ppk5 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
ppk5 antibody; mug189 antibody; SPAC16C9.07 antibody; SPAC2G11.01 antibody; Serine/threonine-protein kinase ppk5 antibody; EC 2.7.11.1 antibody; Meiotically up-regulated gene 189 protein antibody
Target Names
ppk5
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
PPK5 antibody plays a role in meiosis.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. PPK5 (Pom2) exhibits distinct functional properties compared to the well-characterized Pom1. PMID: 22174761
Database Links
Protein Families
Protein kinase superfamily, CMGC Ser/Thr protein kinase family, MNB/DYRK subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Note=Septum.

Q&A

What is ppk5 and what is its role in Schizosaccharomyces pombe?

ppk5 is a protein kinase found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) identified by Uniprot accession number Q09815. It functions as part of signaling pathways within the yeast cell. The protein is studied in cellular regulation processes typical of eukaryotic organisms, making S. pombe an excellent model organism for fundamental cellular mechanisms. Research with ppk5 antibodies enables detection and characterization of this protein in various experimental contexts, contributing to our understanding of protein kinase functions in yeast models that can be extrapolated to higher eukaryotes .

What experimental applications is the ppk5 Antibody suitable for?

The commercially available ppk5 Antibody has been validated for the following applications:

ApplicationValidatedNotes
ELISAYesFor antigen detection and quantification
Western Blot (WB)YesFor protein identification in cell lysates
ImmunoprecipitationPotentialCan be used in pull-down assays
ImmunohistochemistryNot specifiedRequires validation

The antibody is specifically raised against recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) ppk5 protein, making it particularly suitable for detecting this protein in fission yeast experimental systems .

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for ppk5 Antibody?

For maximum stability and retention of activity, ppk5 Antibody should be stored according to these specifications:

  • Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can denature the antibody

  • The antibody is supplied in liquid form with preservative (0.03% Proclin 300)

  • Buffer composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4

  • Working dilutions should be prepared fresh and used within the same day when possible

Proper storage is critical for maintaining antibody functionality, as degradation can lead to decreased specificity and sensitivity in experimental applications .

How should researchers validate the specificity of a ppk5 Antibody?

Validating antibody specificity is essential before conducting advanced experiments. For ppk5 Antibody, recommended validation procedures include:

  • Positive control testing: Use known ppk5-expressing S. pombe strains to confirm detection

  • Negative control testing: Test in strains with ppk5 deletions or in unrelated species

  • Western blot analysis: Confirm single band at the expected molecular weight

  • Pre-absorption test: Pre-incubate antibody with purified antigen to eliminate specific binding

  • Comparison with alternative detection methods: Use tagged ppk5 constructs detected with tag-specific antibodies to confirm colocalization

These validation steps ensure experimental results accurately reflect ppk5 biology rather than non-specific interactions .

How can researchers optimize antibody pull-down experiments using ppk5 Antibody in fission yeast?

Antibody pull-down (co-immunoprecipitation) with ppk5 Antibody requires optimization for fission yeast systems. A recommended protocol includes:

  • Cell preparation: Harvest 50-100 ml of yeast culture (OD595 = 0.5-1.0) by centrifugation

  • Lysis optimization: Use glass bead disruption in lysis buffer containing:

    • 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5)

    • 150 mM NaCl

    • 1 mM EDTA

    • 1% Triton X-100

    • Protease inhibitor cocktail

    • Phosphatase inhibitors (if studying phosphorylation)

  • Pre-clearing: Incubate lysate with protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C

  • Immunoprecipitation: Add 2-5 μg of ppk5 Antibody to pre-cleared lysate and incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

  • Washing conditions: Wash beads 4-5 times with progressively lower salt concentration buffers

  • Elution and analysis: Elute proteins with SDS sample buffer and analyze by Western blotting

This optimized approach increases the likelihood of detecting genuine protein-protein interactions involving ppk5 in fission yeast .

What factors affect the detection sensitivity when using ppk5 Antibody in Western blotting?

Multiple factors influence the detection sensitivity of ppk5 in Western blot experiments:

FactorRecommendationImpact on Sensitivity
Antibody dilution1:500 to 1:2000 (optimize)Higher concentrations increase sensitivity but may increase background
Blocking agent5% non-fat milk or BSABSA may be preferred for phospho-specific detection
Incubation timeOvernight at 4°CLonger incubation improves binding to low-abundance targets
Detection systemHRP-conjugated vs. fluorescentChemiluminescence offers higher sensitivity for low expression
Sample preparationNative vs. denaturing conditionsSome epitopes may be masked in native conditions
Transfer methodWet vs. semi-dryWet transfer typically yields better results for larger proteins

Researchers should optimize these parameters systematically, especially when studying low-abundance kinases like ppk5 in yeast systems .

