results thoroughly, including antibody source, catalog number, lot number, and detailed experimental protocols to facilitate reproducibility across different laboratories.

How can PMP22 antibodies be utilized in multi-omics research approaches?

PMP22 antibodies can serve as valuable tools within integrated multi-omics research frameworks. In proteogenomic approaches, researchers can correlate PMP22 protein expression (detected via antibody-based methods) with corresponding genomic alterations and transcriptomic profiles. This integration provides insights into how genetic variations influence protein expression and post-translational modifications. For instance, studies have shown that genetic alterations in PMP22-related pathways correspond with changes at the RNA expression level, suggesting direct influence of DNA-level changes on biological activity .

For spatial proteomics applications, PMP22 antibodies can be incorporated into multiplex immunofluorescence panels with other neural markers to analyze spatial organization and co-localization patterns within the tumor microenvironment or neural tissues. This approach can reveal insights similar to those seen in the PD-1 monoclonal antibody studies, where spatial organization of tumor-infiltrating immune cells affected treatment response . In functional proteomics, immunoprecipitation with PMP22 antibodies followed by mass spectrometry can identify novel interaction partners, potentially revealing unrecognized functions or regulatory mechanisms. These multi-modal approaches provide more comprehensive understanding than single-omics studies alone.

What methodological approaches can address challenges in detecting PMP22 in complex tissue environments?

Detecting PMP22 in complex tissue environments presents several challenges that require sophisticated methodological approaches. Implement signal amplification strategies such as tyramide signal amplification (TSA) or quantum dot-based detection systems to enhance visualization of low-abundance PMP22 expression without increasing background noise. For tissues with high autofluorescence (particularly neural tissues), consider spectral unmixing approaches or use of far-red fluorophores that operate outside the autofluorescence emission range.

Optimization of tissue clearing techniques like CLARITY or iDISCO can improve antibody penetration in thick tissue sections, allowing for three-dimensional visualization of PMP22 distribution. This is particularly valuable for tracing PMP22 expression along nerve fibers. In highly heterogeneous tissues, laser capture microdissection prior to immunodetection can isolate specific regions of interest, enhancing detection sensitivity by reducing sample complexity. For multiplexed detection scenarios, sequential antibody labeling with complete stripping between rounds or cyclic immunofluorescence approaches enable visualization of PMP22 alongside numerous other markers within the same tissue section, providing contextual information about its expression relative to other cellular components.

How does the spatial distribution of PMP22 correlate with functional outcomes in neuropathological conditions?

The spatial distribution of PMP22 provides critical insights into pathological mechanisms underlying various neuropathies. Advanced imaging methodologies that combine PMP22 antibody labeling with high-resolution confocal or super-resolution microscopy can precisely map protein localization at subcellular levels. Studies should quantify not only the abundance of PMP22 but also its distribution pattern along myelinated fibers, noting alterations in paranodal regions and Schmidt-Lanterman incisures that may indicate early pathological changes.

In Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and other demyelinating conditions, researchers should analyze the correlation between PMP22 spatial organization and functional metrics such as nerve conduction velocity, compound muscle action potentials, and clinical disability scores . Methodologically, this requires integrating quantitative image analysis of PMP22 distribution with electrophysiological and clinical data from the same subjects. Combinatorial analysis with markers of axonal transport, mitochondrial function, and Schwann cell differentiation can further elucidate how spatial dysregulation of PMP22 impacts these interconnected processes. Longitudinal studies that map changes in PMP22 distribution over disease progression provide particularly valuable insights into causal relationships between protein mislocalization and functional deterioration.

How can artificial neural network models incorporate PMP22 antibody data for predictive diagnostics?

Artificial neural network (ANN) models offer significant potential for integrating PMP22 antibody data into predictive diagnostic frameworks for peripheral neuropathies. Drawing from methodologies demonstrated in other fields, researchers can develop multi-parameter prediction models that combine PMP22 immunohistochemical data with clinical and genetic information . Quantitative features extracted from PMP22 antibody staining—such as expression intensity, spatial distribution patterns, and co-localization with other myelin proteins—can serve as input variables for machine learning algorithms.

