KEGG: spo:SPAC16C9.07
STRING: 4896.SPAC16C9.07.1
ppk5 is a protein kinase found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) identified by Uniprot accession number Q09815. It functions as part of signaling pathways within the yeast cell. The protein is studied in cellular regulation processes typical of eukaryotic organisms, making S. pombe an excellent model organism for fundamental cellular mechanisms. Research with ppk5 antibodies enables detection and characterization of this protein in various experimental contexts, contributing to our understanding of protein kinase functions in yeast models that can be extrapolated to higher eukaryotes .
The commercially available ppk5 Antibody has been validated for the following applications:
| Application | Validated | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Yes | For antigen detection and quantification |
| Western Blot (WB) | Yes | For protein identification in cell lysates |
| Immunoprecipitation | Potential | Can be used in pull-down assays |
| Immunohistochemistry | Not specified | Requires validation |
The antibody is specifically raised against recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) ppk5 protein, making it particularly suitable for detecting this protein in fission yeast experimental systems .
For maximum stability and retention of activity, ppk5 Antibody should be stored according to these specifications:
Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can denature the antibody
The antibody is supplied in liquid form with preservative (0.03% Proclin 300)
Buffer composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Working dilutions should be prepared fresh and used within the same day when possible
Proper storage is critical for maintaining antibody functionality, as degradation can lead to decreased specificity and sensitivity in experimental applications .
Validating antibody specificity is essential before conducting advanced experiments. For ppk5 Antibody, recommended validation procedures include:
Positive control testing: Use known ppk5-expressing S. pombe strains to confirm detection
Negative control testing: Test in strains with ppk5 deletions or in unrelated species
Western blot analysis: Confirm single band at the expected molecular weight
Pre-absorption test: Pre-incubate antibody with purified antigen to eliminate specific binding
Comparison with alternative detection methods: Use tagged ppk5 constructs detected with tag-specific antibodies to confirm colocalization
These validation steps ensure experimental results accurately reflect ppk5 biology rather than non-specific interactions .
Antibody pull-down (co-immunoprecipitation) with ppk5 Antibody requires optimization for fission yeast systems. A recommended protocol includes:
Cell preparation: Harvest 50-100 ml of yeast culture (OD595 = 0.5-1.0) by centrifugation
Lysis optimization: Use glass bead disruption in lysis buffer containing:
50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5)
150 mM NaCl
1 mM EDTA
1% Triton X-100
Protease inhibitor cocktail
Phosphatase inhibitors (if studying phosphorylation)
Pre-clearing: Incubate lysate with protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C
Immunoprecipitation: Add 2-5 μg of ppk5 Antibody to pre-cleared lysate and incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation
Washing conditions: Wash beads 4-5 times with progressively lower salt concentration buffers
Elution and analysis: Elute proteins with SDS sample buffer and analyze by Western blotting
This optimized approach increases the likelihood of detecting genuine protein-protein interactions involving ppk5 in fission yeast .
Multiple factors influence the detection sensitivity of ppk5 in Western blot experiments:
| Factor | Recommendation | Impact on Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody dilution | 1:500 to 1:2000 (optimize) | Higher concentrations increase sensitivity but may increase background |
| Blocking agent | 5% non-fat milk or BSA | BSA may be preferred for phospho-specific detection |
| Incubation time | Overnight at 4°C | Longer incubation improves binding to low-abundance targets |
| Detection system | HRP-conjugated vs. fluorescent | Chemiluminescence offers higher sensitivity for low expression |
| Sample preparation | Native vs. denaturing conditions | Some epitopes may be masked in native conditions |
| Transfer method | Wet vs. semi-dry | Wet transfer typically yields better results for larger proteins |
Researchers should optimize these parameters systematically, especially when studying low-abundance kinases like ppk5 in yeast systems .
