PRAMEF6 (Gene ID: 440561) is located on chromosome 1 and encodes a 548.52 kDa protein (UniProt ID: Q5VXH4) . The protein functions as a substrate-recognition component of the Cul2-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (CRL2), mediating ubiquitination and degradation of truncated selenoproteins (e.g., MSRB1/SEPX1) . Its role in protein degradation pathways underscores its relevance in cellular homeostasis and disease mechanisms.
The antibody is validated for multiple techniques:
Western Blotting (WB): Detects endogenous PRAMEF6 in human cell lysates at 1:1000 dilution .
Flow Cytometry (FACS): Stains PRAMEF6-expressing cells (e.g., melanoma lines) at 1:10–50 dilution .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes PRAMEF6 in paraffin-embedded tissues (1:10–50) .
Protein Degradation: PRAMEF6 facilitates ubiquitination of truncated selenoproteins, preventing their accumulation and oxidative damage .
Cancer Biology: While PRAMEF6 itself is not directly implicated in oncogenesis, its family member PRAME is overexpressed in melanomas and serves as a diagnostic marker . This highlights the broader utility of PRAME-family antibodies in cancer research.
PRAMEF6 (PRAME family member 6) is a protein that functions as a substrate-recognition component of a Cul2-RING (CRL2) E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex. This complex mediates ubiquitination of target proteins, leading to their degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Specifically, the CRL2(PRAMEF6) complex targets truncated MSRB1/SEPX1 selenoproteins produced by failed UGA/Sec decoding for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation . This function suggests PRAMEF6 plays a role in protein quality control mechanisms, particularly for selenoproteins whose translation involves recoding of the UGA stop codon to incorporate selenocysteine.
Understanding PRAMEF6's biological function is essential when designing experiments to investigate its role in cellular processes. When studying PRAMEF6, researchers should consider its potential interactions with other components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and its substrate specificity, which may influence experimental design and interpretation of results.
Several types of PRAMEF6 antibodies are available for research applications. These include polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits that target different epitopes of the protein . Some antibodies target specific regions of PRAMEF6, such as:
Additionally, these antibodies are available in different formats:
Unconjugated primary antibodies
Conjugated antibodies with various labels including:
When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider which region of PRAMEF6 they wish to target and which detection method is most suitable for their experimental setup.
PRAMEF6 antibodies have been validated for multiple immunological applications, providing researchers with flexibility in experimental approaches. According to available information, these antibodies can be used in:
Western Blotting (WB): For detecting PRAMEF6 protein in cell or tissue lysates
Flow Cytometry (FACS): For analyzing PRAMEF6 expression in individual cells
Immunofluorescence (IF): For visualizing the subcellular localization of PRAMEF6
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative measurement of PRAMEF6
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detecting PRAMEF6 in tissue sections
The reactivity of these antibodies is primarily against human PRAMEF6, with calculated cross-reactivity specifically for human samples . When planning experiments, researchers should refer to the manufacturer's datasheets for specific validation data, recommended dilutions, and optimized protocols for each application.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for ensuring reliable research results. For PRAMEF6 antibodies, consider implementing these validation approaches:
Positive and Negative Controls:
Use cell lines or tissues known to express or lack PRAMEF6
Include recombinant PRAMEF6 protein as a positive control
Use knockout or knockdown models (CRISPR-Cas9 or siRNA) to confirm specificity
Peptide Competition Assay:
Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide (if available)
A significant reduction in signal indicates specificity for the target epitope
Cross-validation with Different Antibodies:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different PRAMEF6 epitopes
Consistent results across antibodies increase confidence in specificity
Orthogonal Methods:
Compare antibody-based detection with RNA expression data from qPCR or RNA-seq
Consider the RNA-protein correlation, as some genes show poor correlation between transcript and protein levels
Mass Spectrometry Validation:
For definitive validation, immunoprecipitate PRAMEF6 and analyze by mass spectrometry
This confirms the antibody captures the intended target protein
It's important to note that antibody validation should be performed in the specific experimental context in which it will be used, as antibody performance can vary across applications and sample types .