The approach demonstrated in PD-1 antibody research, where an ANN model achieved high prediction efficiency (training set AUC of 0.97 and test set AUC of 0.94), provides a methodological template . For PMP22-related diagnostics, researchers should collect comprehensive datasets including antibody-derived measurements, clinical parameters, genetic testing results, and electrophysiological findings. Feature selection algorithms can identify the most predictive variables, potentially revealing novel biomarker combinations not previously recognized through conventional analysis. Validation protocols should include both internal cross-validation and external testing on independent cohorts to establish generalizability. This integrated approach could significantly improve early detection and intervention strategies for PMP22-associated neuropathies.

What methodological approaches can elucidate the relationship between PMP22 and associated pathway proteins?

Elucidating the relationship between PMP22 and its associated pathway proteins requires sophisticated methodological approaches that capture both physical interactions and functional relationships. Proximity-based labeling techniques such as BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins can identify proteins in close spatial proximity to PMP22 within living cells, revealing both stable and transient interactions that might be missed by traditional co-immunoprecipitation. Quantitative interaction proteomics combining PMP22 antibody-based immunoprecipitation with mass spectrometry can identify interaction partners under different physiological or pathological conditions.

For functional relationship mapping, CRISPR-based genetic screening approaches can systematically identify genes that, when perturbed, alter PMP22 expression, localization, or function. This approach may reveal unexpected pathway connections beyond known associations with neural crest differentiation and integrin signaling pathways . Small molecule perturbation screens followed by PMP22 antibody-based readouts can reveal pharmacological modulators of PMP22 biology, potentially identifying therapeutic targets. Multi-parametric analysis of downstream signaling events following PMP22 modulation, assessed through antibody-based phosphoproteomic approaches, can map the signaling networks influenced by PMP22 activity. Integration of these methodologies provides a systems-level understanding of PMP22's position within broader cellular networks.

How can advanced imaging techniques with PMP22 antibodies enhance understanding of myelin dynamics?

Advanced imaging techniques employing PMP22 antibodies offer unprecedented insights into myelin dynamics in both developmental and pathological contexts. Live-cell super-resolution microscopy using fluorescently tagged PMP22 antibody fragments or genetically encoded tags can visualize real-time movements and organization of PMP22 during active myelination processes. This approach requires careful validation to ensure antibody binding doesn't perturb normal protein function. Expansion microscopy protocols can physically enlarge tissue samples, enabling visualization of nanoscale PMP22 distribution patterns within compact myelin using conventional microscopes.

Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) approaches can bridge the resolution gap between PMP22 antibody immunofluorescence and ultrastructural analysis, precisely localizing the protein within specific myelin domains and correlating its distribution with myelin ultrastructure. For in vivo applications, intravital imaging using minimally invasive optical windows combined with fluorescently labeled PMP22 antibodies can monitor myelin dynamics longitudinally in living organisms. Quantitative analysis should employ advanced computational methods including machine learning-based segmentation algorithms to extract meaningful metrics from these complex imaging datasets. These approaches collectively provide a dynamic, multi-scale view of PMP22 function in myelin formation, maintenance, and pathological remodeling.

What strategies can address non-specific binding issues with PMP22 antibodies?

Non-specific binding represents a common challenge when working with PMP22 antibodies, requiring systematic troubleshooting approaches. Optimize blocking protocols by testing different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blocking solutions) at various concentrations and incubation times; the standard 0.2% BSA concentration mentioned in the product information may require adjustment based on specific tissue types . Implement stringent washing procedures using buffers containing appropriate detergent concentrations (typically 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 or Triton X-100) to remove weakly-bound antibodies while preserving specific interactions.

For particularly problematic tissues, antibody pre-adsorption against tissue homogenates lacking PMP22 expression can reduce non-specific interactions. Titrate primary antibody concentrations methodically, testing a range around the recommended 1:500-1:1000 for Western blot or 1:100-1:200 for immunohistochemistry, as optimal concentrations may vary between tissue types and experimental conditions . Include comprehensive controls in every experiment: negative controls (primary antibody omission, isotype controls), positive controls (tissues known to express PMP22), and when possible, genetic controls (PMP22 knockout/knockdown samples). Finally, consider alternative antibody clones if persistent non-specific binding occurs, as epitope accessibility and specificity vary between antibodies targeting different regions of PMP22.