The current commercially available ppk5 Antibody is polyclonal, which has specific implications for research:
Polyclonal ppk5 Antibody characteristics:
Recognizes multiple epitopes on the ppk5 protein
Generally provides higher sensitivity due to multiple binding sites
Shows greater tolerance to minor protein denaturation
May exhibit batch-to-batch variation requiring validation
Useful for detection of native proteins in complex samples
Considerations if monoclonal alternatives become available:
Would recognize a single epitope with higher specificity
Would provide more consistent results across experiments
Might be less sensitive for low-abundance targets
Could be more susceptible to epitope masking due to protein modification
Would be preferable for quantitative applications
The polyclonal nature of current ppk5 Antibody makes it particularly suitable for initial characterization studies in fission yeast models, while hypothetical monoclonal versions would be advantageous for highly specific quantitative assays .
Non-specific binding can complicate interpretation of results with antibodies including ppk5 Antibody. Researchers can implement these strategies to minimize such issues:
Increase washing stringency: Use higher salt concentrations (up to 500 mM NaCl) in wash buffers
Optimize blocking conditions: Test different blocking agents (milk, BSA, casein) and concentrations
Pre-adsorption: Pre-incubate antibody with lysates from ppk5-knockout strains
Cross-linking optimization: For pull-down experiments, optimize crosslinker concentration and incubation time
Two-step detection: Use a two-antibody approach when possible (e.g., epitope-tagged ppk5)
Gradient elution: For immunoprecipitation, use gradient elution to differentiate high and low-affinity interactions
These approaches systematically reduce non-specific signals, improving data quality and interpretation .
Integrating ppk5 studies into broader protein interaction networks requires multifaceted experimental approaches:
Sequential immunoprecipitation: Use ppk5 Antibody followed by antibodies against predicted interaction partners
Mass spectrometry analysis: Identify novel interaction partners from ppk5 immunoprecipitates
Proximity-based labeling: Combine with BioID or APEX2 systems to identify proximal proteins
Comparative proteomic analysis: Compare ppk5 interactomes under different conditions
Network analysis: Use computational tools to integrate findings with existing protein interaction databases
Validation through orthogonal methods: Confirm key interactions using yeast two-hybrid or FRET approaches
This integrated approach positions ppk5 research within the broader context of cellular signaling networks in fission yeast, potentially revealing novel regulatory mechanisms that may be conserved in higher eukaryotes .
Robust experimental design requires appropriate controls when using ppk5 Antibody:
| Control Type | Implementation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Positive control | Wild-type S. pombe lysate | Confirms antibody functionality |
| Negative control | ppk5 deletion strain | Validates antibody specificity |
| Input control | Pre-immunoprecipitation sample | Normalizes for protein abundance |
| Isotype control | Non-specific IgG of same species | Assesses non-specific binding |
| Loading control | Housekeeping protein detection | Ensures equal sample loading |
| Competitive peptide | Pre-incubation with immunizing peptide | Confirms epitope specificity |
Implementing these controls systematically increases confidence in experimental results and facilitates troubleshooting when unexpected results occur .
Quantitative analysis of ppk5 requires careful methodology:
Standard curve generation: Use recombinant ppk5 protein at known concentrations
Dynamic range determination: Establish linear detection range for the antibody
Normalization strategy: Select appropriate housekeeping proteins stable under experimental conditions
Technical replicates: Minimum of three technical replicates per biological sample
Image analysis: Use calibrated software (ImageJ, etc.) with background subtraction
Statistical approach: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
For relative quantification between conditions, researchers should use consistent protocols and analyze samples simultaneously to minimize technical variation .
Studying ppk5 phosphorylation requires specific methodological adjustments:
Phosphatase inhibitor cocktail: Include in all buffers (e.g., sodium orthovanadate, sodium fluoride, β-glycerophosphate)
Sample handling: Maintain samples at 4°C throughout processing
Gel systems: Use Phos-tag acrylamide gels to separate phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated forms
Antibody selection: Consider phospho-specific antibodies if available or develop them for key sites
Validation approach: Treat samples with lambda phosphatase as negative control
Mass spectrometry integration: Use for identification of specific phosphorylation sites
These modifications preserve phosphorylation states that might otherwise be lost during standard sample preparation, enabling more accurate characterization of ppk5 regulation in vivo .