How does the choice between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies affect experimental outcomes in ppk5 research?

The current commercially available ppk5 Antibody is polyclonal, which has specific implications for research:

Polyclonal ppk5 Antibody characteristics:

  • Recognizes multiple epitopes on the ppk5 protein

  • Generally provides higher sensitivity due to multiple binding sites

  • Shows greater tolerance to minor protein denaturation

  • May exhibit batch-to-batch variation requiring validation

  • Useful for detection of native proteins in complex samples

Considerations if monoclonal alternatives become available:

  • Would recognize a single epitope with higher specificity

  • Would provide more consistent results across experiments

  • Might be less sensitive for low-abundance targets

  • Could be more susceptible to epitope masking due to protein modification

  • Would be preferable for quantitative applications

The polyclonal nature of current ppk5 Antibody makes it particularly suitable for initial characterization studies in fission yeast models, while hypothetical monoclonal versions would be advantageous for highly specific quantitative assays .

What experimental approaches can address non-specific binding issues with ppk5 Antibody?

Non-specific binding can complicate interpretation of results with antibodies including ppk5 Antibody. Researchers can implement these strategies to minimize such issues:

  • Increase washing stringency: Use higher salt concentrations (up to 500 mM NaCl) in wash buffers

  • Optimize blocking conditions: Test different blocking agents (milk, BSA, casein) and concentrations

  • Pre-adsorption: Pre-incubate antibody with lysates from ppk5-knockout strains

  • Cross-linking optimization: For pull-down experiments, optimize crosslinker concentration and incubation time

  • Two-step detection: Use a two-antibody approach when possible (e.g., epitope-tagged ppk5)

  • Gradient elution: For immunoprecipitation, use gradient elution to differentiate high and low-affinity interactions

These approaches systematically reduce non-specific signals, improving data quality and interpretation .

How can researchers integrate ppk5 Antibody-based studies with broader protein interaction networks?

Integrating ppk5 studies into broader protein interaction networks requires multifaceted experimental approaches:

  • Sequential immunoprecipitation: Use ppk5 Antibody followed by antibodies against predicted interaction partners

  • Mass spectrometry analysis: Identify novel interaction partners from ppk5 immunoprecipitates

  • Proximity-based labeling: Combine with BioID or APEX2 systems to identify proximal proteins

  • Comparative proteomic analysis: Compare ppk5 interactomes under different conditions

  • Network analysis: Use computational tools to integrate findings with existing protein interaction databases

  • Validation through orthogonal methods: Confirm key interactions using yeast two-hybrid or FRET approaches

This integrated approach positions ppk5 research within the broader context of cellular signaling networks in fission yeast, potentially revealing novel regulatory mechanisms that may be conserved in higher eukaryotes .

What controls are essential when conducting ppk5 Antibody-based experiments?

Robust experimental design requires appropriate controls when using ppk5 Antibody:

Control TypeImplementationPurpose
Positive controlWild-type S. pombe lysateConfirms antibody functionality
Negative controlppk5 deletion strainValidates antibody specificity
Input controlPre-immunoprecipitation sampleNormalizes for protein abundance
Isotype controlNon-specific IgG of same speciesAssesses non-specific binding
Loading controlHousekeeping protein detectionEnsures equal sample loading
Competitive peptidePre-incubation with immunizing peptideConfirms epitope specificity

Implementing these controls systematically increases confidence in experimental results and facilitates troubleshooting when unexpected results occur .

How should researchers approach quantitative analysis of ppk5 in fission yeast systems?

Quantitative analysis of ppk5 requires careful methodology:

  • Standard curve generation: Use recombinant ppk5 protein at known concentrations

  • Dynamic range determination: Establish linear detection range for the antibody

  • Normalization strategy: Select appropriate housekeeping proteins stable under experimental conditions

  • Technical replicates: Minimum of three technical replicates per biological sample

  • Image analysis: Use calibrated software (ImageJ, etc.) with background subtraction

  • Statistical approach: Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

For relative quantification between conditions, researchers should use consistent protocols and analyze samples simultaneously to minimize technical variation .

What modifications to standard protocols are needed when studying ppk5 phosphorylation states?

Studying ppk5 phosphorylation requires specific methodological adjustments:

  • Phosphatase inhibitor cocktail: Include in all buffers (e.g., sodium orthovanadate, sodium fluoride, β-glycerophosphate)

  • Sample handling: Maintain samples at 4°C throughout processing

  • Gel systems: Use Phos-tag acrylamide gels to separate phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated forms

  • Antibody selection: Consider phospho-specific antibodies if available or develop them for key sites

  • Validation approach: Treat samples with lambda phosphatase as negative control

  • Mass spectrometry integration: Use for identification of specific phosphorylation sites

These modifications preserve phosphorylation states that might otherwise be lost during standard sample preparation, enabling more accurate characterization of ppk5 regulation in vivo .