How can researchers distinguish between PMP22 and closely related proteins in experimental systems?

Distinguishing PMP22 from closely related proteins requires rigorous methodological approaches focused on specificity validation. Begin with epitope analysis by selecting antibodies targeting unique regions of PMP22 with minimal sequence homology to related proteins; consult antibody datasheets for information on the specific peptide sequence used for immunization . Implement parallel detection strategies using multiple antibodies against different PMP22 epitopes – consistent results across different antibodies increase confidence in specific detection.

For challenging systems, employ molecular weight discrimination through high-resolution gel electrophoresis techniques that can separate PMP22 (17.9 kDa) from similarly sized proteins . Consider two-dimensional electrophoresis to separate proteins based on both molecular weight and isoelectric point for enhanced discrimination. Genetic validation approaches provide particularly compelling evidence – compare antibody reactivity in control versus PMP22-silenced systems (siRNA, CRISPR knockout) to confirm signal specificity. When analyzing tissues expressing multiple related proteins, perform differential expression analysis across tissues with known expression patterns of PMP22 and related proteins. Finally, mass spectrometry validation following immunoprecipitation can definitively identify the captured protein through peptide sequence analysis, distinguishing PMP22 from related family members with high confidence.

What methodological considerations are important when quantifying PMP22 expression levels in research samples?

Accurate quantification of PMP22 expression requires careful attention to multiple methodological factors. Establish standardized sample collection and processing protocols that minimize pre-analytical variability, including consistent tissue harvesting times, preservation methods, and storage conditions, as PMP22 stability may vary across sample types. For Western blot quantification, implement loading normalization using appropriate housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH) or total protein staining methods (Ponceau S, REVERT), with verification that these controls are stably expressed across experimental conditions.

Employ standard curves using recombinant PMP22 protein to establish quantitative relationships between signal intensity and protein abundance. For immunohistochemical quantification, develop consistent image acquisition parameters, including exposure times, gain settings, and threshold values, and utilize automated image analysis algorithms to reduce subjective bias in intensity measurements. Consider region-specific quantification approaches, as PMP22 expression varies significantly across tissue microenvironments, particularly in heterogeneous neural tissues. For longitudinal studies, include internal reference standards across all experimental batches to control for inter-assay variability. Finally, validate quantification results through orthogonal methods – for example, confirming Western blot findings with mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry results with qPCR assessment of transcript levels, while acknowledging that transcript and protein levels may not always correlate perfectly.

What are the most promising future directions for PMP22 antibody applications in research?

Future PMP22 antibody applications hold significant promise across multiple research domains. Integration with emerging spatial biology platforms represents a particularly exciting direction, combining PMP22 antibodies with highly multiplexed imaging technologies (CODEX, GeoMx DSP, Hyperion) to simultaneously visualize dozens of proteins within their native tissue context. This approach could reveal previously unrecognized spatial relationships between PMP22 and other cellular components in both normal and pathological states, similar to the spatial organization insights gained in immune cell studies .

Single-cell analysis represents another frontier, with PMP22 antibodies potentially incorporated into flow cytometry or mass cytometry (CyTOF) panels to analyze expression heterogeneity across individual cells within complex populations. Development of proximity-dependent methodologies, such as in situ proximity ligation assays using PMP22 antibodies, could enable visualization of specific protein-protein interactions in tissues, providing functional insights beyond mere co-localization. In therapeutic contexts, PMP22 antibodies may serve as valuable tools for validating emerging gene therapy approaches targeting PMP22-related neuropathies, providing crucial protein-level readouts to complement genetic and clinical assessments. The continued refinement of these methodologies, combined with increasing integration of computational approaches similar to the artificial neural network models described , will likely accelerate discoveries in PMP22 biology and related neurological disorders.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.