Optimizing Western blot conditions for PRAMEF6 detection requires attention to several key parameters:
Sample Preparation:
Use appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Consider using phosphatase inhibitors if studying post-translational modifications
Denature samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in standard Laemmli buffer with reducing agent
Gel Electrophoresis and Transfer:
PRAMEF6 has a molecular weight of approximately 55-60 kDa
Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal resolution
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes using standard protocols (wet transfer often provides better results for proteins >50 kDa)
Blocking and Antibody Incubation:
Block membranes with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST
For primary antibody, dilute according to manufacturer recommendations (typically 1:1000-1:5000)
Incubate overnight at 4°C for optimal sensitivity
For secondary antibody, use 1:5000-1:10000 dilution with 1-hour incubation at room temperature
Detection and Controls:
Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL detection reagents
Include loading controls (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin) to normalize expression levels
Consider running recombinant PRAMEF6 protein as a positive control
Optimization Tips:
If signal is weak, increase antibody concentration or extend incubation time
If background is high, increase washing steps or adjust blocking conditions
For enhanced sensitivity, consider using signal amplification systems or highly sensitive ECL reagents
Following these guidelines should provide reliable detection of PRAMEF6 in Western blot experiments while minimizing non-specific binding and background issues.
Investigating PRAMEF6's function in the ubiquitination pathway requires specialized approaches that focus on protein-protein interactions and enzymatic activities:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) Studies:
Use PRAMEF6 antibodies to immunoprecipitate the protein along with its binding partners
Analyze the precipitated complexes for other components of the CRL2 E3 ligase complex
Perform reverse Co-IP with antibodies against known CRL2 components to confirm interactions
Ubiquitination Assays:
In vitro ubiquitination assays using recombinant proteins to demonstrate direct activity
In vivo ubiquitination assays by overexpressing tagged ubiquitin and immunoprecipitating PRAMEF6 substrates
Analysis by Western blot using anti-ubiquitin antibodies to detect poly-ubiquitinated forms
Substrate Identification:
Combine PRAMEF6 knockdown/knockout with proteomics to identify accumulating substrates
Focus on truncated MSRB1/SEPX1 selenoproteins, the known targets of CRL2(PRAMEF6)
Use translation systems with selenium supplementation and UGA codon readthrough to generate potential substrates
Functional Assays:
Monitor protein degradation kinetics in the presence or absence of PRAMEF6
Use proteasome inhibitors (e.g., MG132) to confirm the degradation pathway
Study cellular consequences of PRAMEF6 depletion on selenium metabolism and selenoprotein homeostasis
Structural Studies:
Use structural biology approaches to understand how PRAMEF6 recognizes its substrates
Investigate the binding interface between PRAMEF6 and other CRL2 components
These methodological approaches provide comprehensive insights into PRAMEF6's role in protein quality control, particularly in the context of selenoprotein metabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
Antibody Selection:
Choose antibodies that target unique epitopes of PRAMEF6 not conserved in other PRAME family members
Verify through sequence alignment which regions of PRAMEF6 have the least homology with related proteins
Request epitope information from antibody manufacturers to evaluate potential cross-reactivity
Validation of Specificity:
Test antibodies against recombinant proteins of multiple PRAME family members
Perform peptide competition assays with peptides from PRAMEF6 and related family members
Use overexpression systems with tagged PRAME family proteins to confirm antibody specificity
RNA-based Approaches:
Design RT-qPCR primers that span unique regions or splice junctions specific to PRAMEF6
Use RNA interference with highly specific siRNAs targeting unique untranslated regions
Verify knockdown specificity by measuring expression of multiple PRAME family members
Mass Spectrometry Differentiation:
Use targeted mass spectrometry to identify unique peptides specific to PRAMEF6
Develop multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) assays for specific detection of PRAMEF6 peptides
Compare fragmentation patterns to distinguish between closely related family members
Functional Differentiation:
Design assays that exploit PRAMEF6's unique role in the ubiquitination of selenoproteins
Examine substrate specificity differences between PRAME family members
Study interaction partners unique to PRAMEF6 versus other family members
By implementing these strategies, researchers can confidently differentiate PRAMEF6 from other PRAME family members, ensuring the specificity and validity of their experimental findings.