What are common troubleshooting approaches for inconsistent results with ppk5 Antibody?

When faced with inconsistent results, researchers should systematically evaluate:

  • Antibody viability: Test antibody activity with a simple dot blot

  • Sample integrity: Verify protein integrity with Coomassie staining

  • Protocol variables: Systematically modify incubation times, temperatures, and buffer compositions

  • Detection system: Ensure secondary antibody and detection reagents are functioning properly

  • Cross-reactivity assessment: Test against known similar proteins in S. pombe

  • Batch variation: Compare results across different antibody lots if available

This systematic approach identifies the source of variability, allowing researchers to implement specific solutions rather than making multiple simultaneous changes .

How can researchers adapt ppk5 Antibody protocols for studies in related yeast species?

Adapting protocols for related species requires careful consideration:

  • Sequence homology analysis: Perform alignment of ppk5 sequences across target species

  • Epitope conservation assessment: Determine if the immunizing epitope is conserved

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Validate antibody reactivity in the target species

  • Protocol modifications:

    • Adjust lysis conditions based on cell wall differences

    • Optimize antibody concentration for each species

    • Modify incubation times based on preliminary results

  • Positive control inclusion: Include S. pombe samples as reference points

These adaptations increase the likelihood of successful application while acknowledging potential limitations in cross-species reactivity .

How does the use of ppk5 Antibody compare with genetic tagging approaches?

Both antibody-based detection and genetic tagging offer distinct advantages:

ApproachAdvantagesLimitations
ppk5 Antibody- Detects native protein
- No genetic manipulation required
- Potential to recognize post-translational modifications
- Specificity dependent on antibody quality
- May not detect all isoforms
- Batch variation possible
Epitope tagging- Highly specific detection
- Consistent reagent quality
- Compatible with commercial tag antibodies
- Tag may affect protein function
- Requires genetic manipulation
- Expression levels may be altered
Fluorescent protein fusion- Direct visualization in live cells
- Temporal studies possible
- No antibody required
- Large tag may disrupt function
- Autofluorescence concerns
- May affect localization

Researchers should select the approach based on specific experimental questions, with antibody detection offering advantages for studying native protein under endogenous regulation .

What considerations are important when designing multiplex experiments incorporating ppk5 Antibody?

Multiplex experiments that detect ppk5 alongside other proteins require careful planning:

  • Antibody compatibility: Ensure primary antibodies are from different host species

  • Signal separation: Choose detection systems with non-overlapping emission spectra

  • Optimization strategy:

    • Test each antibody individually before combining

    • Determine optimal concentration for each antibody

    • Establish appropriate sequential incubation order

  • Controls for multiplexing: Include single-antibody controls alongside multiplex detection

  • Image acquisition: Optimize exposure settings to capture all signals within linear range

This approach enables simultaneous detection of ppk5 and its potential interaction partners or regulatory proteins in the same sample, providing contextual information about relative localization or co-expression .

How might emerging antibody technologies enhance ppk5 research in fission yeast?

Emerging technologies offer new possibilities for ppk5 research:

  • Single-domain antibodies (nanobodies): Smaller size allows access to restricted epitopes

  • Recombinant antibody fragments: Consistent production without batch variation

  • Intrabodies: Expressed within cells for live detection of ppk5

  • Proximity labeling antibodies: Conjugated to enzymes like APEX2 for identifying nearby proteins

  • Degradation-inducing antibodies: For targeted protein degradation studies

  • High-throughput antibody validation: Using CRISPR-edited cell lines for specificity assessment

These advances may address current limitations in studying low-abundance kinases like ppk5 in model organisms, potentially revealing new functions and regulatory mechanisms .

What methodological adaptations would enable super-resolution imaging studies with ppk5 Antibody?

Adapting ppk5 Antibody for super-resolution microscopy requires specific considerations:

  • Fixation optimization: Test multiple fixation protocols to preserve epitope accessibility

  • Secondary antibody selection: Use high-quality fluorophore-conjugated secondaries designed for super-resolution

  • Sample preparation modifications:

    • Thinner sections for better resolution

    • Optimized mounting media to reduce background

    • Appropriate clearing techniques if needed

  • Validation approach: Compare with diffraction-limited microscopy and other localization techniques

  • Quantification strategy: Develop analysis workflows appropriate for super-resolution data

These adaptations could reveal previously undetectable subcellular localizations and dynamics of ppk5 in fission yeast, potentially identifying novel functional compartmentalization .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.