The PPP2R3A antibody, HRP conjugated, is a specialized immunological reagent designed for detecting the PPP2R3A protein—a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) involved in cellular signaling and tumor progression. This antibody combines high specificity with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugation, enabling enzymatic amplification in assays like ELISA and Western blot. Below is a detailed analysis of its technical specifications, applications, and research implications.
The HRP-conjugated PPP2R3A antibody is primarily validated for:
ELISA: Detects PPP2R3A in human lysates or recombinant proteins.
Western Blot: Used in combination with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for signal amplification .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): While not directly validated for HRP-conjugated versions, unconjugated PPP2R3A antibodies are widely used in IHC for tumor tissue analysis .
ELISA Validation: Demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in quantifying PPP2R3A in HCC cell lysates .
Western Blot: Detects PPP2R3A in tumor samples, aiding studies on glycolytic pathway dysregulation .
Immunofluorescence: Dual staining with HK1 antibodies revealed colocalization in HCC cytoplasm, confirming functional interaction .
PPP2R3A (Protein Phosphatase 2, Regulatory Subunit B'', alpha) is a regulatory subunit of the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) complex. This protein is significant in research because the B regulatory subunit modulates substrate selectivity and catalytic activity while also directing the localization of the catalytic enzyme to particular subcellular compartments . Recent studies have revealed that PPP2R3A plays critical roles in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development by regulating glycolysis through targeting hexokinase 1 (HK1) . Understanding PPP2R3A function provides insights into cellular signaling pathways involved in cancer development and progression.
PPP2R3A antibodies are typically characterized by:
Target Specificity: Recognizes specific amino acid regions (e.g., AA 256-508) of the PPP2R3A protein
Host Species: Commonly raised in rabbits for polyclonal antibodies
Reactivity: Primary reactivity with human samples, though some variants may cross-react with mouse and rat samples
Applications: Commonly used in ELISA, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and sometimes Western blotting
Conjugation: Available in both unconjugated and conjugated forms (HRP, FITC)
HRP-conjugated PPP2R3A antibodies are particularly suitable for:
ELISA: The HRP conjugation provides direct enzymatic detection without requiring secondary antibodies, enabling sensitive quantification of PPP2R3A in complex samples
Immunohistochemistry: Can be used for direct detection in tissue sections, though primary applications focus on ELISA
Colorimetric detection systems: The HRP enzyme catalyzes chromogenic reactions for visualization in multiple platforms
Western blotting: Although not explicitly mentioned for the HRP-conjugated version, the antibody characteristics suggest compatibility with this application when properly optimized
Optimization of PPP2R3A antibody dilutions is critical for experimental success:
Initial titration: Begin with manufacturer-recommended dilutions (information not explicitly provided in search results but typically ranges from 1:500 to 1:2000 for HRP-conjugated antibodies)
ELISA optimization:
Immunohistochemistry considerations:
Typically requires lower dilutions than ELISA
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Consider antigen retrieval requirements
Validation: Compare results across multiple applications to ensure consistency and specificity
To maintain optimal activity of HRP-conjugated PPP2R3A antibodies:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles: These can significantly degrade antibody activity and HRP conjugation
Working aliquots: Prepare small aliquots for routine use to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Buffer considerations: The antibody is supplied in 50% glycerol buffer, which helps maintain stability during freezing
Shipping conditions: When receiving the antibody, ensure it was shipped properly on ice or dry ice
Monitoring: Regularly verify activity by including appropriate positive controls in experiments
Recent research has revealed a significant relationship between PPP2R3A and hexokinase 1 (HK1) in hepatocellular carcinoma:
Co-localization studies:
Functional relationship analysis:
Glycolysis pathway investigation:
Several factors can confound results when using PPP2R3A antibodies:
Antibody specificity issues:
Verify specificity through multiple techniques (Western blot, IHC, IF)
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Consider using knockdown/knockout samples as negative controls
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Signal detection challenges:
HRP conjugation may lead to nonspecific background in certain tissues
Optimize blocking conditions (typically 5% BSA or non-fat milk)
Include appropriate enzyme inhibitors when working with tissues with high endogenous peroxidase activity
Functional redundancy in the PP2A complex:
PPP2R3A is one of several regulatory B subunits
Consider parallel analysis of related PP2A subunits to address functional redundancy
Validate findings through multiple approaches (genetic manipulation, pharmacological inhibition)
Based on successful application in recent research , the following protocol is recommended for dual immunofluorescence studies:
Sample preparation:
Fix tissue samples in 4% paraformaldehyde
Process and embed in paraffin or optimal cutting temperature compound for frozen sections
Cut sections at 4-6 μm thickness
Antigen retrieval:
Deparaffinize and rehydrate sections if using paraffin-embedded tissues
Perform heat-induced epitope retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Allow slides to cool to room temperature
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Block with 5% normal serum in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 hour
Incubate with rabbit anti-PPP2R3A antibody (optimized dilution) overnight at 4°C
Wash 3× with PBS
Incubate with mouse anti-HK1 antibody for 2 hours at room temperature
Wash 3× with PBS
Secondary antibody incubation:
Use species-specific secondary antibodies with different fluorophores
Anti-rabbit secondary antibody (red fluorescence)
Anti-mouse secondary antibody (green fluorescence)
Include DAPI for nuclear counterstaining
Control for cross-reactivity between secondary antibodies
Analysis:
Examine colocalization using confocal microscopy
Quantify mean fluorescence intensity for correlation analysis
Analyze Pearson's correlation coefficient to determine relationship strength
A comprehensive validation approach includes:
Multiple antibody comparison:
Test antibodies targeting different epitopes of PPP2R3A
Compare polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies when available
Include antibodies from different vendors
Genetic validation:
Peptide competition assay:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide
Compare signal with and without competing peptide
Cross-platform validation:
Confirm findings using multiple techniques (Western blot, ELISA, IHC, IF)
Ensure consistent results across different detection methods
Expression pattern analysis:
The correlation between PPP2R3A and HK1 in cancer research should be interpreted with the following considerations:
Statistical correlation strength:
Functional relationship:
Biological significance:
Clinical implications:
Consider potential as biomarkers or therapeutic targets
Evaluate relationship in multiple cancer types beyond HCC
Assess correlation with clinical outcomes and disease progression
Several challenges must be addressed when reconciling laboratory and clinical findings:
Antibody performance differences:
Fixation methods in clinical samples may affect epitope accessibility
Background staining patterns may differ between cell lines and tissues
Standardization of staining protocols is critical for comparison
Heterogeneity considerations:
Cancer tissue contains multiple cell types beyond cancer cells
Regional heterogeneity within tumors may affect PPP2R3A expression patterns
Consider microdissection or single-cell approaches for precise analysis
Pathway complexity:
PPP2R3A functions within the complex PP2A regulatory network
Multiple upstream regulators and downstream effectors exist
In vitro models may not capture the full complexity of pathway interactions
Translation of functional findings:
Metabolic changes (glycolysis) observed in cell lines may be influenced by culture conditions
The tumor microenvironment affects cancer metabolism in ways not replicated in vitro
Consider complementary approaches (e.g., patient-derived xenografts, ex vivo tissue culture)