Proper controls are essential for interpreting results using PRAMEF6 antibodies. Include these controls in your experimental design:
Positive Controls:
Cell lines or tissues known to express PRAMEF6
Recombinant PRAMEF6 protein (full-length or the region containing the epitope)
Overexpression systems (transfected cells expressing PRAMEF6)
Negative Controls:
Samples lacking PRAMEF6 expression (if available)
PRAMEF6 knockout or knockdown samples
Primary antibody omission control to assess secondary antibody specificity
Isotype control (irrelevant antibody of the same isotype) to evaluate non-specific binding
Application-Specific Controls:
For Western blotting: Loading controls (GAPDH, β-actin) and molecular weight markers
For immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence: Tissue sections known to lack PRAMEF6
For flow cytometry: Unstained cells, isotype controls, and single-stain controls for compensation
For ELISA: Standard curve using recombinant protein and blank wells
Validation Controls:
Peptide competition assay using the immunizing peptide
Secondary antibody-only controls
Technical Controls:
Replicate samples to assess reproducibility
Concentration gradients to determine linear range of detection
Sample processing controls to evaluate effects of fixation, permeabilization, or antigen retrieval
Implementing these controls helps distinguish specific from non-specific signals, validates antibody performance, and ensures reliable interpretation of experimental results when studying PRAMEF6.
Accurate quantification of PRAMEF6 expression requires careful selection of methods and stringent analysis protocols:
Western Blot Quantification:
Use digital imaging systems with dynamic range verification
Include standard curves with recombinant PRAMEF6 at known concentrations
Normalize to loading controls (GAPDH, β-actin) using densitometry
Perform three independent experiments for statistical validity
Consider using fluorescent secondary antibodies for wider linear range than chemiluminescence
ELISA Approaches:
Sandwich ELISA using capture and detection antibodies targeting different PRAMEF6 epitopes
Develop a standard curve using recombinant PRAMEF6 protein
Evaluate sample matrix effects that might interfere with quantification
Perform technical and biological replicates with appropriate statistical analysis
Flow Cytometry Quantification:
Use quantitative flow cytometry with calibration beads to convert fluorescence intensity to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF)
Include antibody saturation controls to ensure you're working in the linear range
Compare mean or median fluorescence intensity across samples
Consider single-cell analysis to assess population heterogeneity
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence Quantification:
Use digital image analysis software for objective quantification
Establish scoring systems (H-score, Allred score) for semi-quantitative assessment
Include internal reference controls in each batch of staining
Consider automated systems for unbiased assessment of staining intensity and percentage of positive cells
Correlation with Other Methods:
Compare protein quantification results with mRNA expression data (qPCR, RNA-seq)
Be aware that RNA-protein correlation can vary, and incorporating orthogonal data can improve specificity
Consider absolute quantification methods like mass spectrometry to validate antibody-based quantification
These methodological approaches provide researchers with multiple options for reliable quantification of PRAMEF6 expression levels, each with specific advantages and limitations depending on the experimental context.
Selecting between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for PRAMEF6 research requires understanding their respective strengths and weaknesses:
Polyclonal PRAMEF6 Antibodies:
Advantages:
Recognize multiple epitopes, providing robust signal even if some epitopes are masked or modified
Generally provide higher sensitivity due to binding of multiple antibodies per target molecule
Better tolerance to minor protein denaturation or conformation changes
Typically less expensive and faster to produce
Limitations:
Batch-to-batch variability may affect reproducibility
May show cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins, including other PRAME family members
Higher background in some applications due to recognition of non-specific epitopes
Finite supply (dependent on the animal they were raised in)
Monoclonal PRAMEF6 Antibodies:
Advantages:
Consistent specificity across experiments and batches
Higher specificity for a single epitope, reducing cross-reactivity
Unlimited supply through hybridoma culture
Better for distinguishing between highly similar proteins like PRAME family members
Ideal for quantitative applications requiring high reproducibility
Limitations:
May have lower sensitivity as they bind to only one epitope per molecule
The single epitope may be masked by protein interactions or modifications
More susceptible to epitope loss through denaturation or fixation
Generally more expensive and time-consuming to develop
Currently less common for PRAMEF6 research
Application-Specific Considerations:
For Western blotting: Both types work well, though polyclonals often provide stronger signals
For immunoprecipitation: Polyclonals may capture more target protein due to multiple epitope recognition
For immunohistochemistry: Epitope accessibility after fixation is critical; test both types
For flow cytometry: Monoclonals typically provide cleaner results with less background
For detecting specific post-translational modifications: Monoclonals targeting specific modified epitopes are preferable
When studying PRAMEF6, the current research landscape shows predominant use of polyclonal antibodies , but the optimal choice depends on the specific research question, required specificity, and experimental application.