When faced with inconsistent results, researchers should systematically evaluate:
Antibody viability: Test antibody activity with a simple dot blot
Sample integrity: Verify protein integrity with Coomassie staining
Protocol variables: Systematically modify incubation times, temperatures, and buffer compositions
Detection system: Ensure secondary antibody and detection reagents are functioning properly
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against known similar proteins in S. pombe
Batch variation: Compare results across different antibody lots if available
This systematic approach identifies the source of variability, allowing researchers to implement specific solutions rather than making multiple simultaneous changes .
Adapting protocols for related species requires careful consideration:
Sequence homology analysis: Perform alignment of ppk5 sequences across target species
Epitope conservation assessment: Determine if the immunizing epitope is conserved
Cross-reactivity testing: Validate antibody reactivity in the target species
Protocol modifications:
Adjust lysis conditions based on cell wall differences
Optimize antibody concentration for each species
Modify incubation times based on preliminary results
Positive control inclusion: Include S. pombe samples as reference points
These adaptations increase the likelihood of successful application while acknowledging potential limitations in cross-species reactivity .
Both antibody-based detection and genetic tagging offer distinct advantages:
| Approach | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| ppk5 Antibody | - Detects native protein - No genetic manipulation required - Potential to recognize post-translational modifications | - Specificity dependent on antibody quality - May not detect all isoforms - Batch variation possible |
| Epitope tagging | - Highly specific detection - Consistent reagent quality - Compatible with commercial tag antibodies | - Tag may affect protein function - Requires genetic manipulation - Expression levels may be altered |
| Fluorescent protein fusion | - Direct visualization in live cells - Temporal studies possible - No antibody required | - Large tag may disrupt function - Autofluorescence concerns - May affect localization |
Researchers should select the approach based on specific experimental questions, with antibody detection offering advantages for studying native protein under endogenous regulation .
Multiplex experiments that detect ppk5 alongside other proteins require careful planning:
Antibody compatibility: Ensure primary antibodies are from different host species
Signal separation: Choose detection systems with non-overlapping emission spectra
Optimization strategy:
Test each antibody individually before combining
Determine optimal concentration for each antibody
Establish appropriate sequential incubation order
Controls for multiplexing: Include single-antibody controls alongside multiplex detection
Image acquisition: Optimize exposure settings to capture all signals within linear range
This approach enables simultaneous detection of ppk5 and its potential interaction partners or regulatory proteins in the same sample, providing contextual information about relative localization or co-expression .
Emerging technologies offer new possibilities for ppk5 research:
Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies): Smaller size allows access to restricted epitopes
Recombinant antibody fragments: Consistent production without batch variation
Intrabodies: Expressed within cells for live detection of ppk5
Proximity labeling antibodies: Conjugated to enzymes like APEX2 for identifying nearby proteins
Degradation-inducing antibodies: For targeted protein degradation studies
High-throughput antibody validation: Using CRISPR-edited cell lines for specificity assessment
These advances may address current limitations in studying low-abundance kinases like ppk5 in model organisms, potentially revealing new functions and regulatory mechanisms .
Adapting ppk5 Antibody for super-resolution microscopy requires specific considerations:
Fixation optimization: Test multiple fixation protocols to preserve epitope accessibility
Secondary antibody selection: Use high-quality fluorophore-conjugated secondaries designed for super-resolution
Sample preparation modifications:
Thinner sections for better resolution
Optimized mounting media to reduce background
Appropriate clearing techniques if needed
Validation approach: Compare with diffraction-limited microscopy and other localization techniques
Quantification strategy: Develop analysis workflows appropriate for super-resolution data
These adaptations could reveal previously undetectable subcellular localizations and dynamics of ppk5 in fission yeast, potentially identifying novel functional compartmentalization .